TSTP Solution File: SWV920-10 by E-SAT---3.1

View Problem - Process Solution

%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
% File     : E-SAT---3.1
% Problem  : SWV920-10 : TPTP v8.1.2. Released v7.5.0.
% Transfm  : none
% Format   : tptp:raw
% Command  : run_E %s %d THM

% Computer : n029.cluster.edu
% Model    : x86_64 x86_64
% CPU      : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 2.10GHz
% Memory   : 8042.1875MB
% OS       : Linux 3.10.0-693.el7.x86_64
% CPULimit : 2400s
% WCLimit  : 300s
% DateTime : Tue Oct 10 20:08:08 EDT 2023

% Result   : Satisfiable 0.17s 0.45s
% Output   : Saturation 0.17s
% Verified : 
% SZS Type : ERROR: Analysing output (Could not find formula named cls_conjecture_0)

% Comments : 
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
cnf(c_0_13,axiom,
    ifeq(c_Conform_Olconf(X1,X2,X3,X4,X5),true,ifeq(c_Objects_Ohext(X2,X6),true,c_Conform_Olconf(X1,X6,X3,X4,X5),true),true) = true,
    cls_lconf__hext_0,
    [final] ).

cnf(c_0_14,axiom,
    c_Conform_Olconf(v_P,v_ha______,v_la______,v_E____,tc_prod(tc_List_Olist(tc_List_Olist(tc_String_Ochar)),tc_Expr_Oexp(tc_List_Olist(tc_String_Ochar)))) = true,
    cls_RedNew_I5_J_0,
    [final] ).

cnf(c_0_15,axiom,
    ifeq(X1,X1,X2,X3) = X2,
    ifeq_axiom_001,
    [final] ).

cnf(c_0_16,axiom,
    c_Objects_Ohext(X1,X1) = true,
    cls_hext__refl_0,
    [final] ).

cnf(c_0_17,axiom,
    ifeq(c_Objects_Ohext(X1,X2),true,ifeq(c_Objects_Ohext(X3,X1),true,c_Objects_Ohext(X3,X2),true),true) = true,
    cls_hext__trans_0,
    [final] ).

cnf(c_0_18,negated_conjecture,
    c_Conform_Olconf(v_P,v_h_Ha______,v_la______,v_E____,tc_prod(tc_List_Olist(tc_List_Olist(tc_String_Ochar)),tc_Expr_Oexp(tc_List_Olist(tc_String_Ochar)))) != true,
    cls_conjecture_0,
    [final] ).

cnf(c_0_19,plain,
    ifeq(c_Conform_Olconf(v_P,X1,v_la______,v_E____,tc_prod(tc_List_Olist(tc_List_Olist(tc_String_Ochar)),tc_Expr_Oexp(tc_List_Olist(tc_String_Ochar)))),true,ifeq(c_Objects_Ohext(X1,v_ha______),true,true,true),true) = true,
    inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_13,c_0_14]),
    [final] ).

cnf(c_0_20,plain,
    ifeq(c_Objects_Ohext(v_ha______,X1),true,c_Conform_Olconf(v_P,X1,v_la______,v_E____,tc_prod(tc_List_Olist(tc_List_Olist(tc_String_Ochar)),tc_Expr_Oexp(tc_List_Olist(tc_String_Ochar)))),true) = true,
    inference(rw,[status(thm)],[inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_13,c_0_14]),c_0_15]),
    [final] ).

cnf(c_0_21,plain,
    ifeq(c_Conform_Olconf(X1,X2,X3,X4,X5),true,c_Conform_Olconf(X1,X2,X3,X4,X5),true) = true,
    inference(rw,[status(thm)],[inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_13,c_0_16]),c_0_15]),
    [final] ).

