TSTP Solution File: SWV920-1 by iProver---3.8
View Problem
- Process Solution
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
% File : iProver---3.8
% Problem : SWV920-1 : TPTP v8.1.2. Released v4.1.0.
% Transfm : none
% Format : tptp:raw
% Command : run_iprover %s %d THM
% Computer : n022.cluster.edu
% Model : x86_64 x86_64
% CPU : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 2.10GHz
% Memory : 8042.1875MB
% OS : Linux 3.10.0-693.el7.x86_64
% CPULimit : 300s
% WCLimit : 300s
% DateTime : Thu Aug 31 22:43:06 EDT 2023
% Result : Satisfiable 0.48s 1.18s
% Output : Saturation 0.48s
% Verified :
% SZS Type : ERROR: Analysing output (MakeTreeStats fails)
% Comments :
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
cnf(c_49,plain,
c_Objects_Ohext(X0,X0),
file('/export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',cls_hext__refl_0) ).
cnf(c_50,plain,
( ~ c_Objects_Ohext(X0,X1)
| ~ c_Objects_Ohext(X1,X2)
| c_Objects_Ohext(X0,X2) ),
file('/export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',cls_hext__trans_0) ).
cnf(c_51,plain,
c_COMBI(X0,X1) = X0,
file('/export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',cls_COMBI__def_0) ).
cnf(c_53,plain,
( ~ c_Conform_Olconf(X0,X1,X2,X3,X4)
| ~ c_Objects_Ohext(X1,X5)
| c_Conform_Olconf(X0,X5,X2,X3,X4) ),
file('/export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',cls_lconf__hext_0) ).
cnf(c_55,plain,
c_Conform_Olconf(v_P,v_ha______,v_la______,v_E____,tc_prod(tc_List_Olist(tc_List_Olist(tc_String_Ochar)),tc_Expr_Oexp(tc_List_Olist(tc_String_Ochar)))),
file('/export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',cls_CHAINED_0) ).
cnf(c_56,plain,
c_WellTypeRT_OWTrt(v_P,v_ha______,v_E____,c_Expr_Oexp_Onew(v_C______,tc_List_Olist(tc_String_Ochar)),v_T____),
file('/export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',cls_CHAINED_0_01) ).
cnf(c_57,plain,
c_Fun_Ofun__upd(v_ha______,v_a______,c_Option_Ooption_OSome(c_Pair(v_C______,c_Objects_Oinit__fields(v_FDTs______),tc_List_Olist(tc_String_Ochar),tc_fun(tc_prod(tc_List_Olist(tc_String_Ochar),tc_List_Olist(tc_String_Ochar)),tc_Option_Ooption(tc_Value_Oval))),tc_prod(tc_List_Olist(tc_String_Ochar),tc_fun(tc_prod(tc_List_Olist(tc_String_Ochar),tc_List_Olist(tc_String_Ochar)),tc_Option_Ooption(tc_Value_Oval)))),tc_nat,tc_Option_Ooption(tc_prod(tc_List_Olist(tc_String_Ochar),tc_fun(tc_prod(tc_List_Olist(tc_String_Ochar),tc_List_Olist(tc_String_Ochar)),tc_Option_Ooption(tc_Value_Oval))))) = v_h_Ha______,
file('/export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',cls_CHAINED_0_02) ).
cnf(c_58,plain,
c_TypeRel_OFields(v_P,v_C______,v_FDTs______,tc_prod(tc_List_Olist(tc_List_Olist(tc_String_Ochar)),tc_Expr_Oexp(tc_List_Olist(tc_String_Ochar)))),
file('/export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',cls_CHAINED_0_03) ).
cnf(c_59,plain,
c_Option_Ooption_OSome(v_a______,tc_nat) = c_Objects_Onew__Addr(v_ha______),
file('/export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',cls_CHAINED_0_04) ).
cnf(c_60,negated_conjecture,
~ c_Conform_Olconf(v_P,v_h_Ha______,v_la______,v_E____,tc_prod(tc_List_Olist(tc_List_Olist(tc_String_Ochar)),tc_Expr_Oexp(tc_List_Olist(tc_String_Ochar)))),
file('/export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',cls_conjecture_0) ).
cnf(c_123,plain,
( X0 != X1
| X2 != X3
| X4 != X5
| X6 != X7
| X8 != X9
| ~ c_WellTypeRT_OWTrt(X1,X3,X5,X7,X9)
| c_WellTypeRT_OWTrt(X0,X2,X4,X6,X8) ),
theory(equality) ).
cnf(c_130,plain,
( X0 != X1
| X2 != X3
| X4 != X5
| X6 != X7
| ~ c_TypeRel_OFields(X1,X3,X5,X7)
| c_TypeRel_OFields(X0,X2,X4,X6) ),
theory(equality) ).
cnf(c_182,plain,
X0_1 = X0_1,
theory(equality) ).
