TSTP Solution File: SWV920-1 by Etableau---0.67
View Problem
- Process Solution
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
% File : Etableau---0.67
% Problem : SWV920-1 : TPTP v8.1.0. Released v4.1.0.
% Transfm : none
% Format : tptp:raw
% Command : etableau --auto --tsmdo --quicksat=10000 --tableau=1 --tableau-saturation=1 -s -p --tableau-cores=8 --cpu-limit=%d %s
% Computer : n007.cluster.edu
% Model : x86_64 x86_64
% CPU : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 2.10GHz
% Memory : 8042.1875MB
% OS : Linux 3.10.0-693.el7.x86_64
% CPULimit : 300s
% WCLimit : 600s
% DateTime : Wed Jul 20 18:23:57 EDT 2022
% Result : Satisfiable 0.12s 0.36s
% Output : CNFRefutation 0.12s
% Verified :
% SZS Type : -
% Comments :
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
%----WARNING: Could not form TPTP format derivation
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
%----ORIGINAL SYSTEM OUTPUT
% 0.06/0.12 % Problem : SWV920-1 : TPTP v8.1.0. Released v4.1.0.
% 0.06/0.12 % Command : etableau --auto --tsmdo --quicksat=10000 --tableau=1 --tableau-saturation=1 -s -p --tableau-cores=8 --cpu-limit=%d %s
% 0.12/0.33 % Computer : n007.cluster.edu
% 0.12/0.33 % Model : x86_64 x86_64
% 0.12/0.33 % CPU : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 @ 2.10GHz
% 0.12/0.33 % Memory : 8042.1875MB
% 0.12/0.33 % OS : Linux 3.10.0-693.el7.x86_64
% 0.12/0.33 % CPULimit : 300
% 0.12/0.33 % WCLimit : 600
% 0.12/0.33 % DateTime : Thu Jun 16 04:52:56 EDT 2022
% 0.12/0.33 % CPUTime :
% 0.12/0.36 # No SInE strategy applied
% 0.12/0.36 # Auto-Mode selected heuristic G_E___208_C18_F1_SE_CS_SP_PS_S5PRR_RG_S04AN
% 0.12/0.36 # and selection function SelectComplexExceptUniqMaxHorn.
% 0.12/0.36 #
% 0.12/0.36 # Presaturation interreduction done
% 0.12/0.36 # Number of axioms: 12 Number of unprocessed: 11
% 0.12/0.36 # Tableaux proof search.
% 0.12/0.36 # APR header successfully linked.
% 0.12/0.36 # Hello from C++
% 0.12/0.36 # The folding up rule is enabled...
% 0.12/0.36 # Local unification is enabled...
% 0.12/0.36 # Any saturation attempts will use folding labels...
% 0.12/0.36 # 11 beginning clauses after preprocessing and clausification
% 0.12/0.36 # Creating start rules for all 1 conjectures.
% 0.12/0.36 # There are 1 start rule candidates:
% 0.12/0.36 # Found 8 unit axioms.
% 0.12/0.36 # 1 start rule tableaux created.
% 0.12/0.36 # 3 extension rule candidate clauses
% 0.12/0.36 # 8 unit axiom clauses
% 0.12/0.36
% 0.12/0.36 # Requested 8, 32 cores available to the main process.
% 0.12/0.36 # There are not enough tableaux to fork, creating more from the initial 1
% 0.12/0.36 # Creating equality axioms
% 0.12/0.36 # Ran out of tableaux, making start rules for all clauses
% 0.12/0.36 # Returning from population with 12 new_tableaux and 0 remaining starting tableaux.
% 0.12/0.36 # We now have 12 tableaux to operate on
% 0.12/0.36 # 12581 Satisfiable branch
% 0.12/0.36 # 12584 Satisfiable branch
% 0.12/0.36 # 12582 Satisfiable branch
% 0.12/0.36 # Satisfiable branch found.
% 0.12/0.36 # There were 1 total branch saturation attempts.
% 0.12/0.36 # There were 0 of these attempts blocked.
% 0.12/0.36 # There were 0 deferred branch saturation attempts.
% 0.12/0.36 # There were 0 free duplicated saturations.
% 0.12/0.36 # There were 0 total successful branch saturations.
% 0.12/0.36 # There were 0 successful branch saturations in interreduction.
% 0.12/0.36 # There were 0 successful branch saturations on the branch.
% 0.12/0.36 # There were 0 successful branch saturations after the branch.
