TSTP Solution File: SWV951-1 by E---3.1
View Problem
- Process Solution
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
% File : E---3.1
% Problem : SWV951-1 : TPTP v8.1.2. Released v4.1.0.
% Transfm : none
% Format : tptp:raw
% Command : run_E %s %d THM
% Computer : n009.cluster.edu
% Model : x86_64 x86_64
% CPU : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 2.10GHz
% Memory : 8042.1875MB
% OS : Linux 3.10.0-693.el7.x86_64
% CPULimit : 2400s
% WCLimit : 300s
% DateTime : Tue Oct 10 19:55:41 EDT 2023
% Result : Unsatisfiable 0.24s 0.57s
% Output : CNFRefutation 0.24s
% Verified :
% SZS Type : Refutation
% Derivation depth : 3
% Number of leaves : 4
% Syntax : Number of clauses : 10 ( 6 unt; 0 nHn; 6 RR)
% Number of literals : 14 ( 0 equ; 7 neg)
% Maximal clause size : 2 ( 1 avg)
% Maximal term depth : 7 ( 2 avg)
% Number of predicates : 3 ( 2 usr; 1 prp; 0-5 aty)
% Number of functors : 15 ( 15 usr; 9 con; 0-4 aty)
% Number of variables : 22 ( 10 sgn)
% Comments :
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
cnf(cls_conjecture_0,negated_conjecture,
( ~ hBOOL(hAPP(hAPP(c_TypeRel_Owiden(v_P,tc_prod(tc_List_Olist(tc_List_Olist(tc_String_Ochar)),tc_Expr_Oexp(tc_List_Olist(tc_String_Ochar)))),X1),v_T____))
| ~ c_WellTypeRT_OWTrt(v_P,v_h_Ha____,v_E____,c_Expr_Oexp_OFAcc(v_e_Ha____,v_F____,v_D____,tc_List_Olist(tc_String_Ochar)),X1) ),
file('/export/starexec/sandbox/tmp/tmp.lNKPSEWL4s/E---3.1_17310.p',cls_conjecture_0) ).
cnf(cls_widen__refl_0,axiom,
hBOOL(hAPP(hAPP(c_TypeRel_Owiden(X1,X2),X3),X3)),
file('/export/starexec/sandbox/tmp/tmp.lNKPSEWL4s/E---3.1_17310.p',cls_widen__refl_0) ).
cnf(cls_WTrtFAccNT_0,axiom,
( c_WellTypeRT_OWTrt(X1,X2,X3,c_Expr_Oexp_OFAcc(X4,X5,X6,tc_List_Olist(tc_String_Ochar)),X7)
| ~ c_WellTypeRT_OWTrt(X1,X2,X3,X4,c_Type_Oty_ONT) ),
file('/export/starexec/sandbox/tmp/tmp.lNKPSEWL4s/E---3.1_17310.p',cls_WTrtFAccNT_0) ).
cnf(cls_CHAINED_0,axiom,
c_WellTypeRT_OWTrt(v_P,v_h_Ha____,v_E____,v_e_Ha____,c_Type_Oty_ONT),
file('/export/starexec/sandbox/tmp/tmp.lNKPSEWL4s/E---3.1_17310.p',cls_CHAINED_0) ).
cnf(c_0_4,negated_conjecture,
( ~ hBOOL(hAPP(hAPP(c_TypeRel_Owiden(v_P,tc_prod(tc_List_Olist(tc_List_Olist(tc_String_Ochar)),tc_Expr_Oexp(tc_List_Olist(tc_String_Ochar)))),X1),v_T____))
| ~ c_WellTypeRT_OWTrt(v_P,v_h_Ha____,v_E____,c_Expr_Oexp_OFAcc(v_e_Ha____,v_F____,v_D____,tc_List_Olist(tc_String_Ochar)),X1) ),
cls_conjecture_0 ).
cnf(c_0_5,axiom,
hBOOL(hAPP(hAPP(c_TypeRel_Owiden(X1,X2),X3),X3)),
cls_widen__refl_0 ).
cnf(c_0_6,negated_conjecture,
~ c_WellTypeRT_OWTrt(v_P,v_h_Ha____,v_E____,c_Expr_Oexp_OFAcc(v_e_Ha____,v_F____,v_D____,tc_List_Olist(tc_String_Ochar)),v_T____),
inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_4,c_0_5]) ).
