TSTP Solution File: SWV909-1 by E---3.1
View Problem
- Process Solution
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
% File : E---3.1
% Problem : SWV909-1 : TPTP v8.1.2. Released v4.1.0.
% Transfm : none
% Format : tptp:raw
% Command : run_E %s %d THM
% Computer : n006.cluster.edu
% Model : x86_64 x86_64
% CPU : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 2.10GHz
% Memory : 8042.1875MB
% OS : Linux 3.10.0-693.el7.x86_64
% CPULimit : 2400s
% WCLimit : 300s
% DateTime : Tue Oct 10 19:55:37 EDT 2023
% Result : Unsatisfiable 270.44s 36.33s
% Output : CNFRefutation 270.44s
% Verified :
% SZS Type : Refutation
% Derivation depth : 5
% Number of leaves : 6
% Syntax : Number of clauses : 17 ( 14 unt; 3 nHn; 6 RR)
% Number of literals : 20 ( 8 equ; 5 neg)
% Maximal clause size : 2 ( 1 avg)
% Maximal term depth : 6 ( 2 avg)
% Number of predicates : 4 ( 2 usr; 1 prp; 0-3 aty)
% Number of functors : 17 ( 17 usr; 7 con; 0-4 aty)
% Number of variables : 35 ( 14 sgn)
% Comments :
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
cnf(cls_empty__def_0,axiom,
c_Orderings_Obot__class_Obot(tc_fun(X1,tc_bool)) = c_Collect(c_COMBK(c_False,tc_bool,X1),X1),
file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/tmp/tmp.QGYBMveqGp/E---3.1_20382.p',cls_empty__def_0) ).
cnf(cls_Collect__def_0,axiom,
c_Collect(X1,X2) = X1,
file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/tmp/tmp.QGYBMveqGp/E---3.1_20382.p',cls_Collect__def_0) ).
cnf(cls_COMBK__def_0,axiom,
hAPP(c_COMBK(X1,X2,X3),X4) = X1,
file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/tmp/tmp.QGYBMveqGp/E---3.1_20382.p',cls_COMBK__def_0) ).
cnf(cls_escape_0,axiom,
( c_Hoare__Mirabelle_Ohoare__derivs(X1,hAPP(c_Set_Oinsert(c_Hoare__Mirabelle_Otriple_Otriple(X2,X3,X4,t_a),tc_Hoare__Mirabelle_Otriple(t_a)),c_Orderings_Obot__class_Obot(tc_fun(tc_Hoare__Mirabelle_Otriple(t_a),tc_bool))),t_a)
| hBOOL(hAPP(hAPP(X2,v_sko__Hoare__Mirabelle__Xescape__1(X1,X2,X4,X3)),v_sko__Hoare__Mirabelle__Xescape__2(X1,X2,X4,X3))) ),
file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/tmp/tmp.QGYBMveqGp/E---3.1_20382.p',cls_escape_0) ).
cnf(cls_bot1E_0,axiom,
~ hBOOL(hAPP(c_Orderings_Obot__class_Obot(tc_fun(X1,tc_bool)),X2)),
file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/tmp/tmp.QGYBMveqGp/E---3.1_20382.p',cls_bot1E_0) ).
cnf(cls_conjecture_0,negated_conjecture,
~ c_Hoare__Mirabelle_Ohoare__derivs(v_G,hAPP(c_Set_Oinsert(c_Hoare__Mirabelle_Otriple_Otriple(c_COMBK(c_COMBK(c_False,tc_bool,tc_Com_Ostate),tc_fun(tc_Com_Ostate,tc_bool),t_a),v_c,v_Q,t_a),tc_Hoare__Mirabelle_Otriple(t_a)),c_Orderings_Obot__class_Obot(tc_fun(tc_Hoare__Mirabelle_Otriple(t_a),tc_bool))),t_a),
file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/tmp/tmp.QGYBMveqGp/E---3.1_20382.p',cls_conjecture_0) ).
cnf(c_0_6,axiom,
c_Orderings_Obot__class_Obot(tc_fun(X1,tc_bool)) = c_Collect(c_COMBK(c_False,tc_bool,X1),X1),
cls_empty__def_0 ).
