TSTP Solution File: SWV919-1 by E---3.1
View Problem
- Process Solution
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
% File : E---3.1
% Problem : SWV919-1 : TPTP v8.1.2. Released v4.1.0.
% Transfm : none
% Format : tptp:raw
% Command : run_E %s %d THM
% Computer : n019.cluster.edu
% Model : x86_64 x86_64
% CPU : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 2.10GHz
% Memory : 8042.1875MB
% OS : Linux 3.10.0-693.el7.x86_64
% CPULimit : 2400s
% WCLimit : 300s
% DateTime : Tue Oct 10 19:55:38 EDT 2023
% Result : Unsatisfiable 4.67s 1.13s
% Output : CNFRefutation 4.67s
% Verified :
% SZS Type : Refutation
% Derivation depth : 6
% Number of leaves : 12
% Syntax : Number of clauses : 33 ( 17 unt; 0 nHn; 28 RR)
% Number of literals : 63 ( 11 equ; 33 neg)
% Maximal clause size : 4 ( 1 avg)
% Maximal term depth : 8 ( 2 avg)
% Number of predicates : 8 ( 6 usr; 1 prp; 0-6 aty)
% Number of functors : 23 ( 23 usr; 13 con; 0-5 aty)
% Number of variables : 81 ( 9 sgn)
% Comments :
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
cnf(cls_typeof__conf_0,axiom,
( c_Conform_Oconf(X4,X1,X2,X3,X5)
| c_Objects_Otypeof__h(X1,X2) != hAPP(c_Option_Ooption_OSome(tc_Type_Oty),X3) ),
file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/tmp/tmp.v2ju37LA9j/E---3.1_28326.p',cls_typeof__conf_0) ).
cnf(cls_typeofv_0,axiom,
c_Objects_Otypeof__h(v_ha____,v_v____) = hAPP(c_Option_Ooption_OSome(tc_Type_Oty),v_Tv____),
file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/tmp/tmp.v2ju37LA9j/E---3.1_28326.p',cls_typeofv_0) ).
cnf(cls_conf__widen_0,axiom,
( c_Conform_Oconf(X1,X2,X3,X4,X5)
| ~ c_TypeRel_Owiden(X1,X6,X4,X5)
| ~ c_Conform_Oconf(X1,X2,X3,X6,X5) ),
file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/tmp/tmp.v2ju37LA9j/E---3.1_28326.p',cls_conf__widen_0) ).
cnf(cls_hconfD_0,axiom,
( c_Conform_Ooconf(X4,X1,X3,X5)
| hAPP(X1,X2) != hAPP(c_Option_Ooption_OSome(tc_prod(tc_List_Olist(tc_String_Ochar),tc_fun(tc_prod(tc_List_Olist(tc_String_Ochar),tc_List_Olist(tc_String_Ochar)),tc_Option_Ooption(tc_Value_Oval)))),X3)
| ~ c_Conform_Ohconf(X4,X1,X5) ),
file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/tmp/tmp.v2ju37LA9j/E---3.1_28326.p',cls_hconfD_0) ).
cnf(cls_ha_0,axiom,
hAPP(v_ha____,v_a____) = hAPP(c_Option_Ooption_OSome(tc_prod(tc_List_Olist(tc_String_Ochar),tc_fun(tc_prod(tc_List_Olist(tc_String_Ochar),tc_List_Olist(tc_String_Ochar)),tc_Option_Ooption(tc_Value_Oval)))),hAPP(hAPP(c_Pair(tc_List_Olist(tc_String_Ochar),tc_fun(tc_prod(tc_List_Olist(tc_String_Ochar),tc_List_Olist(tc_String_Ochar)),tc_Option_Ooption(tc_Value_Oval))),v_C____),v_fs____)),
file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/tmp/tmp.v2ju37LA9j/E---3.1_28326.p',cls_ha_0) ).