% 0.12/0.36 # SZS status Satisfiable for /export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p
% 0.12/0.36 # SZS output start for /export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p
% 0.12/0.36 # Begin clausification derivation
% 0.12/0.36
% 0.12/0.36 # End clausification derivation
% 0.12/0.36 # Begin listing active clauses obtained from FOF to CNF conversion
% 0.12/0.36 cnf(i_0_15, plain, (c_Objects_Ohext(X1,X1))).
% 0.12/0.36 cnf(i_0_18, plain, (c_Conform_Olconf(v_P,v_ha______,v_la______,v_E____,tc_prod(tc_List_Olist(tc_List_Olist(tc_String_Ochar)),tc_Expr_Oexp(tc_List_Olist(tc_String_Ochar)))))).
% 0.12/0.36 cnf(i_0_24, plain, (c_TypeRel_OFields(v_P,v_C______,v_FDTs______,tc_prod(tc_List_Olist(tc_List_Olist(tc_String_Ochar)),tc_Expr_Oexp(tc_List_Olist(tc_String_Ochar)))))).
% 0.12/0.36 cnf(i_0_25, plain, (c_Objects_Onew__Addr(v_ha______)=c_Option_Ooption_OSome(v_a______,tc_nat))).
% 0.12/0.36 cnf(i_0_27, plain, (c_fequal(X1,X1,X2))).
% 0.12/0.36 cnf(i_0_22, plain, (c_WellTypeRT_OWTrt(v_P,v_ha______,v_E____,c_Expr_Oexp_Onew(v_C______,tc_List_Olist(tc_String_Ochar)),v_T____))).
% 0.12/0.36 cnf(i_0_23, plain, (c_Fun_Ofun__upd(v_ha______,v_a______,c_Option_Ooption_OSome(c_Pair(v_C______,c_Objects_Oinit__fields(v_FDTs______),tc_List_Olist(tc_String_Ochar),tc_fun(tc_prod(tc_List_Olist(tc_String_Ochar),tc_List_Olist(tc_String_Ochar)),tc_Option_Ooption(tc_Value_Oval))),tc_prod(tc_List_Olist(tc_String_Ochar),tc_fun(tc_prod(tc_List_Olist(tc_String_Ochar),tc_List_Olist(tc_String_Ochar)),tc_Option_Ooption(tc_Value_Oval)))),tc_nat,tc_Option_Ooption(tc_prod(tc_List_Olist(tc_String_Ochar),tc_fun(tc_prod(tc_List_Olist(tc_String_Ochar),tc_List_Olist(tc_String_Ochar)),tc_Option_Ooption(tc_Value_Oval)))))=v_h_Ha______)).
% 0.12/0.36 cnf(i_0_26, negated_conjecture, (~c_Conform_Olconf(v_P,v_h_Ha______,v_la______,v_E____,tc_prod(tc_List_Olist(tc_List_Olist(tc_String_Ochar)),tc_Expr_Oexp(tc_List_Olist(tc_String_Ochar)))))).
% 0.12/0.36 cnf(i_0_28, plain, (X1=X2|~c_fequal(X1,X2,X3))).
% 0.12/0.36 cnf(i_0_16, plain, (c_Objects_Ohext(X1,X2)|~c_Objects_Ohext(X3,X2)|~c_Objects_Ohext(X1,X3))).
% 0.12/0.36 cnf(i_0_19, plain, (c_Conform_Olconf(X1,X2,X3,X4,X5)|~c_Conform_Olconf(X1,X6,X3,X4,X5)|~c_Objects_Ohext(X6,X2))).
% 0.12/0.36 cnf(i_0_62, plain, (X7=X7)).
% 0.12/0.36 # End listing active clauses. There is an equivalent clause to each of these in the clausification!
% 0.12/0.36 # Begin printing tableau
% 0.12/0.36 # Found 5 steps
% 0.12/0.36 cnf(i_0_15, plain, (c_Objects_Ohext(v_h_Ha______,v_h_Ha______)), inference(start_rule)).
% 0.12/0.36 cnf(i_0_82, plain, (c_Objects_Ohext(v_h_Ha______,v_h_Ha______)), inference(extension_rule, [i_0_19])).
% 0.12/0.36 cnf(i_0_104, plain, (c_Conform_Olconf(v_P,v_h_Ha______,v_la______,v_E____,tc_prod(tc_List_Olist(tc_List_Olist(tc_String_Ochar)),tc_Expr_Oexp(tc_List_Olist(tc_String_Ochar))))), inference(closure_rule, [i_0_26])).
