TSTP Solution File: SWV918-1 by Etableau---0.67

View Problem - Process Solution

%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
% File     : Etableau---0.67
% Problem  : SWV918-1 : TPTP v8.1.0. Released v4.1.0.
% Transfm  : none
% Format   : tptp:raw
% Command  : etableau --auto --tsmdo --quicksat=10000 --tableau=1 --tableau-saturation=1 -s -p --tableau-cores=8 --cpu-limit=%d %s

% Computer : n024.cluster.edu
% Model    : x86_64 x86_64
% CPU      : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 2.10GHz
% Memory   : 8042.1875MB
% OS       : Linux 3.10.0-693.el7.x86_64
% CPULimit : 300s
% WCLimit  : 600s
% DateTime : Wed Jul 20 18:23:56 EDT 2022

% Result   : Satisfiable 0.12s 0.37s
% Output   : CNFRefutation 0.12s
% Verified : 
% SZS Type : -

% Comments : 
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
%----WARNING: Could not form TPTP format derivation
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
%----ORIGINAL SYSTEM OUTPUT
% 0.07/0.12  % Problem  : SWV918-1 : TPTP v8.1.0. Released v4.1.0.
% 0.07/0.13  % Command  : etableau --auto --tsmdo --quicksat=10000 --tableau=1 --tableau-saturation=1 -s -p --tableau-cores=8 --cpu-limit=%d %s
% 0.12/0.34  % Computer : n024.cluster.edu
% 0.12/0.34  % Model    : x86_64 x86_64
% 0.12/0.34  % CPU      : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 @ 2.10GHz
% 0.12/0.34  % Memory   : 8042.1875MB
% 0.12/0.34  % OS       : Linux 3.10.0-693.el7.x86_64
% 0.12/0.34  % CPULimit : 300
% 0.12/0.34  % WCLimit  : 600
% 0.12/0.34  % DateTime : Wed Jun 15 07:05:18 EDT 2022
% 0.12/0.34  % CPUTime  : 
% 0.12/0.37  # No SInE strategy applied
% 0.12/0.37  # Auto-Mode selected heuristic G_E___208_C18_F1_SE_CS_SP_PS_S5PRR_RG_S04AN
% 0.12/0.37  # and selection function SelectComplexExceptUniqMaxHorn.
% 0.12/0.37  #
% 0.12/0.37  # Presaturation interreduction done
% 0.12/0.37  # Number of axioms: 8 Number of unprocessed: 8
% 0.12/0.37  # Tableaux proof search.
% 0.12/0.37  # APR header successfully linked.
% 0.12/0.37  # Hello from C++
% 0.12/0.37  # The folding up rule is enabled...
% 0.12/0.37  # Local unification is enabled...
% 0.12/0.37  # Any saturation attempts will use folding labels...
% 0.12/0.37  # 8 beginning clauses after preprocessing and clausification
% 0.12/0.37  # Creating start rules for all 1 conjectures.
% 0.12/0.37  # There are 1 start rule candidates:
% 0.12/0.37  # Found 6 unit axioms.
% 0.12/0.37  # 1 start rule tableaux created.
% 0.12/0.37  # 2 extension rule candidate clauses
% 0.12/0.37  # 6 unit axiom clauses
% 0.12/0.37  
% 0.12/0.37  # Requested 8, 32 cores available to the main process.
% 0.12/0.37  # There are not enough tableaux to fork, creating more from the initial 1
% 0.12/0.37  # Creating equality axioms
% 0.12/0.37  # Ran out of tableaux, making start rules for all clauses
% 0.12/0.37  # Returning from population with 9 new_tableaux and 0 remaining starting tableaux.
% 0.12/0.37  # We now have 9 tableaux to operate on
% 0.12/0.37  # 12234 Satisfiable branch
% 0.12/0.37  # 12232 Satisfiable branch
% 0.12/0.37  # 12233 Satisfiable branch
% 0.12/0.37  # 12236 Satisfiable branch
% 0.12/0.37  # Satisfiable branch found.
% 0.12/0.37  # 12235 Satisfiable branch
% 0.12/0.37  # There were 1 total branch saturation attempts.
% 0.12/0.37  # There were 0 of these attempts blocked.
% 0.12/0.37  # There were 0 deferred branch saturation attempts.
