TSTP Solution File: SWV919-1 by E---3.1.00
View Problem
- Process Solution
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
% File : E---3.1.00
% Problem : SWV919-1 : TPTP v8.2.0. Released v4.1.0.
% Transfm : none
% Format : tptp:raw
% Command : run_E %s %d THM
% Computer : n010.cluster.edu
% Model : x86_64 x86_64
% CPU : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 2.10GHz
% Memory : 8042.1875MB
% OS : Linux 3.10.0-693.el7.x86_64
% CPULimit : 300s
% WCLimit : 300s
% DateTime : Tue May 21 05:32:32 EDT 2024
% Result : Unsatisfiable 4.75s 1.10s
% Output : CNFRefutation 4.75s
% Verified :
% SZS Type : Refutation
% Derivation depth : 7
% Number of leaves : 12
% Syntax : Number of clauses : 39 ( 18 unt; 0 nHn; 33 RR)
% Number of literals : 79 ( 13 equ; 44 neg)
% Maximal clause size : 4 ( 2 avg)
% Maximal term depth : 8 ( 2 avg)
% Number of predicates : 8 ( 6 usr; 1 prp; 0-6 aty)
% Number of functors : 23 ( 23 usr; 13 con; 0-5 aty)
% Number of variables : 111 ( 12 sgn)
% Comments :
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
cnf(cls_typeof__conf_0,axiom,
( c_Conform_Oconf(X4,X1,X2,X3,X5)
| c_Objects_Otypeof__h(X1,X2) != hAPP(c_Option_Ooption_OSome(tc_Type_Oty),X3) ),
file('/export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',cls_typeof__conf_0) ).
cnf(cls_conf__widen_0,axiom,
( c_Conform_Oconf(X1,X2,X3,X4,X5)
| ~ c_TypeRel_Owiden(X1,X6,X4,X5)
| ~ c_Conform_Oconf(X1,X2,X3,X6,X5) ),
file('/export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',cls_conf__widen_0) ).
cnf(cls_typeofv_0,axiom,
c_Objects_Otypeof__h(v_ha____,v_v____) = hAPP(c_Option_Ooption_OSome(tc_Type_Oty),v_Tv____),
file('/export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',cls_typeofv_0) ).
cnf(cls_hconfD_0,axiom,
( c_Conform_Ooconf(X4,X1,X3,X5)
| hAPP(X1,X2) != hAPP(c_Option_Ooption_OSome(tc_prod(tc_List_Olist(tc_String_Ochar),tc_fun(tc_prod(tc_List_Olist(tc_String_Ochar),tc_List_Olist(tc_String_Ochar)),tc_Option_Ooption(tc_Value_Oval)))),X3)
| ~ c_Conform_Ohconf(X4,X1,X5) ),
file('/export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',cls_hconfD_0) ).
cnf(cls_oconf__fupd_0,axiom,
( c_Conform_Ooconf(X1,X2,hAPP(hAPP(c_Pair(tc_List_Olist(tc_String_Ochar),tc_fun(tc_prod(tc_List_Olist(tc_String_Ochar),tc_List_Olist(tc_String_Ochar)),tc_Option_Ooption(tc_Value_Oval))),X3),c_Fun_Ofun__upd(X4,hAPP(hAPP(c_Pair(tc_List_Olist(tc_String_Ochar),tc_List_Olist(tc_String_Ochar)),X5),X6),hAPP(c_Option_Ooption_OSome(tc_Value_Oval),X7),tc_prod(tc_List_Olist(tc_String_Ochar),tc_List_Olist(tc_String_Ochar)),tc_Option_Ooption(tc_Value_Oval))),X8)
| ~ c_Conform_Ooconf(X1,X2,hAPP(hAPP(c_Pair(tc_List_Olist(tc_String_Ochar),tc_fun(tc_prod(tc_List_Olist(tc_String_Ochar),tc_List_Olist(tc_String_Ochar)),tc_Option_Ooption(tc_Value_Oval))),X3),X4),X8)
| ~ c_Conform_Oconf(X1,X2,X7,X9,X8)
| ~ c_TypeRel_Ohas__field(X1,X3,X5,X9,X6,X8) ),
file('/export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',cls_oconf__fupd_0) ).
