TSTP Solution File: SWV939-1 by E---3.1
View Problem
- Process Solution
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
% File : E---3.1
% Problem : SWV939-1 : TPTP v8.1.2. Released v4.1.0.
% Transfm : none
% Format : tptp:raw
% Command : run_E %s %d THM
% Computer : n028.cluster.edu
% Model : x86_64 x86_64
% CPU : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 2.10GHz
% Memory : 8042.1875MB
% OS : Linux 3.10.0-693.el7.x86_64
% CPULimit : 2400s
% WCLimit : 300s
% DateTime : Tue Oct 10 19:55:40 EDT 2023
% Result : Unsatisfiable 0.37s 0.62s
% Output : CNFRefutation 0.37s
% Verified :
% SZS Type : Refutation
% Derivation depth : 3
% Number of leaves : 4
% Syntax : Number of clauses : 10 ( 7 unt; 0 nHn; 10 RR)
% Number of literals : 13 ( 2 equ; 6 neg)
% Maximal clause size : 2 ( 1 avg)
% Maximal term depth : 7 ( 2 avg)
% Number of predicates : 4 ( 2 usr; 1 prp; 0-5 aty)
% Number of functors : 26 ( 26 usr; 16 con; 0-4 aty)
% Number of variables : 3 ( 0 sgn)
% Comments :
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
cnf(cls_conjecture_0,negated_conjecture,
( ~ hBOOL(hAPP(hAPP(c_TypeRel_Owiden(v_P,tc_prod(tc_List_Olist(tc_List_Olist(tc_String_Ochar)),tc_Expr_Oexp(tc_List_Olist(tc_String_Ochar)))),X1),v_T_H____))
| ~ c_WellTypeRT_OWTrt(v_P,v_ha____,v_E____,c_SmallStep_Oblocks(c_Pair(c_List_Olist_OCons(c_Type_Othis,v_pns____,tc_List_Olist(tc_String_Ochar)),c_Pair(c_List_Olist_OCons(c_Type_Oty_OClass(v_D____),v_Ts____,tc_Type_Oty),c_Pair(c_List_Olist_OCons(c_Value_Oval_OAddr(v_a____),v_vs____,tc_Value_Oval),v_body____,tc_List_Olist(tc_Value_Oval),tc_Expr_Oexp(tc_List_Olist(tc_String_Ochar))),tc_List_Olist(tc_Type_Oty),tc_prod(tc_List_Olist(tc_Value_Oval),tc_Expr_Oexp(tc_List_Olist(tc_String_Ochar)))),tc_List_Olist(tc_List_Olist(tc_String_Ochar)),tc_prod(tc_List_Olist(tc_Type_Oty),tc_prod(tc_List_Olist(tc_Value_Oval),tc_Expr_Oexp(tc_List_Olist(tc_String_Ochar)))))),X1) ),
file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/tmp/tmp.KorTECqeoD/E---3.1_11629.p',cls_conjecture_0) ).
cnf(cls_T_HisT_0,axiom,
v_T_H____ = v_T____,
file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/tmp/tmp.KorTECqeoD/E---3.1_11629.p',cls_T_HisT_0) ).
cnf(cls_CHAINED_0,axiom,
c_WellTypeRT_OWTrt(v_P,v_ha____,v_E____,c_SmallStep_Oblocks(c_Pair(c_List_Olist_OCons(c_Type_Othis,v_pns____,tc_List_Olist(tc_String_Ochar)),c_Pair(c_List_Olist_OCons(c_Type_Oty_OClass(v_D____),v_Ts____,tc_Type_Oty),c_Pair(c_List_Olist_OCons(c_Value_Oval_OAddr(v_a____),v_vs____,tc_Value_Oval),v_body____,tc_List_Olist(tc_Value_Oval),tc_Expr_Oexp(tc_List_Olist(tc_String_Ochar))),tc_List_Olist(tc_Type_Oty),tc_prod(tc_List_Olist(tc_Value_Oval),tc_Expr_Oexp(tc_List_Olist(tc_String_Ochar)))),tc_List_Olist(tc_List_Olist(tc_String_Ochar)),tc_prod(tc_List_Olist(tc_Type_Oty),tc_prod(tc_List_Olist(tc_Value_Oval),tc_Expr_Oexp(tc_List_Olist(tc_String_Ochar)))))),v_T_H_H____),
file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/tmp/tmp.KorTECqeoD/E---3.1_11629.p',cls_CHAINED_0) ).
