TSTP Solution File: SWV955-1 by E---3.1
View Problem
- Process Solution
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
% File : E---3.1
% Problem : SWV955-1 : TPTP v8.1.2. Released v4.1.0.
% Transfm : none
% Format : tptp:raw
% Command : run_E %s %d THM
% Computer : n032.cluster.edu
% Model : x86_64 x86_64
% CPU : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 2.10GHz
% Memory : 8042.1875MB
% OS : Linux 3.10.0-693.el7.x86_64
% CPULimit : 2400s
% WCLimit : 300s
% DateTime : Tue Oct 10 19:55:42 EDT 2023
% Result : Unsatisfiable 0.19s 0.54s
% Output : CNFRefutation 0.19s
% Verified :
% SZS Type : Refutation
% Derivation depth : 4
% Number of leaves : 6
% Syntax : Number of clauses : 16 ( 10 unt; 0 nHn; 11 RR)
% Number of literals : 24 ( 2 equ; 12 neg)
% Maximal clause size : 3 ( 1 avg)
% Maximal term depth : 7 ( 2 avg)
% Number of predicates : 4 ( 2 usr; 1 prp; 0-5 aty)
% Number of functors : 18 ( 18 usr; 12 con; 0-5 aty)
% Number of variables : 28 ( 12 sgn)
% Comments :
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
cnf(cls_conjecture_0,negated_conjecture,
( ~ hBOOL(hAPP(hAPP(c_TypeRel_Owiden(v_P,tc_prod(tc_List_Olist(tc_List_Olist(tc_String_Ochar)),tc_Expr_Oexp(tc_List_Olist(tc_String_Ochar)))),X1),v_T____))
| ~ c_WellTypeRT_OWTrt(v_P,v_h_Ha____,v_E____,c_Expr_Oexp_OFAss(v_e_Ha____,v_F____,v_D____,v_e_092_060_094isub_0622____,tc_List_Olist(tc_String_Ochar)),X1) ),
file('/export/starexec/sandbox/tmp/tmp.GPdh4DQtBm/E---3.1_13804.p',cls_conjecture_0) ).
cnf(cls_void_0,axiom,
v_T____ = c_Type_Oty_OVoid,
file('/export/starexec/sandbox/tmp/tmp.GPdh4DQtBm/E---3.1_13804.p',cls_void_0) ).
cnf(cls_widen__refl_0,axiom,
hBOOL(hAPP(hAPP(c_TypeRel_Owiden(X1,X2),X3),X3)),
file('/export/starexec/sandbox/tmp/tmp.GPdh4DQtBm/E---3.1_13804.p',cls_widen__refl_0) ).
cnf(cls_WTrtFAssNT_0,axiom,
( c_WellTypeRT_OWTrt(X1,X2,X3,c_Expr_Oexp_OFAss(X4,X5,X6,X7,tc_List_Olist(tc_String_Ochar)),c_Type_Oty_OVoid)
| ~ c_WellTypeRT_OWTrt(X1,X2,X3,X7,X8)
| ~ c_WellTypeRT_OWTrt(X1,X2,X3,X4,c_Type_Oty_ONT) ),
file('/export/starexec/sandbox/tmp/tmp.GPdh4DQtBm/E---3.1_13804.p',cls_WTrtFAssNT_0) ).
cnf(cls_CHAINED_0_01,axiom,
c_WellTypeRT_OWTrt(v_P,v_h_Ha____,v_E____,v_e_092_060_094isub_0622____,v_T_092_060_094isub_0622____),
file('/export/starexec/sandbox/tmp/tmp.GPdh4DQtBm/E---3.1_13804.p',cls_CHAINED_0_01) ).
cnf(cls_CHAINED_0_02,axiom,
c_WellTypeRT_OWTrt(v_P,v_h_Ha____,v_E____,v_e_Ha____,c_Type_Oty_ONT),
file('/export/starexec/sandbox/tmp/tmp.GPdh4DQtBm/E---3.1_13804.p',cls_CHAINED_0_02) ).