cnf(cls_ha_0,axiom,
hAPP(v_ha____,v_a____) = hAPP(c_Option_Ooption_OSome(tc_prod(tc_List_Olist(tc_String_Ochar),tc_fun(tc_prod(tc_List_Olist(tc_String_Ochar),tc_List_Olist(tc_String_Ochar)),tc_Option_Ooption(tc_Value_Oval)))),hAPP(hAPP(c_Pair(tc_List_Olist(tc_String_Ochar),tc_fun(tc_prod(tc_List_Olist(tc_String_Ochar),tc_List_Olist(tc_String_Ochar)),tc_Option_Ooption(tc_Value_Oval))),v_C____),v_fs____)),
file('/export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',cls_ha_0) ).
cnf(cls_conjecture_0,negated_conjecture,
~ c_Conform_Ooconf(v_P,v_ha____,hAPP(hAPP(c_Pair(tc_List_Olist(tc_String_Ochar),tc_fun(tc_prod(tc_List_Olist(tc_String_Ochar),tc_List_Olist(tc_String_Ochar)),tc_Option_Ooption(tc_Value_Oval))),v_C____),c_Fun_Ofun__upd(v_fs____,hAPP(hAPP(c_Pair(tc_List_Olist(tc_String_Ochar),tc_List_Olist(tc_String_Ochar)),v_F____),v_D____),hAPP(c_Option_Ooption_OSome(tc_Value_Oval),v_v____),tc_prod(tc_List_Olist(tc_String_Ochar),tc_List_Olist(tc_String_Ochar)),tc_Option_Ooption(tc_Value_Oval))),tc_prod(tc_List_Olist(tc_List_Olist(tc_String_Ochar)),tc_Expr_Oexp(tc_List_Olist(tc_String_Ochar)))),
file('/export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',cls_conjecture_0) ).
cnf(cls_has_0,axiom,
c_TypeRel_Ohas__field(v_P,v_C____,v_F____,v_TF____,v_D____,tc_prod(tc_List_Olist(tc_List_Olist(tc_String_Ochar)),tc_Expr_Oexp(tc_List_Olist(tc_String_Ochar)))),
file('/export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',cls_has_0) ).
cnf(cls_sub_0,axiom,
c_TypeRel_Owiden(v_P,v_Tv____,v_TF____,tc_prod(tc_List_Olist(tc_List_Olist(tc_String_Ochar)),tc_Expr_Oexp(tc_List_Olist(tc_String_Ochar)))),
file('/export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',cls_sub_0) ).
cnf(cls_oconf__hext_0,axiom,
( c_Conform_Ooconf(X1,X2,X3,X4)
| ~ c_Objects_Ohext(X5,X2)
| ~ c_Conform_Ooconf(X1,X5,X3,X4) ),
file('/export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',cls_oconf__hext_0) ).
cnf(cls_hconf_0,axiom,
c_Conform_Ohconf(v_P,v_ha____,tc_prod(tc_List_Olist(tc_List_Olist(tc_String_Ochar)),tc_Expr_Oexp(tc_List_Olist(tc_String_Ochar)))),
file('/export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',cls_hconf_0) ).
cnf(cls_hext__refl_0,axiom,
c_Objects_Ohext(X1,X1),
file('/export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',cls_hext__refl_0) ).
cnf(c_0_12,plain,
( c_Conform_Oconf(X4,X1,X2,X3,X5)
| c_Objects_Otypeof__h(X1,X2) != hAPP(c_Option_Ooption_OSome(tc_Type_Oty),X3) ),
inference(fof_simplification,[status(thm)],[cls_typeof__conf_0]) ).