cnf(c_431,plain,
( ~ c_Objects_Ohext(v_ha______,X0)
| c_Conform_Olconf(v_P,X0,v_la______,v_E____,tc_prod(tc_List_Olist(tc_List_Olist(tc_String_Ochar)),tc_Expr_Oexp(tc_List_Olist(tc_String_Ochar)))) ),
inference(superposition,[status(thm)],[c_55,c_53]) ).
cnf(c_439,plain,
( ~ c_Objects_Ohext(X0,X1)
| ~ c_Objects_Ohext(v_ha______,X0)
| c_Conform_Olconf(v_P,X1,v_la______,v_E____,tc_prod(tc_List_Olist(tc_List_Olist(tc_String_Ochar)),tc_Expr_Oexp(tc_List_Olist(tc_String_Ochar)))) ),
inference(superposition,[status(thm)],[c_431,c_53]) ).
cnf(c_440,plain,
~ c_Objects_Ohext(v_ha______,v_h_Ha______),
inference(superposition,[status(thm)],[c_431,c_60]) ).
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
%----ORIGINAL SYSTEM OUTPUT
% 0.07/0.12 % Problem : SWV920-1 : TPTP v8.1.2. Released v4.1.0.
% 0.07/0.13 % Command : run_iprover %s %d THM
% 0.13/0.34 % Computer : n022.cluster.edu
% 0.13/0.34 % Model : x86_64 x86_64
% 0.13/0.34 % CPU : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 @ 2.10GHz
% 0.13/0.34 % Memory : 8042.1875MB
% 0.13/0.34 % OS : Linux 3.10.0-693.el7.x86_64
% 0.13/0.34 % CPULimit : 300
% 0.13/0.34 % WCLimit : 300
% 0.13/0.34 % DateTime : Tue Aug 29 10:31:53 EDT 2023
% 0.13/0.34 % CPUTime :
% 0.20/0.47 Running first-order theorem proving
% 0.20/0.47 Running: /export/starexec/sandbox/solver/bin/run_problem --schedule fof_schedule --no_cores 8 /export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p 300
% 0.48/1.18 % SZS status Started for theBenchmark.p
% 0.48/1.18 % SZS status Satisfiable for theBenchmark.p
% 0.48/1.18
% 0.48/1.18 %---------------- iProver v3.8 (pre SMT-COMP 2023/CASC 2023) ----------------%
% 0.48/1.18
% 0.48/1.18 ------ iProver source info
% 0.48/1.18
% 0.48/1.18 git: date: 2023-05-31 18:12:56 +0000
% 0.48/1.18 git: sha1: 8abddc1f627fd3ce0bcb8b4cbf113b3cc443d7b6
% 0.48/1.18 git: non_committed_changes: false
% 0.48/1.18 git: last_make_outside_of_git: false
% 0.48/1.18
% 0.48/1.18 ------ Parsing...successful
% 0.48/1.18
% 0.48/1.18
% 0.48/1.18
% 0.48/1.18 ------ Preprocessing... sup_sim: 0 sf_s rm: 5 0s sf_e pe_s pe:1:0s pe_e sup_sim: 0 sf_s rm: 3 0s sf_e pe_s pe_e
% 0.48/1.18
% 0.48/1.18 ------ Preprocessing... gs_s sp: 0 0s gs_e snvd_s sp: 0 0s snvd_e
% 0.48/1.18
% 0.48/1.18 ------ Preprocessing... sf_s rm: 1 0s sf_e sf_s rm: 0 0s sf_e
% 0.48/1.18 ------ Proving...
% 0.48/1.18 ------ Problem Properties
% 0.48/1.18
% 0.48/1.18
% 0.48/1.18 clauses 8
% 0.48/1.18 conjectures 1
% 0.48/1.18 EPR 3
% 0.48/1.18 Horn 8
% 0.48/1.18 unary 6
% 0.48/1.18 binary 0
% 0.48/1.18 lits 12
% 0.48/1.18 lits eq 3
% 0.48/1.18 fd_pure 0
% 0.48/1.18 fd_pseudo 0
% 0.48/1.18 fd_cond 0
% 0.48/1.18 fd_pseudo_cond 0
% 0.48/1.18 AC symbols 0
% 0.48/1.18
% 0.48/1.18 ------ Schedule dynamic 5 is on
% 0.48/1.18
% 0.48/1.18 ------ Input Options "--resolution_flag false --inst_lit_sel_side none" Time Limit: 10.
% 0.48/1.18
% 0.48/1.18
% 0.48/1.18 ------
% 0.48/1.18 Current options:
% 0.48/1.18 ------
% 0.48/1.18
% 0.48/1.18
% 0.48/1.18
% 0.48/1.18
% 0.48/1.18 ------ Proving...
% 0.48/1.18
% 0.48/1.18
% 0.48/1.18 % SZS status Satisfiable for theBenchmark.p
% 0.48/1.18
% 0.48/1.18 % SZS output start Saturation for theBenchmark.p
% See solution above
% 0.48/1.18
% 0.48/1.18
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------