cnf(c_0_7,axiom,
c_Collect(X1,X2) = X1,
cls_Collect__def_0 ).
cnf(c_0_8,axiom,
hAPP(c_COMBK(X1,X2,X3),X4) = X1,
cls_COMBK__def_0 ).
cnf(c_0_9,plain,
c_Orderings_Obot__class_Obot(tc_fun(X1,tc_bool)) = c_COMBK(c_False,tc_bool,X1),
inference(rw,[status(thm)],[c_0_6,c_0_7]) ).
cnf(c_0_10,axiom,
( c_Hoare__Mirabelle_Ohoare__derivs(X1,hAPP(c_Set_Oinsert(c_Hoare__Mirabelle_Otriple_Otriple(X2,X3,X4,t_a),tc_Hoare__Mirabelle_Otriple(t_a)),c_Orderings_Obot__class_Obot(tc_fun(tc_Hoare__Mirabelle_Otriple(t_a),tc_bool))),t_a)
| hBOOL(hAPP(hAPP(X2,v_sko__Hoare__Mirabelle__Xescape__1(X1,X2,X4,X3)),v_sko__Hoare__Mirabelle__Xescape__2(X1,X2,X4,X3))) ),
cls_escape_0 ).
cnf(c_0_11,axiom,
~ hBOOL(hAPP(c_Orderings_Obot__class_Obot(tc_fun(X1,tc_bool)),X2)),
cls_bot1E_0 ).
cnf(c_0_12,plain,
hAPP(c_Orderings_Obot__class_Obot(tc_fun(X1,tc_bool)),X2) = c_False,
inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_8,c_0_9]) ).
cnf(c_0_13,negated_conjecture,
~ c_Hoare__Mirabelle_Ohoare__derivs(v_G,hAPP(c_Set_Oinsert(c_Hoare__Mirabelle_Otriple_Otriple(c_COMBK(c_COMBK(c_False,tc_bool,tc_Com_Ostate),tc_fun(tc_Com_Ostate,tc_bool),t_a),v_c,v_Q,t_a),tc_Hoare__Mirabelle_Otriple(t_a)),c_Orderings_Obot__class_Obot(tc_fun(tc_Hoare__Mirabelle_Otriple(t_a),tc_bool))),t_a),
cls_conjecture_0 ).
cnf(c_0_14,plain,
( c_Hoare__Mirabelle_Ohoare__derivs(X1,hAPP(c_Set_Oinsert(c_Hoare__Mirabelle_Otriple_Otriple(c_COMBK(X2,X3,X4),X5,X6,t_a),tc_Hoare__Mirabelle_Otriple(t_a)),c_Orderings_Obot__class_Obot(tc_fun(tc_Hoare__Mirabelle_Otriple(t_a),tc_bool))),t_a)
| hBOOL(hAPP(X2,v_sko__Hoare__Mirabelle__Xescape__2(X1,c_COMBK(X2,X3,X4),X6,X5))) ),
inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_10,c_0_8]) ).
cnf(c_0_15,plain,
~ hBOOL(c_False),
inference(rw,[status(thm)],[c_0_11,c_0_12]) ).
cnf(c_0_16,negated_conjecture,
$false,
inference(sr,[status(thm)],[inference(rw,[status(thm)],[inference(rw,[status(thm)],[inference(rw,[status(thm)],[inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_13,c_0_14]),c_0_9]),c_0_9]),c_0_12]),c_0_15]),
[proof] ).
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
%----ORIGINAL SYSTEM OUTPUT
% 0.11/0.17 % Problem : SWV909-1 : TPTP v8.1.2. Released v4.1.0.