% 0.12/0.36 cnf(i_0_105, plain, (~c_Conform_Olconf(v_P,v_h_Ha______,v_la______,v_E____,tc_prod(tc_List_Olist(tc_List_Olist(tc_String_Ochar)),tc_Expr_Oexp(tc_List_Olist(tc_String_Ochar))))), inference(extension_rule, [i_0_19])).
% 0.12/0.36 cnf(i_0_182, plain, (~c_Conform_Olconf(v_P,v_ha______,v_la______,v_E____,tc_prod(tc_List_Olist(tc_List_Olist(tc_String_Ochar)),tc_Expr_Oexp(tc_List_Olist(tc_String_Ochar))))), inference(closure_rule, [i_0_18])).
% 0.12/0.36 # End printing tableau
% 0.12/0.36 # SZS output end
% 0.12/0.36 # Branches closed with saturation will be marked with an "s"
% 0.12/0.36 # 12583 Satisfiable branch
% 0.12/0.36 # 12585 Satisfiable branch
% 0.12/0.36 # 12587 Satisfiable branch
% 0.12/0.36 # Satisfiable branch found.
% 0.12/0.36 # There were 1 total branch saturation attempts.
% 0.12/0.36 # There were 0 of these attempts blocked.
% 0.12/0.36 # There were 0 deferred branch saturation attempts.
% 0.12/0.36 # There were 0 free duplicated saturations.
% 0.12/0.36 # There were 0 total successful branch saturations.
% 0.12/0.36 # There were 0 successful branch saturations in interreduction.
% 0.12/0.36 # There were 0 successful branch saturations on the branch.
% 0.12/0.36 # There were 0 successful branch saturations after the branch.
% 0.12/0.36 # Satisfiable branch found.
% 0.12/0.36 # Satisfiable branch found.
% 0.12/0.36 # There were 1 total branch saturation attempts.
% 0.12/0.36 # There were 0 of these attempts blocked.
% 0.12/0.36 # There were 0 deferred branch saturation attempts.
% 0.12/0.36 # There were 0 free duplicated saturations.
% 0.12/0.36 # There were 0 total successful branch saturations.
% 0.12/0.36 # There were 0 successful branch saturations in interreduction.
% 0.12/0.36 # There were 0 successful branch saturations on the branch.
% 0.12/0.36 # There were 0 successful branch saturations after the branch.
% 0.12/0.36 # SZS status Satisfiable for /export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p
% 0.12/0.36 # SZS output start for /export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p
% 0.12/0.36 # Begin clausification derivation
% 0.12/0.36
% 0.12/0.36 # End clausification derivation
% 0.12/0.36 # Begin listing active clauses obtained from FOF to CNF conversion
% 0.12/0.36 cnf(i_0_15, plain, (c_Objects_Ohext(X1,X1))).
% 0.12/0.36 cnf(i_0_18, plain, (c_Conform_Olconf(v_P,v_ha______,v_la______,v_E____,tc_prod(tc_List_Olist(tc_List_Olist(tc_String_Ochar)),tc_Expr_Oexp(tc_List_Olist(tc_String_Ochar)))))).
% 0.12/0.36 cnf(i_0_24, plain, (c_TypeRel_OFields(v_P,v_C______,v_FDTs______,tc_prod(tc_List_Olist(tc_List_Olist(tc_String_Ochar)),tc_Expr_Oexp(tc_List_Olist(tc_String_Ochar)))))).
% 0.12/0.36 cnf(i_0_25, plain, (c_Objects_Onew__Addr(v_ha______)=c_Option_Ooption_OSome(v_a______,tc_nat))).
% 0.12/0.36 cnf(i_0_27, plain, (c_fequal(X1,X1,X2))).
% 0.12/0.36 cnf(i_0_22, plain, (c_WellTypeRT_OWTrt(v_P,v_ha______,v_E____,c_Expr_Oexp_Onew(v_C______,tc_List_Olist(tc_String_Ochar)),v_T____))).
% 0.12/0.36 cnf(i_0_23, plain, (c_Fun_Ofun__upd(v_ha______,v_a______,c_Option_Ooption_OSome(c_Pair(v_C______,c_Objects_Oinit__fields(v_FDTs______),tc_List_Olist(tc_String_Ochar),tc_fun(tc_prod(tc_List_Olist(tc_String_Ochar),tc_List_Olist(tc_String_Ochar)),tc_Option_Ooption(tc_Value_Oval))),tc_prod(tc_List_Olist(tc_String_Ochar),tc_fun(tc_prod(tc_List_Olist(tc_String_Ochar),tc_List_Olist(tc_String_Ochar)),tc_Option_Ooption(tc_Value_Oval)))),tc_nat,tc_Option_Ooption(tc_prod(tc_List_Olist(tc_String_Ochar),tc_fun(tc_prod(tc_List_Olist(tc_String_Ochar),tc_List_Olist(tc_String_Ochar)),tc_Option_Ooption(tc_Value_Oval)))))=v_h_Ha______)).