cnf(cls_T_H_HsubT_0,axiom,
hBOOL(hAPP(hAPP(c_TypeRel_Owiden(v_P,tc_prod(tc_List_Olist(tc_List_Olist(tc_String_Ochar)),tc_Expr_Oexp(tc_List_Olist(tc_String_Ochar)))),v_T_H_H____),v_T____)),
file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/tmp/tmp.KorTECqeoD/E---3.1_11629.p',cls_T_H_HsubT_0) ).
cnf(c_0_4,negated_conjecture,
( ~ hBOOL(hAPP(hAPP(c_TypeRel_Owiden(v_P,tc_prod(tc_List_Olist(tc_List_Olist(tc_String_Ochar)),tc_Expr_Oexp(tc_List_Olist(tc_String_Ochar)))),X1),v_T_H____))
| ~ c_WellTypeRT_OWTrt(v_P,v_ha____,v_E____,c_SmallStep_Oblocks(c_Pair(c_List_Olist_OCons(c_Type_Othis,v_pns____,tc_List_Olist(tc_String_Ochar)),c_Pair(c_List_Olist_OCons(c_Type_Oty_OClass(v_D____),v_Ts____,tc_Type_Oty),c_Pair(c_List_Olist_OCons(c_Value_Oval_OAddr(v_a____),v_vs____,tc_Value_Oval),v_body____,tc_List_Olist(tc_Value_Oval),tc_Expr_Oexp(tc_List_Olist(tc_String_Ochar))),tc_List_Olist(tc_Type_Oty),tc_prod(tc_List_Olist(tc_Value_Oval),tc_Expr_Oexp(tc_List_Olist(tc_String_Ochar)))),tc_List_Olist(tc_List_Olist(tc_String_Ochar)),tc_prod(tc_List_Olist(tc_Type_Oty),tc_prod(tc_List_Olist(tc_Value_Oval),tc_Expr_Oexp(tc_List_Olist(tc_String_Ochar)))))),X1) ),
cls_conjecture_0 ).
cnf(c_0_5,axiom,
v_T_H____ = v_T____,
cls_T_HisT_0 ).
cnf(c_0_6,negated_conjecture,
( ~ c_WellTypeRT_OWTrt(v_P,v_ha____,v_E____,c_SmallStep_Oblocks(c_Pair(c_List_Olist_OCons(c_Type_Othis,v_pns____,tc_List_Olist(tc_String_Ochar)),c_Pair(c_List_Olist_OCons(c_Type_Oty_OClass(v_D____),v_Ts____,tc_Type_Oty),c_Pair(c_List_Olist_OCons(c_Value_Oval_OAddr(v_a____),v_vs____,tc_Value_Oval),v_body____,tc_List_Olist(tc_Value_Oval),tc_Expr_Oexp(tc_List_Olist(tc_String_Ochar))),tc_List_Olist(tc_Type_Oty),tc_prod(tc_List_Olist(tc_Value_Oval),tc_Expr_Oexp(tc_List_Olist(tc_String_Ochar)))),tc_List_Olist(tc_List_Olist(tc_String_Ochar)),tc_prod(tc_List_Olist(tc_Type_Oty),tc_prod(tc_List_Olist(tc_Value_Oval),tc_Expr_Oexp(tc_List_Olist(tc_String_Ochar)))))),X1)
| ~ hBOOL(hAPP(hAPP(c_TypeRel_Owiden(v_P,tc_prod(tc_List_Olist(tc_List_Olist(tc_String_Ochar)),tc_Expr_Oexp(tc_List_Olist(tc_String_Ochar)))),X1),v_T____)) ),
inference(rw,[status(thm)],[c_0_4,c_0_5]) ).
cnf(c_0_7,axiom,
c_WellTypeRT_OWTrt(v_P,v_ha____,v_E____,c_SmallStep_Oblocks(c_Pair(c_List_Olist_OCons(c_Type_Othis,v_pns____,tc_List_Olist(tc_String_Ochar)),c_Pair(c_List_Olist_OCons(c_Type_Oty_OClass(v_D____),v_Ts____,tc_Type_Oty),c_Pair(c_List_Olist_OCons(c_Value_Oval_OAddr(v_a____),v_vs____,tc_Value_Oval),v_body____,tc_List_Olist(tc_Value_Oval),tc_Expr_Oexp(tc_List_Olist(tc_String_Ochar))),tc_List_Olist(tc_Type_Oty),tc_prod(tc_List_Olist(tc_Value_Oval),tc_Expr_Oexp(tc_List_Olist(tc_String_Ochar)))),tc_List_Olist(tc_List_Olist(tc_String_Ochar)),tc_prod(tc_List_Olist(tc_Type_Oty),tc_prod(tc_List_Olist(tc_Value_Oval),tc_Expr_Oexp(tc_List_Olist(tc_String_Ochar)))))),v_T_H_H____),
cls_CHAINED_0 ).