% 0.12/0.37  # There were 0 free duplicated saturations.
% 0.12/0.37  # There were 0 total successful branch saturations.
% 0.12/0.37  # There were 0 successful branch saturations in interreduction.
% 0.12/0.37  # There were 0 successful branch saturations on the branch.
% 0.12/0.37  # There were 0 successful branch saturations after the branch.
% 0.12/0.37  # Satisfiable branch found.
% 0.12/0.37  # There were 1 total branch saturation attempts.
% 0.12/0.37  # There were 0 of these attempts blocked.
% 0.12/0.37  # There were 0 deferred branch saturation attempts.
% 0.12/0.37  # There were 0 free duplicated saturations.
% 0.12/0.37  # There were 0 total successful branch saturations.
% 0.12/0.37  # There were 0 successful branch saturations in interreduction.
% 0.12/0.37  # There were 0 successful branch saturations on the branch.
% 0.12/0.37  # There were 0 successful branch saturations after the branch.
% 0.12/0.37  # SZS status Satisfiable for /export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p
% 0.12/0.37  # SZS output start for /export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p
% 0.12/0.37  # Begin clausification derivation
% 0.12/0.37  
% 0.12/0.37  # End clausification derivation
% 0.12/0.37  # Begin listing active clauses obtained from FOF to CNF conversion
% 0.12/0.37  cnf(i_0_19, plain, (c_fequal(X1,X1,X2))).
% 0.12/0.37  cnf(i_0_13, plain, (c_Conform_Ohconf(v_P,v_ha____,tc_prod(tc_List_Olist(tc_List_Olist(tc_String_Ochar)),tc_Expr_Oexp(tc_List_Olist(tc_String_Ochar)))))).
% 0.12/0.37  cnf(i_0_17, plain, (c_Option_Ooption_ONone(tc_prod(tc_List_Olist(tc_String_Ochar),tc_fun(tc_prod(tc_List_Olist(tc_String_Ochar),tc_List_Olist(tc_String_Ochar)),tc_Option_Ooption(tc_Value_Oval))))=hAPP(v_ha____,v_a____))).
% 0.12/0.37  cnf(i_0_16, plain, (c_Conform_Ooconf(v_P,v_ha____,c_Pair(v_C____,c_Objects_Oinit__fields(v_FDTs____),tc_List_Olist(tc_String_Ochar),tc_fun(tc_prod(tc_List_Olist(tc_String_Ochar),tc_List_Olist(tc_String_Ochar)),tc_Option_Ooption(tc_Value_Oval))),tc_prod(tc_List_Olist(tc_List_Olist(tc_String_Ochar)),tc_Expr_Oexp(tc_List_Olist(tc_String_Ochar)))))).
% 0.12/0.37  cnf(i_0_15, plain, (c_Fun_Ofun__upd(v_ha____,v_a____,c_Option_Ooption_OSome(c_Pair(v_C____,c_Objects_Oinit__fields(v_FDTs____),tc_List_Olist(tc_String_Ochar),tc_fun(tc_prod(tc_List_Olist(tc_String_Ochar),tc_List_Olist(tc_String_Ochar)),tc_Option_Ooption(tc_Value_Oval))),tc_prod(tc_List_Olist(tc_String_Ochar),tc_fun(tc_prod(tc_List_Olist(tc_String_Ochar),tc_List_Olist(tc_String_Ochar)),tc_Option_Ooption(tc_Value_Oval)))),tc_nat,tc_Option_Ooption(tc_prod(tc_List_Olist(tc_String_Ochar),tc_fun(tc_prod(tc_List_Olist(tc_String_Ochar),tc_List_Olist(tc_String_Ochar)),tc_Option_Ooption(tc_Value_Oval)))))=v_h_Ha____)).
% 0.12/0.37  cnf(i_0_18, negated_conjecture, (~c_Conform_Ohconf(v_P,v_h_Ha____,tc_prod(tc_List_Olist(tc_List_Olist(tc_String_Ochar)),tc_Expr_Oexp(tc_List_Olist(tc_String_Ochar)))))).
% 0.12/0.37  cnf(i_0_20, plain, (X1=X2|~c_fequal(X1,X2,X3))).
% 0.12/0.37  cnf(i_0_12, plain, (c_Exceptions_Opreallocated(X1)|~c_Conform_Ohconf(X2,X1,X3))).