% 0.12/0.36 cnf(i_0_26, negated_conjecture, (~c_Conform_Olconf(v_P,v_h_Ha______,v_la______,v_E____,tc_prod(tc_List_Olist(tc_List_Olist(tc_String_Ochar)),tc_Expr_Oexp(tc_List_Olist(tc_String_Ochar)))))).
% 0.12/0.36 cnf(i_0_28, plain, (X1=X2|~c_fequal(X1,X2,X3))).
% 0.12/0.36 cnf(i_0_16, plain, (c_Objects_Ohext(X1,X2)|~c_Objects_Ohext(X3,X2)|~c_Objects_Ohext(X1,X3))).
% 0.12/0.36 cnf(i_0_19, plain, (c_Conform_Olconf(X1,X2,X3,X4,X5)|~c_Conform_Olconf(X1,X6,X3,X4,X5)|~c_Objects_Ohext(X6,X2))).
% 0.12/0.36 cnf(i_0_62, plain, (X7=X7)).
% 0.12/0.36 # End listing active clauses. There is an equivalent clause to each of these in the clausification!
% 0.12/0.36 # Begin printing tableau
% 0.12/0.36 # Found 6 steps
% 0.12/0.36 cnf(i_0_25, plain, (c_Objects_Onew__Addr(v_ha______)=c_Option_Ooption_OSome(v_a______,tc_nat)), inference(start_rule)).
% 0.12/0.36 cnf(i_0_85, plain, (c_Objects_Onew__Addr(v_ha______)=c_Option_Ooption_OSome(v_a______,tc_nat)), inference(extension_rule, [i_0_65])).
% 0.12/0.36 cnf(i_0_190, plain, (c_Objects_Onew__Addr(v_ha______)!=c_Option_Ooption_OSome(v_a______,tc_nat)), inference(closure_rule, [i_0_25])).
% 0.12/0.36 cnf(i_0_188, plain, (c_Objects_Onew__Addr(v_ha______)=c_Objects_Onew__Addr(v_ha______)), inference(extension_rule, [i_0_66])).
% 0.12/0.36 cnf(i_0_205, plain, (c_Objects_Onew__Addr(v_ha______)!=c_Option_Ooption_OSome(v_a______,tc_nat)), inference(closure_rule, [i_0_25])).
% 0.12/0.36 cnf(i_0_206, plain, (~c_Objects_Ohext(c_Objects_Onew__Addr(v_ha______),c_Objects_Onew__Addr(v_ha______))), inference(closure_rule, [i_0_15])).
% 0.12/0.36 # End printing tableau
% 0.12/0.36 # SZS output end
% 0.12/0.36 # Branches closed with saturation will be marked with an "s"
% 0.12/0.36 # Satisfiable branch found.
% 0.12/0.36 # There were 1 total branch saturation attempts.
% 0.12/0.36 # There were 0 of these attempts blocked.
% 0.12/0.36 # There were 0 deferred branch saturation attempts.
% 0.12/0.36 # There were 0 free duplicated saturations.
% 0.12/0.36 # There were 0 total successful branch saturations.
% 0.12/0.36 # There were 0 successful branch saturations in interreduction.
% 0.12/0.36 # There were 0 successful branch saturations on the branch.
% 0.12/0.36 # There were 0 successful branch saturations after the branch.
% 0.12/0.36 # Satisfiable branch found.
% 0.12/0.36 # There were 1 total branch saturation attempts.
% 0.12/0.36 # There were 0 of these attempts blocked.
% 0.12/0.36 # There were 0 deferred branch saturation attempts.
% 0.12/0.36 # There were 0 free duplicated saturations.
% 0.12/0.36 # There were 0 total successful branch saturations.
% 0.12/0.36 # There were 0 successful branch saturations in interreduction.
% 0.12/0.36 # There were 0 successful branch saturations on the branch.
% 0.12/0.36 # There were 0 successful branch saturations after the branch.
% 0.12/0.36 # There were 1 total branch saturation attempts.
% 0.12/0.36 # There were 0 of these attempts blocked.
% 0.12/0.36 # There were 0 deferred branch saturation attempts.
