TSTP Solution File: SWV920-10 by E---3.1
View Problem
- Process Solution
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
% File : E---3.1
% Problem : SWV920-10 : TPTP v8.1.2. Released v7.5.0.
% Transfm : none
% Format : tptp:raw
% Command : run_E %s %d THM
% Computer : n015.cluster.edu
% Model : x86_64 x86_64
% CPU : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 2.10GHz
% Memory : 8042.1875MB
% OS : Linux 3.10.0-693.el7.x86_64
% CPULimit : 2400s
% WCLimit : 300s
% DateTime : Tue Oct 10 19:55:38 EDT 2023
% Result : Satisfiable 0.21s 0.50s
% Output : Saturation 0.21s
% Verified :
% SZS Type : ERROR: Analysing output (Could not find formula named cls_conjecture_0)
% Comments :
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
cnf(c_0_13,axiom,
ifeq(c_Conform_Olconf(X1,X2,X3,X4,X5),true,ifeq(c_Objects_Ohext(X2,X6),true,c_Conform_Olconf(X1,X6,X3,X4,X5),true),true) = true,
cls_lconf__hext_0,
[final] ).
cnf(c_0_14,axiom,
c_Conform_Olconf(v_P,v_ha______,v_la______,v_E____,tc_prod(tc_List_Olist(tc_List_Olist(tc_String_Ochar)),tc_Expr_Oexp(tc_List_Olist(tc_String_Ochar)))) = true,
cls_RedNew_I5_J_0,
[final] ).
cnf(c_0_15,axiom,
ifeq(X1,X1,X2,X3) = X2,
ifeq_axiom_001,
[final] ).
cnf(c_0_16,axiom,
c_Objects_Ohext(X1,X1) = true,
cls_hext__refl_0,
[final] ).
cnf(c_0_17,axiom,
ifeq(c_Objects_Ohext(X1,X2),true,ifeq(c_Objects_Ohext(X3,X1),true,c_Objects_Ohext(X3,X2),true),true) = true,
cls_hext__trans_0,
[final] ).
cnf(c_0_18,negated_conjecture,
c_Conform_Olconf(v_P,v_h_Ha______,v_la______,v_E____,tc_prod(tc_List_Olist(tc_List_Olist(tc_String_Ochar)),tc_Expr_Oexp(tc_List_Olist(tc_String_Ochar)))) != true,
cls_conjecture_0,
[final] ).
cnf(c_0_19,plain,
ifeq(c_Conform_Olconf(v_P,X1,v_la______,v_E____,tc_prod(tc_List_Olist(tc_List_Olist(tc_String_Ochar)),tc_Expr_Oexp(tc_List_Olist(tc_String_Ochar)))),true,ifeq(c_Objects_Ohext(X1,v_ha______),true,true,true),true) = true,
inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_13,c_0_14]),
[final] ).
cnf(c_0_20,plain,
ifeq(c_Objects_Ohext(v_ha______,X1),true,c_Conform_Olconf(v_P,X1,v_la______,v_E____,tc_prod(tc_List_Olist(tc_List_Olist(tc_String_Ochar)),tc_Expr_Oexp(tc_List_Olist(tc_String_Ochar)))),true) = true,
inference(rw,[status(thm)],[inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_13,c_0_14]),c_0_15]),
[final] ).
cnf(c_0_21,plain,
ifeq(c_Conform_Olconf(X1,X2,X3,X4,X5),true,c_Conform_Olconf(X1,X2,X3,X4,X5),true) = true,
inference(rw,[status(thm)],[inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_13,c_0_16]),c_0_15]),
[final] ).
cnf(c_0_22,axiom,
v_h_Ha______ = c_Fun_Ofun__upd(v_ha______,v_a______,c_Option_Ooption_OSome(c_Pair(v_C______,c_Objects_Oinit__fields(v_FDTs______),tc_List_Olist(tc_String_Ochar),tc_fun(tc_prod(tc_List_Olist(tc_String_Ochar),tc_List_Olist(tc_String_Ochar)),tc_Option_Ooption(tc_Value_Oval))),tc_prod(tc_List_Olist(tc_String_Ochar),tc_fun(tc_prod(tc_List_Olist(tc_String_Ochar),tc_List_Olist(tc_String_Ochar)),tc_Option_Ooption(tc_Value_Oval)))),tc_nat,tc_Option_Ooption(tc_prod(tc_List_Olist(tc_String_Ochar),tc_fun(tc_prod(tc_List_Olist(tc_String_Ochar),tc_List_Olist(tc_String_Ochar)),tc_Option_Ooption(tc_Value_Oval))))),
cls_CHAINED_0_02,
[final] ).
cnf(c_0_23,plain,
ifeq(c_Objects_Ohext(X1,X2),true,ifeq(c_Objects_Ohext(X2,X1),true,true,true),true) = true,
inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_17,c_0_16]),
[final] ).
cnf(c_0_24,plain,
ifeq(c_Objects_Ohext(X1,X2),true,c_Objects_Ohext(X1,X2),true) = true,
inference(rw,[status(thm)],[inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_17,c_0_16]),c_0_15]),
[final] ).