cnf(c_0_13,plain,
( c_Conform_Oconf(X1,X2,X3,X4,X5)
| ~ c_TypeRel_Owiden(X1,X6,X4,X5)
| ~ c_Conform_Oconf(X1,X2,X3,X6,X5) ),
inference(fof_simplification,[status(thm)],[cls_conf__widen_0]) ).
cnf(c_0_14,plain,
( c_Conform_Oconf(X4,X1,X2,X3,X5)
| c_Objects_Otypeof__h(X1,X2) != hAPP(c_Option_Ooption_OSome(tc_Type_Oty),X3) ),
c_0_12 ).
cnf(c_0_15,axiom,
c_Objects_Otypeof__h(v_ha____,v_v____) = hAPP(c_Option_Ooption_OSome(tc_Type_Oty),v_Tv____),
cls_typeofv_0 ).
cnf(c_0_16,plain,
( c_Conform_Ooconf(X4,X1,X3,X5)
| hAPP(X1,X2) != hAPP(c_Option_Ooption_OSome(tc_prod(tc_List_Olist(tc_String_Ochar),tc_fun(tc_prod(tc_List_Olist(tc_String_Ochar),tc_List_Olist(tc_String_Ochar)),tc_Option_Ooption(tc_Value_Oval)))),X3)
| ~ c_Conform_Ohconf(X4,X1,X5) ),
inference(fof_simplification,[status(thm)],[cls_hconfD_0]) ).
cnf(c_0_17,plain,
( c_Conform_Ooconf(X1,X2,hAPP(hAPP(c_Pair(tc_List_Olist(tc_String_Ochar),tc_fun(tc_prod(tc_List_Olist(tc_String_Ochar),tc_List_Olist(tc_String_Ochar)),tc_Option_Ooption(tc_Value_Oval))),X3),c_Fun_Ofun__upd(X4,hAPP(hAPP(c_Pair(tc_List_Olist(tc_String_Ochar),tc_List_Olist(tc_String_Ochar)),X5),X6),hAPP(c_Option_Ooption_OSome(tc_Value_Oval),X7),tc_prod(tc_List_Olist(tc_String_Ochar),tc_List_Olist(tc_String_Ochar)),tc_Option_Ooption(tc_Value_Oval))),X8)
| ~ c_Conform_Ooconf(X1,X2,hAPP(hAPP(c_Pair(tc_List_Olist(tc_String_Ochar),tc_fun(tc_prod(tc_List_Olist(tc_String_Ochar),tc_List_Olist(tc_String_Ochar)),tc_Option_Ooption(tc_Value_Oval))),X3),X4),X8)
| ~ c_Conform_Oconf(X1,X2,X7,X9,X8)
| ~ c_TypeRel_Ohas__field(X1,X3,X5,X9,X6,X8) ),
inference(fof_simplification,[status(thm)],[cls_oconf__fupd_0]) ).
cnf(c_0_18,plain,
( c_Conform_Oconf(X1,X2,X3,X4,X5)
| ~ c_TypeRel_Owiden(X1,X6,X4,X5)
| ~ c_Conform_Oconf(X1,X2,X3,X6,X5) ),
c_0_13 ).
cnf(c_0_19,plain,
( c_Conform_Oconf(X1,v_ha____,v_v____,X2,X3)
| hAPP(c_Option_Ooption_OSome(tc_Type_Oty),v_Tv____) != hAPP(c_Option_Ooption_OSome(tc_Type_Oty),X2) ),
inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_14,c_0_15]) ).
cnf(c_0_20,plain,
( c_Conform_Ooconf(X4,X1,X3,X5)
| hAPP(X1,X2) != hAPP(c_Option_Ooption_OSome(tc_prod(tc_List_Olist(tc_String_Ochar),tc_fun(tc_prod(tc_List_Olist(tc_String_Ochar),tc_List_Olist(tc_String_Ochar)),tc_Option_Ooption(tc_Value_Oval)))),X3)
| ~ c_Conform_Ohconf(X4,X1,X5) ),
c_0_16 ).
