TSTP Solution File: SWV920-1 by E-SAT---3.1
View Problem
- Process Solution
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
% File : E-SAT---3.1
% Problem : SWV920-1 : TPTP v8.1.2. Released v4.1.0.
% Transfm : none
% Format : tptp:raw
% Command : run_E %s %d THM
% Computer : n031.cluster.edu
% Model : x86_64 x86_64
% CPU : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 2.10GHz
% Memory : 8042.1875MB
% OS : Linux 3.10.0-693.el7.x86_64
% CPULimit : 2400s
% WCLimit : 300s
% DateTime : Tue Oct 10 20:08:08 EDT 2023
% Result : Satisfiable 0.18s 0.46s
% Output : Saturation 0.18s
% Verified :
% SZS Type : ERROR: Analysing output (Could not find formula named cls_lconf__hext_0)
% Comments :
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
cnf(c_0_11,axiom,
( c_Conform_Olconf(X1,X2,X3,X4,X5)
| ~ c_Objects_Ohext(X6,X2)
| ~ c_Conform_Olconf(X1,X6,X3,X4,X5) ),
cls_lconf__hext_0,
[final] ).
cnf(c_0_12,axiom,
c_Conform_Olconf(v_P,v_ha______,v_la______,v_E____,tc_prod(tc_List_Olist(tc_List_Olist(tc_String_Ochar)),tc_Expr_Oexp(tc_List_Olist(tc_String_Ochar)))),
cls_RedNew_I5_J_0,
[final] ).
cnf(c_0_13,plain,
( c_Conform_Olconf(v_P,X1,v_la______,v_E____,tc_prod(tc_List_Olist(tc_List_Olist(tc_String_Ochar)),tc_Expr_Oexp(tc_List_Olist(tc_String_Ochar))))
| ~ c_Objects_Ohext(v_ha______,X1) ),
inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_11,c_0_12]),
[final] ).
cnf(c_0_14,negated_conjecture,
~ c_Conform_Olconf(v_P,v_h_Ha______,v_la______,v_E____,tc_prod(tc_List_Olist(tc_List_Olist(tc_String_Ochar)),tc_Expr_Oexp(tc_List_Olist(tc_String_Ochar)))),
cls_conjecture_0,
[final] ).
cnf(c_0_15,plain,
( c_Conform_Olconf(v_P,X1,v_la______,v_E____,tc_prod(tc_List_Olist(tc_List_Olist(tc_String_Ochar)),tc_Expr_Oexp(tc_List_Olist(tc_String_Ochar))))
| ~ c_Objects_Ohext(v_ha______,X2)
| ~ c_Objects_Ohext(X2,X1) ),
inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_11,c_0_13]),
[final] ).
cnf(c_0_16,axiom,
( c_Objects_Ohext(X1,X2)
| ~ c_Objects_Ohext(X3,X2)
| ~ c_Objects_Ohext(X1,X3) ),
cls_hext__trans_0,
[final] ).
cnf(c_0_17,axiom,
( X1 = X2
| ~ c_fequal(X1,X2,X3) ),
cls_ATP__Linkup_Ofequal__imp__equal_0,
[final] ).
cnf(c_0_18,negated_conjecture,
~ c_Objects_Ohext(v_ha______,v_h_Ha______),
inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_14,c_0_13]),
[final] ).
cnf(c_0_19,axiom,
v_h_Ha______ = c_Fun_Ofun__upd(v_ha______,v_a______,c_Option_Ooption_OSome(c_Pair(v_C______,c_Objects_Oinit__fields(v_FDTs______),tc_List_Olist(tc_String_Ochar),tc_fun(tc_prod(tc_List_Olist(tc_String_Ochar),tc_List_Olist(tc_String_Ochar)),tc_Option_Ooption(tc_Value_Oval))),tc_prod(tc_List_Olist(tc_String_Ochar),tc_fun(tc_prod(tc_List_Olist(tc_String_Ochar),tc_List_Olist(tc_String_Ochar)),tc_Option_Ooption(tc_Value_Oval)))),tc_nat,tc_Option_Ooption(tc_prod(tc_List_Olist(tc_String_Ochar),tc_fun(tc_prod(tc_List_Olist(tc_String_Ochar),tc_List_Olist(tc_String_Ochar)),tc_Option_Ooption(tc_Value_Oval))))),
cls_CHAINED_0_02,
[final] ).
cnf(c_0_20,axiom,
c_WellTypeRT_OWTrt(v_P,v_ha______,v_E____,c_Expr_Oexp_Onew(v_C______,tc_List_Olist(tc_String_Ochar)),v_T____),
cls_CHAINED_0_01,
[final] ).