% 0.12/0.37  cnf(i_0_26, plain, (X4=X4)).
% 0.12/0.37  # End listing active clauses.  There is an equivalent clause to each of these in the clausification!
% 0.12/0.37  # Begin printing tableau
% 0.12/0.37  # Found 6 steps
% 0.12/0.37  cnf(i_0_19, plain, (c_fequal(v_P,v_P,X6)), inference(start_rule)).
% 0.12/0.37  cnf(i_0_45, plain, (c_fequal(v_P,v_P,X6)), inference(extension_rule, [i_0_20])).
% 0.12/0.37  cnf(i_0_56, plain, (v_P=v_P), inference(extension_rule, [i_0_31])).
% 0.12/0.37  cnf(i_0_207, plain, (c_Conform_Ohconf(v_P,v_h_Ha____,tc_prod(tc_List_Olist(tc_List_Olist(tc_String_Ochar)),tc_Expr_Oexp(tc_List_Olist(tc_String_Ochar))))), inference(closure_rule, [i_0_18])).
% 0.12/0.37  cnf(i_0_209, plain, (c_Fun_Ofun__upd(v_ha____,v_a____,c_Option_Ooption_OSome(c_Pair(v_C____,c_Objects_Oinit__fields(v_FDTs____),tc_List_Olist(tc_String_Ochar),tc_fun(tc_prod(tc_List_Olist(tc_String_Ochar),tc_List_Olist(tc_String_Ochar)),tc_Option_Ooption(tc_Value_Oval))),tc_prod(tc_List_Olist(tc_String_Ochar),tc_fun(tc_prod(tc_List_Olist(tc_String_Ochar),tc_List_Olist(tc_String_Ochar)),tc_Option_Ooption(tc_Value_Oval)))),tc_nat,tc_Option_Ooption(tc_prod(tc_List_Olist(tc_String_Ochar),tc_fun(tc_prod(tc_List_Olist(tc_String_Ochar),tc_List_Olist(tc_String_Ochar)),tc_Option_Ooption(tc_Value_Oval)))))!=v_h_Ha____), inference(closure_rule, [i_0_15])).
% 0.12/0.37  cnf(i_0_210, plain, ($false), inference(closure_rule, [i_0_26])).
% 0.12/0.37  # End printing tableau
% 0.12/0.37  # SZS output end
% 0.12/0.37  # Branches closed with saturation will be marked with an "s"
% 0.12/0.37  # Satisfiable branch found.
% 0.12/0.37  # There were 1 total branch saturation attempts.
% 0.12/0.37  # There were 0 of these attempts blocked.
% 0.12/0.37  # There were 0 deferred branch saturation attempts.
% 0.12/0.37  # There were 0 free duplicated saturations.
% 0.12/0.37  # There were 0 total successful branch saturations.
% 0.12/0.37  # There were 0 successful branch saturations in interreduction.
% 0.12/0.37  # There were 0 successful branch saturations on the branch.
% 0.12/0.37  # There were 0 successful branch saturations after the branch.
% 0.12/0.37  # SZS status Satisfiable for /export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p
% 0.12/0.37  # SZS output start for /export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p
% 0.12/0.37  # Begin clausification derivation
% 0.12/0.37  
% 0.12/0.37  # End clausification derivation
% 0.12/0.37  # Begin listing active clauses obtained from FOF to CNF conversion
% 0.12/0.37  cnf(i_0_19, plain, (c_fequal(X1,X1,X2))).
% 0.12/0.37  cnf(i_0_13, plain, (c_Conform_Ohconf(v_P,v_ha____,tc_prod(tc_List_Olist(tc_List_Olist(tc_String_Ochar)),tc_Expr_Oexp(tc_List_Olist(tc_String_Ochar)))))).
% 0.12/0.37  cnf(i_0_17, plain, (c_Option_Ooption_ONone(tc_prod(tc_List_Olist(tc_String_Ochar),tc_fun(tc_prod(tc_List_Olist(tc_String_Ochar),tc_List_Olist(tc_String_Ochar)),tc_Option_Ooption(tc_Value_Oval))))=hAPP(v_ha____,v_a____))).
