TSTP Solution File: SWV943-1 by E-SAT---3.1

View Problem - Process Solution

%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
% File     : E-SAT---3.1
% Problem  : SWV943-1 : TPTP v8.1.2. Released v4.1.0.
% Transfm  : none
% Format   : tptp:raw
% Command  : run_E %s %d THM

% Computer : n008.cluster.edu
% Model    : x86_64 x86_64
% CPU      : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 2.10GHz
% Memory   : 8042.1875MB
% OS       : Linux 3.10.0-693.el7.x86_64
% CPULimit : 2400s
% WCLimit  : 300s
% DateTime : Tue Oct 10 20:08:10 EDT 2023

% Result   : Unsatisfiable 0.13s 0.44s
% Output   : CNFRefutation 0.13s
% Verified : 
% SZS Type : Refutation
%            Derivation depth      :    2
%            Number of leaves      :    3
% Syntax   : Number of clauses     :    7 (   5 unt;   0 nHn;   5 RR)
%            Number of literals    :    9 (   0 equ;   4 neg)
%            Maximal clause size   :    2 (   1 avg)
%            Maximal term depth    :    7 (   2 avg)
%            Number of predicates  :    3 (   2 usr;   1 prp; 0-5 aty)
%            Number of functors    :   14 (  14 usr;   8 con; 0-4 aty)
%            Number of variables   :    8 (   4 sgn)

% Comments : 
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
cnf(cls_conjecture_0,negated_conjecture,
    ( ~ hBOOL(hAPP(hAPP(c_TypeRel_Owiden(v_P,tc_prod(tc_List_Olist(tc_List_Olist(tc_String_Ochar)),tc_Expr_Oexp(tc_List_Olist(tc_String_Ochar)))),X1),v_T____))
    | ~ c_WellTypeRT_OWTrt(v_P,v_h_Ha____,v_E____,c_Expr_Oexp_OBinOp(v_e_092_060_094isub_0621_H____,v_bop____,v_e_092_060_094isub_0622____,tc_List_Olist(tc_String_Ochar)),X1) ),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/tmp/tmp.hMpwo8tcg6/E---3.1_14224.p',cls_conjecture_0) ).

cnf(cls_widen__refl_0,axiom,
    hBOOL(hAPP(hAPP(c_TypeRel_Owiden(X1,X2),X3),X3)),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/tmp/tmp.hMpwo8tcg6/E---3.1_14224.p',cls_widen__refl_0) ).

cnf(cls_CHAINED_0,axiom,
    c_WellTypeRT_OWTrt(v_P,v_h_Ha____,v_E____,c_Expr_Oexp_OBinOp(v_e_092_060_094isub_0621_H____,v_bop____,v_e_092_060_094isub_0622____,tc_List_Olist(tc_String_Ochar)),v_T____),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/tmp/tmp.hMpwo8tcg6/E---3.1_14224.p',cls_CHAINED_0) ).

cnf(c_0_3,negated_conjecture,
    ( ~ hBOOL(hAPP(hAPP(c_TypeRel_Owiden(v_P,tc_prod(tc_List_Olist(tc_List_Olist(tc_String_Ochar)),tc_Expr_Oexp(tc_List_Olist(tc_String_Ochar)))),X1),v_T____))
    | ~ c_WellTypeRT_OWTrt(v_P,v_h_Ha____,v_E____,c_Expr_Oexp_OBinOp(v_e_092_060_094isub_0621_H____,v_bop____,v_e_092_060_094isub_0622____,tc_List_Olist(tc_String_Ochar)),X1) ),
    cls_conjecture_0 ).

cnf(c_0_4,axiom,
    hBOOL(hAPP(hAPP(c_TypeRel_Owiden(X1,X2),X3),X3)),
    cls_widen__refl_0 ).

cnf(c_0_5,axiom,
    c_WellTypeRT_OWTrt(v_P,v_h_Ha____,v_E____,c_Expr_Oexp_OBinOp(v_e_092_060_094isub_0621_H____,v_bop____,v_e_092_060_094isub_0622____,tc_List_Olist(tc_String_Ochar)),v_T____),
    cls_CHAINED_0 ).

cnf(c_0_6,negated_conjecture,
    $false,
    inference(cn,[status(thm)],[inference(rw,[status(thm)],[inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_3,c_0_4]),c_0_5])]),
    [proof] ).