cnf(c_0_6,negated_conjecture,
( ~ hBOOL(hAPP(hAPP(c_TypeRel_Owiden(v_P,tc_prod(tc_List_Olist(tc_List_Olist(tc_String_Ochar)),tc_Expr_Oexp(tc_List_Olist(tc_String_Ochar)))),X1),v_T____))
| ~ c_WellTypeRT_OWTrt(v_P,v_h_Ha____,v_E____,c_Expr_Oexp_OFAss(v_e_Ha____,v_F____,v_D____,v_e_092_060_094isub_0622____,tc_List_Olist(tc_String_Ochar)),X1) ),
cls_conjecture_0 ).
cnf(c_0_7,axiom,
v_T____ = c_Type_Oty_OVoid,
cls_void_0 ).
cnf(c_0_8,negated_conjecture,
( ~ hBOOL(hAPP(hAPP(c_TypeRel_Owiden(v_P,tc_prod(tc_List_Olist(tc_List_Olist(tc_String_Ochar)),tc_Expr_Oexp(tc_List_Olist(tc_String_Ochar)))),X1),c_Type_Oty_OVoid))
| ~ c_WellTypeRT_OWTrt(v_P,v_h_Ha____,v_E____,c_Expr_Oexp_OFAss(v_e_Ha____,v_F____,v_D____,v_e_092_060_094isub_0622____,tc_List_Olist(tc_String_Ochar)),X1) ),
inference(rw,[status(thm)],[c_0_6,c_0_7]) ).
cnf(c_0_9,axiom,
hBOOL(hAPP(hAPP(c_TypeRel_Owiden(X1,X2),X3),X3)),
cls_widen__refl_0 ).
cnf(c_0_10,axiom,
( c_WellTypeRT_OWTrt(X1,X2,X3,c_Expr_Oexp_OFAss(X4,X5,X6,X7,tc_List_Olist(tc_String_Ochar)),c_Type_Oty_OVoid)
| ~ c_WellTypeRT_OWTrt(X1,X2,X3,X7,X8)
| ~ c_WellTypeRT_OWTrt(X1,X2,X3,X4,c_Type_Oty_ONT) ),
cls_WTrtFAssNT_0 ).
cnf(c_0_11,axiom,
c_WellTypeRT_OWTrt(v_P,v_h_Ha____,v_E____,v_e_092_060_094isub_0622____,v_T_092_060_094isub_0622____),
cls_CHAINED_0_01 ).
cnf(c_0_12,negated_conjecture,
~ c_WellTypeRT_OWTrt(v_P,v_h_Ha____,v_E____,c_Expr_Oexp_OFAss(v_e_Ha____,v_F____,v_D____,v_e_092_060_094isub_0622____,tc_List_Olist(tc_String_Ochar)),c_Type_Oty_OVoid),
inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_8,c_0_9]) ).
cnf(c_0_13,plain,
( c_WellTypeRT_OWTrt(v_P,v_h_Ha____,v_E____,c_Expr_Oexp_OFAss(X1,X2,X3,v_e_092_060_094isub_0622____,tc_List_Olist(tc_String_Ochar)),c_Type_Oty_OVoid)
| ~ c_WellTypeRT_OWTrt(v_P,v_h_Ha____,v_E____,X1,c_Type_Oty_ONT) ),
inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_10,c_0_11]) ).
cnf(c_0_14,axiom,
c_WellTypeRT_OWTrt(v_P,v_h_Ha____,v_E____,v_e_Ha____,c_Type_Oty_ONT),
cls_CHAINED_0_02 ).
cnf(c_0_15,negated_conjecture,
$false,
inference(cn,[status(thm)],[inference(rw,[status(thm)],[inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_12,c_0_13]),c_0_14])]),
[proof] ).
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
%----ORIGINAL SYSTEM OUTPUT
% 0.09/0.13 % Problem : SWV955-1 : TPTP v8.1.2. Released v4.1.0.