cnf(cls_oconf__fupd_0,axiom,
( c_Conform_Ooconf(X1,X2,hAPP(hAPP(c_Pair(tc_List_Olist(tc_String_Ochar),tc_fun(tc_prod(tc_List_Olist(tc_String_Ochar),tc_List_Olist(tc_String_Ochar)),tc_Option_Ooption(tc_Value_Oval))),X3),c_Fun_Ofun__upd(X4,hAPP(hAPP(c_Pair(tc_List_Olist(tc_String_Ochar),tc_List_Olist(tc_String_Ochar)),X5),X6),hAPP(c_Option_Ooption_OSome(tc_Value_Oval),X7),tc_prod(tc_List_Olist(tc_String_Ochar),tc_List_Olist(tc_String_Ochar)),tc_Option_Ooption(tc_Value_Oval))),X8)
| ~ c_Conform_Ooconf(X1,X2,hAPP(hAPP(c_Pair(tc_List_Olist(tc_String_Ochar),tc_fun(tc_prod(tc_List_Olist(tc_String_Ochar),tc_List_Olist(tc_String_Ochar)),tc_Option_Ooption(tc_Value_Oval))),X3),X4),X8)
| ~ c_Conform_Oconf(X1,X2,X7,X9,X8)
| ~ c_TypeRel_Ohas__field(X1,X3,X5,X9,X6,X8) ),
file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/tmp/tmp.v2ju37LA9j/E---3.1_28326.p',cls_oconf__fupd_0) ).
cnf(cls_has_0,axiom,
c_TypeRel_Ohas__field(v_P,v_C____,v_F____,v_TF____,v_D____,tc_prod(tc_List_Olist(tc_List_Olist(tc_String_Ochar)),tc_Expr_Oexp(tc_List_Olist(tc_String_Ochar)))),
file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/tmp/tmp.v2ju37LA9j/E---3.1_28326.p',cls_has_0) ).
cnf(cls_sub_0,axiom,
c_TypeRel_Owiden(v_P,v_Tv____,v_TF____,tc_prod(tc_List_Olist(tc_List_Olist(tc_String_Ochar)),tc_Expr_Oexp(tc_List_Olist(tc_String_Ochar)))),
file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/tmp/tmp.v2ju37LA9j/E---3.1_28326.p',cls_sub_0) ).
cnf(cls_conjecture_0,negated_conjecture,
~ c_Conform_Ooconf(v_P,v_ha____,hAPP(hAPP(c_Pair(tc_List_Olist(tc_String_Ochar),tc_fun(tc_prod(tc_List_Olist(tc_String_Ochar),tc_List_Olist(tc_String_Ochar)),tc_Option_Ooption(tc_Value_Oval))),v_C____),c_Fun_Ofun__upd(v_fs____,hAPP(hAPP(c_Pair(tc_List_Olist(tc_String_Ochar),tc_List_Olist(tc_String_Ochar)),v_F____),v_D____),hAPP(c_Option_Ooption_OSome(tc_Value_Oval),v_v____),tc_prod(tc_List_Olist(tc_String_Ochar),tc_List_Olist(tc_String_Ochar)),tc_Option_Ooption(tc_Value_Oval))),tc_prod(tc_List_Olist(tc_List_Olist(tc_String_Ochar)),tc_Expr_Oexp(tc_List_Olist(tc_String_Ochar)))),
file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/tmp/tmp.v2ju37LA9j/E---3.1_28326.p',cls_conjecture_0) ).
cnf(cls_oconf__hext_0,axiom,
( c_Conform_Ooconf(X1,X2,X3,X4)
| ~ c_Objects_Ohext(X5,X2)
| ~ c_Conform_Ooconf(X1,X5,X3,X4) ),
file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/tmp/tmp.v2ju37LA9j/E---3.1_28326.p',cls_oconf__hext_0) ).
cnf(cls_hconf_0,axiom,
c_Conform_Ohconf(v_P,v_ha____,tc_prod(tc_List_Olist(tc_List_Olist(tc_String_Ochar)),tc_Expr_Oexp(tc_List_Olist(tc_String_Ochar)))),
file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/tmp/tmp.v2ju37LA9j/E---3.1_28326.p',cls_hconf_0) ).