% 0.11/0.18 % Command : run_E %s %d THM
% 0.18/0.38 % Computer : n006.cluster.edu
% 0.18/0.38 % Model : x86_64 x86_64
% 0.18/0.38 % CPU : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 @ 2.10GHz
% 0.18/0.38 % Memory : 8042.1875MB
% 0.18/0.38 % OS : Linux 3.10.0-693.el7.x86_64
% 0.18/0.38 % CPULimit : 2400
% 0.18/0.38 % WCLimit : 300
% 0.18/0.38 % DateTime : Tue Oct 3 04:12:25 EDT 2023
% 0.18/0.39 % CPUTime :
% 0.23/0.57 Running first-order theorem proving
% 0.23/0.57 Running: /export/starexec/sandbox2/solver/bin/eprover --delete-bad-limit=2000000000 --definitional-cnf=24 -s --print-statistics -R --print-version --proof-object --auto-schedule=8 --cpu-limit=300 /export/starexec/sandbox2/tmp/tmp.QGYBMveqGp/E---3.1_20382.p
% 270.44/36.33 # Version: 3.1pre001
% 270.44/36.33 # Preprocessing class: FSLMSMSMSSSNFFN.
% 270.44/36.33 # Scheduled 4 strats onto 8 cores with 300 seconds (2400 total)
% 270.44/36.33 # Starting G-E--_207_C18_F1_AE_CS_SP_PI_PS_S2S with 1200s (4) cores
% 270.44/36.33 # Starting new_bool_3 with 600s (2) cores
% 270.44/36.33 # Starting new_bool_1 with 300s (1) cores
% 270.44/36.33 # Starting sh5l with 300s (1) cores
% 270.44/36.33 # G-E--_207_C18_F1_AE_CS_SP_PI_PS_S2S with pid 20461 completed with status 0
% 270.44/36.33 # Result found by G-E--_207_C18_F1_AE_CS_SP_PI_PS_S2S
% 270.44/36.33 # Preprocessing class: FSLMSMSMSSSNFFN.
% 270.44/36.33 # Scheduled 4 strats onto 8 cores with 300 seconds (2400 total)
% 270.44/36.33 # Starting G-E--_207_C18_F1_AE_CS_SP_PI_PS_S2S with 1200s (4) cores
% 270.44/36.33 # No SInE strategy applied
% 270.44/36.33 # Search class: FGHSM-FSLM32-DFFFFFNN
% 270.44/36.33 # Scheduled 13 strats onto 4 cores with 1200 seconds (1200 total)
% 270.44/36.33 # Starting G-E--_301_C18_F1_URBAN_S5PRR_S0Y with 90s (1) cores
% 270.44/36.33 # Starting G-E--_207_C18_F1_AE_CS_SP_PI_PS_S2S with 121s (1) cores
% 270.44/36.33 # Starting G-E--_300_C18_F1_SE_CS_SP_PS_S0Y with 90s (1) cores
% 270.44/36.33 # Starting U----_206c_05_B11_00_F1_SE_PI_CS_SP_PS_S5PRR_RG_S04AN with 90s (1) cores
% 270.44/36.33 # G-E--_207_C18_F1_AE_CS_SP_PI_PS_S2S with pid 20470 completed with status 0
% 270.44/36.33 # Result found by G-E--_207_C18_F1_AE_CS_SP_PI_PS_S2S
% 270.44/36.33 # Preprocessing class: FSLMSMSMSSSNFFN.
% 270.44/36.33 # Scheduled 4 strats onto 8 cores with 300 seconds (2400 total)
% 270.44/36.33 # Starting G-E--_207_C18_F1_AE_CS_SP_PI_PS_S2S with 1200s (4) cores
% 270.44/36.33 # No SInE strategy applied
% 270.44/36.33 # Search class: FGHSM-FSLM32-DFFFFFNN
% 270.44/36.33 # Scheduled 13 strats onto 4 cores with 1200 seconds (1200 total)
% 270.44/36.33 # Starting G-E--_301_C18_F1_URBAN_S5PRR_S0Y with 90s (1) cores
% 270.44/36.33 # Starting G-E--_207_C18_F1_AE_CS_SP_PI_PS_S2S with 121s (1) cores
% 270.44/36.33 # Preprocessing time : 0.009 s
% 270.44/36.33 # Presaturation interreduction done
% 270.44/36.33
% 270.44/36.33 # Proof found!