cnf(c_0_25,axiom,
c_WellTypeRT_OWTrt(v_P,v_ha______,v_E____,c_Expr_Oexp_Onew(v_C______,tc_List_Olist(tc_String_Ochar)),v_T____) = true,
cls_CHAINED_0_01,
[final] ).
cnf(c_0_26,axiom,
c_TypeRel_OFields(v_P,v_C______,v_FDTs______,tc_prod(tc_List_Olist(tc_List_Olist(tc_String_Ochar)),tc_Expr_Oexp(tc_List_Olist(tc_String_Ochar)))) = true,
cls_CHAINED_0_03,
[final] ).
cnf(c_0_27,axiom,
ifeq2(c_fequal(X1,X2,X3),true,X1,X2) = X2,
cls_ATP__Linkup_Ofequal__imp__equal_0,
[final] ).
cnf(c_0_28,axiom,
ifeq2(X1,X1,X2,X3) = X2,
ifeq_axiom,
[final] ).
cnf(c_0_29,axiom,
c_fequal(X1,X1,X2) = true,
cls_ATP__Linkup_Oequal__imp__fequal_0,
[final] ).
cnf(c_0_30,axiom,
c_Objects_Onew__Addr(v_ha______) = c_Option_Ooption_OSome(v_a______,tc_nat),
cls_CHAINED_0_04,
[final] ).
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
%----ORIGINAL SYSTEM OUTPUT
% 0.06/0.12 % Problem : SWV920-10 : TPTP v8.1.2. Released v7.5.0.
% 0.06/0.14 % Command : run_E %s %d THM
% 0.13/0.35 % Computer : n015.cluster.edu
% 0.13/0.35 % Model : x86_64 x86_64
% 0.13/0.35 % CPU : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 @ 2.10GHz
% 0.13/0.35 % Memory : 8042.1875MB
% 0.13/0.35 % OS : Linux 3.10.0-693.el7.x86_64
% 0.13/0.35 % CPULimit : 2400
% 0.13/0.35 % WCLimit : 300
% 0.13/0.35 % DateTime : Tue Oct 3 03:27:01 EDT 2023
% 0.13/0.35 % CPUTime :
% 0.21/0.48 Running first-order theorem proving
% 0.21/0.48 Running: /export/starexec/sandbox/solver/bin/eprover --delete-bad-limit=2000000000 --definitional-cnf=24 -s --print-statistics -R --print-version --proof-object --auto-schedule=8 --cpu-limit=300 /export/starexec/sandbox/tmp/tmp.SR1bC7Y6RI/E---3.1_381.p
% 0.21/0.50 # Version: 3.1pre001
% 0.21/0.50 # Preprocessing class: FSMSSMSMSSSNFFN.
% 0.21/0.50 # Scheduled 4 strats onto 8 cores with 300 seconds (2400 total)
% 0.21/0.50 # Starting G-E--_207_C18_F1_SE_CS_SP_PI_PS_S2SI with 1500s (5) cores
% 0.21/0.50 # Starting new_bool_3 with 300s (1) cores
% 0.21/0.50 # Starting new_bool_1 with 300s (1) cores
% 0.21/0.50 # Starting sh5l with 300s (1) cores
% 0.21/0.50 # G-E--_207_C18_F1_SE_CS_SP_PI_PS_S2SI with pid 459 completed with status 1
% 0.21/0.50 # Result found by G-E--_207_C18_F1_SE_CS_SP_PI_PS_S2SI
% 0.21/0.50 # Preprocessing class: FSMSSMSMSSSNFFN.
% 0.21/0.50 # Scheduled 4 strats onto 8 cores with 300 seconds (2400 total)
% 0.21/0.50 # Starting G-E--_207_C18_F1_SE_CS_SP_PI_PS_S2SI with 1500s (5) cores
% 0.21/0.50 # No SInE strategy applied
% 0.21/0.50 # Search class: FUUPM-FFSM32-DFFFFFNN
% 0.21/0.50 # partial match(1): FUUPM-FFMM32-DFFFFFNN
% 0.21/0.50 # Scheduled 6 strats onto 5 cores with 1500 seconds (1500 total)
% 0.21/0.50 # Starting G-E--_208_C18C--_F1_SE_CS_SP_PS_S5PRR_RG_S04AN with 811s (1) cores
% 0.21/0.50 # Starting G-E--_207_C18_F1_SE_CS_SP_PI_PS_S2SI with 151s (1) cores
% 0.21/0.50 # Starting new_bool_3 with 136s (1) cores
% 0.21/0.50 # Starting new_bool_1 with 136s (1) cores
% 0.21/0.50 # Starting sh5l with 136s (1) cores
% 0.21/0.50 # G-E--_208_C18C--_F1_SE_CS_SP_PS_S5PRR_RG_S04AN with pid 464 completed with status 1
% 0.21/0.50 # Result found by G-E--_208_C18C--_F1_SE_CS_SP_PS_S5PRR_RG_S04AN
% 0.21/0.50 # Preprocessing class: FSMSSMSMSSSNFFN.