cnf(cls_hext__refl_0,axiom,
c_Objects_Ohext(X1,X1),
file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/tmp/tmp.v2ju37LA9j/E---3.1_28326.p',cls_hext__refl_0) ).
cnf(c_0_12,axiom,
( c_Conform_Oconf(X4,X1,X2,X3,X5)
| c_Objects_Otypeof__h(X1,X2) != hAPP(c_Option_Ooption_OSome(tc_Type_Oty),X3) ),
cls_typeof__conf_0 ).
cnf(c_0_13,axiom,
c_Objects_Otypeof__h(v_ha____,v_v____) = hAPP(c_Option_Ooption_OSome(tc_Type_Oty),v_Tv____),
cls_typeofv_0 ).
cnf(c_0_14,axiom,
( c_Conform_Oconf(X1,X2,X3,X4,X5)
| ~ c_TypeRel_Owiden(X1,X6,X4,X5)
| ~ c_Conform_Oconf(X1,X2,X3,X6,X5) ),
cls_conf__widen_0 ).
cnf(c_0_15,plain,
( c_Conform_Oconf(X1,v_ha____,v_v____,X2,X3)
| hAPP(c_Option_Ooption_OSome(tc_Type_Oty),v_Tv____) != hAPP(c_Option_Ooption_OSome(tc_Type_Oty),X2) ),
inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_12,c_0_13]) ).
cnf(c_0_16,axiom,
( c_Conform_Ooconf(X4,X1,X3,X5)
| hAPP(X1,X2) != hAPP(c_Option_Ooption_OSome(tc_prod(tc_List_Olist(tc_String_Ochar),tc_fun(tc_prod(tc_List_Olist(tc_String_Ochar),tc_List_Olist(tc_String_Ochar)),tc_Option_Ooption(tc_Value_Oval)))),X3)
| ~ c_Conform_Ohconf(X4,X1,X5) ),
cls_hconfD_0 ).
cnf(c_0_17,axiom,
hAPP(v_ha____,v_a____) = hAPP(c_Option_Ooption_OSome(tc_prod(tc_List_Olist(tc_String_Ochar),tc_fun(tc_prod(tc_List_Olist(tc_String_Ochar),tc_List_Olist(tc_String_Ochar)),tc_Option_Ooption(tc_Value_Oval)))),hAPP(hAPP(c_Pair(tc_List_Olist(tc_String_Ochar),tc_fun(tc_prod(tc_List_Olist(tc_String_Ochar),tc_List_Olist(tc_String_Ochar)),tc_Option_Ooption(tc_Value_Oval))),v_C____),v_fs____)),
cls_ha_0 ).
cnf(c_0_18,axiom,
( c_Conform_Ooconf(X1,X2,hAPP(hAPP(c_Pair(tc_List_Olist(tc_String_Ochar),tc_fun(tc_prod(tc_List_Olist(tc_String_Ochar),tc_List_Olist(tc_String_Ochar)),tc_Option_Ooption(tc_Value_Oval))),X3),c_Fun_Ofun__upd(X4,hAPP(hAPP(c_Pair(tc_List_Olist(tc_String_Ochar),tc_List_Olist(tc_String_Ochar)),X5),X6),hAPP(c_Option_Ooption_OSome(tc_Value_Oval),X7),tc_prod(tc_List_Olist(tc_String_Ochar),tc_List_Olist(tc_String_Ochar)),tc_Option_Ooption(tc_Value_Oval))),X8)
| ~ c_Conform_Ooconf(X1,X2,hAPP(hAPP(c_Pair(tc_List_Olist(tc_String_Ochar),tc_fun(tc_prod(tc_List_Olist(tc_String_Ochar),tc_List_Olist(tc_String_Ochar)),tc_Option_Ooption(tc_Value_Oval))),X3),X4),X8)
| ~ c_Conform_Oconf(X1,X2,X7,X9,X8)
| ~ c_TypeRel_Ohas__field(X1,X3,X5,X9,X6,X8) ),
cls_oconf__fupd_0 ).
