TSTP Solution File: SWV911-1 by Vampire---4.8
View Problem
- Process Solution
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
% File : Vampire---4.8
% Problem : SWV911-1 : TPTP v8.1.2. Released v4.1.0.
% Transfm : none
% Format : tptp:raw
% Command : vampire --input_syntax tptp --proof tptp --output_axiom_names on --mode portfolio --schedule file --schedule_file /export/starexec/sandbox2/solver/bin/quickGreedyProduceRating_steal_pow3.txt --cores 8 -m 12000 -t %d %s
% Computer : n015.cluster.edu
% Model : x86_64 x86_64
% CPU : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 2.10GHz
% Memory : 8042.1875MB
% OS : Linux 3.10.0-693.el7.x86_64
% CPULimit : 300s
% WCLimit : 300s
% DateTime : Wed May 1 04:13:50 EDT 2024
% Result : Unsatisfiable 0.62s 0.85s
% Output : Refutation 0.62s
% Verified :
% SZS Type : Refutation
% Derivation depth : 5
% Number of leaves : 9
% Syntax : Number of formulae : 21 ( 9 unt; 1 typ; 0 def)
% Number of atoms : 196 ( 0 equ)
% Maximal formula atoms : 3 ( 9 avg)
% Number of connectives : 28 ( 16 ~; 10 |; 0 &)
% ( 2 <=>; 0 =>; 0 <=; 0 <~>)
% Maximal formula depth : 7 ( 3 avg)
% Maximal term depth : 1 ( 1 avg)
% Number of FOOLs : 164 ( 164 fml; 0 var)
% Number of types : 2 ( 0 usr)
% Number of type conns : 2 ( 1 >; 1 *; 0 +; 0 <<)
% Number of predicates : 23 ( 22 usr; 13 prp; 0-4 aty)
% Number of functors : 0 ( 0 usr; 0 con; --- aty)
% Number of variables : 10 ( 9 !; 0 ?; 10 :)
% ( 1 !>; 0 ?*; 0 @-; 0 @+)
% Comments :
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
tff(pred_def_28,type,
sQ0_eqProxy:
!>[X0: $tType] : ( ( X0 * X0 ) > $o ) ).
tff(f643,plain,
$false,
inference(avatar_sat_refutation,[],[f629,f639,f642]) ).
tff(f642,plain,
~ spl1_1,
inference(avatar_contradiction_clause,[],[f641]) ).
tff(f641,plain,
( $false
| ~ spl1_1 ),
inference(subsumption_resolution,[],[f640,f624]) ).
tff(f624,plain,
( hBOOL(hAPP(hAPP(v_P_H,v_x),v_xa))
| ~ spl1_1 ),
inference(avatar_component_clause,[],[f622]) ).
tff(f622,plain,
( spl1_1
<=> hBOOL(hAPP(hAPP(v_P_H,v_x),v_xa)) ),
introduced(avatar_definition,[new_symbols(naming,[spl1_1])]) ).
tff(f640,plain,
~ hBOOL(hAPP(hAPP(v_P_H,v_x),v_xa)),
inference(resolution,[],[f635,f633]) ).
tff(f633,plain,
~ hBOOL(hAPP(hAPP(v_Q_H,v_x),v_xb(v_P_H,v_Q_H))),
inference(resolution,[],[f532,f529]) ).
tff(f529,axiom,
c_Hoare__Mirabelle_Ohoare__derivs(v_G,hAPP(hAPP(c_Set_Oinsert(tc_Hoare__Mirabelle_Otriple(t_a)),c_Hoare__Mirabelle_Otriple_Otriple(v_P_H,v_c,v_Q_H,t_a)),c_Orderings_Obot__class_Obot(tc_fun(tc_Hoare__Mirabelle_Otriple(t_a),tc_bool))),t_a),
file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/tmp/tmp.eBtkXTsEz5/Vampire---4.8_3325',cls_conjecture_1) ).
tff(f532,axiom,
! [X76: $i,X64: $i] :
( ~ c_Hoare__Mirabelle_Ohoare__derivs(v_G,hAPP(hAPP(c_Set_Oinsert(tc_Hoare__Mirabelle_Otriple(t_a)),c_Hoare__Mirabelle_Otriple_Otriple(X64,v_c,X76,t_a)),c_Orderings_Obot__class_Obot(tc_fun(tc_Hoare__Mirabelle_Otriple(t_a),tc_bool))),t_a)
| ~ hBOOL(hAPP(hAPP(v_Q_H,v_x),v_xb(X64,X76))) ),
file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/tmp/tmp.eBtkXTsEz5/Vampire---4.8_3325',cls_conjecture_4) ).
