TSTP Solution File: SWV955-1 by SnakeForV---1.0
View Problem
- Process Solution
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
% File : SnakeForV---1.0
% Problem : SWV955-1 : TPTP v8.1.0. Released v4.1.0.
% Transfm : none
% Format : tptp:raw
% Command : vampire --input_syntax tptp --proof tptp --output_axiom_names on --mode portfolio --schedule snake_tptp_uns --cores 0 -t %d %s
% Computer : n024.cluster.edu
% Model : x86_64 x86_64
% CPU : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 2.10GHz
% Memory : 8042.1875MB
% OS : Linux 3.10.0-693.el7.x86_64
% CPULimit : 300s
% WCLimit : 300s
% DateTime : Wed Aug 31 18:54:59 EDT 2022
% Result : Unsatisfiable 0.21s 0.62s
% Output : Refutation 0.21s
% Verified :
% SZS Type : Refutation
% Derivation depth : 4
% Number of leaves : 6
% Syntax : Number of formulae : 11 ( 7 unt; 0 def)
% Number of atoms : 17 ( 1 equ)
% Maximal formula atoms : 3 ( 1 avg)
% Number of connectives : 16 ( 10 ~; 6 |; 0 &)
% ( 0 <=>; 0 =>; 0 <=; 0 <~>)
% Maximal formula depth : 12 ( 4 avg)
% Maximal term depth : 7 ( 1 avg)
% Number of predicates : 4 ( 2 usr; 1 prp; 0-5 aty)
% Number of functors : 18 ( 18 usr; 12 con; 0-5 aty)
% Number of variables : 22 ( 22 !; 0 ?)
% Comments :
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
fof(f729,plain,
$false,
inference(subsumption_resolution,[],[f380,f728]) ).
fof(f728,plain,
! [X3] : ~ c_WellTypeRT_OWTrt(v_P,v_h_Ha____,v_E____,v_e_092_060_094isub_0622____,X3),
inference(subsumption_resolution,[],[f723,f381]) ).
fof(f381,axiom,
c_WellTypeRT_OWTrt(v_P,v_h_Ha____,v_E____,v_e_Ha____,c_Type_Oty_ONT),
file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',cls_CHAINED_0_02) ).
fof(f723,plain,
! [X3] :
( ~ c_WellTypeRT_OWTrt(v_P,v_h_Ha____,v_E____,v_e_092_060_094isub_0622____,X3)
| ~ c_WellTypeRT_OWTrt(v_P,v_h_Ha____,v_E____,v_e_Ha____,c_Type_Oty_ONT) ),
inference(resolution,[],[f720,f397]) ).
fof(f397,plain,
! [X2,X0,X71,X1,X55,X4,X24,X5] :
( ~ c_WellTypeRT_OWTrt(X0,X1,X2,X24,X71)
| c_WellTypeRT_OWTrt(X0,X1,X2,c_Expr_Oexp_OFAss(X55,X5,X4,X24,tc_List_Olist(tc_String_Ochar)),v_T____)
| ~ c_WellTypeRT_OWTrt(X0,X1,X2,X55,c_Type_Oty_ONT) ),
inference(definition_unfolding,[],[f308,f379]) ).
fof(f379,axiom,
c_Type_Oty_OVoid = v_T____,
file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',cls_CHAINED_0) ).
fof(f308,axiom,
! [X2,X0,X71,X1,X55,X4,X24,X5] :
( ~ c_WellTypeRT_OWTrt(X0,X1,X2,X55,c_Type_Oty_ONT)
| c_WellTypeRT_OWTrt(X0,X1,X2,c_Expr_Oexp_OFAss(X55,X5,X4,X24,tc_List_Olist(tc_String_Ochar)),c_Type_Oty_OVoid)
| ~ c_WellTypeRT_OWTrt(X0,X1,X2,X24,X71) ),
file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',cls_WTrtFAssNT_0) ).
fof(f720,plain,
~ c_WellTypeRT_OWTrt(v_P,v_h_Ha____,v_E____,c_Expr_Oexp_OFAss(v_e_Ha____,v_F____,v_D____,v_e_092_060_094isub_0622____,tc_List_Olist(tc_String_Ochar)),v_T____),
inference(resolution,[],[f382,f351]) ).