% 0.12/0.37  cnf(i_0_16, plain, (c_Conform_Ooconf(v_P,v_ha____,c_Pair(v_C____,c_Objects_Oinit__fields(v_FDTs____),tc_List_Olist(tc_String_Ochar),tc_fun(tc_prod(tc_List_Olist(tc_String_Ochar),tc_List_Olist(tc_String_Ochar)),tc_Option_Ooption(tc_Value_Oval))),tc_prod(tc_List_Olist(tc_List_Olist(tc_String_Ochar)),tc_Expr_Oexp(tc_List_Olist(tc_String_Ochar)))))).
% 0.12/0.37  cnf(i_0_15, plain, (c_Fun_Ofun__upd(v_ha____,v_a____,c_Option_Ooption_OSome(c_Pair(v_C____,c_Objects_Oinit__fields(v_FDTs____),tc_List_Olist(tc_String_Ochar),tc_fun(tc_prod(tc_List_Olist(tc_String_Ochar),tc_List_Olist(tc_String_Ochar)),tc_Option_Ooption(tc_Value_Oval))),tc_prod(tc_List_Olist(tc_String_Ochar),tc_fun(tc_prod(tc_List_Olist(tc_String_Ochar),tc_List_Olist(tc_String_Ochar)),tc_Option_Ooption(tc_Value_Oval)))),tc_nat,tc_Option_Ooption(tc_prod(tc_List_Olist(tc_String_Ochar),tc_fun(tc_prod(tc_List_Olist(tc_String_Ochar),tc_List_Olist(tc_String_Ochar)),tc_Option_Ooption(tc_Value_Oval)))))=v_h_Ha____)).
% 0.12/0.37  cnf(i_0_18, negated_conjecture, (~c_Conform_Ohconf(v_P,v_h_Ha____,tc_prod(tc_List_Olist(tc_List_Olist(tc_String_Ochar)),tc_Expr_Oexp(tc_List_Olist(tc_String_Ochar)))))).
% 0.12/0.37  cnf(i_0_20, plain, (X1=X2|~c_fequal(X1,X2,X3))).
% 0.12/0.37  cnf(i_0_12, plain, (c_Exceptions_Opreallocated(X1)|~c_Conform_Ohconf(X2,X1,X3))).
% 0.12/0.37  cnf(i_0_26, plain, (X4=X4)).
% 0.12/0.37  # End listing active clauses.  There is an equivalent clause to each of these in the clausification!
% 0.12/0.37  # Begin printing tableau
% 0.12/0.37  # Found 6 steps
% 0.12/0.37  cnf(i_0_13, plain, (c_Conform_Ohconf(v_P,v_ha____,tc_prod(tc_List_Olist(tc_List_Olist(tc_String_Ochar)),tc_Expr_Oexp(tc_List_Olist(tc_String_Ochar))))), inference(start_rule)).
% 0.12/0.37  cnf(i_0_46, plain, (c_Conform_Ohconf(v_P,v_ha____,tc_prod(tc_List_Olist(tc_List_Olist(tc_String_Ochar)),tc_Expr_Oexp(tc_List_Olist(tc_String_Ochar))))), inference(extension_rule, [i_0_31])).
% 0.12/0.37  cnf(i_0_270, plain, (c_Conform_Ohconf(v_P,v_h_Ha____,tc_prod(tc_List_Olist(tc_List_Olist(tc_String_Ochar)),tc_Expr_Oexp(tc_List_Olist(tc_String_Ochar))))), inference(closure_rule, [i_0_18])).
% 0.12/0.37  cnf(i_0_271, plain, ($false), inference(closure_rule, [i_0_26])).
% 0.12/0.37  cnf(i_0_273, plain, ($false), inference(closure_rule, [i_0_26])).
% 0.12/0.37  cnf(i_0_272, plain, (v_ha____!=v_h_Ha____), inference(extension_rule, [i_0_20])).
% 0.12/0.37  # End printing tableau
% 0.12/0.37  # SZS output end
% 0.12/0.37  # Branches closed with saturation will be marked with an "s"
% 0.12/0.37  # Satisfiable branch found.
% 0.12/0.37  # Satisfiable branch found.
% 0.12/0.37  # There were 1 total branch saturation attempts.
% 0.12/0.37  # There were 0 of these attempts blocked.
% 0.12/0.37  # There were 0 deferred branch saturation attempts.