% 0.21/0.50 # Scheduled 4 strats onto 8 cores with 300 seconds (2400 total)
% 0.21/0.50 # Starting G-E--_207_C18_F1_SE_CS_SP_PI_PS_S2SI with 1500s (5) cores
% 0.21/0.50 # No SInE strategy applied
% 0.21/0.50 # Search class: FUUPM-FFSM32-DFFFFFNN
% 0.21/0.50 # partial match(1): FUUPM-FFMM32-DFFFFFNN
% 0.21/0.50 # Scheduled 6 strats onto 5 cores with 1500 seconds (1500 total)
% 0.21/0.50 # Starting G-E--_208_C18C--_F1_SE_CS_SP_PS_S5PRR_RG_S04AN with 811s (1) cores
% 0.21/0.50 # Preprocessing time : 0.001 s
% 0.21/0.50 # Presaturation interreduction done
% 0.21/0.50
% 0.21/0.50 # No proof found!
% 0.21/0.50 # SZS status Satisfiable
% 0.21/0.50 # SZS output start Saturation
% See solution above
% 0.21/0.50 # Parsed axioms : 16
% 0.21/0.50 # Removed by relevancy pruning/SinE : 0
% 0.21/0.50 # Initial clauses : 16
% 0.21/0.50 # Removed in clause preprocessing : 2
% 0.21/0.50 # Initial clauses in saturation : 14
% 0.21/0.50 # Processed clauses : 33
% 0.21/0.50 # ...of these trivial : 2
% 0.21/0.50 # ...subsumed : 0
% 0.21/0.50 # ...remaining for further processing : 31
% 0.21/0.50 # Other redundant clauses eliminated : 0
% 0.21/0.50 # Clauses deleted for lack of memory : 0
% 0.21/0.50 # Backward-subsumed : 0
% 0.21/0.50 # Backward-rewritten : 0
% 0.21/0.50 # Generated clauses : 19
% 0.21/0.50 # ...of the previous two non-redundant : 6
% 0.21/0.50 # ...aggressively subsumed : 0
% 0.21/0.50 # Contextual simplify-reflections : 0
% 0.21/0.50 # Paramodulations : 19
% 0.21/0.50 # Factorizations : 0
% 0.21/0.50 # NegExts : 0
% 0.21/0.50 # Equation resolutions : 0
% 0.21/0.50 # Total rewrite steps : 31
% 0.21/0.50 # Propositional unsat checks : 0
% 0.21/0.50 # Propositional check models : 0
% 0.21/0.50 # Propositional check unsatisfiable : 0
% 0.21/0.50 # Propositional clauses : 0
% 0.21/0.50 # Propositional clauses after purity: 0
% 0.21/0.50 # Propositional unsat core size : 0
% 0.21/0.50 # Propositional preprocessing time : 0.000
% 0.21/0.50 # Propositional encoding time : 0.000
% 0.21/0.50 # Propositional solver time : 0.000
% 0.21/0.50 # Success case prop preproc time : 0.000
% 0.21/0.50 # Success case prop encoding time : 0.000
% 0.21/0.50 # Success case prop solver time : 0.000
% 0.21/0.50 # Current number of processed clauses : 18
% 0.21/0.50 # Positive orientable unit clauses : 17
% 0.21/0.50 # Positive unorientable unit clauses: 0
% 0.21/0.50 # Negative unit clauses : 1
% 0.21/0.50 # Non-unit-clauses : 0
% 0.21/0.50 # Current number of unprocessed clauses: 0
% 0.21/0.50 # ...number of literals in the above : 0
% 0.21/0.50 # Current number of archived formulas : 0
% 0.21/0.50 # Current number of archived clauses : 14
% 0.21/0.50 # Clause-clause subsumption calls (NU) : 0
% 0.21/0.50 # Rec. Clause-clause subsumption calls : 0
% 0.21/0.50 # Non-unit clause-clause subsumptions : 0
% 0.21/0.50 # Unit Clause-clause subsumption calls : 0
% 0.21/0.50 # Rewrite failures with RHS unbound : 0
% 0.21/0.50 # BW rewrite match attempts : 7
% 0.21/0.50 # BW rewrite match successes : 0
% 0.21/0.50 # Condensation attempts : 0
% 0.21/0.50 # Condensation successes : 0
% 0.21/0.50 # Termbank termtop insertions : 716
% 0.21/0.50
% 0.21/0.50 # -------------------------------------------------
% 0.21/0.50 # User time : 0.003 s
% 0.21/0.50 # System time : 0.001 s
% 0.21/0.50 # Total time : 0.004 s
% 0.21/0.50 # Maximum resident set size: 1664 pages
% 0.21/0.50
% 0.21/0.50 # -------------------------------------------------
% 0.21/0.50 # User time : 0.012 s
% 0.21/0.50 # System time : 0.006 s
% 0.21/0.50 # Total time : 0.018 s
% 0.21/0.50 # Maximum resident set size: 1692 pages
% 0.21/0.50 % E---3.1 exiting
% 0.21/0.50 % E---3.1 exiting
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------