fof(f351,axiom,
! [X0,X11,X7] : hBOOL(hAPP(hAPP(c_TypeRel_Owiden(X0,X11),X7),X7)),
file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',cls_widen__refl_0) ).
fof(f382,axiom,
! [X56] :
( ~ hBOOL(hAPP(hAPP(c_TypeRel_Owiden(v_P,tc_prod(tc_List_Olist(tc_List_Olist(tc_String_Ochar)),tc_Expr_Oexp(tc_List_Olist(tc_String_Ochar)))),X56),v_T____))
| ~ c_WellTypeRT_OWTrt(v_P,v_h_Ha____,v_E____,c_Expr_Oexp_OFAss(v_e_Ha____,v_F____,v_D____,v_e_092_060_094isub_0622____,tc_List_Olist(tc_String_Ochar)),X56) ),
file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',cls_conjecture_0) ).
fof(f380,axiom,
c_WellTypeRT_OWTrt(v_P,v_h_Ha____,v_E____,v_e_092_060_094isub_0622____,v_T_092_060_094isub_0622____),
file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',cls_CHAINED_0_01) ).
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
%----ORIGINAL SYSTEM OUTPUT
% 0.07/0.13 % Problem : SWV955-1 : TPTP v8.1.0. Released v4.1.0.
% 0.07/0.14 % Command : vampire --input_syntax tptp --proof tptp --output_axiom_names on --mode portfolio --schedule snake_tptp_uns --cores 0 -t %d %s
% 0.13/0.35 % Computer : n024.cluster.edu
% 0.13/0.35 % Model : x86_64 x86_64
% 0.13/0.35 % CPU : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 @ 2.10GHz
% 0.13/0.35 % Memory : 8042.1875MB
% 0.13/0.35 % OS : Linux 3.10.0-693.el7.x86_64
% 0.13/0.35 % CPULimit : 300
% 0.13/0.35 % WCLimit : 300
% 0.13/0.35 % DateTime : Tue Aug 30 20:12:04 EDT 2022
% 0.13/0.35 % CPUTime :
% 0.21/0.58 % (18942)fmb+10_1:1_fmbes=contour:fmbsr=2.0:fmbsso=input_usage:i=6:si=on:rawr=on:rtra=on_0 on theBenchmark for (2999ds/6Mi)
% 0.21/0.58 % (18943)lrs+1_1:1_aac=none:add=large:anc=all_dependent:cond=fast:ep=RST:fsr=off:lma=on:nm=2:sos=on:sp=reverse_arity:stl=30:uhcvi=on:urr=on:i=2:si=on:rawr=on:rtra=on_0 on theBenchmark for (2999ds/2Mi)
% 0.21/0.58 % (18933)dis+21_1:1_av=off:er=filter:slsq=on:slsqc=0:slsqr=1,1:sp=frequency:to=lpo:i=49:si=on:rawr=on:rtra=on_0 on theBenchmark for (2999ds/49Mi)
% 0.21/0.58 % (18935)lrs+1011_1:1_atotf=0.0306256:ep=RST:mep=off:nm=0:sos=all:i=3:si=on:rawr=on:rtra=on_0 on theBenchmark for (2999ds/3Mi)
% 0.21/0.58 % (18935)Instruction limit reached!
% 0.21/0.58 % (18935)------------------------------
% 0.21/0.58 % (18935)Version: Vampire 4.7 (commit 807e37dd9 on 2022-08-23 09:55:27 +0200)
% 0.21/0.58 % (18935)Linked with Z3 4.8.13.0 f03d756e086f81f2596157241e0decfb1c982299 z3-4.8.4-5390-gf03d756e0
% 0.21/0.58 % (18935)Termination reason: Unknown
% 0.21/0.58 % (18935)Termination phase: Property scanning
% 0.21/0.58
% 0.21/0.58 % (18935)Memory used [KB]: 1663
% 0.21/0.58 % (18935)Time elapsed: 0.004 s
% 0.21/0.58 % (18935)Instructions burned: 3 (million)
% 0.21/0.58 % (18935)------------------------------
% 0.21/0.58 % (18935)------------------------------
% 0.21/0.58 % (18943)Instruction limit reached!
