TSTP Solution File: SWV955-1 by E-SAT---3.1

View Problem - Process Solution

%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
% File     : E-SAT---3.1
% Problem  : SWV955-1 : TPTP v8.1.2. Released v4.1.0.
% Transfm  : none
% Format   : tptp:raw
% Command  : run_E %s %d THM

% Computer : n003.cluster.edu
% Model    : x86_64 x86_64
% CPU      : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 2.10GHz
% Memory   : 8042.1875MB
% OS       : Linux 3.10.0-693.el7.x86_64
% CPULimit : 2400s
% WCLimit  : 300s
% DateTime : Tue Oct 10 20:08:11 EDT 2023

% Result   : Unsatisfiable 0.16s 0.50s
% Output   : CNFRefutation 0.16s
% Verified : 
% SZS Type : Refutation
%            Derivation depth      :    3
%            Number of leaves      :    6
% Syntax   : Number of clauses     :   15 (   9 unt;   0 nHn;  10 RR)
%            Number of literals    :   23 (   2 equ;  11 neg)
%            Maximal clause size   :    3 (   1 avg)
%            Maximal term depth    :    7 (   2 avg)
%            Number of predicates  :    4 (   2 usr;   1 prp; 0-5 aty)
%            Number of functors    :   18 (  18 usr;  12 con; 0-5 aty)
%            Number of variables   :   28 (  12 sgn)

% Comments : 
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
cnf(cls_conjecture_0,negated_conjecture,
    ( ~ hBOOL(hAPP(hAPP(c_TypeRel_Owiden(v_P,tc_prod(tc_List_Olist(tc_List_Olist(tc_String_Ochar)),tc_Expr_Oexp(tc_List_Olist(tc_String_Ochar)))),X1),v_T____))
    | ~ c_WellTypeRT_OWTrt(v_P,v_h_Ha____,v_E____,c_Expr_Oexp_OFAss(v_e_Ha____,v_F____,v_D____,v_e_092_060_094isub_0622____,tc_List_Olist(tc_String_Ochar)),X1) ),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox/tmp/tmp.tIB6TDD11F/E---3.1_19999.p',cls_conjecture_0) ).

cnf(cls_void_0,axiom,
    v_T____ = c_Type_Oty_OVoid,
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox/tmp/tmp.tIB6TDD11F/E---3.1_19999.p',cls_void_0) ).

cnf(cls_WTrtFAssNT_0,axiom,
    ( c_WellTypeRT_OWTrt(X1,X2,X3,c_Expr_Oexp_OFAss(X4,X5,X6,X7,tc_List_Olist(tc_String_Ochar)),c_Type_Oty_OVoid)
    | ~ c_WellTypeRT_OWTrt(X1,X2,X3,X7,X8)
    | ~ c_WellTypeRT_OWTrt(X1,X2,X3,X4,c_Type_Oty_ONT) ),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox/tmp/tmp.tIB6TDD11F/E---3.1_19999.p',cls_WTrtFAssNT_0) ).

cnf(cls_CHAINED_0_01,axiom,
    c_WellTypeRT_OWTrt(v_P,v_h_Ha____,v_E____,v_e_092_060_094isub_0622____,v_T_092_060_094isub_0622____),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox/tmp/tmp.tIB6TDD11F/E---3.1_19999.p',cls_CHAINED_0_01) ).

cnf(cls_widen__refl_0,axiom,
    hBOOL(hAPP(hAPP(c_TypeRel_Owiden(X1,X2),X3),X3)),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox/tmp/tmp.tIB6TDD11F/E---3.1_19999.p',cls_widen__refl_0) ).

cnf(cls_CHAINED_0_02,axiom,
    c_WellTypeRT_OWTrt(v_P,v_h_Ha____,v_E____,v_e_Ha____,c_Type_Oty_ONT),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox/tmp/tmp.tIB6TDD11F/E---3.1_19999.p',cls_CHAINED_0_02) ).

