TSTP Solution File: SWV888-1 by Zipperpin---2.1.9999
View Problem
- Process Solution
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
% File : Zipperpin---2.1.9999
% Problem : SWV888-1 : TPTP v8.1.2. Released v4.1.0.
% Transfm : NO INFORMATION
% Format : NO INFORMATION
% Command : python3 /export/starexec/sandbox2/solver/bin/portfolio.lams.parallel.py %s %d /export/starexec/sandbox2/tmp/tmp.cGQOyTkw6g true
% Computer : n022.cluster.edu
% Model : x86_64 x86_64
% CPU : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 2.10GHz
% Memory : 8042.1875MB
% OS : Linux 3.10.0-693.el7.x86_64
% CPULimit : 300s
% WCLimit : 300s
% DateTime : Fri Sep 1 00:12:25 EDT 2023
% Result : Unsatisfiable 0.54s 0.79s
% Output : Refutation 0.54s
% Verified :
% SZS Type : -
% Comments :
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
%----WARNING: Could not form TPTP format derivation
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
%----ORIGINAL SYSTEM OUTPUT
% 0.06/0.11 % Problem : SWV888-1 : TPTP v8.1.2. Released v4.1.0.
% 0.06/0.12 % Command : python3 /export/starexec/sandbox2/solver/bin/portfolio.lams.parallel.py %s %d /export/starexec/sandbox2/tmp/tmp.cGQOyTkw6g true
% 0.11/0.32 % Computer : n022.cluster.edu
% 0.11/0.32 % Model : x86_64 x86_64
% 0.11/0.32 % CPU : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 @ 2.10GHz
% 0.11/0.32 % Memory : 8042.1875MB
% 0.11/0.32 % OS : Linux 3.10.0-693.el7.x86_64
% 0.11/0.32 % CPULimit : 300
% 0.11/0.32 % WCLimit : 300
% 0.11/0.32 % DateTime : Tue Aug 29 05:18:39 EDT 2023
% 0.11/0.33 % CPUTime :
% 0.11/0.33 % Running portfolio for 300 s
% 0.11/0.33 % File : /export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p
% 0.11/0.33 % Number of cores: 8
% 0.11/0.33 % Python version: Python 3.6.8
% 0.11/0.33 % Running in FO mode
% 0.47/0.64 % Total configuration time : 435
% 0.47/0.64 % Estimated wc time : 1092
% 0.47/0.64 % Estimated cpu time (7 cpus) : 156.0
% 0.50/0.72 % /export/starexec/sandbox2/solver/bin/fo/fo3_bce.sh running for 75s
% 0.50/0.72 % /export/starexec/sandbox2/solver/bin/fo/fo6_bce.sh running for 75s
% 0.50/0.72 % /export/starexec/sandbox2/solver/bin/fo/fo7.sh running for 63s
% 0.50/0.72 % /export/starexec/sandbox2/solver/bin/fo/fo1_av.sh running for 75s
% 0.50/0.72 % /export/starexec/sandbox2/solver/bin/fo/fo13.sh running for 50s
% 0.50/0.72 % /export/starexec/sandbox2/solver/bin/fo/fo5.sh running for 50s
% 0.50/0.73 % /export/starexec/sandbox2/solver/bin/fo/fo4.sh running for 50s
% 0.54/0.79 % Solved by fo/fo3_bce.sh.
% 0.54/0.79 % BCE start: 55
% 0.54/0.79 % BCE eliminated: 1
% 0.54/0.79 % PE start: 54
% 0.54/0.79 logic: eq
% 0.54/0.79 % PE eliminated: 0
% 0.54/0.79 % done 42 iterations in 0.030s
% 0.54/0.79 % SZS status Theorem for '/export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p'
% 0.54/0.79 % SZS output start Refutation
% 0.54/0.79 thf(v_pn_type, type, v_pn: $i).
% 0.54/0.79 thf(c_Natural_Oevalc_type, type, c_Natural_Oevalc: $i > $i > $i > $o).
% 0.54/0.79 thf(v_xa_type, type, v_xa: $i).
% 0.54/0.79 thf(c_Com_Ocom_OBODY_type, type, c_Com_Ocom_OBODY: $i > $i).
% 0.54/0.79 thf(v_x_type, type, v_x: $i).