tff(f635,plain,
! [X0: $i] :
( hBOOL(hAPP(hAPP(v_Q_H,X0),v_xb(v_P_H,v_Q_H)))
| ~ hBOOL(hAPP(hAPP(v_P_H,X0),v_xa)) ),
inference(resolution,[],[f533,f529]) ).
tff(f533,axiom,
! [X71: $i,X76: $i,X64: $i] :
( ~ c_Hoare__Mirabelle_Ohoare__derivs(v_G,hAPP(hAPP(c_Set_Oinsert(tc_Hoare__Mirabelle_Otriple(t_a)),c_Hoare__Mirabelle_Otriple_Otriple(X64,v_c,X76,t_a)),c_Orderings_Obot__class_Obot(tc_fun(tc_Hoare__Mirabelle_Otriple(t_a),tc_bool))),t_a)
| ~ hBOOL(hAPP(hAPP(X64,X71),v_xa))
| hBOOL(hAPP(hAPP(X76,X71),v_xb(X64,X76))) ),
file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/tmp/tmp.eBtkXTsEz5/Vampire---4.8_3325',cls_conjecture_5) ).
tff(f639,plain,
~ spl1_2,
inference(avatar_split_clause,[],[f636,f626]) ).
tff(f626,plain,
( spl1_2
<=> hBOOL(hAPP(hAPP(v_P,v_x),v_xa)) ),
introduced(avatar_definition,[new_symbols(naming,[spl1_2])]) ).
tff(f636,plain,
~ hBOOL(hAPP(hAPP(v_P,v_x),v_xa)),
inference(resolution,[],[f634,f630]) ).
tff(f630,plain,
~ hBOOL(hAPP(hAPP(v_Q,v_x),v_xb(v_P,v_Q))),
inference(resolution,[],[f531,f528]) ).
tff(f528,axiom,
c_Hoare__Mirabelle_Ohoare__derivs(v_G,hAPP(hAPP(c_Set_Oinsert(tc_Hoare__Mirabelle_Otriple(t_a)),c_Hoare__Mirabelle_Otriple_Otriple(v_P,v_c,v_Q,t_a)),c_Orderings_Obot__class_Obot(tc_fun(tc_Hoare__Mirabelle_Otriple(t_a),tc_bool))),t_a),
file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/tmp/tmp.eBtkXTsEz5/Vampire---4.8_3325',cls_conjecture_0) ).
tff(f531,axiom,
! [X76: $i,X64: $i] :
( ~ c_Hoare__Mirabelle_Ohoare__derivs(v_G,hAPP(hAPP(c_Set_Oinsert(tc_Hoare__Mirabelle_Otriple(t_a)),c_Hoare__Mirabelle_Otriple_Otriple(X64,v_c,X76,t_a)),c_Orderings_Obot__class_Obot(tc_fun(tc_Hoare__Mirabelle_Otriple(t_a),tc_bool))),t_a)
| ~ hBOOL(hAPP(hAPP(v_Q,v_x),v_xb(X64,X76))) ),
file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/tmp/tmp.eBtkXTsEz5/Vampire---4.8_3325',cls_conjecture_3) ).
tff(f634,plain,
! [X0: $i] :
( hBOOL(hAPP(hAPP(v_Q,X0),v_xb(v_P,v_Q)))
| ~ hBOOL(hAPP(hAPP(v_P,X0),v_xa)) ),
inference(resolution,[],[f533,f528]) ).
tff(f629,plain,
( spl1_1
| spl1_2 ),
inference(avatar_split_clause,[],[f530,f626,f622]) ).
tff(f530,axiom,
( hBOOL(hAPP(hAPP(v_P,v_x),v_xa))
| hBOOL(hAPP(hAPP(v_P_H,v_x),v_xa)) ),
file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/tmp/tmp.eBtkXTsEz5/Vampire---4.8_3325',cls_conjecture_2) ).
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
%----ORIGINAL SYSTEM OUTPUT
% 0.07/0.13 % Problem : SWV911-1 : TPTP v8.1.2. Released v4.1.0.
