TSTP Solution File: SWV918-1 by Otter---3.3
View Problem
- Process Solution
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
% File : Otter---3.3
% Problem : SWV918-1 : TPTP v8.1.0. Released v4.1.0.
% Transfm : none
% Format : tptp:raw
% Command : otter-tptp-script %s
% Computer : n016.cluster.edu
% Model : x86_64 x86_64
% CPU : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 2.10GHz
% Memory : 8042.1875MB
% OS : Linux 3.10.0-693.el7.x86_64
% CPULimit : 300s
% WCLimit : 300s
% DateTime : Wed Jul 27 13:21:46 EDT 2022
% Result : Unknown 25.71s 25.92s
% Output : None
% Verified :
% SZS Type : -
% Comments :
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
%----No solution output by system
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
%----ORIGINAL SYSTEM OUTPUT
% 0.03/0.12 % Problem : SWV918-1 : TPTP v8.1.0. Released v4.1.0.
% 0.03/0.13 % Command : otter-tptp-script %s
% 0.12/0.33 % Computer : n016.cluster.edu
% 0.12/0.33 % Model : x86_64 x86_64
% 0.12/0.33 % CPU : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 @ 2.10GHz
% 0.12/0.33 % Memory : 8042.1875MB
% 0.12/0.33 % OS : Linux 3.10.0-693.el7.x86_64
% 0.12/0.33 % CPULimit : 300
% 0.12/0.33 % WCLimit : 300
% 0.12/0.33 % DateTime : Wed Jul 27 06:17:07 EDT 2022
% 0.12/0.34 % CPUTime :
% 1.78/1.99 ----- Otter 3.3f, August 2004 -----
% 1.78/1.99 The process was started by sandbox on n016.cluster.edu,
% 1.78/1.99 Wed Jul 27 06:17:07 2022
% 1.78/1.99 The command was "./otter". The process ID is 8690.
% 1.78/1.99
% 1.78/1.99 set(prolog_style_variables).
% 1.78/1.99 set(auto).
% 1.78/1.99 dependent: set(auto1).
% 1.78/1.99 dependent: set(process_input).
% 1.78/1.99 dependent: clear(print_kept).
% 1.78/1.99 dependent: clear(print_new_demod).
% 1.78/1.99 dependent: clear(print_back_demod).
% 1.78/1.99 dependent: clear(print_back_sub).
% 1.78/1.99 dependent: set(control_memory).
% 1.78/1.99 dependent: assign(max_mem, 12000).
% 1.78/1.99 dependent: assign(pick_given_ratio, 4).
% 1.78/1.99 dependent: assign(stats_level, 1).
% 1.78/1.99 dependent: assign(max_seconds, 10800).
% 1.78/1.99 clear(print_given).
% 1.78/1.99
% 1.78/1.99 list(usable).
% 1.78/1.99 0 [] A=A.
% 1.78/1.99 0 [] c_COMBI(V_P,T_a)=V_P.
% 1.78/1.99 0 [] c_Exceptions_Opreallocated(V_h)| -c_Conform_Ohconf(V_P,V_h,T_a).
% 1.78/1.99 0 [] c_Conform_Ohconf(v_P,v_ha____,tc_prod(tc_List_Olist(tc_List_Olist(tc_String_Ochar)),tc_Expr_Oexp(tc_List_Olist(tc_String_Ochar)))).
% 1.78/1.99 0 [] c_COMBI(v_P,t_a)=v_P.
% 1.78/1.99 0 [] v_h_Ha____=c_Fun_Ofun__upd(v_ha____,v_a____,c_Option_Ooption_OSome(c_Pair(v_C____,c_Objects_Oinit__fields(v_FDTs____),tc_List_Olist(tc_String_Ochar),tc_fun(tc_prod(tc_List_Olist(tc_String_Ochar),tc_List_Olist(tc_String_Ochar)),tc_Option_Ooption(tc_Value_Oval))),tc_prod(tc_List_Olist(tc_String_Ochar),tc_fun(tc_prod(tc_List_Olist(tc_String_Ochar),tc_List_Olist(tc_String_Ochar)),tc_Option_Ooption(tc_Value_Oval)))),tc_nat,tc_Option_Ooption(tc_prod(tc_List_Olist(tc_String_Ochar),tc_fun(tc_prod(tc_List_Olist(tc_String_Ochar),tc_List_Olist(tc_String_Ochar)),tc_Option_Ooption(tc_Value_Oval))))).
% 1.78/1.99 0 [] c_Conform_Ooconf(v_P,v_ha____,c_Pair(v_C____,c_Objects_Oinit__fields(v_FDTs____),tc_List_Olist(tc_String_Ochar),tc_fun(tc_prod(tc_List_Olist(tc_String_Ochar),tc_List_Olist(tc_String_Ochar)),tc_Option_Ooption(tc_Value_Oval))),tc_prod(tc_List_Olist(tc_List_Olist(tc_String_Ochar)),tc_Expr_Oexp(tc_List_Olist(tc_String_Ochar)))).