cnf(c_0_21,axiom,
hAPP(v_ha____,v_a____) = hAPP(c_Option_Ooption_OSome(tc_prod(tc_List_Olist(tc_String_Ochar),tc_fun(tc_prod(tc_List_Olist(tc_String_Ochar),tc_List_Olist(tc_String_Ochar)),tc_Option_Ooption(tc_Value_Oval)))),hAPP(hAPP(c_Pair(tc_List_Olist(tc_String_Ochar),tc_fun(tc_prod(tc_List_Olist(tc_String_Ochar),tc_List_Olist(tc_String_Ochar)),tc_Option_Ooption(tc_Value_Oval))),v_C____),v_fs____)),
cls_ha_0 ).
cnf(c_0_22,negated_conjecture,
~ c_Conform_Ooconf(v_P,v_ha____,hAPP(hAPP(c_Pair(tc_List_Olist(tc_String_Ochar),tc_fun(tc_prod(tc_List_Olist(tc_String_Ochar),tc_List_Olist(tc_String_Ochar)),tc_Option_Ooption(tc_Value_Oval))),v_C____),c_Fun_Ofun__upd(v_fs____,hAPP(hAPP(c_Pair(tc_List_Olist(tc_String_Ochar),tc_List_Olist(tc_String_Ochar)),v_F____),v_D____),hAPP(c_Option_Ooption_OSome(tc_Value_Oval),v_v____),tc_prod(tc_List_Olist(tc_String_Ochar),tc_List_Olist(tc_String_Ochar)),tc_Option_Ooption(tc_Value_Oval))),tc_prod(tc_List_Olist(tc_List_Olist(tc_String_Ochar)),tc_Expr_Oexp(tc_List_Olist(tc_String_Ochar)))),
inference(fof_simplification,[status(thm)],[cls_conjecture_0]) ).
cnf(c_0_23,plain,
( c_Conform_Ooconf(X1,X2,hAPP(hAPP(c_Pair(tc_List_Olist(tc_String_Ochar),tc_fun(tc_prod(tc_List_Olist(tc_String_Ochar),tc_List_Olist(tc_String_Ochar)),tc_Option_Ooption(tc_Value_Oval))),X3),c_Fun_Ofun__upd(X4,hAPP(hAPP(c_Pair(tc_List_Olist(tc_String_Ochar),tc_List_Olist(tc_String_Ochar)),X5),X6),hAPP(c_Option_Ooption_OSome(tc_Value_Oval),X7),tc_prod(tc_List_Olist(tc_String_Ochar),tc_List_Olist(tc_String_Ochar)),tc_Option_Ooption(tc_Value_Oval))),X8)
| ~ c_Conform_Ooconf(X1,X2,hAPP(hAPP(c_Pair(tc_List_Olist(tc_String_Ochar),tc_fun(tc_prod(tc_List_Olist(tc_String_Ochar),tc_List_Olist(tc_String_Ochar)),tc_Option_Ooption(tc_Value_Oval))),X3),X4),X8)
| ~ c_Conform_Oconf(X1,X2,X7,X9,X8)
| ~ c_TypeRel_Ohas__field(X1,X3,X5,X9,X6,X8) ),
c_0_17 ).
cnf(c_0_24,axiom,
c_TypeRel_Ohas__field(v_P,v_C____,v_F____,v_TF____,v_D____,tc_prod(tc_List_Olist(tc_List_Olist(tc_String_Ochar)),tc_Expr_Oexp(tc_List_Olist(tc_String_Ochar)))),
cls_has_0 ).
cnf(c_0_25,plain,
( c_Conform_Oconf(X1,v_ha____,v_v____,X2,X3)
| hAPP(c_Option_Ooption_OSome(tc_Type_Oty),v_Tv____) != hAPP(c_Option_Ooption_OSome(tc_Type_Oty),X4)
| ~ c_TypeRel_Owiden(X1,X4,X2,X3) ),
inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_18,c_0_19]) ).