% 0.09/0.14 % Command : run_E %s %d THM
% 0.13/0.34 % Computer : n032.cluster.edu
% 0.13/0.34 % Model : x86_64 x86_64
% 0.13/0.34 % CPU : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 @ 2.10GHz
% 0.13/0.34 % Memory : 8042.1875MB
% 0.13/0.34 % OS : Linux 3.10.0-693.el7.x86_64
% 0.13/0.35 % CPULimit : 2400
% 0.13/0.35 % WCLimit : 300
% 0.13/0.35 % DateTime : Tue Oct 3 04:32:20 EDT 2023
% 0.18/0.35 % CPUTime :
% 0.19/0.48 Running first-order theorem proving
% 0.19/0.48 Running: /export/starexec/sandbox/solver/bin/eprover --delete-bad-limit=2000000000 --definitional-cnf=24 -s --print-statistics -R --print-version --proof-object --auto-schedule=8 --cpu-limit=300 /export/starexec/sandbox/tmp/tmp.GPdh4DQtBm/E---3.1_13804.p
% 0.19/0.54 # Version: 3.1pre001
% 0.19/0.54 # Preprocessing class: FSLSSMSMSSSNFFN.
% 0.19/0.54 # Scheduled 4 strats onto 8 cores with 300 seconds (2400 total)
% 0.19/0.54 # Starting C07_19_nc_SOS_SAT001_MinMin_p005000_rr with 1500s (5) cores
% 0.19/0.54 # Starting new_bool_3 with 300s (1) cores
% 0.19/0.54 # Starting new_bool_1 with 300s (1) cores
% 0.19/0.54 # Starting sh5l with 300s (1) cores
% 0.19/0.54 # C07_19_nc_SOS_SAT001_MinMin_p005000_rr with pid 13886 completed with status 0
% 0.19/0.54 # Result found by C07_19_nc_SOS_SAT001_MinMin_p005000_rr
% 0.19/0.54 # Preprocessing class: FSLSSMSMSSSNFFN.
% 0.19/0.54 # Scheduled 4 strats onto 8 cores with 300 seconds (2400 total)
% 0.19/0.54 # Starting C07_19_nc_SOS_SAT001_MinMin_p005000_rr with 1500s (5) cores
% 0.19/0.54 # No SInE strategy applied
% 0.19/0.54 # Search class: FGHSM-FSLM33-DFFFFFNN
% 0.19/0.54 # Scheduled 10 strats onto 5 cores with 1500 seconds (1500 total)
% 0.19/0.54 # Starting G-E--_207_C18_F1_AE_CS_SP_PI_PS_S0S with 271s (1) cores
% 0.19/0.54 # Starting C07_19_nc_SOS_SAT001_MinMin_p005000_rr with 151s (1) cores
% 0.19/0.54 # Starting G-E--_302_C18_F1_URBAN_S5PRR_RG_S04BN with 136s (1) cores
% 0.19/0.54 # Starting G-E--_208_C09_12_F1_SE_CS_SP_PS_S070I with 136s (1) cores
% 0.19/0.54 # Starting G-E--_300_C18_F1_SE_CS_SP_PS_S0Y with 136s (1) cores
% 0.19/0.54 # G-E--_300_C18_F1_SE_CS_SP_PS_S0Y with pid 13897 completed with status 0
% 0.19/0.54 # Result found by G-E--_300_C18_F1_SE_CS_SP_PS_S0Y
% 0.19/0.54 # Preprocessing class: FSLSSMSMSSSNFFN.
% 0.19/0.54 # Scheduled 4 strats onto 8 cores with 300 seconds (2400 total)
% 0.19/0.54 # Starting C07_19_nc_SOS_SAT001_MinMin_p005000_rr with 1500s (5) cores
% 0.19/0.54 # No SInE strategy applied
% 0.19/0.54 # Search class: FGHSM-FSLM33-DFFFFFNN
% 0.19/0.54 # Scheduled 10 strats onto 5 cores with 1500 seconds (1500 total)
% 0.19/0.54 # Starting G-E--_207_C18_F1_AE_CS_SP_PI_PS_S0S with 271s (1) cores
% 0.19/0.54 # Starting C07_19_nc_SOS_SAT001_MinMin_p005000_rr with 151s (1) cores
% 0.19/0.54 # Starting G-E--_302_C18_F1_URBAN_S5PRR_RG_S04BN with 136s (1) cores
% 0.19/0.54 # Starting G-E--_208_C09_12_F1_SE_CS_SP_PS_S070I with 136s (1) cores
% 0.19/0.54 # Starting G-E--_300_C18_F1_SE_CS_SP_PS_S0Y with 136s (1) cores
% 0.19/0.54 # Preprocessing time : 0.004 s
% 0.19/0.54 # Presaturation interreduction done
% 0.19/0.54
% 0.19/0.54 # Proof found!