% 0.12/0.36 # There were 0 free duplicated saturations.
% 0.12/0.36 # There were 0 total successful branch saturations.
% 0.12/0.36 # There were 0 successful branch saturations in interreduction.
% 0.12/0.36 # There were 0 successful branch saturations on the branch.
% 0.12/0.36 # There were 0 successful branch saturations after the branch.
% 0.12/0.36 # SZS status Satisfiable for /export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p
% 0.12/0.36 # SZS output start for /export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p
% 0.12/0.36 # Begin clausification derivation
% 0.12/0.36
% 0.12/0.36 # End clausification derivation
% 0.12/0.36 # Begin listing active clauses obtained from FOF to CNF conversion
% 0.12/0.36 cnf(i_0_15, plain, (c_Objects_Ohext(X1,X1))).
% 0.12/0.36 cnf(i_0_18, plain, (c_Conform_Olconf(v_P,v_ha______,v_la______,v_E____,tc_prod(tc_List_Olist(tc_List_Olist(tc_String_Ochar)),tc_Expr_Oexp(tc_List_Olist(tc_String_Ochar)))))).
% 0.12/0.36 cnf(i_0_24, plain, (c_TypeRel_OFields(v_P,v_C______,v_FDTs______,tc_prod(tc_List_Olist(tc_List_Olist(tc_String_Ochar)),tc_Expr_Oexp(tc_List_Olist(tc_String_Ochar)))))).
% 0.12/0.36 cnf(i_0_25, plain, (c_Objects_Onew__Addr(v_ha______)=c_Option_Ooption_OSome(v_a______,tc_nat))).
% 0.12/0.36 cnf(i_0_27, plain, (c_fequal(X1,X1,X2))).
% 0.12/0.36 cnf(i_0_22, plain, (c_WellTypeRT_OWTrt(v_P,v_ha______,v_E____,c_Expr_Oexp_Onew(v_C______,tc_List_Olist(tc_String_Ochar)),v_T____))).
% 0.12/0.36 cnf(i_0_23, plain, (c_Fun_Ofun__upd(v_ha______,v_a______,c_Option_Ooption_OSome(c_Pair(v_C______,c_Objects_Oinit__fields(v_FDTs______),tc_List_Olist(tc_String_Ochar),tc_fun(tc_prod(tc_List_Olist(tc_String_Ochar),tc_List_Olist(tc_String_Ochar)),tc_Option_Ooption(tc_Value_Oval))),tc_prod(tc_List_Olist(tc_String_Ochar),tc_fun(tc_prod(tc_List_Olist(tc_String_Ochar),tc_List_Olist(tc_String_Ochar)),tc_Option_Ooption(tc_Value_Oval)))),tc_nat,tc_Option_Ooption(tc_prod(tc_List_Olist(tc_String_Ochar),tc_fun(tc_prod(tc_List_Olist(tc_String_Ochar),tc_List_Olist(tc_String_Ochar)),tc_Option_Ooption(tc_Value_Oval)))))=v_h_Ha______)).
% 0.12/0.36 cnf(i_0_26, negated_conjecture, (~c_Conform_Olconf(v_P,v_h_Ha______,v_la______,v_E____,tc_prod(tc_List_Olist(tc_List_Olist(tc_String_Ochar)),tc_Expr_Oexp(tc_List_Olist(tc_String_Ochar)))))).
% 0.12/0.36 cnf(i_0_28, plain, (X1=X2|~c_fequal(X1,X2,X3))).
% 0.12/0.36 cnf(i_0_16, plain, (c_Objects_Ohext(X1,X2)|~c_Objects_Ohext(X3,X2)|~c_Objects_Ohext(X1,X3))).
% 0.12/0.36 cnf(i_0_19, plain, (c_Conform_Olconf(X1,X2,X3,X4,X5)|~c_Conform_Olconf(X1,X6,X3,X4,X5)|~c_Objects_Ohext(X6,X2))).
% 0.12/0.36 cnf(i_0_62, plain, (X7=X7)).
% 0.12/0.36 # End listing active clauses. There is an equivalent clause to each of these in the clausification!
% 0.12/0.36 # Begin printing tableau
% 0.12/0.36 # Found 7 steps
% 0.12/0.36 cnf(i_0_18, plain, (c_Conform_Olconf(v_P,v_ha______,v_la______,v_E____,tc_prod(tc_List_Olist(tc_List_Olist(tc_String_Ochar)),tc_Expr_Oexp(tc_List_Olist(tc_String_Ochar))))), inference(start_rule)).