cnf(c_0_26,axiom,
c_TypeRel_Owiden(v_P,v_Tv____,v_TF____,tc_prod(tc_List_Olist(tc_List_Olist(tc_String_Ochar)),tc_Expr_Oexp(tc_List_Olist(tc_String_Ochar)))),
cls_sub_0 ).
cnf(c_0_27,plain,
( c_Conform_Ooconf(X1,X2,X3,X4)
| ~ c_Objects_Ohext(X5,X2)
| ~ c_Conform_Ooconf(X1,X5,X3,X4) ),
inference(fof_simplification,[status(thm)],[cls_oconf__hext_0]) ).
cnf(c_0_28,plain,
( c_Conform_Ooconf(X1,X2,hAPP(hAPP(c_Pair(tc_List_Olist(tc_String_Ochar),tc_fun(tc_prod(tc_List_Olist(tc_String_Ochar),tc_List_Olist(tc_String_Ochar)),tc_Option_Ooption(tc_Value_Oval))),v_C____),v_fs____),X3)
| hAPP(X2,X4) != hAPP(v_ha____,v_a____)
| ~ c_Conform_Ohconf(X1,X2,X3) ),
inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_20,c_0_21]) ).
cnf(c_0_29,negated_conjecture,
~ c_Conform_Ooconf(v_P,v_ha____,hAPP(hAPP(c_Pair(tc_List_Olist(tc_String_Ochar),tc_fun(tc_prod(tc_List_Olist(tc_String_Ochar),tc_List_Olist(tc_String_Ochar)),tc_Option_Ooption(tc_Value_Oval))),v_C____),c_Fun_Ofun__upd(v_fs____,hAPP(hAPP(c_Pair(tc_List_Olist(tc_String_Ochar),tc_List_Olist(tc_String_Ochar)),v_F____),v_D____),hAPP(c_Option_Ooption_OSome(tc_Value_Oval),v_v____),tc_prod(tc_List_Olist(tc_String_Ochar),tc_List_Olist(tc_String_Ochar)),tc_Option_Ooption(tc_Value_Oval))),tc_prod(tc_List_Olist(tc_List_Olist(tc_String_Ochar)),tc_Expr_Oexp(tc_List_Olist(tc_String_Ochar)))),
c_0_22 ).
cnf(c_0_30,plain,
( c_Conform_Ooconf(v_P,X1,hAPP(hAPP(c_Pair(tc_List_Olist(tc_String_Ochar),tc_fun(tc_prod(tc_List_Olist(tc_String_Ochar),tc_List_Olist(tc_String_Ochar)),tc_Option_Ooption(tc_Value_Oval))),v_C____),c_Fun_Ofun__upd(X2,hAPP(hAPP(c_Pair(tc_List_Olist(tc_String_Ochar),tc_List_Olist(tc_String_Ochar)),v_F____),v_D____),hAPP(c_Option_Ooption_OSome(tc_Value_Oval),X3),tc_prod(tc_List_Olist(tc_String_Ochar),tc_List_Olist(tc_String_Ochar)),tc_Option_Ooption(tc_Value_Oval))),tc_prod(tc_List_Olist(tc_List_Olist(tc_String_Ochar)),tc_Expr_Oexp(tc_List_Olist(tc_String_Ochar))))
| ~ c_Conform_Ooconf(v_P,X1,hAPP(hAPP(c_Pair(tc_List_Olist(tc_String_Ochar),tc_fun(tc_prod(tc_List_Olist(tc_String_Ochar),tc_List_Olist(tc_String_Ochar)),tc_Option_Ooption(tc_Value_Oval))),v_C____),X2),tc_prod(tc_List_Olist(tc_List_Olist(tc_String_Ochar)),tc_Expr_Oexp(tc_List_Olist(tc_String_Ochar))))
| ~ c_Conform_Oconf(v_P,X1,X3,v_TF____,tc_prod(tc_List_Olist(tc_List_Olist(tc_String_Ochar)),tc_Expr_Oexp(tc_List_Olist(tc_String_Ochar)))) ),
inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_23,c_0_24]) ).
