TSTP Solution File: SWV888-1 by Prover9---1109a
View Problem
- Process Solution
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
% File : Prover9---1109a
% Problem : SWV888-1 : TPTP v8.1.0. Released v4.1.0.
% Transfm : none
% Format : tptp:raw
% Command : tptp2X_and_run_prover9 %d %s
% Computer : n009.cluster.edu
% Model : x86_64 x86_64
% CPU : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 2.10GHz
% Memory : 8042.1875MB
% OS : Linux 3.10.0-693.el7.x86_64
% CPULimit : 300s
% WCLimit : 600s
% DateTime : Wed Jul 20 21:15:09 EDT 2022
% Result : Unsatisfiable 0.68s 0.99s
% Output : Refutation 0.68s
% Verified :
% SZS Type : -
% Comments :
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
%----WARNING: Could not form TPTP format derivation
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
%----ORIGINAL SYSTEM OUTPUT
% 0.10/0.12 % Problem : SWV888-1 : TPTP v8.1.0. Released v4.1.0.
% 0.10/0.12 % Command : tptp2X_and_run_prover9 %d %s
% 0.13/0.33 % Computer : n009.cluster.edu
% 0.13/0.33 % Model : x86_64 x86_64
% 0.13/0.33 % CPU : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 @ 2.10GHz
% 0.13/0.33 % Memory : 8042.1875MB
% 0.13/0.33 % OS : Linux 3.10.0-693.el7.x86_64
% 0.13/0.33 % CPULimit : 300
% 0.13/0.33 % WCLimit : 600
% 0.13/0.33 % DateTime : Wed Jun 15 03:18:23 EDT 2022
% 0.13/0.34 % CPUTime :
% 0.68/0.99 ============================== Prover9 ===============================
% 0.68/0.99 Prover9 (32) version 2009-11A, November 2009.
% 0.68/0.99 Process 28045 was started by sandbox on n009.cluster.edu,
% 0.68/0.99 Wed Jun 15 03:18:23 2022
% 0.68/0.99 The command was "/export/starexec/sandbox/solver/bin/prover9 -t 300 -f /tmp/Prover9_27690_n009.cluster.edu".
% 0.68/0.99 ============================== end of head ===========================
% 0.68/0.99
% 0.68/0.99 ============================== INPUT =================================
% 0.68/0.99
% 0.68/0.99 % Reading from file /tmp/Prover9_27690_n009.cluster.edu
% 0.68/0.99
% 0.68/0.99 set(prolog_style_variables).
% 0.68/0.99 set(auto2).
% 0.68/0.99 % set(auto2) -> set(auto).
% 0.68/0.99 % set(auto) -> set(auto_inference).
% 0.68/0.99 % set(auto) -> set(auto_setup).
% 0.68/0.99 % set(auto_setup) -> set(predicate_elim).
% 0.68/0.99 % set(auto_setup) -> assign(eq_defs, unfold).
% 0.68/0.99 % set(auto) -> set(auto_limits).
% 0.68/0.99 % set(auto_limits) -> assign(max_weight, "100.000").
% 0.68/0.99 % set(auto_limits) -> assign(sos_limit, 20000).
% 0.68/0.99 % set(auto) -> set(auto_denials).
% 0.68/0.99 % set(auto) -> set(auto_process).
% 0.68/0.99 % set(auto2) -> assign(new_constants, 1).
% 0.68/0.99 % set(auto2) -> assign(fold_denial_max, 3).
% 0.68/0.99 % set(auto2) -> assign(max_weight, "200.000").
% 0.68/0.99 % set(auto2) -> assign(max_hours, 1).
% 0.68/0.99 % assign(max_hours, 1) -> assign(max_seconds, 3600).
% 0.68/0.99 % set(auto2) -> assign(max_seconds, 0).
% 0.68/0.99 % set(auto2) -> assign(max_minutes, 5).
% 0.68/0.99 % assign(max_minutes, 5) -> assign(max_seconds, 300).
% 0.68/0.99 % set(auto2) -> set(sort_initial_sos).
% 0.68/0.99 % set(auto2) -> assign(sos_limit, -1).
% 0.68/0.99 % set(auto2) -> assign(lrs_ticks, 3000).
% 0.68/0.99 % set(auto2) -> assign(max_megs, 400).
% 0.68/0.99 % set(auto2) -> assign(stats, some).
% 0.68/0.99 % set(auto2) -> clear(echo_input).
% 0.68/0.99 % set(auto2) -> set(quiet).
% 0.68/0.99 % set(auto2) -> clear(print_initial_clauses).
% 0.68/0.99 % set(auto2) -> clear(print_given).
% 0.68/0.99 assign(lrs_ticks,-1).
% 0.68/0.99 assign(sos_limit,10000).
% 0.68/0.99 assign(order,kbo).
% 0.68/0.99 set(lex_order_vars).
% 0.68/0.99 clear(print_given).
% 0.68/0.99
% 0.68/0.99 % formulas(sos). % not echoed (55 formulas)
% 0.68/0.99
% 0.68/0.99 ============================== end of input ==========================
% 0.68/0.99
% 0.68/0.99 % From the command line: assign(max_seconds, 300).