cnf(c_0_8,axiom,
hBOOL(hAPP(hAPP(c_TypeRel_Owiden(v_P,tc_prod(tc_List_Olist(tc_List_Olist(tc_String_Ochar)),tc_Expr_Oexp(tc_List_Olist(tc_String_Ochar)))),v_T_H_H____),v_T____)),
cls_T_H_HsubT_0 ).
cnf(c_0_9,negated_conjecture,
$false,
inference(cn,[status(thm)],[inference(rw,[status(thm)],[inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_6,c_0_7]),c_0_8])]),
[proof] ).
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
%----ORIGINAL SYSTEM OUTPUT
% 0.11/0.18 % Problem : SWV939-1 : TPTP v8.1.2. Released v4.1.0.
% 0.11/0.19 % Command : run_E %s %d THM
% 0.18/0.38 % Computer : n028.cluster.edu
% 0.18/0.38 % Model : x86_64 x86_64
% 0.18/0.38 % CPU : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 @ 2.10GHz
% 0.18/0.38 % Memory : 8042.1875MB
% 0.18/0.38 % OS : Linux 3.10.0-693.el7.x86_64
% 0.18/0.38 % CPULimit : 2400
% 0.18/0.38 % WCLimit : 300
% 0.18/0.38 % DateTime : Tue Oct 3 03:39:22 EDT 2023
% 0.18/0.38 % CPUTime :
% 0.37/0.55 Running first-order theorem proving
% 0.37/0.55 Running: /export/starexec/sandbox2/solver/bin/eprover --delete-bad-limit=2000000000 --definitional-cnf=24 -s --print-statistics -R --print-version --proof-object --auto-schedule=8 --cpu-limit=300 /export/starexec/sandbox2/tmp/tmp.KorTECqeoD/E---3.1_11629.p
% 0.37/0.62 # Version: 3.1pre001
% 0.37/0.62 # Preprocessing class: FSLMSMSMSSSNFFN.
% 0.37/0.62 # Scheduled 4 strats onto 8 cores with 300 seconds (2400 total)
% 0.37/0.62 # Starting G-E--_207_C18_F1_AE_CS_SP_PI_PS_S2S with 1200s (4) cores
% 0.37/0.62 # Starting new_bool_3 with 600s (2) cores
% 0.37/0.62 # Starting new_bool_1 with 300s (1) cores
% 0.37/0.62 # Starting sh5l with 300s (1) cores
% 0.37/0.62 # new_bool_3 with pid 11708 completed with status 0
% 0.37/0.62 # Result found by new_bool_3
% 0.37/0.62 # Preprocessing class: FSLMSMSMSSSNFFN.
% 0.37/0.62 # Scheduled 4 strats onto 8 cores with 300 seconds (2400 total)
% 0.37/0.62 # Starting G-E--_207_C18_F1_AE_CS_SP_PI_PS_S2S with 1200s (4) cores
% 0.37/0.62 # Starting new_bool_3 with 600s (2) cores
% 0.37/0.62 # SinE strategy is GSinE(CountFormulas,hypos,1.5,,3,20000,1.0)
% 0.37/0.62 # Search class: FGHSM-FSLM32-DFFFFFNN
% 0.37/0.62 # Scheduled 13 strats onto 2 cores with 600 seconds (600 total)
% 0.37/0.62 # Starting G-E--_301_C18_F1_URBAN_S5PRR_S0Y with 45s (1) cores
% 0.37/0.62 # Starting new_bool_3 with 61s (1) cores
% 0.37/0.62 # G-E--_301_C18_F1_URBAN_S5PRR_S0Y with pid 11711 completed with status 0
% 0.37/0.62 # Result found by G-E--_301_C18_F1_URBAN_S5PRR_S0Y
% 0.37/0.62 # Preprocessing class: FSLMSMSMSSSNFFN.
% 0.37/0.62 # Scheduled 4 strats onto 8 cores with 300 seconds (2400 total)
% 0.37/0.62 # Starting G-E--_207_C18_F1_AE_CS_SP_PI_PS_S2S with 1200s (4) cores
% 0.37/0.62 # Starting new_bool_3 with 600s (2) cores
% 0.37/0.62 # SinE strategy is GSinE(CountFormulas,hypos,1.5,,3,20000,1.0)
% 0.37/0.62 # Search class: FGHSM-FSLM32-DFFFFFNN
% 0.37/0.62 # Scheduled 13 strats onto 2 cores with 600 seconds (600 total)
% 0.37/0.62 # Starting G-E--_301_C18_F1_URBAN_S5PRR_S0Y with 45s (1) cores
% 0.37/0.62 # Preprocessing time : 0.032 s
% 0.37/0.62
% 0.37/0.62 # Proof found!