% 0.54/0.79 thf(c_Com_Obody_type, type, c_Com_Obody: $i > $i).
% 0.54/0.79 thf(c_Option_Othe_type, type, c_Option_Othe: $i > $i > $i).
% 0.54/0.79 thf(tc_Com_Ocom_type, type, tc_Com_Ocom: $i).
% 0.54/0.79 thf(cls_conjecture_1, conjecture,
% 0.54/0.79 (c_Natural_Oevalc @ ( c_Com_Ocom_OBODY @ v_pn ) @ v_x @ v_xa)).
% 0.54/0.79 thf(zf_stmt_0, negated_conjecture,
% 0.54/0.79 (~( c_Natural_Oevalc @ ( c_Com_Ocom_OBODY @ v_pn ) @ v_x @ v_xa )),
% 0.54/0.79 inference('cnf.neg', [status(esa)], [cls_conjecture_1])).
% 0.54/0.79 thf(zip_derived_cl54, plain,
% 0.54/0.79 (~ (c_Natural_Oevalc @ (c_Com_Ocom_OBODY @ v_pn) @ v_x @ v_xa)),
% 0.54/0.79 inference('cnf', [status(esa)], [zf_stmt_0])).
% 0.54/0.79 thf(cls_evalc_OBody_0, axiom,
% 0.54/0.79 (( c_Natural_Oevalc @ ( c_Com_Ocom_OBODY @ V_pn ) @ V_s0 @ V_s1 ) |
% 0.54/0.79 ( ~( c_Natural_Oevalc @
% 0.54/0.79 ( c_Option_Othe @ ( c_Com_Obody @ V_pn ) @ tc_Com_Ocom ) @ V_s0 @
% 0.54/0.79 V_s1 ) ))).
% 0.54/0.79 thf(zip_derived_cl37, plain,
% 0.54/0.79 (![X0 : $i, X1 : $i, X2 : $i]:
% 0.54/0.79 ( (c_Natural_Oevalc @ (c_Com_Ocom_OBODY @ X0) @ X1 @ X2)
% 0.54/0.79 | ~ (c_Natural_Oevalc @
% 0.54/0.79 (c_Option_Othe @ (c_Com_Obody @ X0) @ tc_Com_Ocom) @ X1 @ X2))),
% 0.54/0.79 inference('cnf', [status(esa)], [cls_evalc_OBody_0])).
% 0.54/0.79 thf(cls_conjecture_0, conjecture,
% 0.54/0.79 (~( c_Natural_Oevalc @
% 0.54/0.79 ( c_Option_Othe @ ( c_Com_Obody @ v_pn ) @ tc_Com_Ocom ) @ v_x @ v_xa ))).
% 0.54/0.79 thf(zf_stmt_1, negated_conjecture,
% 0.54/0.79 (c_Natural_Oevalc @
% 0.54/0.79 ( c_Option_Othe @ ( c_Com_Obody @ v_pn ) @ tc_Com_Ocom ) @ v_x @ v_xa),
% 0.54/0.79 inference('cnf.neg', [status(esa)], [cls_conjecture_0])).
% 0.54/0.79 thf(zip_derived_cl53, plain,
% 0.54/0.79 ( (c_Natural_Oevalc @
% 0.54/0.79 (c_Option_Othe @ (c_Com_Obody @ v_pn) @ tc_Com_Ocom) @ v_x @ v_xa)),
% 0.54/0.79 inference('cnf', [status(esa)], [zf_stmt_1])).
% 0.54/0.79 thf(zip_derived_cl193, plain,
% 0.54/0.79 ( (c_Natural_Oevalc @ (c_Com_Ocom_OBODY @ v_pn) @ v_x @ v_xa)),
% 0.54/0.79 inference('sup+', [status(thm)], [zip_derived_cl37, zip_derived_cl53])).
% 0.54/0.79 thf(zip_derived_cl196, plain, ($false),
% 0.54/0.79 inference('demod', [status(thm)], [zip_derived_cl54, zip_derived_cl193])).
% 0.54/0.79
% 0.54/0.79 % SZS output end Refutation
% 0.54/0.79
% 0.54/0.79
% 0.54/0.79 % Terminating...
% 1.04/0.83 % Runner terminated.
% 1.04/0.85 % Zipperpin 1.5 exiting
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------