% 0.12/0.36 cnf(i_0_83, plain, (c_Conform_Olconf(v_P,v_ha______,v_la______,v_E____,tc_prod(tc_List_Olist(tc_List_Olist(tc_String_Ochar)),tc_Expr_Oexp(tc_List_Olist(tc_String_Ochar))))), inference(extension_rule, [i_0_19])).
% 0.12/0.36 cnf(i_0_181, plain, (c_Conform_Olconf(v_P,v_h_Ha______,v_la______,v_E____,tc_prod(tc_List_Olist(tc_List_Olist(tc_String_Ochar)),tc_Expr_Oexp(tc_List_Olist(tc_String_Ochar))))), inference(closure_rule, [i_0_26])).
% 0.12/0.36 cnf(i_0_183, plain, (~c_Objects_Ohext(v_ha______,v_h_Ha______)), inference(extension_rule, [i_0_16])).
% 0.12/0.36 cnf(i_0_187, plain, (~c_Objects_Ohext(c_Option_Ooption_OSome(v_a______,tc_nat),v_h_Ha______)), inference(extension_rule, [i_0_66])).
% 0.12/0.36 cnf(i_0_199, plain, (c_Objects_Onew__Addr(v_ha______)!=c_Option_Ooption_OSome(v_a______,tc_nat)), inference(closure_rule, [i_0_25])).
% 0.12/0.36 cnf(i_0_200, plain, (c_Fun_Ofun__upd(v_ha______,v_a______,c_Option_Ooption_OSome(c_Pair(v_C______,c_Objects_Oinit__fields(v_FDTs______),tc_List_Olist(tc_String_Ochar),tc_fun(tc_prod(tc_List_Olist(tc_String_Ochar),tc_List_Olist(tc_String_Ochar)),tc_Option_Ooption(tc_Value_Oval))),tc_prod(tc_List_Olist(tc_String_Ochar),tc_fun(tc_prod(tc_List_Olist(tc_String_Ochar),tc_List_Olist(tc_String_Ochar)),tc_Option_Ooption(tc_Value_Oval)))),tc_nat,tc_Option_Ooption(tc_prod(tc_List_Olist(tc_String_Ochar),tc_fun(tc_prod(tc_List_Olist(tc_String_Ochar),tc_List_Olist(tc_String_Ochar)),tc_Option_Ooption(tc_Value_Oval)))))!=v_h_Ha______), inference(closure_rule, [i_0_23])).
% 0.12/0.36 # End printing tableau
% 0.12/0.36 # SZS output end
% 0.12/0.36 # Branches closed with saturation will be marked with an "s"
% 0.12/0.36 # SZS status Satisfiable for /export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p
% 0.12/0.36 # SZS output start for /export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p
% 0.12/0.36 # Begin clausification derivation
% 0.12/0.36
% 0.12/0.36 # End clausification derivation
% 0.12/0.36 # Begin listing active clauses obtained from FOF to CNF conversion
% 0.12/0.36 cnf(i_0_15, plain, (c_Objects_Ohext(X1,X1))).
% 0.12/0.36 cnf(i_0_18, plain, (c_Conform_Olconf(v_P,v_ha______,v_la______,v_E____,tc_prod(tc_List_Olist(tc_List_Olist(tc_String_Ochar)),tc_Expr_Oexp(tc_List_Olist(tc_String_Ochar)))))).
% 0.12/0.36 cnf(i_0_24, plain, (c_TypeRel_OFields(v_P,v_C______,v_FDTs______,tc_prod(tc_List_Olist(tc_List_Olist(tc_String_Ochar)),tc_Expr_Oexp(tc_List_Olist(tc_String_Ochar)))))).
% 0.12/0.36 cnf(i_0_25, plain, (c_Objects_Onew__Addr(v_ha______)=c_Option_Ooption_OSome(v_a______,tc_nat))).
% 0.12/0.36 cnf(i_0_27, plain, (c_fequal(X1,X1,X2))).
% 0.12/0.36 cnf(i_0_22, plain, (c_WellTypeRT_OWTrt(v_P,v_ha______,v_E____,c_Expr_Oexp_Onew(v_C______,tc_List_Olist(tc_String_Ochar)),v_T____))).