% 0.37/0.62 # SZS status Unsatisfiable
% 0.37/0.62 # SZS output start CNFRefutation
% See solution above
% 0.37/0.62 # Parsed axioms : 666
% 0.37/0.62 # Removed by relevancy pruning/SinE : 230
% 0.37/0.62 # Initial clauses : 436
% 0.37/0.62 # Removed in clause preprocessing : 0
% 0.37/0.62 # Initial clauses in saturation : 436
% 0.37/0.62 # Processed clauses : 56
% 0.37/0.62 # ...of these trivial : 4
% 0.37/0.62 # ...subsumed : 19
% 0.37/0.62 # ...remaining for further processing : 33
% 0.37/0.62 # Other redundant clauses eliminated : 0
% 0.37/0.62 # Clauses deleted for lack of memory : 0
% 0.37/0.62 # Backward-subsumed : 0
% 0.37/0.62 # Backward-rewritten : 0
% 0.37/0.62 # Generated clauses : 4
% 0.37/0.62 # ...of the previous two non-redundant : 0
% 0.37/0.62 # ...aggressively subsumed : 0
% 0.37/0.62 # Contextual simplify-reflections : 0
% 0.37/0.62 # Paramodulations : 2
% 0.37/0.62 # Factorizations : 0
% 0.37/0.62 # NegExts : 0
% 0.37/0.62 # Equation resolutions : 2
% 0.37/0.62 # Total rewrite steps : 7
% 0.37/0.62 # Propositional unsat checks : 0
% 0.37/0.62 # Propositional check models : 0
% 0.37/0.62 # Propositional check unsatisfiable : 0
% 0.37/0.62 # Propositional clauses : 0
% 0.37/0.62 # Propositional clauses after purity: 0
% 0.37/0.62 # Propositional unsat core size : 0
% 0.37/0.62 # Propositional preprocessing time : 0.000
% 0.37/0.62 # Propositional encoding time : 0.000
% 0.37/0.62 # Propositional solver time : 0.000
% 0.37/0.62 # Success case prop preproc time : 0.000
% 0.37/0.62 # Success case prop encoding time : 0.000
% 0.37/0.62 # Success case prop solver time : 0.000
% 0.37/0.62 # Current number of processed clauses : 33
% 0.37/0.62 # Positive orientable unit clauses : 9
% 0.37/0.62 # Positive unorientable unit clauses: 0
% 0.37/0.62 # Negative unit clauses : 19
% 0.37/0.62 # Non-unit-clauses : 5
% 0.37/0.62 # Current number of unprocessed clauses: 380
% 0.37/0.62 # ...number of literals in the above : 626
% 0.37/0.62 # Current number of archived formulas : 0
% 0.37/0.62 # Current number of archived clauses : 0
% 0.37/0.62 # Clause-clause subsumption calls (NU) : 16
% 0.37/0.62 # Rec. Clause-clause subsumption calls : 10
% 0.37/0.62 # Non-unit clause-clause subsumptions : 0
% 0.37/0.62 # Unit Clause-clause subsumption calls : 136
% 0.37/0.62 # Rewrite failures with RHS unbound : 0
% 0.37/0.62 # BW rewrite match attempts : 0
% 0.37/0.62 # BW rewrite match successes : 0
% 0.37/0.62 # Condensation attempts : 0
% 0.37/0.62 # Condensation successes : 0
% 0.37/0.62 # Termbank termtop insertions : 21536
% 0.37/0.62
% 0.37/0.62 # -------------------------------------------------
% 0.37/0.62 # User time : 0.034 s
% 0.37/0.62 # System time : 0.009 s
% 0.37/0.62 # Total time : 0.043 s
% 0.37/0.62 # Maximum resident set size: 2804 pages
% 0.37/0.62
% 0.37/0.62 # -------------------------------------------------
% 0.37/0.62 # User time : 0.082 s
% 0.37/0.62 # System time : 0.013 s
% 0.37/0.62 # Total time : 0.096 s
% 0.37/0.62 # Maximum resident set size: 2212 pages
% 0.37/0.62 % E---3.1 exiting
% 0.37/0.62 % E---3.1 exiting
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------