%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
%----ORIGINAL SYSTEM OUTPUT
% 0.00/0.09  % Problem    : SWV943-1 : TPTP v8.1.2. Released v4.1.0.
% 0.00/0.10  % Command    : run_E %s %d THM
% 0.09/0.29  % Computer : n008.cluster.edu
% 0.09/0.29  % Model    : x86_64 x86_64
% 0.09/0.29  % CPU      : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 @ 2.10GHz
% 0.09/0.29  % Memory   : 8042.1875MB
% 0.09/0.29  % OS       : Linux 3.10.0-693.el7.x86_64
% 0.09/0.29  % CPULimit   : 2400
% 0.09/0.29  % WCLimit    : 300
% 0.09/0.29  % DateTime   : Tue Oct  3 04:09:13 EDT 2023
% 0.09/0.29  % CPUTime    : 
% 0.13/0.41  Running first-order model finding
% 0.13/0.41  Running: /export/starexec/sandbox2/solver/bin/eprover --delete-bad-limit=2000000000 --definitional-cnf=24 -s --print-statistics -R --print-version --proof-object --satauto-schedule=8 --cpu-limit=300 /export/starexec/sandbox2/tmp/tmp.hMpwo8tcg6/E---3.1_14224.p
% 0.13/0.44  # Version: 3.1pre001
% 0.13/0.44  # Preprocessing class: FSLSSMSMSSSNFFN.
% 0.13/0.44  # Scheduled 4 strats onto 8 cores with 300 seconds (2400 total)
% 0.13/0.44  # Starting C07_19_nc_SOS_SAT001_MinMin_p005000_rr with 1500s (5) cores
% 0.13/0.44  # Starting new_bool_3 with 300s (1) cores
% 0.13/0.44  # Starting new_bool_1 with 300s (1) cores
% 0.13/0.44  # Starting sh5l with 300s (1) cores
% 0.13/0.44  # new_bool_1 with pid 14303 completed with status 0
% 0.13/0.44  # Result found by new_bool_1
% 0.13/0.44  # Preprocessing class: FSLSSMSMSSSNFFN.
% 0.13/0.44  # Scheduled 4 strats onto 8 cores with 300 seconds (2400 total)
% 0.13/0.44  # Starting C07_19_nc_SOS_SAT001_MinMin_p005000_rr with 1500s (5) cores
% 0.13/0.44  # Starting new_bool_3 with 300s (1) cores
% 0.13/0.44  # Starting new_bool_1 with 300s (1) cores
% 0.13/0.44  # SinE strategy is GSinE(CountFormulas,hypos,1.5,,3,20000,1.0)
% 0.13/0.44  # Search class: FGHSF-FSLS32-DFFFFFNN
% 0.13/0.44  # partial match(1): FGHSF-FSLM32-DFFFFFNN
% 0.13/0.44  # Scheduled 5 strats onto 1 cores with 300 seconds (300 total)
% 0.13/0.44  # Starting SAT001_MinMin_p005000_rr_RG with 181s (1) cores
% 0.13/0.44  # SAT001_MinMin_p005000_rr_RG with pid 14306 completed with status 0
% 0.13/0.44  # Result found by SAT001_MinMin_p005000_rr_RG
% 0.13/0.44  # Preprocessing class: FSLSSMSMSSSNFFN.
% 0.13/0.44  # Scheduled 4 strats onto 8 cores with 300 seconds (2400 total)
% 0.13/0.44  # Starting C07_19_nc_SOS_SAT001_MinMin_p005000_rr with 1500s (5) cores
% 0.13/0.44  # Starting new_bool_3 with 300s (1) cores
% 0.13/0.44  # Starting new_bool_1 with 300s (1) cores
% 0.13/0.44  # SinE strategy is GSinE(CountFormulas,hypos,1.5,,3,20000,1.0)
% 0.13/0.44  # Search class: FGHSF-FSLS32-DFFFFFNN
% 0.13/0.44  # partial match(1): FGHSF-FSLM32-DFFFFFNN
% 0.13/0.44  # Scheduled 5 strats onto 1 cores with 300 seconds (300 total)
% 0.13/0.44  # Starting SAT001_MinMin_p005000_rr_RG with 181s (1) cores
% 0.13/0.44  # Preprocessing time       : 0.003 s
% 0.13/0.44  # Presaturation interreduction done
% 0.13/0.44  
% 0.13/0.44  # Proof found!
% 0.13/0.44  # SZS status Unsatisfiable
% 0.13/0.44  # SZS output start CNFRefutation
% See solution above
% 0.13/0.44  # Parsed axioms                        : 383
% 0.13/0.44  # Removed by relevancy pruning/SinE    : 89
% 0.13/0.44  # Initial clauses                      : 294
% 0.13/0.44  # Removed in clause preprocessing      : 0
% 0.13/0.44  # Initial clauses in saturation        : 294