% 0.12/0.37  # There were 0 free duplicated saturations.
% 0.12/0.37  # There were 0 total successful branch saturations.
% 0.12/0.37  # There were 0 successful branch saturations in interreduction.
% 0.12/0.37  # There were 0 successful branch saturations on the branch.
% 0.12/0.37  # There were 0 successful branch saturations after the branch.
% 0.12/0.37  # SZS status Satisfiable for /export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p
% 0.12/0.37  # SZS output start for /export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p
% 0.12/0.37  # Begin clausification derivation
% 0.12/0.37  
% 0.12/0.37  # End clausification derivation
% 0.12/0.37  # Begin listing active clauses obtained from FOF to CNF conversion
% 0.12/0.37  cnf(i_0_19, plain, (c_fequal(X1,X1,X2))).
% 0.12/0.37  cnf(i_0_13, plain, (c_Conform_Ohconf(v_P,v_ha____,tc_prod(tc_List_Olist(tc_List_Olist(tc_String_Ochar)),tc_Expr_Oexp(tc_List_Olist(tc_String_Ochar)))))).
% 0.12/0.37  cnf(i_0_17, plain, (c_Option_Ooption_ONone(tc_prod(tc_List_Olist(tc_String_Ochar),tc_fun(tc_prod(tc_List_Olist(tc_String_Ochar),tc_List_Olist(tc_String_Ochar)),tc_Option_Ooption(tc_Value_Oval))))=hAPP(v_ha____,v_a____))).
% 0.12/0.37  cnf(i_0_16, plain, (c_Conform_Ooconf(v_P,v_ha____,c_Pair(v_C____,c_Objects_Oinit__fields(v_FDTs____),tc_List_Olist(tc_String_Ochar),tc_fun(tc_prod(tc_List_Olist(tc_String_Ochar),tc_List_Olist(tc_String_Ochar)),tc_Option_Ooption(tc_Value_Oval))),tc_prod(tc_List_Olist(tc_List_Olist(tc_String_Ochar)),tc_Expr_Oexp(tc_List_Olist(tc_String_Ochar)))))).
% 0.12/0.37  cnf(i_0_15, plain, (c_Fun_Ofun__upd(v_ha____,v_a____,c_Option_Ooption_OSome(c_Pair(v_C____,c_Objects_Oinit__fields(v_FDTs____),tc_List_Olist(tc_String_Ochar),tc_fun(tc_prod(tc_List_Olist(tc_String_Ochar),tc_List_Olist(tc_String_Ochar)),tc_Option_Ooption(tc_Value_Oval))),tc_prod(tc_List_Olist(tc_String_Ochar),tc_fun(tc_prod(tc_List_Olist(tc_String_Ochar),tc_List_Olist(tc_String_Ochar)),tc_Option_Ooption(tc_Value_Oval)))),tc_nat,tc_Option_Ooption(tc_prod(tc_List_Olist(tc_String_Ochar),tc_fun(tc_prod(tc_List_Olist(tc_String_Ochar),tc_List_Olist(tc_String_Ochar)),tc_Option_Ooption(tc_Value_Oval)))))=v_h_Ha____)).
% 0.12/0.37  cnf(i_0_18, negated_conjecture, (~c_Conform_Ohconf(v_P,v_h_Ha____,tc_prod(tc_List_Olist(tc_List_Olist(tc_String_Ochar)),tc_Expr_Oexp(tc_List_Olist(tc_String_Ochar)))))).
% 0.12/0.37  cnf(i_0_20, plain, (X1=X2|~c_fequal(X1,X2,X3))).
% 0.12/0.37  cnf(i_0_12, plain, (c_Exceptions_Opreallocated(X1)|~c_Conform_Ohconf(X2,X1,X3))).
% 0.12/0.37  cnf(i_0_26, plain, (X4=X4)).
% 0.12/0.37  # End listing active clauses.  There is an equivalent clause to each of these in the clausification!
% 0.12/0.37  # Begin printing tableau
% 0.12/0.37  # Found 4 steps
% 0.12/0.37  cnf(i_0_17, plain, (c_Option_Ooption_ONone(tc_prod(tc_List_Olist(tc_String_Ochar),tc_fun(tc_prod(tc_List_Olist(tc_String_Ochar),tc_List_Olist(tc_String_Ochar)),tc_Option_Ooption(tc_Value_Oval))))=hAPP(v_ha____,v_a____)), inference(start_rule)).
