TSTP Solution File: SWV888-1 by SOS---2.0
View Problem
- Process Solution
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
% File : SOS---2.0
% Problem : SWV888-1 : TPTP v8.1.0. Released v4.1.0.
% Transfm : none
% Format : tptp:raw
% Command : sos-script %s
% Computer : n008.cluster.edu
% Model : x86_64 x86_64
% CPU : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 2.10GHz
% Memory : 8042.1875MB
% OS : Linux 3.10.0-693.el7.x86_64
% CPULimit : 300s
% WCLimit : 600s
% DateTime : Wed Jul 20 21:40:33 EDT 2022
% Result : Unsatisfiable 0.19s 0.47s
% Output : Refutation 0.19s
% Verified :
% SZS Type : -
% Comments :
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
%----WARNING: Could not form TPTP format derivation
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
%----ORIGINAL SYSTEM OUTPUT
% 0.03/0.12 % Problem : SWV888-1 : TPTP v8.1.0. Released v4.1.0.
% 0.03/0.13 % Command : sos-script %s
% 0.13/0.34 % Computer : n008.cluster.edu
% 0.13/0.34 % Model : x86_64 x86_64
% 0.13/0.34 % CPU : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 @ 2.10GHz
% 0.13/0.34 % Memory : 8042.1875MB
% 0.13/0.34 % OS : Linux 3.10.0-693.el7.x86_64
% 0.13/0.34 % CPULimit : 300
% 0.13/0.34 % WCLimit : 600
% 0.13/0.34 % DateTime : Wed Jun 15 03:24:37 EDT 2022
% 0.13/0.34 % CPUTime :
% 0.19/0.36 ----- Otter 3.2, August 2001 -----
% 0.19/0.36 The process was started by sandbox on n008.cluster.edu,
% 0.19/0.36 Wed Jun 15 03:24:37 2022
% 0.19/0.36 The command was "./sos". The process ID is 15430.
% 0.19/0.36
% 0.19/0.36 set(prolog_style_variables).
% 0.19/0.36 set(auto).
% 0.19/0.36 dependent: set(auto1).
% 0.19/0.36 dependent: set(process_input).
% 0.19/0.36 dependent: clear(print_kept).
% 0.19/0.36 dependent: clear(print_new_demod).
% 0.19/0.36 dependent: clear(print_back_demod).
% 0.19/0.36 dependent: clear(print_back_sub).
% 0.19/0.36 dependent: set(control_memory).
% 0.19/0.36 dependent: assign(max_mem, 12000).
% 0.19/0.36 dependent: assign(pick_given_ratio, 4).
% 0.19/0.36 dependent: assign(stats_level, 1).
% 0.19/0.36 dependent: assign(pick_semantic_ratio, 3).
% 0.19/0.36 dependent: assign(sos_limit, 5000).
% 0.19/0.36 dependent: assign(max_weight, 60).
% 0.19/0.36 clear(print_given).
% 0.19/0.36
% 0.19/0.36 list(usable).
% 0.19/0.36
% 0.19/0.36 SCAN INPUT: prop=0, horn=0, equality=1, symmetry=0, max_lits=3.
% 0.19/0.36
% 0.19/0.36 This ia a non-Horn set with equality. The strategy will be
% 0.19/0.36 Knuth-Bendix, ordered hyper_res, ur_res, factoring, and
% 0.19/0.36 unit deletion, with positive clauses in sos and nonpositive
% 0.19/0.36 clauses in usable.
% 0.19/0.36
% 0.19/0.36 dependent: set(knuth_bendix).
% 0.19/0.36 dependent: set(para_from).
% 0.19/0.36 dependent: set(para_into).
% 0.19/0.36 dependent: clear(para_from_right).
% 0.19/0.36 dependent: clear(para_into_right).
% 0.19/0.36 dependent: set(para_from_vars).
% 0.19/0.36 dependent: set(eq_units_both_ways).
% 0.19/0.36 dependent: set(dynamic_demod_all).
% 0.19/0.36 dependent: set(dynamic_demod).
% 0.19/0.36 dependent: set(order_eq).
% 0.19/0.36 dependent: set(back_demod).
% 0.19/0.36 dependent: set(lrpo).
% 0.19/0.36 dependent: set(hyper_res).
% 0.19/0.36 dependent: set(unit_deletion).
% 0.19/0.36 dependent: set(factor).
% 0.19/0.36
% 0.19/0.36 ------------> process usable:
% 0.19/0.36 Following clause subsumed by 7 during input processing: 0 [] {-} c_Option_Ooption_ONone(A)!=c_Option_Ooption_OSome(B,A).
% 0.19/0.36 Following clause subsumed by 11 during input processing: 0 [] {-} c_Option_Ooption_OSome(A,B)!=c_Option_Ooption_ONone(B).
% 0.19/0.36 Following clause subsumed by 13 during input processing: 0 [] {-} c_Suc(A)!=c_Suc(B)|A=B.
% 0.19/0.36 Following clause subsumed by 23 during input processing: 0 [flip.1] {-} c_Suc(A)!=A.
% 0.19/0.36 Following clause subsumed by 19 during input processing: 0 [flip.1] {-} c_Com_Ocom_OSemi(A,B)!=c_Com_Ocom_OSKIP.