cnf(c_0_22,axiom,
    v_h_Ha______ = c_Fun_Ofun__upd(v_ha______,v_a______,c_Option_Ooption_OSome(c_Pair(v_C______,c_Objects_Oinit__fields(v_FDTs______),tc_List_Olist(tc_String_Ochar),tc_fun(tc_prod(tc_List_Olist(tc_String_Ochar),tc_List_Olist(tc_String_Ochar)),tc_Option_Ooption(tc_Value_Oval))),tc_prod(tc_List_Olist(tc_String_Ochar),tc_fun(tc_prod(tc_List_Olist(tc_String_Ochar),tc_List_Olist(tc_String_Ochar)),tc_Option_Ooption(tc_Value_Oval)))),tc_nat,tc_Option_Ooption(tc_prod(tc_List_Olist(tc_String_Ochar),tc_fun(tc_prod(tc_List_Olist(tc_String_Ochar),tc_List_Olist(tc_String_Ochar)),tc_Option_Ooption(tc_Value_Oval))))),
    cls_CHAINED_0_02,
    [final] ).

cnf(c_0_23,plain,
    ifeq(c_Objects_Ohext(X1,X2),true,ifeq(c_Objects_Ohext(X2,X1),true,true,true),true) = true,
    inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_17,c_0_16]),
    [final] ).

cnf(c_0_24,plain,
    ifeq(c_Objects_Ohext(X1,X2),true,c_Objects_Ohext(X1,X2),true) = true,
    inference(rw,[status(thm)],[inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_17,c_0_16]),c_0_15]),
    [final] ).

cnf(c_0_25,axiom,
    c_WellTypeRT_OWTrt(v_P,v_ha______,v_E____,c_Expr_Oexp_Onew(v_C______,tc_List_Olist(tc_String_Ochar)),v_T____) = true,
    cls_CHAINED_0_01,
    [final] ).

cnf(c_0_26,axiom,
    c_TypeRel_OFields(v_P,v_C______,v_FDTs______,tc_prod(tc_List_Olist(tc_List_Olist(tc_String_Ochar)),tc_Expr_Oexp(tc_List_Olist(tc_String_Ochar)))) = true,
    cls_CHAINED_0_03,
    [final] ).

cnf(c_0_27,axiom,
    ifeq2(c_fequal(X1,X2,X3),true,X1,X2) = X2,
    cls_ATP__Linkup_Ofequal__imp__equal_0,
    [final] ).

cnf(c_0_28,axiom,
    ifeq2(X1,X1,X2,X3) = X2,
    ifeq_axiom,
    [final] ).

cnf(c_0_29,axiom,
    c_fequal(X1,X1,X2) = true,
    cls_ATP__Linkup_Oequal__imp__fequal_0,
    [final] ).

cnf(c_0_30,axiom,
    c_Objects_Onew__Addr(v_ha______) = c_Option_Ooption_OSome(v_a______,tc_nat),
    cls_CHAINED_0_04,
    [final] ).