% 0.21/0.58 % (18943)------------------------------
% 0.21/0.58 % (18943)Version: Vampire 4.7 (commit 807e37dd9 on 2022-08-23 09:55:27 +0200)
% 0.21/0.59 % (18951)dis+10_1:1_add=large:alpa=false:anc=none:fd=off:lcm=reverse:nwc=5.0:sd=2:sgt=20:ss=included:i=46:si=on:rawr=on:rtra=on_0 on theBenchmark for (2999ds/46Mi)
% 0.21/0.59 % (18943)Linked with Z3 4.8.13.0 f03d756e086f81f2596157241e0decfb1c982299 z3-4.8.4-5390-gf03d756e0
% 0.21/0.59 % (18943)Termination reason: Unknown
% 0.21/0.59 % (18943)Termination phase: Function definition elimination
% 0.21/0.59
% 0.21/0.59 % (18943)Memory used [KB]: 1663
% 0.21/0.59 % (18943)Time elapsed: 0.004 s
% 0.21/0.59 % (18943)Instructions burned: 2 (million)
% 0.21/0.59 % (18943)------------------------------
% 0.21/0.59 % (18943)------------------------------
% 0.21/0.59 % (18942)Instruction limit reached!
% 0.21/0.59 % (18942)------------------------------
% 0.21/0.59 % (18942)Version: Vampire 4.7 (commit 807e37dd9 on 2022-08-23 09:55:27 +0200)
% 0.21/0.59 % (18950)lrs+1011_1:1_aac=none:bsr=unit_only:ep=R:sac=on:sos=all:i=37:si=on:rawr=on:rtra=on_0 on theBenchmark for (2999ds/37Mi)
% 0.21/0.60 % (18942)Linked with Z3 4.8.13.0 f03d756e086f81f2596157241e0decfb1c982299 z3-4.8.4-5390-gf03d756e0
% 0.21/0.60 % (18942)Termination reason: Unknown
% 0.21/0.60 % (18942)Termination phase: Property scanning
% 0.21/0.60
% 0.21/0.60 % (18942)Memory used [KB]: 1663
% 0.21/0.60 % (18942)Time elapsed: 0.006 s
% 0.21/0.60 % (18942)Instructions burned: 6 (million)
% 0.21/0.60 % (18942)------------------------------
% 0.21/0.60 % (18942)------------------------------
% 0.21/0.61 % (18931)lrs+10_5:1_br=off:fde=none:nwc=3.0:sd=1:sgt=10:sos=on:ss=axioms:urr=on:i=34:si=on:rawr=on:rtra=on_0 on theBenchmark for (2999ds/34Mi)
% 0.21/0.62 % (18950)First to succeed.
% 0.21/0.62 % (18950)Refutation found. Thanks to Tanya!
% 0.21/0.62 % SZS status Unsatisfiable for theBenchmark
% 0.21/0.62 % SZS output start Proof for theBenchmark
% See solution above
% 0.21/0.62 % (18950)------------------------------
% 0.21/0.62 % (18950)Version: Vampire 4.7 (commit 807e37dd9 on 2022-08-23 09:55:27 +0200)
% 0.21/0.62 % (18950)Linked with Z3 4.8.13.0 f03d756e086f81f2596157241e0decfb1c982299 z3-4.8.4-5390-gf03d756e0
% 0.21/0.62 % (18950)Termination reason: Refutation
% 0.21/0.62
% 0.21/0.62 % (18950)Memory used [KB]: 6524
% 0.21/0.62 % (18950)Time elapsed: 0.166 s
% 0.21/0.62 % (18950)Instructions burned: 22 (million)
% 0.21/0.62 % (18950)------------------------------
% 0.21/0.62 % (18950)------------------------------
% 0.21/0.62 % (18926)Success in time 0.255 s
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------