cnf(c_0_6,negated_conjecture,
    ( ~ hBOOL(hAPP(hAPP(c_TypeRel_Owiden(v_P,tc_prod(tc_List_Olist(tc_List_Olist(tc_String_Ochar)),tc_Expr_Oexp(tc_List_Olist(tc_String_Ochar)))),X1),v_T____))
    | ~ c_WellTypeRT_OWTrt(v_P,v_h_Ha____,v_E____,c_Expr_Oexp_OFAss(v_e_Ha____,v_F____,v_D____,v_e_092_060_094isub_0622____,tc_List_Olist(tc_String_Ochar)),X1) ),
    cls_conjecture_0 ).

cnf(c_0_7,axiom,
    v_T____ = c_Type_Oty_OVoid,
    cls_void_0 ).

cnf(c_0_8,axiom,
    ( c_WellTypeRT_OWTrt(X1,X2,X3,c_Expr_Oexp_OFAss(X4,X5,X6,X7,tc_List_Olist(tc_String_Ochar)),c_Type_Oty_OVoid)
    | ~ c_WellTypeRT_OWTrt(X1,X2,X3,X7,X8)
    | ~ c_WellTypeRT_OWTrt(X1,X2,X3,X4,c_Type_Oty_ONT) ),
    cls_WTrtFAssNT_0 ).

cnf(c_0_9,axiom,
    c_WellTypeRT_OWTrt(v_P,v_h_Ha____,v_E____,v_e_092_060_094isub_0622____,v_T_092_060_094isub_0622____),
    cls_CHAINED_0_01 ).

cnf(c_0_10,negated_conjecture,
    ( ~ hBOOL(hAPP(hAPP(c_TypeRel_Owiden(v_P,tc_prod(tc_List_Olist(tc_List_Olist(tc_String_Ochar)),tc_Expr_Oexp(tc_List_Olist(tc_String_Ochar)))),X1),c_Type_Oty_OVoid))
    | ~ c_WellTypeRT_OWTrt(v_P,v_h_Ha____,v_E____,c_Expr_Oexp_OFAss(v_e_Ha____,v_F____,v_D____,v_e_092_060_094isub_0622____,tc_List_Olist(tc_String_Ochar)),X1) ),
    inference(rw,[status(thm)],[c_0_6,c_0_7]) ).

cnf(c_0_11,plain,
    ( c_WellTypeRT_OWTrt(v_P,v_h_Ha____,v_E____,c_Expr_Oexp_OFAss(X1,X2,X3,v_e_092_060_094isub_0622____,tc_List_Olist(tc_String_Ochar)),c_Type_Oty_OVoid)
    | ~ c_WellTypeRT_OWTrt(v_P,v_h_Ha____,v_E____,X1,c_Type_Oty_ONT) ),
    inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_8,c_0_9]) ).

cnf(c_0_12,axiom,
    hBOOL(hAPP(hAPP(c_TypeRel_Owiden(X1,X2),X3),X3)),
    cls_widen__refl_0 ).

cnf(c_0_13,axiom,
    c_WellTypeRT_OWTrt(v_P,v_h_Ha____,v_E____,v_e_Ha____,c_Type_Oty_ONT),
    cls_CHAINED_0_02 ).

cnf(c_0_14,negated_conjecture,
    $false,
    inference(cn,[status(thm)],[inference(rw,[status(thm)],[inference(rw,[status(thm)],[inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_10,c_0_11]),c_0_12]),c_0_13])]),
    [proof] ).