% 0.07/0.15 % Command : vampire --input_syntax tptp --proof tptp --output_axiom_names on --mode portfolio --schedule file --schedule_file /export/starexec/sandbox2/solver/bin/quickGreedyProduceRating_steal_pow3.txt --cores 8 -m 12000 -t %d %s
% 0.15/0.36 % Computer : n015.cluster.edu
% 0.15/0.36 % Model : x86_64 x86_64
% 0.15/0.36 % CPU : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 @ 2.10GHz
% 0.15/0.36 % Memory : 8042.1875MB
% 0.15/0.36 % OS : Linux 3.10.0-693.el7.x86_64
% 0.15/0.36 % CPULimit : 300
% 0.15/0.36 % WCLimit : 300
% 0.15/0.36 % DateTime : Tue Apr 30 18:52:18 EDT 2024
% 0.15/0.36 % CPUTime :
% 0.15/0.36 This is a CNF_UNS_RFO_SEQ_NHN problem
% 0.15/0.37 Running vampire --input_syntax tptp --proof tptp --output_axiom_names on --mode portfolio --schedule file --schedule_file /export/starexec/sandbox2/solver/bin/quickGreedyProduceRating_steal_pow3.txt --cores 8 -m 12000 -t 300 /export/starexec/sandbox2/tmp/tmp.eBtkXTsEz5/Vampire---4.8_3325
% 0.62/0.84 % (3556)dis-1011_2:1_sil=2000:lsd=20:nwc=5.0:flr=on:mep=off:st=3.0:i=34:sd=1:ep=RS:ss=axioms_0 on Vampire---4 for (2995ds/34Mi)
% 0.62/0.84 % (3558)lrs+1011_1:1_sil=8000:sp=occurrence:nwc=10.0:i=78:ss=axioms:sgt=8_0 on Vampire---4 for (2995ds/78Mi)
% 0.62/0.84 % (3557)lrs+1011_461:32768_sil=16000:irw=on:sp=frequency:lsd=20:fd=preordered:nwc=10.0:s2agt=32:alpa=false:cond=fast:s2a=on:i=51:s2at=3.0:awrs=decay:awrsf=691:bd=off:nm=20:fsr=off:amm=sco:uhcvi=on:rawr=on_0 on Vampire---4 for (2995ds/51Mi)
% 0.62/0.84 % (3559)ott+1011_1:1_sil=2000:urr=on:i=33:sd=1:kws=inv_frequency:ss=axioms:sup=off_0 on Vampire---4 for (2995ds/33Mi)
% 0.62/0.84 % (3560)lrs+2_1:1_sil=16000:fde=none:sos=all:nwc=5.0:i=34:ep=RS:s2pl=on:lma=on:afp=100000_0 on Vampire---4 for (2995ds/34Mi)
% 0.62/0.84 % (3561)lrs+1002_1:16_to=lpo:sil=32000:sp=unary_frequency:sos=on:i=45:bd=off:ss=axioms_0 on Vampire---4 for (2995ds/45Mi)
% 0.62/0.84 % (3562)lrs+21_1:5_sil=2000:sos=on:urr=on:newcnf=on:slsq=on:i=83:slsql=off:bd=off:nm=2:ss=axioms:st=1.5:sp=const_min:gsp=on:rawr=on_0 on Vampire---4 for (2995ds/83Mi)
% 0.62/0.84 % (3563)lrs-21_1:1_to=lpo:sil=2000:sp=frequency:sos=on:lma=on:i=56:sd=2:ss=axioms:ep=R_0 on Vampire---4 for (2995ds/56Mi)
% 0.62/0.85 % (3556)First to succeed.
% 0.62/0.85 % (3563)Also succeeded, but the first one will report.
% 0.62/0.85 % (3556)Refutation found. Thanks to Tanya!
% 0.62/0.85 % SZS status Unsatisfiable for Vampire---4
% 0.62/0.85 % SZS output start Proof for Vampire---4
% See solution above
% 0.62/0.85 % (3556)------------------------------
% 0.62/0.85 % (3556)Version: Vampire 4.8 (commit 8e9376e55 on 2024-01-18 13:49:33 +0100)
% 0.62/0.85 % (3556)Termination reason: Refutation
% 0.62/0.85
% 0.62/0.85 % (3556)Memory used [KB]: 1378
% 0.62/0.85 % (3556)Time elapsed: 0.008 s
% 0.62/0.85 % (3556)Instructions burned: 12 (million)
% 0.62/0.85 % (3556)------------------------------
% 0.62/0.85 % (3556)------------------------------
% 0.62/0.85 % (3511)Success in time 0.472 s
% 0.62/0.85 % Vampire---4.8 exiting
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------