cnf(c_0_19,axiom,
c_TypeRel_Ohas__field(v_P,v_C____,v_F____,v_TF____,v_D____,tc_prod(tc_List_Olist(tc_List_Olist(tc_String_Ochar)),tc_Expr_Oexp(tc_List_Olist(tc_String_Ochar)))),
cls_has_0 ).
cnf(c_0_20,plain,
( c_Conform_Oconf(X1,v_ha____,v_v____,X2,X3)
| hAPP(c_Option_Ooption_OSome(tc_Type_Oty),v_Tv____) != hAPP(c_Option_Ooption_OSome(tc_Type_Oty),X4)
| ~ c_TypeRel_Owiden(X1,X4,X2,X3) ),
inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_14,c_0_15]) ).
cnf(c_0_21,axiom,
c_TypeRel_Owiden(v_P,v_Tv____,v_TF____,tc_prod(tc_List_Olist(tc_List_Olist(tc_String_Ochar)),tc_Expr_Oexp(tc_List_Olist(tc_String_Ochar)))),
cls_sub_0 ).
cnf(c_0_22,plain,
( c_Conform_Ooconf(X1,X2,hAPP(hAPP(c_Pair(tc_List_Olist(tc_String_Ochar),tc_fun(tc_prod(tc_List_Olist(tc_String_Ochar),tc_List_Olist(tc_String_Ochar)),tc_Option_Ooption(tc_Value_Oval))),v_C____),v_fs____),X3)
| hAPP(X2,X4) != hAPP(v_ha____,v_a____)
| ~ c_Conform_Ohconf(X1,X2,X3) ),
inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_16,c_0_17]) ).
cnf(c_0_23,negated_conjecture,
~ c_Conform_Ooconf(v_P,v_ha____,hAPP(hAPP(c_Pair(tc_List_Olist(tc_String_Ochar),tc_fun(tc_prod(tc_List_Olist(tc_String_Ochar),tc_List_Olist(tc_String_Ochar)),tc_Option_Ooption(tc_Value_Oval))),v_C____),c_Fun_Ofun__upd(v_fs____,hAPP(hAPP(c_Pair(tc_List_Olist(tc_String_Ochar),tc_List_Olist(tc_String_Ochar)),v_F____),v_D____),hAPP(c_Option_Ooption_OSome(tc_Value_Oval),v_v____),tc_prod(tc_List_Olist(tc_String_Ochar),tc_List_Olist(tc_String_Ochar)),tc_Option_Ooption(tc_Value_Oval))),tc_prod(tc_List_Olist(tc_List_Olist(tc_String_Ochar)),tc_Expr_Oexp(tc_List_Olist(tc_String_Ochar)))),
cls_conjecture_0 ).
cnf(c_0_24,plain,
( c_Conform_Ooconf(v_P,X1,hAPP(hAPP(c_Pair(tc_List_Olist(tc_String_Ochar),tc_fun(tc_prod(tc_List_Olist(tc_String_Ochar),tc_List_Olist(tc_String_Ochar)),tc_Option_Ooption(tc_Value_Oval))),v_C____),c_Fun_Ofun__upd(X2,hAPP(hAPP(c_Pair(tc_List_Olist(tc_String_Ochar),tc_List_Olist(tc_String_Ochar)),v_F____),v_D____),hAPP(c_Option_Ooption_OSome(tc_Value_Oval),X3),tc_prod(tc_List_Olist(tc_String_Ochar),tc_List_Olist(tc_String_Ochar)),tc_Option_Ooption(tc_Value_Oval))),tc_prod(tc_List_Olist(tc_List_Olist(tc_String_Ochar)),tc_Expr_Oexp(tc_List_Olist(tc_String_Ochar))))
| ~ c_Conform_Ooconf(v_P,X1,hAPP(hAPP(c_Pair(tc_List_Olist(tc_String_Ochar),tc_fun(tc_prod(tc_List_Olist(tc_String_Ochar),tc_List_Olist(tc_String_Ochar)),tc_Option_Ooption(tc_Value_Oval))),v_C____),X2),tc_prod(tc_List_Olist(tc_List_Olist(tc_String_Ochar)),tc_Expr_Oexp(tc_List_Olist(tc_String_Ochar))))
| ~ c_Conform_Oconf(v_P,X1,X3,v_TF____,tc_prod(tc_List_Olist(tc_List_Olist(tc_String_Ochar)),tc_Expr_Oexp(tc_List_Olist(tc_String_Ochar)))) ),
inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_18,c_0_19]) ).