cnf(c_0_31,plain,
c_Conform_Oconf(v_P,v_ha____,v_v____,v_TF____,tc_prod(tc_List_Olist(tc_List_Olist(tc_String_Ochar)),tc_Expr_Oexp(tc_List_Olist(tc_String_Ochar)))),
inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_25,c_0_26]) ).
cnf(c_0_32,plain,
( c_Conform_Ooconf(X1,X2,X3,X4)
| ~ c_Objects_Ohext(X5,X2)
| ~ c_Conform_Ooconf(X1,X5,X3,X4) ),
c_0_27 ).
cnf(c_0_33,plain,
( c_Conform_Ooconf(X1,v_ha____,hAPP(hAPP(c_Pair(tc_List_Olist(tc_String_Ochar),tc_fun(tc_prod(tc_List_Olist(tc_String_Ochar),tc_List_Olist(tc_String_Ochar)),tc_Option_Ooption(tc_Value_Oval))),v_C____),v_fs____),X2)
| ~ c_Conform_Ohconf(X1,v_ha____,X2) ),
inference(er,[status(thm)],[c_0_28]) ).
cnf(c_0_34,negated_conjecture,
~ c_Conform_Ooconf(v_P,v_ha____,hAPP(hAPP(c_Pair(tc_List_Olist(tc_String_Ochar),tc_fun(tc_prod(tc_List_Olist(tc_String_Ochar),tc_List_Olist(tc_String_Ochar)),tc_Option_Ooption(tc_Value_Oval))),v_C____),v_fs____),tc_prod(tc_List_Olist(tc_List_Olist(tc_String_Ochar)),tc_Expr_Oexp(tc_List_Olist(tc_String_Ochar)))),
inference(cn,[status(thm)],[inference(rw,[status(thm)],[inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_29,c_0_30]),c_0_31])]) ).
cnf(c_0_35,plain,
( c_Conform_Ooconf(X1,X2,hAPP(hAPP(c_Pair(tc_List_Olist(tc_String_Ochar),tc_fun(tc_prod(tc_List_Olist(tc_String_Ochar),tc_List_Olist(tc_String_Ochar)),tc_Option_Ooption(tc_Value_Oval))),v_C____),v_fs____),X3)
| ~ c_Conform_Ohconf(X1,v_ha____,X3)
| ~ c_Objects_Ohext(v_ha____,X2) ),
inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_32,c_0_33]) ).
cnf(c_0_36,axiom,
c_Conform_Ohconf(v_P,v_ha____,tc_prod(tc_List_Olist(tc_List_Olist(tc_String_Ochar)),tc_Expr_Oexp(tc_List_Olist(tc_String_Ochar)))),
cls_hconf_0 ).
cnf(c_0_37,axiom,
c_Objects_Ohext(X1,X1),
cls_hext__refl_0 ).
cnf(c_0_38,negated_conjecture,
$false,
inference(cn,[status(thm)],[inference(rw,[status(thm)],[inference(rw,[status(thm)],[inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_34,c_0_35]),c_0_36]),c_0_37])]),
[proof] ).
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
%----ORIGINAL SYSTEM OUTPUT
% 0.10/0.12 % Problem : SWV919-1 : TPTP v8.2.0. Released v4.1.0.