% 0.19/0.36 Following clause subsumed by 24 during input processing: 0 [flip.1] {-} c_Com_Ocom_OBODY(A)!=c_Com_Ocom_OSKIP.
% 0.19/0.36 Following clause subsumed by 37 during input processing: 0 [] {-} c_Natural_Oevalc(A,B,C)| -c_Natural_Oevaln(A,B,D,C).
% 0.19/0.36 Following clause subsumed by 11 during input processing: 0 [copy,7,flip.1] {-} c_Option_Ooption_OSome(A,B)!=c_Option_Ooption_ONone(B).
% 0.19/0.36 Following clause subsumed by 7 during input processing: 0 [copy,11,flip.1] {-} c_Option_Ooption_ONone(A)!=c_Option_Ooption_OSome(B,A).
% 0.19/0.36 Following clause subsumed by 32 during input processing: 0 [copy,31,flip.1] {-} c_Com_Ocom_OSemi(A,B)!=c_Com_Ocom_OBODY(C).
% 0.19/0.36 Following clause subsumed by 31 during input processing: 0 [copy,32,flip.1] {-} c_Com_Ocom_OBODY(A)!=c_Com_Ocom_OSemi(B,C).
% 0.19/0.36
% 0.19/0.36 ------------> process sos:
% 0.19/0.36 Following clause subsumed by 62 during input processing: 0 [copy,60,flip.1] {-} v_x=v_x.
% 0.19/0.36 Following clause subsumed by 62 during input processing: 0 [copy,62,flip.1] {-} A=A.
% 0.19/0.36 62 back subsumes 60.
% 0.19/0.36 62 back subsumes 41.
% 0.19/0.36
% 0.19/0.36 ======= end of input processing =======
% 0.19/0.46
% 0.19/0.46
% 0.19/0.46 Failed to model usable list: disabling FINDER
% 0.19/0.46
% 0.19/0.46
% 0.19/0.46
% 0.19/0.46 -------------- Softie stats --------------
% 0.19/0.46
% 0.19/0.46 UPDATE_STOP: 300
% 0.19/0.46 SFINDER_TIME_LIMIT: 2
% 0.19/0.46 SHORT_CLAUSE_CUTOFF: 4
% 0.19/0.46 number of clauses in intial UL: 39
% 0.19/0.46 number of clauses initially in problem: 53
% 0.19/0.46 percentage of clauses intially in UL: 73
% 0.19/0.46 percentage of distinct symbols occuring in initial UL: 82
% 0.19/0.46 percent of all initial clauses that are short: 100
% 0.19/0.46 absolute distinct symbol count: 28
% 0.19/0.46 distinct predicate count: 4
% 0.19/0.46 distinct function count: 18
% 0.19/0.46 distinct constant count: 6
% 0.19/0.46
% 0.19/0.46 ---------- no more Softie stats ----------
% 0.19/0.46
% 0.19/0.46
% 0.19/0.46
% 0.19/0.46 =========== start of search ===========
% 0.19/0.47
% 0.19/0.47 -------- PROOF --------
% 0.19/0.47 % SZS status Unsatisfiable
% 0.19/0.47 % SZS output start Refutation
% 0.19/0.47
% 0.19/0.47 ----> UNIT CONFLICT at 0.09 sec ----> 504 [binary,503.1,38.1] {-} $F.
% 0.19/0.47
% 0.19/0.47 Length of proof is 1. Level of proof is 1.
% 0.19/0.47
% 0.19/0.47 ---------------- PROOF ----------------
% 0.19/0.47 % SZS status Unsatisfiable
% 0.19/0.47 % SZS output start Refutation
% 0.19/0.47
% 0.19/0.47 25 [] {+} c_Natural_Oevalc(c_Com_Ocom_OBODY(A),B,C)| -c_Natural_Oevalc(c_Option_Othe(c_Com_Obody(A),tc_Com_Ocom),B,C).
% 0.19/0.47 38 [] {+} -c_Natural_Oevalc(c_Com_Ocom_OBODY(v_pn),v_x,v_xa).
% 0.19/0.47 61 [] {-} c_Natural_Oevalc(c_Option_Othe(c_Com_Obody(v_pn),tc_Com_Ocom),v_x,v_xa).
% 0.19/0.47 503 [hyper,61,25] {-} c_Natural_Oevalc(c_Com_Ocom_OBODY(v_pn),v_x,v_xa).
% 0.19/0.47 504 [binary,503.1,38.1] {-} $F.
% 0.19/0.47
% 0.19/0.47 % SZS output end Refutation
% 0.19/0.47 ------------ end of proof -------------
% 0.19/0.47
% 0.19/0.47
% 0.19/0.47 Search stopped by max_proofs option.
% 0.19/0.47
% 0.19/0.47
% 0.19/0.47 Search stopped by max_proofs option.
% 0.19/0.47
% 0.19/0.47 ============ end of search ============
% 0.19/0.47
% 0.19/0.47 That finishes the proof of the theorem.
% 0.19/0.47
% 0.19/0.47 Process 15430 finished Wed Jun 15 03:24:37 2022
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------