cnf(c_0_25,plain,
c_Conform_Oconf(v_P,v_ha____,v_v____,v_TF____,tc_prod(tc_List_Olist(tc_List_Olist(tc_String_Ochar)),tc_Expr_Oexp(tc_List_Olist(tc_String_Ochar)))),
inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_20,c_0_21]) ).
cnf(c_0_26,axiom,
( c_Conform_Ooconf(X1,X2,X3,X4)
| ~ c_Objects_Ohext(X5,X2)
| ~ c_Conform_Ooconf(X1,X5,X3,X4) ),
cls_oconf__hext_0 ).
cnf(c_0_27,plain,
( c_Conform_Ooconf(X1,v_ha____,hAPP(hAPP(c_Pair(tc_List_Olist(tc_String_Ochar),tc_fun(tc_prod(tc_List_Olist(tc_String_Ochar),tc_List_Olist(tc_String_Ochar)),tc_Option_Ooption(tc_Value_Oval))),v_C____),v_fs____),X2)
| ~ c_Conform_Ohconf(X1,v_ha____,X2) ),
inference(er,[status(thm)],[c_0_22]) ).
cnf(c_0_28,negated_conjecture,
~ c_Conform_Ooconf(v_P,v_ha____,hAPP(hAPP(c_Pair(tc_List_Olist(tc_String_Ochar),tc_fun(tc_prod(tc_List_Olist(tc_String_Ochar),tc_List_Olist(tc_String_Ochar)),tc_Option_Ooption(tc_Value_Oval))),v_C____),v_fs____),tc_prod(tc_List_Olist(tc_List_Olist(tc_String_Ochar)),tc_Expr_Oexp(tc_List_Olist(tc_String_Ochar)))),
inference(cn,[status(thm)],[inference(rw,[status(thm)],[inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_23,c_0_24]),c_0_25])]) ).
cnf(c_0_29,plain,
( c_Conform_Ooconf(X1,X2,hAPP(hAPP(c_Pair(tc_List_Olist(tc_String_Ochar),tc_fun(tc_prod(tc_List_Olist(tc_String_Ochar),tc_List_Olist(tc_String_Ochar)),tc_Option_Ooption(tc_Value_Oval))),v_C____),v_fs____),X3)
| ~ c_Conform_Ohconf(X1,v_ha____,X3)
| ~ c_Objects_Ohext(v_ha____,X2) ),
inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_26,c_0_27]) ).
cnf(c_0_30,axiom,
c_Conform_Ohconf(v_P,v_ha____,tc_prod(tc_List_Olist(tc_List_Olist(tc_String_Ochar)),tc_Expr_Oexp(tc_List_Olist(tc_String_Ochar)))),
cls_hconf_0 ).
cnf(c_0_31,axiom,
c_Objects_Ohext(X1,X1),
cls_hext__refl_0 ).
cnf(c_0_32,negated_conjecture,
$false,
inference(cn,[status(thm)],[inference(rw,[status(thm)],[inference(rw,[status(thm)],[inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_28,c_0_29]),c_0_30]),c_0_31])]),
[proof] ).
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
%----ORIGINAL SYSTEM OUTPUT
% 0.15/0.16 % Problem : SWV919-1 : TPTP v8.1.2. Released v4.1.0.