% 0.10/0.13 % Command : run_E %s %d THM
% 0.13/0.34 % Computer : n010.cluster.edu
% 0.13/0.34 % Model : x86_64 x86_64
% 0.13/0.34 % CPU : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 @ 2.10GHz
% 0.13/0.34 % Memory : 8042.1875MB
% 0.13/0.34 % OS : Linux 3.10.0-693.el7.x86_64
% 0.13/0.34 % CPULimit : 300
% 0.13/0.34 % WCLimit : 300
% 0.13/0.34 % DateTime : Sun May 19 08:58:52 EDT 2024
% 0.13/0.34 % CPUTime :
% 0.20/0.48 Running first-order theorem proving
% 0.20/0.48 Running: /export/starexec/sandbox/solver/bin/eprover --delete-bad-limit=2000000000 --definitional-cnf=24 -s --print-statistics -R --print-version --proof-object --auto-schedule=8 --cpu-limit=300 /export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p
% 4.75/1.10 # Version: 3.1.0
% 4.75/1.10 # Preprocessing class: FSLMSMSMSSSNFFN.
% 4.75/1.10 # Scheduled 4 strats onto 8 cores with 300 seconds (2400 total)
% 4.75/1.10 # Starting G-E--_207_C18_F1_AE_CS_SP_PI_PS_S2S with 1200s (4) cores
% 4.75/1.10 # Starting new_bool_3 with 600s (2) cores
% 4.75/1.10 # Starting new_bool_1 with 300s (1) cores
% 4.75/1.10 # Starting sh5l with 300s (1) cores
% 4.75/1.10 # new_bool_3 with pid 7453 completed with status 0
% 4.75/1.10 # Result found by new_bool_3
% 4.75/1.10 # Preprocessing class: FSLMSMSMSSSNFFN.
% 4.75/1.10 # Scheduled 4 strats onto 8 cores with 300 seconds (2400 total)
% 4.75/1.10 # Starting G-E--_207_C18_F1_AE_CS_SP_PI_PS_S2S with 1200s (4) cores
% 4.75/1.10 # Starting new_bool_3 with 600s (2) cores
% 4.75/1.10 # SinE strategy is GSinE(CountFormulas,hypos,1.5,,3,20000,1.0)
% 4.75/1.10 # Search class: FGHSM-FFLM32-DFFFFFNN
% 4.75/1.10 # Scheduled 5 strats onto 2 cores with 600 seconds (600 total)
% 4.75/1.10 # Starting G-E--_208_C18_F1_SE_CS_SP_PS_S5PRR_S0Y with 123s (1) cores
% 4.75/1.10 # Starting new_bool_3 with 123s (1) cores
% 4.75/1.10 # G-E--_208_C18_F1_SE_CS_SP_PS_S5PRR_S0Y with pid 7460 completed with status 0
% 4.75/1.10 # Result found by G-E--_208_C18_F1_SE_CS_SP_PS_S5PRR_S0Y
% 4.75/1.10 # Preprocessing class: FSLMSMSMSSSNFFN.
% 4.75/1.10 # Scheduled 4 strats onto 8 cores with 300 seconds (2400 total)
% 4.75/1.10 # Starting G-E--_207_C18_F1_AE_CS_SP_PI_PS_S2S with 1200s (4) cores
% 4.75/1.10 # Starting new_bool_3 with 600s (2) cores
% 4.75/1.10 # SinE strategy is GSinE(CountFormulas,hypos,1.5,,3,20000,1.0)
% 4.75/1.10 # Search class: FGHSM-FFLM32-DFFFFFNN
% 4.75/1.10 # Scheduled 5 strats onto 2 cores with 600 seconds (600 total)
% 4.75/1.10 # Starting G-E--_208_C18_F1_SE_CS_SP_PS_S5PRR_S0Y with 123s (1) cores
% 4.75/1.10 # Preprocessing time : 0.003 s
% 4.75/1.10 # Presaturation interreduction done
% 4.75/1.10
% 4.75/1.10 # Proof found!