% 270.44/36.33 # SZS status Unsatisfiable
% 270.44/36.33 # SZS output start CNFRefutation
% See solution above
% 270.44/36.33 # Parsed axioms : 661
% 270.44/36.33 # Removed by relevancy pruning/SinE : 0
% 270.44/36.33 # Initial clauses : 661
% 270.44/36.33 # Removed in clause preprocessing : 3
% 270.44/36.33 # Initial clauses in saturation : 658
% 270.44/36.33 # Processed clauses : 60055
% 270.44/36.33 # ...of these trivial : 1023
% 270.44/36.33 # ...subsumed : 47925
% 270.44/36.33 # ...remaining for further processing : 11107
% 270.44/36.33 # Other redundant clauses eliminated : 803
% 270.44/36.33 # Clauses deleted for lack of memory : 0
% 270.44/36.33 # Backward-subsumed : 1227
% 270.44/36.33 # Backward-rewritten : 246
% 270.44/36.33 # Generated clauses : 1355598
% 270.44/36.33 # ...of the previous two non-redundant : 1293413
% 270.44/36.33 # ...aggressively subsumed : 0
% 270.44/36.33 # Contextual simplify-reflections : 32
% 270.44/36.33 # Paramodulations : 1354564
% 270.44/36.33 # Factorizations : 20
% 270.44/36.33 # NegExts : 0
% 270.44/36.33 # Equation resolutions : 1014
% 270.44/36.33 # Total rewrite steps : 291144
% 270.44/36.33 # Propositional unsat checks : 0
% 270.44/36.33 # Propositional check models : 0
% 270.44/36.33 # Propositional check unsatisfiable : 0
% 270.44/36.33 # Propositional clauses : 0
% 270.44/36.33 # Propositional clauses after purity: 0
% 270.44/36.33 # Propositional unsat core size : 0
% 270.44/36.33 # Propositional preprocessing time : 0.000
% 270.44/36.33 # Propositional encoding time : 0.000
% 270.44/36.33 # Propositional solver time : 0.000
% 270.44/36.33 # Success case prop preproc time : 0.000
% 270.44/36.33 # Success case prop encoding time : 0.000
% 270.44/36.33 # Success case prop solver time : 0.000
% 270.44/36.33 # Current number of processed clauses : 9111
% 270.44/36.33 # Positive orientable unit clauses : 743
% 270.44/36.33 # Positive unorientable unit clauses: 79
% 270.44/36.33 # Negative unit clauses : 366
% 270.44/36.33 # Non-unit-clauses : 7923
% 270.44/36.33 # Current number of unprocessed clauses: 1227983
% 270.44/36.33 # ...number of literals in the above : 3962446
% 270.44/36.33 # Current number of archived formulas : 0
% 270.44/36.33 # Current number of archived clauses : 1999
% 270.44/36.33 # Clause-clause subsumption calls (NU) : 5060412
% 270.44/36.33 # Rec. Clause-clause subsumption calls : 2799794
% 270.44/36.33 # Non-unit clause-clause subsumptions : 32974
% 270.44/36.33 # Unit Clause-clause subsumption calls : 77330
% 270.44/36.33 # Rewrite failures with RHS unbound : 114
% 270.44/36.33 # BW rewrite match attempts : 52702
% 270.44/36.33 # BW rewrite match successes : 621
% 270.44/36.33 # Condensation attempts : 0
% 270.44/36.33 # Condensation successes : 0
% 270.44/36.33 # Termbank termtop insertions : 35661762
% 270.44/36.33
% 270.44/36.33 # -------------------------------------------------
% 270.44/36.33 # User time : 32.163 s
% 270.44/36.33 # System time : 0.933 s
% 270.44/36.33 # Total time : 33.096 s
% 270.44/36.33 # Maximum resident set size: 3068 pages
% 270.44/36.33
% 270.44/36.33 # -------------------------------------------------
% 270.44/36.33 # User time : 131.298 s
% 270.44/36.33 # System time : 3.958 s
% 270.44/36.33 # Total time : 135.257 s
% 270.44/36.33 # Maximum resident set size: 2244 pages
% 270.44/36.33 % E---3.1 exiting
% 270.44/36.33 % E---3.1 exiting
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------