TSTP Solution File: SWV898-1 by E---3.1
View Problem
- Process Solution
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
% File : E---3.1
% Problem : SWV898-1 : TPTP v8.1.2. Released v4.1.0.
% Transfm : none
% Format : tptp:raw
% Command : run_E %s %d THM
% Computer : n011.cluster.edu
% Model : x86_64 x86_64
% CPU : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 2.10GHz
% Memory : 8042.1875MB
% OS : Linux 3.10.0-693.el7.x86_64
% CPULimit : 2400s
% WCLimit : 300s
% DateTime : Tue Oct 10 19:55:35 EDT 2023
% Result : Unsatisfiable 0.46s 0.64s
% Output : CNFRefutation 0.46s
% Verified :
% SZS Type : Refutation
% Derivation depth : 2
% Number of leaves : 3
% Syntax : Number of clauses : 7 ( 5 unt; 0 nHn; 5 RR)
% Number of literals : 9 ( 0 equ; 4 neg)
% Maximal clause size : 2 ( 1 avg)
% Maximal term depth : 5 ( 1 avg)
% Number of predicates : 2 ( 1 usr; 1 prp; 0-2 aty)
% Number of functors : 11 ( 11 usr; 5 con; 0-5 aty)
% Number of variables : 8 ( 2 sgn)
% Comments :
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
cnf(cls_conjecture_3,negated_conjecture,
~ c_Finite__Set_Ofinite(c_Set_Oimage(c_COMBB(c_Hoare__Mirabelle_OMGT,c_COMBB(c_Option_Othe(tc_Com_Ocom),c_Com_Obody,tc_Option_Ooption(tc_Com_Ocom),tc_Com_Ocom,tc_Com_Opname),tc_Com_Ocom,tc_Hoare__Mirabelle_Otriple(tc_Com_Ostate),tc_Com_Opname),c_Map_Odom(c_Com_Obody,tc_Com_Opname,tc_Com_Ocom),tc_Com_Opname,tc_Hoare__Mirabelle_Otriple(tc_Com_Ostate)),tc_Hoare__Mirabelle_Otriple(tc_Com_Ostate)),
file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/tmp/tmp.PMffZcyVPq/E---3.1_10428.p',cls_conjecture_3) ).
cnf(cls_finite__imageI_0,axiom,
( c_Finite__Set_Ofinite(c_Set_Oimage(X1,X2,X3,X4),X4)
| ~ c_Finite__Set_Ofinite(X2,X3) ),
file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/tmp/tmp.PMffZcyVPq/E---3.1_10428.p',cls_finite__imageI_0) ).
cnf(cls_finite__dom__body_0,axiom,
c_Finite__Set_Ofinite(c_Map_Odom(c_Com_Obody,tc_Com_Opname,tc_Com_Ocom),tc_Com_Opname),
file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/tmp/tmp.PMffZcyVPq/E---3.1_10428.p',cls_finite__dom__body_0) ).
cnf(c_0_3,negated_conjecture,
~ c_Finite__Set_Ofinite(c_Set_Oimage(c_COMBB(c_Hoare__Mirabelle_OMGT,c_COMBB(c_Option_Othe(tc_Com_Ocom),c_Com_Obody,tc_Option_Ooption(tc_Com_Ocom),tc_Com_Ocom,tc_Com_Opname),tc_Com_Ocom,tc_Hoare__Mirabelle_Otriple(tc_Com_Ostate),tc_Com_Opname),c_Map_Odom(c_Com_Obody,tc_Com_Opname,tc_Com_Ocom),tc_Com_Opname,tc_Hoare__Mirabelle_Otriple(tc_Com_Ostate)),tc_Hoare__Mirabelle_Otriple(tc_Com_Ostate)),
cls_conjecture_3 ).
cnf(c_0_4,axiom,
( c_Finite__Set_Ofinite(c_Set_Oimage(X1,X2,X3,X4),X4)
| ~ c_Finite__Set_Ofinite(X2,X3) ),
cls_finite__imageI_0 ).
cnf(c_0_5,axiom,
c_Finite__Set_Ofinite(c_Map_Odom(c_Com_Obody,tc_Com_Opname,tc_Com_Ocom),tc_Com_Opname),
cls_finite__dom__body_0 ).
cnf(c_0_6,negated_conjecture,
$false,
inference(cn,[status(thm)],[inference(rw,[status(thm)],[inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_3,c_0_4]),c_0_5])]),
[proof] ).