% 4.75/1.10 # SZS status Unsatisfiable
% 4.75/1.10 # SZS output start CNFRefutation
% See solution above
% 4.75/1.10 # Parsed axioms : 456
% 4.75/1.10 # Removed by relevancy pruning/SinE : 336
% 4.75/1.10 # Initial clauses : 120
% 4.75/1.10 # Removed in clause preprocessing : 0
% 4.75/1.10 # Initial clauses in saturation : 120
% 4.75/1.10 # Processed clauses : 3917
% 4.75/1.10 # ...of these trivial : 129
% 4.75/1.10 # ...subsumed : 2775
% 4.75/1.10 # ...remaining for further processing : 1013
% 4.75/1.10 # Other redundant clauses eliminated : 252
% 4.75/1.10 # Clauses deleted for lack of memory : 0
% 4.75/1.10 # Backward-subsumed : 61
% 4.75/1.10 # Backward-rewritten : 11
% 4.75/1.10 # Generated clauses : 23851
% 4.75/1.10 # ...of the previous two non-redundant : 21753
% 4.75/1.10 # ...aggressively subsumed : 0
% 4.75/1.10 # Contextual simplify-reflections : 0
% 4.75/1.10 # Paramodulations : 23559
% 4.75/1.10 # Factorizations : 0
% 4.75/1.10 # NegExts : 0
% 4.75/1.10 # Equation resolutions : 292
% 4.75/1.10 # Disequality decompositions : 0
% 4.75/1.10 # Total rewrite steps : 2187
% 4.75/1.10 # ...of those cached : 1439
% 4.75/1.10 # Propositional unsat checks : 0
% 4.75/1.10 # Propositional check models : 0
% 4.75/1.10 # Propositional check unsatisfiable : 0
% 4.75/1.10 # Propositional clauses : 0
% 4.75/1.10 # Propositional clauses after purity: 0
% 4.75/1.10 # Propositional unsat core size : 0
% 4.75/1.10 # Propositional preprocessing time : 0.000
% 4.75/1.10 # Propositional encoding time : 0.000
% 4.75/1.10 # Propositional solver time : 0.000
% 4.75/1.10 # Success case prop preproc time : 0.000
% 4.75/1.10 # Success case prop encoding time : 0.000
% 4.75/1.10 # Success case prop solver time : 0.000
% 4.75/1.10 # Current number of processed clauses : 854
% 4.75/1.10 # Positive orientable unit clauses : 46
% 4.75/1.10 # Positive unorientable unit clauses: 12
% 4.75/1.10 # Negative unit clauses : 13
% 4.75/1.10 # Non-unit-clauses : 783
% 4.75/1.10 # Current number of unprocessed clauses: 17793
% 4.75/1.10 # ...number of literals in the above : 64604
% 4.75/1.10 # Current number of archived formulas : 0
% 4.75/1.10 # Current number of archived clauses : 159
% 4.75/1.10 # Clause-clause subsumption calls (NU) : 149717
% 4.75/1.10 # Rec. Clause-clause subsumption calls : 65530
% 4.75/1.10 # Non-unit clause-clause subsumptions : 2390
% 4.75/1.10 # Unit Clause-clause subsumption calls : 948
% 4.75/1.10 # Rewrite failures with RHS unbound : 20
% 4.75/1.10 # BW rewrite match attempts : 201
% 4.75/1.10 # BW rewrite match successes : 15
% 4.75/1.10 # Condensation attempts : 0
% 4.75/1.10 # Condensation successes : 0
% 4.75/1.10 # Termbank termtop insertions : 735621
% 4.75/1.10 # Search garbage collected termcells : 2010
% 4.75/1.10
% 4.75/1.10 # -------------------------------------------------
% 4.75/1.10 # User time : 0.552 s
% 4.75/1.10 # System time : 0.016 s
% 4.75/1.10 # Total time : 0.568 s
% 4.75/1.10 # Maximum resident set size: 2424 pages
% 4.75/1.10
% 4.75/1.10 # -------------------------------------------------
% 4.75/1.10 # User time : 1.129 s
% 4.75/1.10 # System time : 0.020 s
% 4.75/1.10 # Total time : 1.149 s
% 4.75/1.10 # Maximum resident set size: 2152 pages
% 4.75/1.10 % E---3.1 exiting
% 4.75/1.10 % E exiting
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------