% 0.68/0.99
% 0.68/0.99 ============================== PROCESS NON-CLAUSAL FORMULAS ==========
% 0.68/0.99
% 0.68/0.99 % Formulas that are not ordinary clauses:
% 0.68/0.99
% 0.68/0.99 ============================== end of process non-clausal formulas ===
% 0.68/0.99
% 0.68/0.99 ============================== PROCESS INITIAL CLAUSES ===============
% 0.68/0.99
% 0.68/0.99 ============================== PREDICATE ELIMINATION =================
% 0.68/0.99
% 0.68/0.99 ============================== end predicate elimination =============
% 0.68/0.99
% 0.68/0.99 Auto_denials: (non-Horn, no changes).
% 0.68/0.99
% 0.68/0.99 Term ordering decisions:
% 0.68/0.99 Function symbol KB weights: tc_Com_Ocom=1. c_Com_Ocom_OSKIP=1. v_x=1. t_a=1. v_pn=1. v_xa=1. c_Com_Ocom_OSemi=1. c_Option_Ooption_OSome=1. c_Option_Othe=1. c_Fun_Oid=1. c_ATP__Linkup_Osko__Option__Xnot__None__eq__1__1=1. c_ATP__Linkup_Osko__Option__Xnot__Some__eq__1__1=1. c_ATP__Linkup_Osko__Option__Xoption__Xexhaust__1__1=1. c_ATP__Linkup_Osko__Option__Xoption__Xnchotomy__1__1=1. c_Com_Ocom_OBODY=1. c_Com_Obody=1. c_Suc=1. c_Option_Ooption_ONone=1. c_Com_Osko__Com__XWTs__elim__cases__7__1=1. c_Natural_Osko__Natural__Xeval__eq__1__1=1. c_Natural_Osko__Natural__Xevalc__evaln__1__1=1. c_Natural_Osko__Natural__Xevalc__elim__cases__4__1=1. c_Natural_Osko__Natural__Xevaln__elim__cases__6__1=1. c_Natural_Osko__Natural__Xevaln__elim__cases__4__1=1.
% 0.68/0.99
% 0.68/0.99 ============================== end of process initial clauses ========
% 0.68/0.99
% 0.68/0.99 ============================== CLAUSES FOR SEARCH ====================
% 0.68/0.99
% 0.68/0.99 ============================== end of clauses for search =============
% 0.68/0.99
% 0.68/0.99 ============================== SEARCH ================================
% 0.68/0.99
% 0.68/0.99 % Starting search at 0.02 seconds.
% 0.68/0.99
% 0.68/0.99 ============================== PROOF =================================
% 0.68/0.99 % SZS status Unsatisfiable
% 0.68/0.99 % SZS output start Refutation
% 0.68/0.99
% 0.68/0.99 % Proof 1 at 0.02 (+ 0.00) seconds.
% 0.68/0.99 % Length of proof is 4.
% 0.68/0.99 % Level of proof is 1.
% 0.68/0.99 % Maximum clause weight is 12.000.
% 0.68/0.99 % Given clauses 35.
% 0.68/0.99
% 0.68/0.99 7 c_Natural_Oevalc(c_Option_Othe(c_Com_Obody(v_pn),tc_Com_Ocom),v_x,v_xa) # label(cls_conjecture_0) # label(negated_conjecture). [assumption].
% 0.68/0.99 23 -c_Natural_Oevalc(c_Com_Ocom_OBODY(v_pn),v_x,v_xa) # label(cls_conjecture_1) # label(negated_conjecture). [assumption].
% 0.68/0.99 47 c_Natural_Oevalc(c_Com_Ocom_OBODY(A),B,C) | -c_Natural_Oevalc(c_Option_Othe(c_Com_Obody(A),tc_Com_Ocom),B,C) # label(cls_evalc_OBody_0) # label(axiom). [assumption].
% 0.68/0.99 129 $F. [resolve(47,b,7,a),unit_del(a,23)].
% 0.68/0.99
% 0.68/0.99 % SZS output end Refutation
% 0.68/0.99 ============================== end of proof ==========================
% 0.68/0.99
% 0.68/0.99 ============================== STATISTICS ============================
% 0.68/0.99
% 0.68/0.99 Given=35. Generated=209. Kept=115. proofs=1.
% 0.68/0.99 Usable=35. Sos=80. Demods=6. Limbo=0, Disabled=55. Hints=0.
% 0.68/0.99 Megabytes=0.17.
% 0.68/0.99 User_CPU=0.02, System_CPU=0.00, Wall_clock=0.
% 0.68/0.99
% 0.68/0.99 ============================== end of statistics =====================
% 0.68/0.99
% 0.68/0.99 ============================== end of search =========================
% 0.68/0.99
% 0.68/0.99 THEOREM PROVED
% 0.68/0.99 % SZS status Unsatisfiable
% 0.68/0.99
% 0.68/0.99 Exiting with 1 proof.
% 0.68/0.99
% 0.68/0.99 Process 28045 exit (max_proofs) Wed Jun 15 03:18:23 2022
% 0.68/0.99 Prover9 interrupted
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------