% 0.15/0.18 % Command : run_E %s %d THM
% 0.17/0.38 % Computer : n019.cluster.edu
% 0.17/0.38 % Model : x86_64 x86_64
% 0.17/0.38 % CPU : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 @ 2.10GHz
% 0.17/0.38 % Memory : 8042.1875MB
% 0.17/0.38 % OS : Linux 3.10.0-693.el7.x86_64
% 0.17/0.38 % CPULimit : 2400
% 0.17/0.38 % WCLimit : 300
% 0.17/0.38 % DateTime : Tue Oct 3 04:27:06 EDT 2023
% 0.17/0.39 % CPUTime :
% 0.38/0.56 Running first-order theorem proving
% 0.38/0.56 Running: /export/starexec/sandbox2/solver/bin/eprover --delete-bad-limit=2000000000 --definitional-cnf=24 -s --print-statistics -R --print-version --proof-object --auto-schedule=8 --cpu-limit=300 /export/starexec/sandbox2/tmp/tmp.v2ju37LA9j/E---3.1_28326.p
% 4.67/1.13 # Version: 3.1pre001
% 4.67/1.13 # Preprocessing class: FSLMSMSMSSSNFFN.
% 4.67/1.13 # Scheduled 4 strats onto 8 cores with 300 seconds (2400 total)
% 4.67/1.13 # Starting G-E--_207_C18_F1_AE_CS_SP_PI_PS_S2S with 1200s (4) cores
% 4.67/1.13 # Starting new_bool_3 with 600s (2) cores
% 4.67/1.13 # Starting new_bool_1 with 300s (1) cores
% 4.67/1.13 # Starting sh5l with 300s (1) cores
% 4.67/1.13 # new_bool_3 with pid 28406 completed with status 0
% 4.67/1.13 # Result found by new_bool_3
% 4.67/1.13 # Preprocessing class: FSLMSMSMSSSNFFN.
% 4.67/1.13 # Scheduled 4 strats onto 8 cores with 300 seconds (2400 total)
% 4.67/1.13 # Starting G-E--_207_C18_F1_AE_CS_SP_PI_PS_S2S with 1200s (4) cores
% 4.67/1.13 # Starting new_bool_3 with 600s (2) cores
% 4.67/1.13 # SinE strategy is GSinE(CountFormulas,hypos,1.5,,3,20000,1.0)
% 4.67/1.13 # Search class: FGHSM-FFLM32-DFFFFFNN
% 4.67/1.13 # Scheduled 5 strats onto 2 cores with 600 seconds (600 total)
% 4.67/1.13 # Starting G-E--_208_C18_F1_SE_CS_SP_PS_S5PRR_S0Y with 123s (1) cores
% 4.67/1.13 # Starting new_bool_3 with 123s (1) cores
% 4.67/1.13 # G-E--_208_C18_F1_SE_CS_SP_PS_S5PRR_S0Y with pid 28409 completed with status 0
% 4.67/1.13 # Result found by G-E--_208_C18_F1_SE_CS_SP_PS_S5PRR_S0Y
% 4.67/1.13 # Preprocessing class: FSLMSMSMSSSNFFN.
% 4.67/1.13 # Scheduled 4 strats onto 8 cores with 300 seconds (2400 total)
% 4.67/1.13 # Starting G-E--_207_C18_F1_AE_CS_SP_PI_PS_S2S with 1200s (4) cores
% 4.67/1.13 # Starting new_bool_3 with 600s (2) cores
% 4.67/1.13 # SinE strategy is GSinE(CountFormulas,hypos,1.5,,3,20000,1.0)
% 4.67/1.13 # Search class: FGHSM-FFLM32-DFFFFFNN
% 4.67/1.13 # Scheduled 5 strats onto 2 cores with 600 seconds (600 total)
% 4.67/1.13 # Starting G-E--_208_C18_F1_SE_CS_SP_PS_S5PRR_S0Y with 123s (1) cores
% 4.67/1.13 # Preprocessing time : 0.004 s
% 4.67/1.13 # Presaturation interreduction done
% 4.67/1.13
% 4.67/1.13 # Proof found!