cnf(c_0_7,axiom,
( c_WellTypeRT_OWTrt(X1,X2,X3,c_Expr_Oexp_OFAcc(X4,X5,X6,tc_List_Olist(tc_String_Ochar)),X7)
| ~ c_WellTypeRT_OWTrt(X1,X2,X3,X4,c_Type_Oty_ONT) ),
cls_WTrtFAccNT_0 ).
cnf(c_0_8,axiom,
c_WellTypeRT_OWTrt(v_P,v_h_Ha____,v_E____,v_e_Ha____,c_Type_Oty_ONT),
cls_CHAINED_0 ).
cnf(c_0_9,negated_conjecture,
$false,
inference(cn,[status(thm)],[inference(rw,[status(thm)],[inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_6,c_0_7]),c_0_8])]),
[proof] ).
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
%----ORIGINAL SYSTEM OUTPUT
% 0.06/0.15 % Problem : SWV951-1 : TPTP v8.1.2. Released v4.1.0.
% 0.06/0.16 % Command : run_E %s %d THM
% 0.17/0.37 % Computer : n009.cluster.edu
% 0.17/0.37 % Model : x86_64 x86_64
% 0.17/0.37 % CPU : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 @ 2.10GHz
% 0.17/0.37 % Memory : 8042.1875MB
% 0.17/0.37 % OS : Linux 3.10.0-693.el7.x86_64
% 0.17/0.38 % CPULimit : 2400
% 0.17/0.38 % WCLimit : 300
% 0.17/0.38 % DateTime : Tue Oct 3 03:57:29 EDT 2023
% 0.17/0.38 % CPUTime :
% 0.24/0.54 Running first-order theorem proving
% 0.24/0.54 Running: /export/starexec/sandbox/solver/bin/eprover --delete-bad-limit=2000000000 --definitional-cnf=24 -s --print-statistics -R --print-version --proof-object --auto-schedule=8 --cpu-limit=300 /export/starexec/sandbox/tmp/tmp.lNKPSEWL4s/E---3.1_17310.p
% 0.24/0.57 # Version: 3.1pre001
% 0.24/0.57 # Preprocessing class: FSLSSMSMSSSNFFN.
% 0.24/0.57 # Scheduled 4 strats onto 8 cores with 300 seconds (2400 total)
% 0.24/0.57 # Starting C07_19_nc_SOS_SAT001_MinMin_p005000_rr with 1500s (5) cores
% 0.24/0.57 # Starting new_bool_3 with 300s (1) cores
% 0.24/0.57 # Starting new_bool_1 with 300s (1) cores
% 0.24/0.57 # Starting sh5l with 300s (1) cores
% 0.24/0.57 # new_bool_3 with pid 17389 completed with status 0
% 0.24/0.57 # Result found by new_bool_3
% 0.24/0.57 # Preprocessing class: FSLSSMSMSSSNFFN.
% 0.24/0.57 # Scheduled 4 strats onto 8 cores with 300 seconds (2400 total)
% 0.24/0.57 # Starting C07_19_nc_SOS_SAT001_MinMin_p005000_rr with 1500s (5) cores
% 0.24/0.57 # Starting new_bool_3 with 300s (1) cores
% 0.24/0.57 # SinE strategy is GSinE(CountFormulas,hypos,1.5,,3,20000,1.0)
% 0.24/0.57 # Search class: FGHSS-FFLS32-DFFFFFNN
% 0.24/0.57 # partial match(1): FGHSM-FFLS32-DFFFFFNN
% 0.24/0.57 # Scheduled 6 strats onto 1 cores with 300 seconds (300 total)
% 0.24/0.57 # Starting new_ho_10 with 55s (1) cores
% 0.24/0.57 # new_ho_10 with pid 17392 completed with status 0
% 0.24/0.57 # Result found by new_ho_10
% 0.24/0.57 # Preprocessing class: FSLSSMSMSSSNFFN.
% 0.24/0.57 # Scheduled 4 strats onto 8 cores with 300 seconds (2400 total)
% 0.24/0.57 # Starting C07_19_nc_SOS_SAT001_MinMin_p005000_rr with 1500s (5) cores
% 0.24/0.57 # Starting new_bool_3 with 300s (1) cores
% 0.24/0.57 # SinE strategy is GSinE(CountFormulas,hypos,1.5,,3,20000,1.0)
% 0.24/0.57 # Search class: FGHSS-FFLS32-DFFFFFNN
% 0.24/0.57 # partial match(1): FGHSM-FFLS32-DFFFFFNN
% 0.24/0.57 # Scheduled 6 strats onto 1 cores with 300 seconds (300 total)
% 0.24/0.57 # Starting new_ho_10 with 55s (1) cores
% 0.24/0.57 # Preprocessing time : 0.003 s
% 0.24/0.57 # Presaturation interreduction done
% 0.24/0.57
% 0.24/0.57 # Proof found!