%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
%----ORIGINAL SYSTEM OUTPUT
% 0.06/0.11  % Problem    : SWV920-10 : TPTP v8.1.2. Released v7.5.0.
% 0.06/0.12  % Command    : run_E %s %d THM
% 0.12/0.32  % Computer : n029.cluster.edu
% 0.12/0.32  % Model    : x86_64 x86_64
% 0.12/0.32  % CPU      : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 @ 2.10GHz
% 0.12/0.32  % Memory   : 8042.1875MB
% 0.12/0.32  % OS       : Linux 3.10.0-693.el7.x86_64
% 0.12/0.32  % CPULimit   : 2400
% 0.12/0.32  % WCLimit    : 300
% 0.12/0.32  % DateTime   : Tue Oct  3 03:25:52 EDT 2023
% 0.12/0.32  % CPUTime    : 
% 0.17/0.44  Running first-order model finding
% 0.17/0.44  Running: /export/starexec/sandbox2/solver/bin/eprover --delete-bad-limit=2000000000 --definitional-cnf=24 -s --print-statistics -R --print-version --proof-object --satauto-schedule=8 --cpu-limit=300 /export/starexec/sandbox2/tmp/tmp.giF3dLyfJF/E---3.1_29821.p
% 0.17/0.45  # Version: 3.1pre001
% 0.17/0.45  # Preprocessing class: FSMSSMSMSSSNFFN.
% 0.17/0.45  # Scheduled 4 strats onto 8 cores with 300 seconds (2400 total)
% 0.17/0.45  # Starting G-E--_207_C18_F1_SE_CS_SP_PI_PS_S2SI with 1500s (5) cores
% 0.17/0.45  # Starting new_bool_3 with 300s (1) cores
% 0.17/0.45  # Starting new_bool_1 with 300s (1) cores
% 0.17/0.45  # Starting sh5l with 300s (1) cores
% 0.17/0.45  # G-E--_207_C18_F1_SE_CS_SP_PI_PS_S2SI with pid 29898 completed with status 1
% 0.17/0.45  # Result found by G-E--_207_C18_F1_SE_CS_SP_PI_PS_S2SI
% 0.17/0.45  # Preprocessing class: FSMSSMSMSSSNFFN.
% 0.17/0.45  # Scheduled 4 strats onto 8 cores with 300 seconds (2400 total)
% 0.17/0.45  # Starting G-E--_207_C18_F1_SE_CS_SP_PI_PS_S2SI with 1500s (5) cores
% 0.17/0.45  # No SInE strategy applied
% 0.17/0.45  # Search class: FUUPM-FFSM32-DFFFFFNN
% 0.17/0.45  # partial match(1): FUUPM-FFMM32-DFFFFFNN
% 0.17/0.45  # Scheduled 6 strats onto 5 cores with 1500 seconds (1500 total)
% 0.17/0.45  # Starting G-E--_208_C18C--_F1_SE_CS_SP_PS_S5PRR_RG_S04AN with 811s (1) cores
% 0.17/0.45  # Starting G-E--_207_C18_F1_SE_CS_SP_PI_PS_S2SI with 151s (1) cores
% 0.17/0.45  # Starting new_bool_3 with 136s (1) cores
% 0.17/0.45  # Starting new_bool_1 with 136s (1) cores
% 0.17/0.45  # Starting sh5l with 136s (1) cores
% 0.17/0.45  # G-E--_208_C18C--_F1_SE_CS_SP_PS_S5PRR_RG_S04AN with pid 29902 completed with status 1
% 0.17/0.45  # Result found by G-E--_208_C18C--_F1_SE_CS_SP_PS_S5PRR_RG_S04AN
% 0.17/0.45  # Preprocessing class: FSMSSMSMSSSNFFN.
% 0.17/0.45  # Scheduled 4 strats onto 8 cores with 300 seconds (2400 total)
% 0.17/0.45  # Starting G-E--_207_C18_F1_SE_CS_SP_PI_PS_S2SI with 1500s (5) cores
% 0.17/0.45  # No SInE strategy applied
% 0.17/0.45  # Search class: FUUPM-FFSM32-DFFFFFNN
% 0.17/0.45  # partial match(1): FUUPM-FFMM32-DFFFFFNN
% 0.17/0.45  # Scheduled 6 strats onto 5 cores with 1500 seconds (1500 total)
% 0.17/0.45  # Starting G-E--_208_C18C--_F1_SE_CS_SP_PS_S5PRR_RG_S04AN with 811s (1) cores
% 0.17/0.45  # Preprocessing time       : 0.001 s
% 0.17/0.45  # Presaturation interreduction done
% 0.17/0.45  
% 0.17/0.45  # No proof found!
% 0.17/0.45  # SZS status Satisfiable
% 0.17/0.45  # SZS output start Saturation
% See solution above
% 0.17/0.45  # Parsed axioms                        : 16
% 0.17/0.45  # Removed by relevancy pruning/SinE    : 0
% 0.17/0.45  # Initial clauses                      : 16
% 0.17/0.45  # Removed in clause preprocessing      : 2