%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
%----ORIGINAL SYSTEM OUTPUT
% 0.02/0.10  % Problem    : SWV955-1 : TPTP v8.1.2. Released v4.1.0.
% 0.02/0.11  % Command    : run_E %s %d THM
% 0.10/0.31  % Computer : n003.cluster.edu
% 0.10/0.31  % Model    : x86_64 x86_64
% 0.10/0.31  % CPU      : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 @ 2.10GHz
% 0.10/0.31  % Memory   : 8042.1875MB
% 0.10/0.31  % OS       : Linux 3.10.0-693.el7.x86_64
% 0.10/0.31  % CPULimit   : 2400
% 0.10/0.31  % WCLimit    : 300
% 0.10/0.31  % DateTime   : Tue Oct  3 04:33:03 EDT 2023
% 0.10/0.31  % CPUTime    : 
% 0.16/0.44  Running first-order model finding
% 0.16/0.44  Running: /export/starexec/sandbox/solver/bin/eprover --delete-bad-limit=2000000000 --definitional-cnf=24 -s --print-statistics -R --print-version --proof-object --satauto-schedule=8 --cpu-limit=300 /export/starexec/sandbox/tmp/tmp.tIB6TDD11F/E---3.1_19999.p
% 0.16/0.50  # Version: 3.1pre001
% 0.16/0.50  # Preprocessing class: FSLSSMSMSSSNFFN.
% 0.16/0.50  # Scheduled 4 strats onto 8 cores with 300 seconds (2400 total)
% 0.16/0.50  # Starting C07_19_nc_SOS_SAT001_MinMin_p005000_rr with 1500s (5) cores
% 0.16/0.50  # Starting new_bool_3 with 300s (1) cores
% 0.16/0.50  # Starting new_bool_1 with 300s (1) cores
% 0.16/0.50  # Starting sh5l with 300s (1) cores
% 0.16/0.50  # C07_19_nc_SOS_SAT001_MinMin_p005000_rr with pid 20076 completed with status 0
% 0.16/0.50  # Result found by C07_19_nc_SOS_SAT001_MinMin_p005000_rr
% 0.16/0.50  # Preprocessing class: FSLSSMSMSSSNFFN.
% 0.16/0.50  # Scheduled 4 strats onto 8 cores with 300 seconds (2400 total)
% 0.16/0.50  # Starting C07_19_nc_SOS_SAT001_MinMin_p005000_rr with 1500s (5) cores
% 0.16/0.50  # No SInE strategy applied
% 0.16/0.50  # Search class: FGHSM-FSLM33-DFFFFFNN
% 0.16/0.50  # Scheduled 10 strats onto 5 cores with 1500 seconds (1500 total)
% 0.16/0.50  # Starting G-E--_207_C18_F1_AE_CS_SP_PI_PS_S0S with 271s (1) cores
% 0.16/0.50  # Starting C07_19_nc_SOS_SAT001_MinMin_p005000_rr with 151s (1) cores
% 0.16/0.50  # Starting G-E--_302_C18_F1_URBAN_S5PRR_RG_S04BN with 136s (1) cores
% 0.16/0.50  # Starting G-E--_208_C09_12_F1_SE_CS_SP_PS_S070I with 136s (1) cores
% 0.16/0.50  # Starting G-E--_300_C18_F1_SE_CS_SP_PS_S0Y with 136s (1) cores
% 0.16/0.50  # C07_19_nc_SOS_SAT001_MinMin_p005000_rr with pid 20084 completed with status 0
% 0.16/0.50  # Result found by C07_19_nc_SOS_SAT001_MinMin_p005000_rr
% 0.16/0.50  # Preprocessing class: FSLSSMSMSSSNFFN.
% 0.16/0.50  # Scheduled 4 strats onto 8 cores with 300 seconds (2400 total)
% 0.16/0.50  # Starting C07_19_nc_SOS_SAT001_MinMin_p005000_rr with 1500s (5) cores
% 0.16/0.50  # No SInE strategy applied
% 0.16/0.50  # Search class: FGHSM-FSLM33-DFFFFFNN
% 0.16/0.50  # Scheduled 10 strats onto 5 cores with 1500 seconds (1500 total)
% 0.16/0.50  # Starting G-E--_207_C18_F1_AE_CS_SP_PI_PS_S0S with 271s (1) cores
% 0.16/0.50  # Starting C07_19_nc_SOS_SAT001_MinMin_p005000_rr with 151s (1) cores
% 0.16/0.50  # Preprocessing time       : 0.004 s
% 0.16/0.50  # Presaturation interreduction done
% 0.16/0.50  
% 0.16/0.50  # Proof found!
% 0.16/0.50  # SZS status Unsatisfiable
% 0.16/0.50  # SZS output start CNFRefutation
% See solution above
% 0.16/0.50  # Parsed axioms                        : 384
% 0.16/0.50  # Removed by relevancy pruning/SinE    : 0
% 0.16/0.50  # Initial clauses                      : 384
% 0.16/0.50  # Removed in clause preprocessing      : 2