% 1.78/1.99 0 [] hAPP(v_ha____,v_a____)=c_Option_Ooption_ONone(tc_prod(tc_List_Olist(tc_String_Ochar),tc_fun(tc_prod(tc_List_Olist(tc_String_Ochar),tc_List_Olist(tc_String_Ochar)),tc_Option_Ooption(tc_Value_Oval)))).
% 1.78/1.99 0 [] -c_Conform_Ohconf(v_P,v_h_Ha____,tc_prod(tc_List_Olist(tc_List_Olist(tc_String_Ochar)),tc_Expr_Oexp(tc_List_Olist(tc_String_Ochar)))).
% 1.78/1.99 0 [] c_fe_qual(V_x,V_x,T_a).
% 1.78/1.99 0 [] V_X=V_Y| -c_fe_qual(V_X,V_Y,T_a).
% 1.78/1.99 end_of_list.
% 1.78/1.99
% 1.78/1.99 SCAN INPUT: prop=0, horn=1, equality=1, symmetry=0, max_lits=2.
% 1.78/1.99
% 1.78/1.99 This is a Horn set with equality. The strategy will be
% 1.78/1.99 Knuth-Bendix and hyper_res, with positive clauses in
% 1.78/1.99 sos and nonpositive clauses in usable.
% 1.78/1.99
% 1.78/1.99 dependent: set(knuth_bendix).
% 1.78/1.99 dependent: set(anl_eq).
% 1.78/1.99 dependent: set(para_from).
% 1.78/1.99 dependent: set(para_into).
% 1.78/1.99 dependent: clear(para_from_right).
% 1.78/1.99 dependent: clear(para_into_right).
% 1.78/1.99 dependent: set(para_from_vars).
% 1.78/1.99 dependent: set(eq_units_both_ways).
% 1.78/1.99 dependent: set(dynamic_demod_all).
% 1.78/1.99 dependent: set(dynamic_demod).
% 1.78/1.99 dependent: set(order_eq).
% 1.78/1.99 dependent: set(back_demod).
% 1.78/1.99 dependent: set(lrpo).
% 1.78/1.99 dependent: set(hyper_res).
% 1.78/1.99 dependent: clear(order_hyper).
% 1.78/1.99
% 1.78/1.99 ------------> process usable:
% 1.78/1.99 ** KEPT (pick-wt=6): 1 [] c_Exceptions_Opreallocated(A)| -c_Conform_Ohconf(B,A,C).
% 1.78/1.99 ** KEPT (pick-wt=10): 2 [] -c_Conform_Ohconf(v_P,v_h_Ha____,tc_prod(tc_List_Olist(tc_List_Olist(tc_String_Ochar)),tc_Expr_Oexp(tc_List_Olist(tc_String_Ochar)))).
% 1.78/1.99 ** KEPT (pick-wt=7): 3 [] A=B| -c_fe_qual(A,B,C).
% 1.78/1.99
% 1.78/1.99 ------------> process sos:
% 1.78/1.99 ** KEPT (pick-wt=3): 4 [] A=A.
% 1.78/1.99 ** KEPT (pick-wt=5): 5 [] c_COMBI(A,B)=A.
% 1.78/1.99 ---> New Demodulator: 6 [new_demod,5] c_COMBI(A,B)=A.
% 1.78/1.99 ** KEPT (pick-wt=10): 7 [] c_Conform_Ohconf(v_P,v_ha____,tc_prod(tc_List_Olist(tc_List_Olist(tc_String_Ochar)),tc_Expr_Oexp(tc_List_Olist(tc_String_Ochar)))).
% 1.78/1.99 Following clause subsumed by 4 during input processing: 0 [demod,6] v_P=v_P.
% 1.78/1.99 ** KEPT (pick-wt=44): 9 [copy,8,flip.1] c_Fun_Ofun__upd(v_ha____,v_a____,c_Option_Ooption_OSome(c_Pair(v_C____,c_Objects_Oinit__fields(v_FDTs____),tc_List_Olist(tc_String_Ochar),tc_fun(tc_prod(tc_List_Olist(tc_String_Ochar),tc_List_Olist(tc_String_Ochar)),tc_Option_Ooption(tc_Value_Oval))),tc_prod(tc_List_Olist(tc_String_Ochar),tc_fun(tc_prod(tc_List_Olist(tc_String_Ochar),tc_List_Olist(tc_String_Ochar)),tc_Option_Ooption(tc_Value_Oval)))),tc_nat,tc_Option_Ooption(tc_prod(tc_List_Olist(tc_String_Ochar),tc_fun(tc_prod(tc_List_Olist(tc_String_Ochar),tc_List_Olist(tc_String_Ochar)),tc_Option_Ooption(tc_Value_Oval)))))=v_h_Ha____.