cnf(c_0_21,axiom,
c_fequal(X1,X1,X2),
cls_ATP__Linkup_Oequal__imp__fequal_0,
[final] ).
cnf(c_0_22,axiom,
c_Objects_Onew__Addr(v_ha______) = c_Option_Ooption_OSome(v_a______,tc_nat),
cls_CHAINED_0_04,
[final] ).
cnf(c_0_23,axiom,
c_TypeRel_OFields(v_P,v_C______,v_FDTs______,tc_prod(tc_List_Olist(tc_List_Olist(tc_String_Ochar)),tc_Expr_Oexp(tc_List_Olist(tc_String_Ochar)))),
cls_CHAINED_0_03,
[final] ).
cnf(c_0_24,axiom,
c_Objects_Ohext(X1,X1),
cls_hext__refl_0,
[final] ).
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
%----ORIGINAL SYSTEM OUTPUT
% 0.02/0.11 % Problem : SWV920-1 : TPTP v8.1.2. Released v4.1.0.
% 0.02/0.13 % Command : run_E %s %d THM
% 0.11/0.33 % Computer : n031.cluster.edu
% 0.11/0.33 % Model : x86_64 x86_64
% 0.11/0.33 % CPU : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 @ 2.10GHz
% 0.11/0.33 % Memory : 8042.1875MB
% 0.11/0.33 % OS : Linux 3.10.0-693.el7.x86_64
% 0.11/0.33 % CPULimit : 2400
% 0.11/0.33 % WCLimit : 300
% 0.11/0.33 % DateTime : Tue Oct 3 05:08:43 EDT 2023
% 0.11/0.33 % CPUTime :
% 0.18/0.45 Running first-order model finding
% 0.18/0.45 Running: /export/starexec/sandbox2/solver/bin/eprover --delete-bad-limit=2000000000 --definitional-cnf=24 -s --print-statistics -R --print-version --proof-object --satauto-schedule=8 --cpu-limit=300 /export/starexec/sandbox2/tmp/tmp.6sVAUZu6Xl/E---3.1_14893.p
% 0.18/0.46 # Version: 3.1pre001
% 0.18/0.46 # Preprocessing class: FSMSSMSMSSSNFFN.
% 0.18/0.46 # Scheduled 4 strats onto 8 cores with 300 seconds (2400 total)
% 0.18/0.46 # Starting G-E--_207_C18_F1_SE_CS_SP_PI_PS_S2SI with 1500s (5) cores
% 0.18/0.46 # Starting new_bool_3 with 300s (1) cores
% 0.18/0.46 # Starting new_bool_1 with 300s (1) cores
% 0.18/0.46 # Starting sh5l with 300s (1) cores
% 0.18/0.46 # G-E--_207_C18_F1_SE_CS_SP_PI_PS_S2SI with pid 15029 completed with status 1
% 0.18/0.46 # Result found by G-E--_207_C18_F1_SE_CS_SP_PI_PS_S2SI
% 0.18/0.46 # Preprocessing class: FSMSSMSMSSSNFFN.
% 0.18/0.46 # Scheduled 4 strats onto 8 cores with 300 seconds (2400 total)
% 0.18/0.46 # Starting G-E--_207_C18_F1_SE_CS_SP_PI_PS_S2SI with 1500s (5) cores
% 0.18/0.46 # No SInE strategy applied
% 0.18/0.46 # Search class: FHUSS-FFSM32-DFFFFFNN
% 0.18/0.46 # partial match(2): FHUSS-FFSF22-DFFFFFNN
% 0.18/0.46 # Scheduled 6 strats onto 5 cores with 1500 seconds (1500 total)
% 0.18/0.46 # Starting SAT001_MinMin_p005000_rr_RG with 811s (1) cores
% 0.18/0.46 # Starting G-E--_207_C18_F1_SE_CS_SP_PI_PS_S2SI with 151s (1) cores
% 0.18/0.46 # Starting G-E--_208_C18_F1_SE_CS_SP_PS_S5PRR_S0Y with 136s (1) cores
% 0.18/0.46 # Starting new_bool_3 with 136s (1) cores
% 0.18/0.46 # Starting new_bool_1 with 136s (1) cores
% 0.18/0.46 # SAT001_MinMin_p005000_rr_RG with pid 15035 completed with status 1
% 0.18/0.46 # Result found by SAT001_MinMin_p005000_rr_RG
% 0.18/0.46 # Preprocessing class: FSMSSMSMSSSNFFN.