% 4.67/1.13 # SZS status Unsatisfiable
% 4.67/1.13 # SZS output start CNFRefutation
% See solution above
% 4.67/1.13 # Parsed axioms : 456
% 4.67/1.13 # Removed by relevancy pruning/SinE : 336
% 4.67/1.13 # Initial clauses : 120
% 4.67/1.13 # Removed in clause preprocessing : 0
% 4.67/1.13 # Initial clauses in saturation : 120
% 4.67/1.13 # Processed clauses : 3917
% 4.67/1.13 # ...of these trivial : 130
% 4.67/1.13 # ...subsumed : 2760
% 4.67/1.13 # ...remaining for further processing : 1027
% 4.67/1.13 # Other redundant clauses eliminated : 257
% 4.67/1.13 # Clauses deleted for lack of memory : 0
% 4.67/1.13 # Backward-subsumed : 59
% 4.67/1.13 # Backward-rewritten : 11
% 4.67/1.13 # Generated clauses : 23760
% 4.67/1.13 # ...of the previous two non-redundant : 21627
% 4.67/1.13 # ...aggressively subsumed : 0
% 4.67/1.13 # Contextual simplify-reflections : 0
% 4.67/1.13 # Paramodulations : 23463
% 4.67/1.13 # Factorizations : 0
% 4.67/1.13 # NegExts : 0
% 4.67/1.13 # Equation resolutions : 297
% 4.67/1.13 # Total rewrite steps : 2263
% 4.67/1.13 # Propositional unsat checks : 0
% 4.67/1.13 # Propositional check models : 0
% 4.67/1.13 # Propositional check unsatisfiable : 0
% 4.67/1.13 # Propositional clauses : 0
% 4.67/1.13 # Propositional clauses after purity: 0
% 4.67/1.13 # Propositional unsat core size : 0
% 4.67/1.13 # Propositional preprocessing time : 0.000
% 4.67/1.13 # Propositional encoding time : 0.000
% 4.67/1.13 # Propositional solver time : 0.000
% 4.67/1.13 # Success case prop preproc time : 0.000
% 4.67/1.13 # Success case prop encoding time : 0.000
% 4.67/1.13 # Success case prop solver time : 0.000
% 4.67/1.13 # Current number of processed clauses : 870
% 4.67/1.13 # Positive orientable unit clauses : 46
% 4.67/1.13 # Positive unorientable unit clauses: 12
% 4.67/1.13 # Negative unit clauses : 13
% 4.67/1.13 # Non-unit-clauses : 799
% 4.67/1.13 # Current number of unprocessed clauses: 17663
% 4.67/1.13 # ...number of literals in the above : 64333
% 4.67/1.13 # Current number of archived formulas : 0
% 4.67/1.13 # Current number of archived clauses : 157
% 4.67/1.13 # Clause-clause subsumption calls (NU) : 149951
% 4.67/1.13 # Rec. Clause-clause subsumption calls : 65687
% 4.67/1.13 # Non-unit clause-clause subsumptions : 2370
% 4.67/1.13 # Unit Clause-clause subsumption calls : 940
% 4.67/1.13 # Rewrite failures with RHS unbound : 20
% 4.67/1.13 # BW rewrite match attempts : 204
% 4.67/1.13 # BW rewrite match successes : 15
% 4.67/1.13 # Condensation attempts : 0
% 4.67/1.13 # Condensation successes : 0
% 4.67/1.13 # Termbank termtop insertions : 725694
% 4.67/1.13
% 4.67/1.13 # -------------------------------------------------
% 4.67/1.13 # User time : 0.515 s
% 4.67/1.13 # System time : 0.017 s
% 4.67/1.13 # Total time : 0.532 s
% 4.67/1.13 # Maximum resident set size: 2400 pages
% 4.67/1.13
% 4.67/1.13 # -------------------------------------------------
% 4.67/1.13 # User time : 1.042 s
% 4.67/1.13 # System time : 0.022 s
% 4.67/1.13 # Total time : 1.064 s
% 4.67/1.13 # Maximum resident set size: 2124 pages
% 4.67/1.13 % E---3.1 exiting
% 4.67/1.13 % E---3.1 exiting
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------