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
%----ORIGINAL SYSTEM OUTPUT
% 0.13/0.18 % Problem : SWV898-1 : TPTP v8.1.2. Released v4.1.0.
% 0.13/0.20 % Command : run_E %s %d THM
% 0.20/0.41 % Computer : n011.cluster.edu
% 0.20/0.41 % Model : x86_64 x86_64
% 0.20/0.41 % CPU : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 @ 2.10GHz
% 0.20/0.41 % Memory : 8042.1875MB
% 0.20/0.41 % OS : Linux 3.10.0-693.el7.x86_64
% 0.20/0.41 % CPULimit : 2400
% 0.20/0.41 % WCLimit : 300
% 0.20/0.41 % DateTime : Tue Oct 3 03:47:53 EDT 2023
% 0.20/0.41 % CPUTime :
% 0.40/0.61 Running first-order theorem proving
% 0.40/0.61 Running: /export/starexec/sandbox2/solver/bin/eprover --delete-bad-limit=2000000000 --definitional-cnf=24 -s --print-statistics -R --print-version --proof-object --auto-schedule=8 --cpu-limit=300 /export/starexec/sandbox2/tmp/tmp.PMffZcyVPq/E---3.1_10428.p
% 0.46/0.64 # Version: 3.1pre001
% 0.46/0.64 # Preprocessing class: FSLSSLSMSSSNFFN.
% 0.46/0.64 # Scheduled 4 strats onto 8 cores with 300 seconds (2400 total)
% 0.46/0.64 # Starting G-N--_023_B07_F1_SP_PI_Q7_CS_SP_CO_S5PRR_S0Y1 with 1500s (5) cores
% 0.46/0.64 # Starting new_bool_3 with 300s (1) cores
% 0.46/0.64 # Starting new_bool_1 with 300s (1) cores
% 0.46/0.64 # Starting sh5l with 300s (1) cores
% 0.46/0.64 # new_bool_1 with pid 10508 completed with status 0
% 0.46/0.64 # Result found by new_bool_1
% 0.46/0.64 # Preprocessing class: FSLSSLSMSSSNFFN.
% 0.46/0.64 # Scheduled 4 strats onto 8 cores with 300 seconds (2400 total)
% 0.46/0.64 # Starting G-N--_023_B07_F1_SP_PI_Q7_CS_SP_CO_S5PRR_S0Y1 with 1500s (5) cores
% 0.46/0.64 # Starting new_bool_3 with 300s (1) cores
% 0.46/0.64 # Starting new_bool_1 with 300s (1) cores
% 0.46/0.64 # SinE strategy is GSinE(CountFormulas,hypos,1.5,,3,20000,1.0)
% 0.46/0.64 # Search class: FGHSM-FSLS32-MFFFFFNN
% 0.46/0.64 # Scheduled 5 strats onto 1 cores with 300 seconds (300 total)
% 0.46/0.64 # Starting G-E--_200_C45_F1_SE_CS_SP_PI_CO_S5PRR_S0V with 150s (1) cores
% 0.46/0.64 # G-E--_200_C45_F1_SE_CS_SP_PI_CO_S5PRR_S0V with pid 10510 completed with status 0
% 0.46/0.64 # Result found by G-E--_200_C45_F1_SE_CS_SP_PI_CO_S5PRR_S0V
% 0.46/0.64 # Preprocessing class: FSLSSLSMSSSNFFN.
% 0.46/0.64 # Scheduled 4 strats onto 8 cores with 300 seconds (2400 total)
% 0.46/0.64 # Starting G-N--_023_B07_F1_SP_PI_Q7_CS_SP_CO_S5PRR_S0Y1 with 1500s (5) cores
% 0.46/0.64 # Starting new_bool_3 with 300s (1) cores
% 0.46/0.64 # Starting new_bool_1 with 300s (1) cores
% 0.46/0.64 # SinE strategy is GSinE(CountFormulas,hypos,1.5,,3,20000,1.0)
% 0.46/0.64 # Search class: FGHSM-FSLS32-MFFFFFNN
% 0.46/0.64 # Scheduled 5 strats onto 1 cores with 300 seconds (300 total)
% 0.46/0.64 # Starting G-E--_200_C45_F1_SE_CS_SP_PI_CO_S5PRR_S0V with 150s (1) cores
% 0.46/0.64 # Preprocessing time : 0.003 s
% 0.46/0.64
% 0.46/0.64 # Proof found!