% 0.18/0.46 # Scheduled 4 strats onto 8 cores with 300 seconds (2400 total)
% 0.18/0.46 # Starting G-E--_207_C18_F1_SE_CS_SP_PI_PS_S2SI with 1500s (5) cores
% 0.18/0.46 # No SInE strategy applied
% 0.18/0.46 # Search class: FHUSS-FFSM32-DFFFFFNN
% 0.18/0.46 # partial match(2): FHUSS-FFSF22-DFFFFFNN
% 0.18/0.46 # Scheduled 6 strats onto 5 cores with 1500 seconds (1500 total)
% 0.18/0.46 # Starting SAT001_MinMin_p005000_rr_RG with 811s (1) cores
% 0.18/0.46 # Preprocessing time : 0.001 s
% 0.18/0.46 # Presaturation interreduction done
% 0.18/0.46
% 0.18/0.46 # No proof found!
% 0.18/0.46 # SZS status Satisfiable
% 0.18/0.46 # SZS output start Saturation
% See solution above
% 0.18/0.46 # Parsed axioms : 14
% 0.18/0.46 # Removed by relevancy pruning/SinE : 0
% 0.18/0.46 # Initial clauses : 14
% 0.18/0.46 # Removed in clause preprocessing : 2
% 0.18/0.46 # Initial clauses in saturation : 12
% 0.18/0.46 # Processed clauses : 27
% 0.18/0.46 # ...of these trivial : 1
% 0.18/0.46 # ...subsumed : 1
% 0.18/0.46 # ...remaining for further processing : 25
% 0.18/0.46 # Other redundant clauses eliminated : 0
% 0.18/0.46 # Clauses deleted for lack of memory : 0
% 0.18/0.46 # Backward-subsumed : 0
% 0.18/0.46 # Backward-rewritten : 0
% 0.18/0.46 # Generated clauses : 5
% 0.18/0.46 # ...of the previous two non-redundant : 4
% 0.18/0.46 # ...aggressively subsumed : 0
% 0.18/0.46 # Contextual simplify-reflections : 0
% 0.18/0.46 # Paramodulations : 5
% 0.18/0.46 # Factorizations : 0
% 0.18/0.46 # NegExts : 0
% 0.18/0.46 # Equation resolutions : 0
% 0.18/0.46 # Total rewrite steps : 1
% 0.18/0.46 # Propositional unsat checks : 0
% 0.18/0.46 # Propositional check models : 0
% 0.18/0.46 # Propositional check unsatisfiable : 0
% 0.18/0.46 # Propositional clauses : 0
% 0.18/0.46 # Propositional clauses after purity: 0
% 0.18/0.46 # Propositional unsat core size : 0
% 0.18/0.46 # Propositional preprocessing time : 0.000
% 0.18/0.46 # Propositional encoding time : 0.000
% 0.18/0.46 # Propositional solver time : 0.000
% 0.18/0.46 # Success case prop preproc time : 0.000
% 0.18/0.46 # Success case prop encoding time : 0.000
% 0.18/0.46 # Success case prop solver time : 0.000
% 0.18/0.46 # Current number of processed clauses : 14
% 0.18/0.46 # Positive orientable unit clauses : 7
% 0.18/0.46 # Positive unorientable unit clauses: 0
% 0.18/0.46 # Negative unit clauses : 2
% 0.18/0.46 # Non-unit-clauses : 5
% 0.18/0.46 # Current number of unprocessed clauses: 0
% 0.18/0.46 # ...number of literals in the above : 0
% 0.18/0.46 # Current number of archived formulas : 0
% 0.18/0.46 # Current number of archived clauses : 12
% 0.18/0.46 # Clause-clause subsumption calls (NU) : 24
% 0.18/0.46 # Rec. Clause-clause subsumption calls : 22
% 0.18/0.46 # Non-unit clause-clause subsumptions : 1
% 0.18/0.46 # Unit Clause-clause subsumption calls : 3
% 0.18/0.46 # Rewrite failures with RHS unbound : 0
% 0.18/0.46 # BW rewrite match attempts : 0
% 0.18/0.46 # BW rewrite match successes : 0
% 0.18/0.46 # Condensation attempts : 0
% 0.18/0.46 # Condensation successes : 0
% 0.18/0.46 # Termbank termtop insertions : 437
% 0.18/0.46
% 0.18/0.46 # -------------------------------------------------
% 0.18/0.46 # User time : 0.003 s
% 0.18/0.46 # System time : 0.001 s
% 0.18/0.46 # Total time : 0.004 s
% 0.18/0.46 # Maximum resident set size: 1692 pages
% 0.18/0.46
% 0.18/0.46 # -------------------------------------------------
% 0.18/0.46 # User time : 0.013 s
% 0.18/0.46 # System time : 0.006 s
% 0.18/0.46 # Total time : 0.019 s
% 0.18/0.46 # Maximum resident set size: 1688 pages
% 0.18/0.46 % E---3.1 exiting
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------