% 25.71/25.92 ---> New Demodulator: 10 [new_demod,9] c_Fun_Ofun__upd(v_ha____,v_a____,c_Option_Ooption_OSome(c_Pair(v_C____,c_Objects_Oinit__fields(v_FDTs____),tc_List_Olist(tc_String_Ochar),tc_fun(tc_prod(tc_List_Olist(tc_String_Ochar),tc_List_Olist(tc_String_Ochar)),tc_Option_Ooption(tc_Value_Oval))),tc_prod(tc_List_Olist(tc_String_Ochar),tc_fun(tc_prod(tc_List_Olist(tc_String_Ochar),tc_List_Olist(tc_String_Ochar)),tc_Option_Ooption(tc_Value_Oval)))),tc_nat,tc_Option_Ooption(tc_prod(tc_List_Olist(tc_String_Ochar),tc_fun(tc_prod(tc_List_Olist(tc_String_Ochar),tc_List_Olist(tc_String_Ochar)),tc_Option_Ooption(tc_Value_Oval)))))=v_h_Ha____.
% 25.71/25.92 ** KEPT (pick-wt=24): 11 [] c_Conform_Ooconf(v_P,v_ha____,c_Pair(v_C____,c_Objects_Oinit__fields(v_FDTs____),tc_List_Olist(tc_String_Ochar),tc_fun(tc_prod(tc_List_Olist(tc_String_Ochar),tc_List_Olist(tc_String_Ochar)),tc_Option_Ooption(tc_Value_Oval))),tc_prod(tc_List_Olist(tc_List_Olist(tc_String_Ochar)),tc_Expr_Oexp(tc_List_Olist(tc_String_Ochar)))).
% 25.71/25.92 ** KEPT (pick-wt=16): 13 [copy,12,flip.1] c_Option_Ooption_ONone(tc_prod(tc_List_Olist(tc_String_Ochar),tc_fun(tc_prod(tc_List_Olist(tc_String_Ochar),tc_List_Olist(tc_String_Ochar)),tc_Option_Ooption(tc_Value_Oval))))=hAPP(v_ha____,v_a____).
% 25.71/25.92 ---> New Demodulator: 14 [new_demod,13] c_Option_Ooption_ONone(tc_prod(tc_List_Olist(tc_String_Ochar),tc_fun(tc_prod(tc_List_Olist(tc_String_Ochar),tc_List_Olist(tc_String_Ochar)),tc_Option_Ooption(tc_Value_Oval))))=hAPP(v_ha____,v_a____).
% 25.71/25.92 ** KEPT (pick-wt=4): 15 [] c_fe_qual(A,A,B).
% 25.71/25.92 Following clause subsumed by 4 during input processing: 0 [copy,4,flip.1] A=A.
% 25.71/25.92 >>>> Starting back demodulation with 6.
% 25.71/25.92 >>>> Starting back demodulation with 10.
% 25.71/25.92 >>>> Starting back demodulation with 14.
% 25.71/25.92
% 25.71/25.92 ======= end of input processing =======
% 25.71/25.92
% 25.71/25.92 =========== start of search ===========
% 25.71/25.92
% 25.71/25.92
% 25.71/25.92 Resetting weight limit to 18.
% 25.71/25.92
% 25.71/25.92
% 25.71/25.92 Resetting weight limit to 18.
% 25.71/25.92
% 25.71/25.92 sos_size=2175
% 25.71/25.92
% 25.71/25.92 Search stopped because sos empty.
% 25.71/25.92
% 25.71/25.92
% 25.71/25.92 Search stopped because sos empty.
% 25.71/25.92
% 25.71/25.92 ============ end of search ============
% 25.71/25.92
% 25.71/25.92 -------------- statistics -------------
% 25.71/25.92 clauses given 2297
% 25.71/25.92 clauses generated 3884588
% 25.71/25.92 clauses kept 2300
% 25.71/25.92 clauses forward subsumed 80958
% 25.71/25.92 clauses back subsumed 9
% 25.71/25.92 Kbytes malloced 5859
% 25.71/25.92
% 25.71/25.92 ----------- times (seconds) -----------
% 25.71/25.92 user CPU time 23.93 (0 hr, 0 min, 23 sec)
% 25.71/25.92 system CPU time 0.01 (0 hr, 0 min, 0 sec)
% 25.71/25.92 wall-clock time 25 (0 hr, 0 min, 25 sec)
% 25.71/25.92
% 25.71/25.92 Process 8690 finished Wed Jul 27 06:17:32 2022
% 25.71/25.92 Otter interrupted
% 25.71/25.92 PROOF NOT FOUND
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------