% 0.13/0.44  # Processed clauses                    : 303
% 0.13/0.44  # ...of these trivial                  : 0
% 0.13/0.44  # ...subsumed                          : 107
% 0.13/0.44  # ...remaining for further processing  : 196
% 0.13/0.44  # Other redundant clauses eliminated   : 0
% 0.13/0.44  # Clauses deleted for lack of memory   : 0
% 0.13/0.44  # Backward-subsumed                    : 0
% 0.13/0.44  # Backward-rewritten                   : 0
% 0.13/0.44  # Generated clauses                    : 1
% 0.13/0.44  # ...of the previous two non-redundant : 0
% 0.13/0.44  # ...aggressively subsumed             : 0
% 0.13/0.44  # Contextual simplify-reflections      : 0
% 0.13/0.44  # Paramodulations                      : 1
% 0.13/0.44  # Factorizations                       : 0
% 0.13/0.44  # NegExts                              : 0
% 0.13/0.44  # Equation resolutions                 : 0
% 0.13/0.44  # Total rewrite steps                  : 3
% 0.13/0.44  # Propositional unsat checks           : 0
% 0.13/0.44  #    Propositional check models        : 0
% 0.13/0.44  #    Propositional check unsatisfiable : 0
% 0.13/0.44  #    Propositional clauses             : 0
% 0.13/0.44  #    Propositional clauses after purity: 0
% 0.13/0.44  #    Propositional unsat core size     : 0
% 0.13/0.44  #    Propositional preprocessing time  : 0.000
% 0.13/0.44  #    Propositional encoding time       : 0.000
% 0.13/0.44  #    Propositional solver time         : 0.000
% 0.13/0.44  #    Success case prop preproc time    : 0.000
% 0.13/0.44  #    Success case prop encoding time   : 0.000
% 0.13/0.44  #    Success case prop solver time     : 0.000
% 0.13/0.44  # Current number of processed clauses  : 9
% 0.13/0.44  #    Positive orientable unit clauses  : 3
% 0.13/0.44  #    Positive unorientable unit clauses: 0
% 0.13/0.44  #    Negative unit clauses             : 5
% 0.13/0.44  #    Non-unit-clauses                  : 1
% 0.13/0.44  # Current number of unprocessed clauses: 178
% 0.13/0.44  # ...number of literals in the above   : 303
% 0.13/0.44  # Current number of archived formulas  : 0
% 0.13/0.44  # Current number of archived clauses   : 187
% 0.13/0.44  # Clause-clause subsumption calls (NU) : 3683
% 0.13/0.44  # Rec. Clause-clause subsumption calls : 2509
% 0.13/0.44  # Non-unit clause-clause subsumptions  : 0
% 0.13/0.44  # Unit Clause-clause subsumption calls : 2586
% 0.13/0.44  # Rewrite failures with RHS unbound    : 0
% 0.13/0.44  # BW rewrite match attempts            : 1
% 0.13/0.44  # BW rewrite match successes           : 0
% 0.13/0.44  # Condensation attempts                : 0
% 0.13/0.44  # Condensation successes               : 0
% 0.13/0.44  # Termbank termtop insertions          : 5049
% 0.13/0.44  
% 0.13/0.44  # -------------------------------------------------
% 0.13/0.44  # User time                : 0.014 s
% 0.13/0.44  # System time              : 0.001 s
% 0.13/0.44  # Total time               : 0.015 s
% 0.13/0.44  # Maximum resident set size: 2276 pages
% 0.13/0.44  
% 0.13/0.44  # -------------------------------------------------
% 0.13/0.44  # User time                : 0.022 s
% 0.13/0.44  # System time              : 0.003 s
% 0.13/0.44  # Total time               : 0.025 s
% 0.13/0.44  # Maximum resident set size: 1948 pages
% 0.13/0.44  % E---3.1 exiting
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------