% 0.12/0.37  cnf(i_0_47, plain, (c_Option_Ooption_ONone(tc_prod(tc_List_Olist(tc_String_Ochar),tc_fun(tc_prod(tc_List_Olist(tc_String_Ochar),tc_List_Olist(tc_String_Ochar)),tc_Option_Ooption(tc_Value_Oval))))=hAPP(v_ha____,v_a____)), inference(extension_rule, [i_0_29])).
% 0.12/0.37  cnf(i_0_129, plain, (c_Option_Ooption_ONone(tc_prod(tc_List_Olist(tc_String_Ochar),tc_fun(tc_prod(tc_List_Olist(tc_String_Ochar),tc_List_Olist(tc_String_Ochar)),tc_Option_Ooption(tc_Value_Oval))))!=hAPP(v_ha____,v_a____)), inference(closure_rule, [i_0_17])).
% 0.12/0.37  cnf(i_0_127, plain, (c_Option_Ooption_ONone(tc_prod(tc_List_Olist(tc_String_Ochar),tc_fun(tc_prod(tc_List_Olist(tc_String_Ochar),tc_List_Olist(tc_String_Ochar)),tc_Option_Ooption(tc_Value_Oval))))=c_Option_Ooption_ONone(tc_prod(tc_List_Olist(tc_String_Ochar),tc_fun(tc_prod(tc_List_Olist(tc_String_Ochar),tc_List_Olist(tc_String_Ochar)),tc_Option_Ooption(tc_Value_Oval))))), inference(extension_rule, [i_0_30])).
% 0.12/0.37  # End printing tableau
% 0.12/0.37  # SZS output end
% 0.12/0.37  # Branches closed with saturation will be marked with an "s"
% 0.12/0.37  # 12237 Satisfiable branch
% 0.12/0.37  # SZS status Satisfiable for /export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p
% 0.12/0.37  # SZS output start for /export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p
% 0.12/0.37  # Begin clausification derivation
% 0.12/0.37  
% 0.12/0.37  # End clausification derivation
% 0.12/0.37  # Begin listing active clauses obtained from FOF to CNF conversion
% 0.12/0.37  cnf(i_0_19, plain, (c_fequal(X1,X1,X2))).
% 0.12/0.37  cnf(i_0_13, plain, (c_Conform_Ohconf(v_P,v_ha____,tc_prod(tc_List_Olist(tc_List_Olist(tc_String_Ochar)),tc_Expr_Oexp(tc_List_Olist(tc_String_Ochar)))))).
% 0.12/0.37  cnf(i_0_17, plain, (c_Option_Ooption_ONone(tc_prod(tc_List_Olist(tc_String_Ochar),tc_fun(tc_prod(tc_List_Olist(tc_String_Ochar),tc_List_Olist(tc_String_Ochar)),tc_Option_Ooption(tc_Value_Oval))))=hAPP(v_ha____,v_a____))).
% 0.12/0.37  cnf(i_0_16, plain, (c_Conform_Ooconf(v_P,v_ha____,c_Pair(v_C____,c_Objects_Oinit__fields(v_FDTs____),tc_List_Olist(tc_String_Ochar),tc_fun(tc_prod(tc_List_Olist(tc_String_Ochar),tc_List_Olist(tc_String_Ochar)),tc_Option_Ooption(tc_Value_Oval))),tc_prod(tc_List_Olist(tc_List_Olist(tc_String_Ochar)),tc_Expr_Oexp(tc_List_Olist(tc_String_Ochar)))))).
% 0.12/0.37  cnf(i_0_15, plain, (c_Fun_Ofun__upd(v_ha____,v_a____,c_Option_Ooption_OSome(c_Pair(v_C____,c_Objects_Oinit__fields(v_FDTs____),tc_List_Olist(tc_String_Ochar),tc_fun(tc_prod(tc_List_Olist(tc_String_Ochar),tc_List_Olist(tc_String_Ochar)),tc_Option_Ooption(tc_Value_Oval))),tc_prod(tc_List_Olist(tc_String_Ochar),tc_fun(tc_prod(tc_List_Olist(tc_String_Ochar),tc_List_Olist(tc_String_Ochar)),tc_Option_Ooption(tc_Value_Oval)))),tc_nat,tc_Option_Ooption(tc_prod(tc_List_Olist(tc_String_Ochar),tc_fun(tc_prod(tc_List_Olist(tc_String_Ochar),tc_List_Olist(tc_String_Ochar)),tc_Option_Ooption(tc_Value_Oval)))))=v_h_Ha____)).