% 0.12/0.36 cnf(i_0_23, plain, (c_Fun_Ofun__upd(v_ha______,v_a______,c_Option_Ooption_OSome(c_Pair(v_C______,c_Objects_Oinit__fields(v_FDTs______),tc_List_Olist(tc_String_Ochar),tc_fun(tc_prod(tc_List_Olist(tc_String_Ochar),tc_List_Olist(tc_String_Ochar)),tc_Option_Ooption(tc_Value_Oval))),tc_prod(tc_List_Olist(tc_String_Ochar),tc_fun(tc_prod(tc_List_Olist(tc_String_Ochar),tc_List_Olist(tc_String_Ochar)),tc_Option_Ooption(tc_Value_Oval)))),tc_nat,tc_Option_Ooption(tc_prod(tc_List_Olist(tc_String_Ochar),tc_fun(tc_prod(tc_List_Olist(tc_String_Ochar),tc_List_Olist(tc_String_Ochar)),tc_Option_Ooption(tc_Value_Oval)))))=v_h_Ha______)).
% 0.12/0.36 cnf(i_0_26, negated_conjecture, (~c_Conform_Olconf(v_P,v_h_Ha______,v_la______,v_E____,tc_prod(tc_List_Olist(tc_List_Olist(tc_String_Ochar)),tc_Expr_Oexp(tc_List_Olist(tc_String_Ochar)))))).
% 0.12/0.36 cnf(i_0_28, plain, (X1=X2|~c_fequal(X1,X2,X3))).
% 0.12/0.36 cnf(i_0_16, plain, (c_Objects_Ohext(X1,X2)|~c_Objects_Ohext(X3,X2)|~c_Objects_Ohext(X1,X3))).
% 0.12/0.36 cnf(i_0_19, plain, (c_Conform_Olconf(X1,X2,X3,X4,X5)|~c_Conform_Olconf(X1,X6,X3,X4,X5)|~c_Objects_Ohext(X6,X2))).
% 0.12/0.36 cnf(i_0_62, plain, (X7=X7)).
% 0.12/0.36 # End listing active clauses. There is an equivalent clause to each of these in the clausification!
% 0.12/0.36 # Begin printing tableau
% 0.12/0.36 # Found 9 steps
% 0.12/0.36 cnf(i_0_24, plain, (c_TypeRel_OFields(v_P,v_C______,v_FDTs______,tc_prod(tc_List_Olist(tc_List_Olist(tc_String_Ochar)),tc_Expr_Oexp(tc_List_Olist(tc_String_Ochar))))), inference(start_rule)).
% 0.12/0.36 cnf(i_0_84, plain, (c_TypeRel_OFields(v_P,v_C______,v_FDTs______,tc_prod(tc_List_Olist(tc_List_Olist(tc_String_Ochar)),tc_Expr_Oexp(tc_List_Olist(tc_String_Ochar))))), inference(extension_rule, [i_0_79])).
% 0.12/0.36 cnf(i_0_241, plain, ($false), inference(closure_rule, [i_0_62])).
% 0.12/0.36 cnf(i_0_242, plain, ($false), inference(closure_rule, [i_0_62])).
% 0.12/0.36 cnf(i_0_243, plain, ($false), inference(closure_rule, [i_0_62])).
% 0.12/0.36 cnf(i_0_240, plain, (c_TypeRel_OFields(v_P,v_C______,v_FDTs______,v_P)), inference(extension_rule, [i_0_79])).
% 0.12/0.36 cnf(i_0_318, plain, ($false), inference(closure_rule, [i_0_62])).
% 0.12/0.36 cnf(i_0_319, plain, ($false), inference(closure_rule, [i_0_62])).
% 0.12/0.36 cnf(i_0_320, plain, ($false), inference(closure_rule, [i_0_62])).
% 0.12/0.36 # End printing tableau
% 0.12/0.36 # SZS output end
% 0.12/0.36 # Branches closed with saturation will be marked with an "s"
% 0.12/0.36 # SZS status Satisfiable for /export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p
% 0.12/0.36 # SZS output start for /export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p
% 0.12/0.36 # Begin clausification derivation
% 0.12/0.36
% 0.12/0.36 # End clausification derivation
% 0.12/0.36 # Begin listing active clauses obtained from FOF to CNF conversion
% 0.12/0.37 cnf(i_0_15, plain, (c_Objects_Ohext(X1,X1))).
% 0.12/0.37 cnf(i_0_18, plain, (c_Conform_Olconf(v_P,v_ha______,v_la______,v_E____,tc_prod(tc_List_Olist(tc_List_Olist(tc_String_Ochar)),tc_Expr_Oexp(tc_List_Olist(tc_String_Ochar)))))).