% 0.16/0.50  # Initial clauses in saturation        : 382
% 0.16/0.50  # Processed clauses                    : 619
% 0.16/0.50  # ...of these trivial                  : 1
% 0.16/0.50  # ...subsumed                          : 121
% 0.16/0.50  # ...remaining for further processing  : 497
% 0.16/0.50  # Other redundant clauses eliminated   : 0
% 0.16/0.50  # Clauses deleted for lack of memory   : 0
% 0.16/0.50  # Backward-subsumed                    : 0
% 0.16/0.50  # Backward-rewritten                   : 0
% 0.16/0.50  # Generated clauses                    : 93
% 0.16/0.50  # ...of the previous two non-redundant : 42
% 0.16/0.50  # ...aggressively subsumed             : 0
% 0.16/0.50  # Contextual simplify-reflections      : 0
% 0.16/0.50  # Paramodulations                      : 55
% 0.16/0.50  # Factorizations                       : 0
% 0.16/0.50  # NegExts                              : 0
% 0.16/0.50  # Equation resolutions                 : 38
% 0.16/0.50  # Total rewrite steps                  : 8
% 0.16/0.50  # Propositional unsat checks           : 0
% 0.16/0.50  #    Propositional check models        : 0
% 0.16/0.50  #    Propositional check unsatisfiable : 0
% 0.16/0.50  #    Propositional clauses             : 0
% 0.16/0.50  #    Propositional clauses after purity: 0
% 0.16/0.50  #    Propositional unsat core size     : 0
% 0.16/0.50  #    Propositional preprocessing time  : 0.000
% 0.16/0.50  #    Propositional encoding time       : 0.000
% 0.16/0.50  #    Propositional solver time         : 0.000
% 0.16/0.50  #    Success case prop preproc time    : 0.000
% 0.16/0.50  #    Success case prop encoding time   : 0.000
% 0.16/0.50  #    Success case prop solver time     : 0.000
% 0.16/0.50  # Current number of processed clauses  : 233
% 0.16/0.50  #    Positive orientable unit clauses  : 29
% 0.16/0.50  #    Positive unorientable unit clauses: 0
% 0.16/0.50  #    Negative unit clauses             : 111
% 0.16/0.50  #    Non-unit-clauses                  : 93
% 0.16/0.50  # Current number of unprocessed clauses: 66
% 0.16/0.50  # ...number of literals in the above   : 186
% 0.16/0.50  # Current number of archived formulas  : 0
% 0.16/0.50  # Current number of archived clauses   : 265
% 0.16/0.50  # Clause-clause subsumption calls (NU) : 11570
% 0.16/0.50  # Rec. Clause-clause subsumption calls : 8320
% 0.16/0.50  # Non-unit clause-clause subsumptions  : 10
% 0.16/0.50  # Unit Clause-clause subsumption calls : 3995
% 0.16/0.50  # Rewrite failures with RHS unbound    : 0
% 0.16/0.50  # BW rewrite match attempts            : 240
% 0.16/0.50  # BW rewrite match successes           : 0
% 0.16/0.50  # Condensation attempts                : 0
% 0.16/0.50  # Condensation successes               : 0
% 0.16/0.50  # Termbank termtop insertions          : 9247
% 0.16/0.50  
% 0.16/0.50  # -------------------------------------------------
% 0.16/0.50  # User time                : 0.025 s
% 0.16/0.50  # System time              : 0.009 s
% 0.16/0.50  # Total time               : 0.034 s
% 0.16/0.50  # Maximum resident set size: 2368 pages
% 0.16/0.50  
% 0.16/0.50  # -------------------------------------------------
% 0.16/0.50  # User time                : 0.127 s
% 0.16/0.50  # System time              : 0.027 s
% 0.16/0.50  # Total time               : 0.154 s
% 0.16/0.50  # Maximum resident set size: 1952 pages
% 0.16/0.50  % E---3.1 exiting
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------