% 0.12/0.37  cnf(i_0_18, negated_conjecture, (~c_Conform_Ohconf(v_P,v_h_Ha____,tc_prod(tc_List_Olist(tc_List_Olist(tc_String_Ochar)),tc_Expr_Oexp(tc_List_Olist(tc_String_Ochar)))))).
% 0.12/0.37  cnf(i_0_20, plain, (X1=X2|~c_fequal(X1,X2,X3))).
% 0.12/0.37  cnf(i_0_12, plain, (c_Exceptions_Opreallocated(X1)|~c_Conform_Ohconf(X2,X1,X3))).
% 0.12/0.37  cnf(i_0_26, plain, (X4=X4)).
% 0.12/0.37  # End listing active clauses.  There is an equivalent clause to each of these in the clausification!
% 0.12/0.37  # Begin printing tableau
% 0.12/0.37  # Found 9 steps
% 0.12/0.37  cnf(i_0_16, plain, (c_Conform_Ooconf(v_P,v_ha____,c_Pair(v_C____,c_Objects_Oinit__fields(v_FDTs____),tc_List_Olist(tc_String_Ochar),tc_fun(tc_prod(tc_List_Olist(tc_String_Ochar),tc_List_Olist(tc_String_Ochar)),tc_Option_Ooption(tc_Value_Oval))),tc_prod(tc_List_Olist(tc_List_Olist(tc_String_Ochar)),tc_Expr_Oexp(tc_List_Olist(tc_String_Ochar))))), inference(start_rule)).
% 0.12/0.37  cnf(i_0_48, plain, (c_Conform_Ooconf(v_P,v_ha____,c_Pair(v_C____,c_Objects_Oinit__fields(v_FDTs____),tc_List_Olist(tc_String_Ochar),tc_fun(tc_prod(tc_List_Olist(tc_String_Ochar),tc_List_Olist(tc_String_Ochar)),tc_Option_Ooption(tc_Value_Oval))),tc_prod(tc_List_Olist(tc_List_Olist(tc_String_Ochar)),tc_Expr_Oexp(tc_List_Olist(tc_String_Ochar))))), inference(extension_rule, [i_0_41])).
% 0.12/0.37  cnf(i_0_167, plain, ($false), inference(closure_rule, [i_0_26])).
% 0.12/0.37  cnf(i_0_169, plain, ($false), inference(closure_rule, [i_0_26])).
% 0.12/0.37  cnf(i_0_170, plain, ($false), inference(closure_rule, [i_0_26])).
% 0.12/0.37  cnf(i_0_166, plain, (c_Conform_Ooconf(v_P,v_P,c_Pair(v_C____,c_Objects_Oinit__fields(v_FDTs____),tc_List_Olist(tc_String_Ochar),tc_fun(tc_prod(tc_List_Olist(tc_String_Ochar),tc_List_Olist(tc_String_Ochar)),tc_Option_Ooption(tc_Value_Oval))),tc_prod(tc_List_Olist(tc_List_Olist(tc_String_Ochar)),tc_Expr_Oexp(tc_List_Olist(tc_String_Ochar))))), inference(extension_rule, [i_0_41])).
% 0.12/0.37  cnf(i_0_230, plain, ($false), inference(closure_rule, [i_0_26])).
% 0.12/0.37  cnf(i_0_231, plain, ($false), inference(closure_rule, [i_0_26])).
% 0.12/0.37  cnf(i_0_232, plain, ($false), inference(closure_rule, [i_0_26])).
% 0.12/0.37  # End printing tableau
% 0.12/0.37  # SZS output end
% 0.12/0.37  # Branches closed with saturation will be marked with an "s"
% 0.12/0.37  # 12238 Satisfiable branch
% 0.12/0.37  # Child (12232) has found a proof.
% 0.12/0.37  
% 0.12/0.37  # Proof search is over...
% 0.12/0.37  # Freeing feature tree
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------