% 0.46/0.64 # SZS status Unsatisfiable
% 0.46/0.64 # SZS output start CNFRefutation
% See solution above
% 0.46/0.64 # Parsed axioms : 626
% 0.46/0.64 # Removed by relevancy pruning/SinE : 353
% 0.46/0.64 # Initial clauses : 273
% 0.46/0.64 # Removed in clause preprocessing : 0
% 0.46/0.64 # Initial clauses in saturation : 273
% 0.46/0.64 # Processed clauses : 76
% 0.46/0.64 # ...of these trivial : 5
% 0.46/0.64 # ...subsumed : 7
% 0.46/0.64 # ...remaining for further processing : 64
% 0.46/0.64 # Other redundant clauses eliminated : 3
% 0.46/0.64 # Clauses deleted for lack of memory : 0
% 0.46/0.64 # Backward-subsumed : 0
% 0.46/0.64 # Backward-rewritten : 0
% 0.46/0.65 # Generated clauses : 72
% 0.46/0.65 # ...of the previous two non-redundant : 33
% 0.46/0.65 # ...aggressively subsumed : 0
% 0.46/0.65 # Contextual simplify-reflections : 0
% 0.46/0.65 # Paramodulations : 66
% 0.46/0.65 # Factorizations : 0
% 0.46/0.65 # NegExts : 0
% 0.46/0.65 # Equation resolutions : 6
% 0.46/0.65 # Total rewrite steps : 25
% 0.46/0.65 # Propositional unsat checks : 0
% 0.46/0.65 # Propositional check models : 0
% 0.46/0.65 # Propositional check unsatisfiable : 0
% 0.46/0.65 # Propositional clauses : 0
% 0.46/0.65 # Propositional clauses after purity: 0
% 0.46/0.65 # Propositional unsat core size : 0
% 0.46/0.65 # Propositional preprocessing time : 0.000
% 0.46/0.65 # Propositional encoding time : 0.000
% 0.46/0.65 # Propositional solver time : 0.000
% 0.46/0.65 # Success case prop preproc time : 0.000
% 0.46/0.65 # Success case prop encoding time : 0.000
% 0.46/0.65 # Success case prop solver time : 0.000
% 0.46/0.65 # Current number of processed clauses : 64
% 0.46/0.65 # Positive orientable unit clauses : 25
% 0.46/0.65 # Positive unorientable unit clauses: 0
% 0.46/0.65 # Negative unit clauses : 4
% 0.46/0.65 # Non-unit-clauses : 35
% 0.46/0.65 # Current number of unprocessed clauses: 230
% 0.46/0.65 # ...number of literals in the above : 458
% 0.46/0.65 # Current number of archived formulas : 0
% 0.46/0.65 # Current number of archived clauses : 0
% 0.46/0.65 # Clause-clause subsumption calls (NU) : 140
% 0.46/0.65 # Rec. Clause-clause subsumption calls : 132
% 0.46/0.65 # Non-unit clause-clause subsumptions : 4
% 0.46/0.65 # Unit Clause-clause subsumption calls : 5
% 0.46/0.65 # Rewrite failures with RHS unbound : 0
% 0.46/0.65 # BW rewrite match attempts : 2
% 0.46/0.65 # BW rewrite match successes : 0
% 0.46/0.65 # Condensation attempts : 76
% 0.46/0.65 # Condensation successes : 0
% 0.46/0.65 # Termbank termtop insertions : 10446
% 0.46/0.65
% 0.46/0.65 # -------------------------------------------------
% 0.46/0.65 # User time : 0.008 s
% 0.46/0.65 # System time : 0.004 s
% 0.46/0.65 # Total time : 0.012 s
% 0.46/0.65 # Maximum resident set size: 2536 pages
% 0.46/0.65
% 0.46/0.65 # -------------------------------------------------
% 0.46/0.65 # User time : 0.020 s
% 0.46/0.65 # System time : 0.005 s
% 0.46/0.65 # Total time : 0.025 s
% 0.46/0.65 # Maximum resident set size: 2152 pages
% 0.46/0.65 % E---3.1 exiting
% 0.46/0.65 % E---3.1 exiting
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------