% 0.24/0.57 # SZS status Unsatisfiable
% 0.24/0.57 # SZS output start CNFRefutation
% See solution above
% 0.24/0.57 # Parsed axioms : 367
% 0.24/0.57 # Removed by relevancy pruning/SinE : 93
% 0.24/0.57 # Initial clauses : 274
% 0.24/0.57 # Removed in clause preprocessing : 0
% 0.24/0.57 # Initial clauses in saturation : 274
% 0.24/0.57 # Processed clauses : 433
% 0.24/0.57 # ...of these trivial : 0
% 0.24/0.57 # ...subsumed : 108
% 0.24/0.57 # ...remaining for further processing : 325
% 0.24/0.57 # Other redundant clauses eliminated : 0
% 0.24/0.57 # Clauses deleted for lack of memory : 0
% 0.24/0.57 # Backward-subsumed : 0
% 0.24/0.57 # Backward-rewritten : 0
% 0.24/0.57 # Generated clauses : 44
% 0.24/0.57 # ...of the previous two non-redundant : 4
% 0.24/0.57 # ...aggressively subsumed : 0
% 0.24/0.57 # Contextual simplify-reflections : 0
% 0.24/0.57 # Paramodulations : 7
% 0.24/0.57 # Factorizations : 0
% 0.24/0.57 # NegExts : 0
% 0.24/0.57 # Equation resolutions : 37
% 0.24/0.57 # Total rewrite steps : 3
% 0.24/0.57 # Propositional unsat checks : 0
% 0.24/0.57 # Propositional check models : 0
% 0.24/0.57 # Propositional check unsatisfiable : 0
% 0.24/0.57 # Propositional clauses : 0
% 0.24/0.57 # Propositional clauses after purity: 0
% 0.24/0.57 # Propositional unsat core size : 0
% 0.24/0.57 # Propositional preprocessing time : 0.000
% 0.24/0.57 # Propositional encoding time : 0.000
% 0.24/0.57 # Propositional solver time : 0.000
% 0.24/0.57 # Success case prop preproc time : 0.000
% 0.24/0.57 # Success case prop encoding time : 0.000
% 0.24/0.57 # Success case prop solver time : 0.000
% 0.24/0.57 # Current number of processed clauses : 159
% 0.24/0.57 # Positive orientable unit clauses : 5
% 0.24/0.57 # Positive unorientable unit clauses: 0
% 0.24/0.57 # Negative unit clauses : 109
% 0.24/0.57 # Non-unit-clauses : 45
% 0.24/0.57 # Current number of unprocessed clauses: 11
% 0.24/0.57 # ...number of literals in the above : 45
% 0.24/0.57 # Current number of archived formulas : 0
% 0.24/0.57 # Current number of archived clauses : 166
% 0.24/0.57 # Clause-clause subsumption calls (NU) : 2060
% 0.24/0.57 # Rec. Clause-clause subsumption calls : 1244
% 0.24/0.57 # Non-unit clause-clause subsumptions : 0
% 0.24/0.57 # Unit Clause-clause subsumption calls : 1999
% 0.24/0.57 # Rewrite failures with RHS unbound : 0
% 0.24/0.57 # BW rewrite match attempts : 2
% 0.24/0.57 # BW rewrite match successes : 0
% 0.24/0.57 # Condensation attempts : 433
% 0.24/0.57 # Condensation successes : 0
% 0.24/0.57 # Termbank termtop insertions : 5491
% 0.24/0.57
% 0.24/0.57 # -------------------------------------------------
% 0.24/0.57 # User time : 0.014 s
% 0.24/0.57 # System time : 0.005 s
% 0.24/0.57 # Total time : 0.019 s
% 0.24/0.57 # Maximum resident set size: 2248 pages
% 0.24/0.57
% 0.24/0.57 # -------------------------------------------------
% 0.24/0.57 # User time : 0.023 s
% 0.24/0.57 # System time : 0.007 s
% 0.24/0.57 # Total time : 0.031 s
% 0.24/0.57 # Maximum resident set size: 1932 pages
% 0.24/0.57 % E---3.1 exiting
% 0.24/0.57 % E---3.1 exiting
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------