% 0.19/0.54 # SZS status Unsatisfiable
% 0.19/0.54 # SZS output start CNFRefutation
% See solution above
% 0.19/0.54 # Parsed axioms : 384
% 0.19/0.54 # Removed by relevancy pruning/SinE : 0
% 0.19/0.54 # Initial clauses : 384
% 0.19/0.54 # Removed in clause preprocessing : 2
% 0.19/0.54 # Initial clauses in saturation : 382
% 0.19/0.54 # Processed clauses : 620
% 0.19/0.54 # ...of these trivial : 1
% 0.19/0.54 # ...subsumed : 119
% 0.19/0.54 # ...remaining for further processing : 500
% 0.19/0.54 # Other redundant clauses eliminated : 0
% 0.19/0.54 # Clauses deleted for lack of memory : 0
% 0.19/0.54 # Backward-subsumed : 0
% 0.19/0.54 # Backward-rewritten : 0
% 0.19/0.54 # Generated clauses : 80
% 0.19/0.54 # ...of the previous two non-redundant : 26
% 0.19/0.54 # ...aggressively subsumed : 0
% 0.19/0.54 # Contextual simplify-reflections : 0
% 0.19/0.54 # Paramodulations : 42
% 0.19/0.54 # Factorizations : 0
% 0.19/0.54 # NegExts : 0
% 0.19/0.54 # Equation resolutions : 38
% 0.19/0.54 # Total rewrite steps : 10
% 0.19/0.54 # Propositional unsat checks : 0
% 0.19/0.54 # Propositional check models : 0
% 0.19/0.54 # Propositional check unsatisfiable : 0
% 0.19/0.54 # Propositional clauses : 0
% 0.19/0.54 # Propositional clauses after purity: 0
% 0.19/0.54 # Propositional unsat core size : 0
% 0.19/0.54 # Propositional preprocessing time : 0.000
% 0.19/0.54 # Propositional encoding time : 0.000
% 0.19/0.54 # Propositional solver time : 0.000
% 0.19/0.54 # Success case prop preproc time : 0.000
% 0.19/0.54 # Success case prop encoding time : 0.000
% 0.19/0.54 # Success case prop solver time : 0.000
% 0.19/0.54 # Current number of processed clauses : 236
% 0.19/0.54 # Positive orientable unit clauses : 32
% 0.19/0.54 # Positive unorientable unit clauses: 0
% 0.19/0.54 # Negative unit clauses : 112
% 0.19/0.54 # Non-unit-clauses : 92
% 0.19/0.54 # Current number of unprocessed clauses: 49
% 0.19/0.54 # ...number of literals in the above : 145
% 0.19/0.54 # Current number of archived formulas : 0
% 0.19/0.54 # Current number of archived clauses : 265
% 0.19/0.54 # Clause-clause subsumption calls (NU) : 11359
% 0.19/0.54 # Rec. Clause-clause subsumption calls : 8099
% 0.19/0.54 # Non-unit clause-clause subsumptions : 8
% 0.19/0.54 # Unit Clause-clause subsumption calls : 4367
% 0.19/0.54 # Rewrite failures with RHS unbound : 0
% 0.19/0.54 # BW rewrite match attempts : 274
% 0.19/0.54 # BW rewrite match successes : 0
% 0.19/0.54 # Condensation attempts : 0
% 0.19/0.54 # Condensation successes : 0
% 0.19/0.54 # Termbank termtop insertions : 9057
% 0.19/0.54
% 0.19/0.54 # -------------------------------------------------
% 0.19/0.54 # User time : 0.029 s
% 0.19/0.54 # System time : 0.006 s
% 0.19/0.54 # Total time : 0.035 s
% 0.19/0.54 # Maximum resident set size: 2372 pages
% 0.19/0.54
% 0.19/0.54 # -------------------------------------------------
% 0.19/0.54 # User time : 0.132 s
% 0.19/0.54 # System time : 0.027 s
% 0.19/0.54 # Total time : 0.158 s
% 0.19/0.54 # Maximum resident set size: 1956 pages
% 0.19/0.54 % E---3.1 exiting
% 0.19/0.54 % E---3.1 exiting
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------