% 0.17/0.45  # Initial clauses in saturation        : 14
% 0.17/0.45  # Processed clauses                    : 33
% 0.17/0.45  # ...of these trivial                  : 2
% 0.17/0.45  # ...subsumed                          : 0
% 0.17/0.45  # ...remaining for further processing  : 31
% 0.17/0.45  # Other redundant clauses eliminated   : 0
% 0.17/0.45  # Clauses deleted for lack of memory   : 0
% 0.17/0.45  # Backward-subsumed                    : 0
% 0.17/0.45  # Backward-rewritten                   : 0
% 0.17/0.45  # Generated clauses                    : 19
% 0.17/0.45  # ...of the previous two non-redundant : 6
% 0.17/0.45  # ...aggressively subsumed             : 0
% 0.17/0.45  # Contextual simplify-reflections      : 0
% 0.17/0.45  # Paramodulations                      : 19
% 0.17/0.45  # Factorizations                       : 0
% 0.17/0.45  # NegExts                              : 0
% 0.17/0.45  # Equation resolutions                 : 0
% 0.17/0.45  # Total rewrite steps                  : 31
% 0.17/0.45  # Propositional unsat checks           : 0
% 0.17/0.45  #    Propositional check models        : 0
% 0.17/0.45  #    Propositional check unsatisfiable : 0
% 0.17/0.45  #    Propositional clauses             : 0
% 0.17/0.45  #    Propositional clauses after purity: 0
% 0.17/0.45  #    Propositional unsat core size     : 0
% 0.17/0.45  #    Propositional preprocessing time  : 0.000
% 0.17/0.45  #    Propositional encoding time       : 0.000
% 0.17/0.45  #    Propositional solver time         : 0.000
% 0.17/0.45  #    Success case prop preproc time    : 0.000
% 0.17/0.45  #    Success case prop encoding time   : 0.000
% 0.17/0.45  #    Success case prop solver time     : 0.000
% 0.17/0.45  # Current number of processed clauses  : 18
% 0.17/0.45  #    Positive orientable unit clauses  : 17
% 0.17/0.45  #    Positive unorientable unit clauses: 0
% 0.17/0.45  #    Negative unit clauses             : 1
% 0.17/0.45  #    Non-unit-clauses                  : 0
% 0.17/0.45  # Current number of unprocessed clauses: 0
% 0.17/0.45  # ...number of literals in the above   : 0
% 0.17/0.45  # Current number of archived formulas  : 0
% 0.17/0.45  # Current number of archived clauses   : 14
% 0.17/0.45  # Clause-clause subsumption calls (NU) : 0
% 0.17/0.45  # Rec. Clause-clause subsumption calls : 0
% 0.17/0.45  # Non-unit clause-clause subsumptions  : 0
% 0.17/0.45  # Unit Clause-clause subsumption calls : 0
% 0.17/0.45  # Rewrite failures with RHS unbound    : 0
% 0.17/0.45  # BW rewrite match attempts            : 7
% 0.17/0.45  # BW rewrite match successes           : 0
% 0.17/0.45  # Condensation attempts                : 0
% 0.17/0.45  # Condensation successes               : 0
% 0.17/0.45  # Termbank termtop insertions          : 716
% 0.17/0.45  
% 0.17/0.45  # -------------------------------------------------
% 0.17/0.45  # User time                : 0.004 s
% 0.17/0.45  # System time              : 0.001 s
% 0.17/0.45  # Total time               : 0.004 s
% 0.17/0.45  # Maximum resident set size: 1664 pages
% 0.17/0.45  
% 0.17/0.45  # -------------------------------------------------
% 0.17/0.45  # User time                : 0.017 s
% 0.17/0.45  # System time              : 0.002 s
% 0.17/0.45  # Total time               : 0.019 s
% 0.17/0.45  # Maximum resident set size: 1684 pages
% 0.17/0.45  % E---3.1 exiting
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------