% 0.12/0.37 cnf(i_0_24, plain, (c_TypeRel_OFields(v_P,v_C______,v_FDTs______,tc_prod(tc_List_Olist(tc_List_Olist(tc_String_Ochar)),tc_Expr_Oexp(tc_List_Olist(tc_String_Ochar)))))).
% 0.12/0.37 cnf(i_0_25, plain, (c_Objects_Onew__Addr(v_ha______)=c_Option_Ooption_OSome(v_a______,tc_nat))).
% 0.12/0.37 cnf(i_0_27, plain, (c_fequal(X1,X1,X2))).
% 0.12/0.37 cnf(i_0_22, plain, (c_WellTypeRT_OWTrt(v_P,v_ha______,v_E____,c_Expr_Oexp_Onew(v_C______,tc_List_Olist(tc_String_Ochar)),v_T____))).
% 0.12/0.37 cnf(i_0_23, plain, (c_Fun_Ofun__upd(v_ha______,v_a______,c_Option_Ooption_OSome(c_Pair(v_C______,c_Objects_Oinit__fields(v_FDTs______),tc_List_Olist(tc_String_Ochar),tc_fun(tc_prod(tc_List_Olist(tc_String_Ochar),tc_List_Olist(tc_String_Ochar)),tc_Option_Ooption(tc_Value_Oval))),tc_prod(tc_List_Olist(tc_String_Ochar),tc_fun(tc_prod(tc_List_Olist(tc_String_Ochar),tc_List_Olist(tc_String_Ochar)),tc_Option_Ooption(tc_Value_Oval)))),tc_nat,tc_Option_Ooption(tc_prod(tc_List_Olist(tc_String_Ochar),tc_fun(tc_prod(tc_List_Olist(tc_String_Ochar),tc_List_Olist(tc_String_Ochar)),tc_Option_Ooption(tc_Value_Oval)))))=v_h_Ha______)).
% 0.12/0.37 cnf(i_0_26, negated_conjecture, (~c_Conform_Olconf(v_P,v_h_Ha______,v_la______,v_E____,tc_prod(tc_List_Olist(tc_List_Olist(tc_String_Ochar)),tc_Expr_Oexp(tc_List_Olist(tc_String_Ochar)))))).
% 0.12/0.37 cnf(i_0_28, plain, (X1=X2|~c_fequal(X1,X2,X3))).
% 0.12/0.37 cnf(i_0_16, plain, (c_Objects_Ohext(X1,X2)|~c_Objects_Ohext(X3,X2)|~c_Objects_Ohext(X1,X3))).
% 0.12/0.37 cnf(i_0_19, plain, (c_Conform_Olconf(X1,X2,X3,X4,X5)|~c_Conform_Olconf(X1,X6,X3,X4,X5)|~c_Objects_Ohext(X6,X2))).
% 0.12/0.37 cnf(i_0_62, plain, (X7=X7)).
% 0.12/0.37 # End listing active clauses. There is an equivalent clause to each of these in the clausification!
% 0.12/0.37 # Begin printing tableau
% 0.12/0.37 # Found 5 steps
% 0.12/0.37 cnf(i_0_27, plain, (c_fequal(c_Objects_Onew__Addr(v_ha______),c_Objects_Onew__Addr(v_ha______),X6)), inference(start_rule)).
% 0.12/0.37 cnf(i_0_86, plain, (c_fequal(c_Objects_Onew__Addr(v_ha______),c_Objects_Onew__Addr(v_ha______),X6)), inference(extension_rule, [i_0_28])).
% 0.12/0.37 cnf(i_0_176, plain, (c_Objects_Onew__Addr(v_ha______)=c_Objects_Onew__Addr(v_ha______)), inference(extension_rule, [i_0_66])).
% 0.12/0.37 cnf(i_0_193, plain, (c_Objects_Onew__Addr(v_ha______)!=c_Option_Ooption_OSome(v_a______,tc_nat)), inference(closure_rule, [i_0_25])).
% 0.12/0.37 cnf(i_0_194, plain, (~c_Objects_Ohext(c_Objects_Onew__Addr(v_ha______),c_Objects_Onew__Addr(v_ha______))), inference(closure_rule, [i_0_15])).
% 0.12/0.37 # End printing tableau
% 0.12/0.37 # SZS output end
% 0.12/0.37 # Branches closed with saturation will be marked with an "s"
% 0.12/0.37 # 12586 Satisfiable branch
% 0.12/0.37 # Child (12581) has found a proof.
% 0.12/0.37
% 0.12/0.37 # 12588 Satisfiable branch
% 0.12/0.37 # Proof search is over...
% 0.12/0.37 # Freeing feature tree
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------