TSTP Solution File: SWV888-1 by Etableau---0.67
View Problem
- Process Solution
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
% File : Etableau---0.67
% Problem : SWV888-1 : TPTP v8.1.0. Released v4.1.0.
% Transfm : none
% Format : tptp:raw
% Command : etableau --auto --tsmdo --quicksat=10000 --tableau=1 --tableau-saturation=1 -s -p --tableau-cores=8 --cpu-limit=%d %s
% Computer : n003.cluster.edu
% Model : x86_64 x86_64
% CPU : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 2.10GHz
% Memory : 8042.1875MB
% OS : Linux 3.10.0-693.el7.x86_64
% CPULimit : 300s
% WCLimit : 600s
% DateTime : Wed Jul 20 18:23:49 EDT 2022
% Result : Unsatisfiable 0.13s 0.37s
% Output : CNFRefutation 0.13s
% Verified :
% SZS Type : -
% Comments :
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
%----WARNING: Could not form TPTP format derivation
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
%----ORIGINAL SYSTEM OUTPUT
% 0.07/0.12 % Problem : SWV888-1 : TPTP v8.1.0. Released v4.1.0.
% 0.07/0.13 % Command : etableau --auto --tsmdo --quicksat=10000 --tableau=1 --tableau-saturation=1 -s -p --tableau-cores=8 --cpu-limit=%d %s
% 0.13/0.34 % Computer : n003.cluster.edu
% 0.13/0.34 % Model : x86_64 x86_64
% 0.13/0.34 % CPU : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 @ 2.10GHz
% 0.13/0.34 % Memory : 8042.1875MB
% 0.13/0.34 % OS : Linux 3.10.0-693.el7.x86_64
% 0.13/0.34 % CPULimit : 300
% 0.13/0.34 % WCLimit : 600
% 0.13/0.34 % DateTime : Wed Jun 15 03:19:10 EDT 2022
% 0.13/0.34 % CPUTime :
% 0.13/0.37 # No SInE strategy applied
% 0.13/0.37 # Auto-Mode selected heuristic G_E___207_C18_F1_SE_CS_SP_PI_PS_S5PRR_S2SI
% 0.13/0.37 # and selection function SelectNewComplexAHP.
% 0.13/0.37 #
% 0.13/0.37 # Presaturation interreduction done
% 0.13/0.37 # Number of axioms: 53 Number of unprocessed: 44
% 0.13/0.37 # Tableaux proof search.
% 0.13/0.37 # APR header successfully linked.
% 0.13/0.37 # Hello from C++
% 0.13/0.37 # The folding up rule is enabled...
% 0.13/0.37 # Local unification is enabled...
% 0.13/0.37 # Any saturation attempts will use folding labels...
% 0.13/0.37 # 44 beginning clauses after preprocessing and clausification
% 0.13/0.37 # Creating start rules for all 2 conjectures.
% 0.13/0.37 # There are 2 start rule candidates:
% 0.13/0.37 # Found 11 unit axioms.
% 0.13/0.37 # Unsuccessfully attempted saturation on 1 start tableaux, moving on.
% 0.13/0.37 # 2 start rule tableaux created.
% 0.13/0.37 # 33 extension rule candidate clauses
% 0.13/0.37 # 11 unit axiom clauses
% 0.13/0.37
% 0.13/0.37 # Requested 8, 32 cores available to the main process.
% 0.13/0.37 # There are not enough tableaux to fork, creating more from the initial 2
% 0.13/0.37 # Closed tableau found in foldup close cycle with 0 folds and 1 closures done.
% 0.13/0.37 # There were 0 total branch saturation attempts.
% 0.13/0.37 # There were 0 of these attempts blocked.
% 0.13/0.37 # There were 0 deferred branch saturation attempts.
% 0.13/0.37 # There were 0 free duplicated saturations.
% 0.13/0.37 # There were 0 total successful branch saturations.
% 0.13/0.37 # There were 0 successful branch saturations in interreduction.
% 0.13/0.37 # There were 0 successful branch saturations on the branch.
% 0.13/0.37 # There were 0 successful branch saturations after the branch.
% 0.13/0.37 # SZS status Unsatisfiable for /export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p
% 0.13/0.37 # SZS output start for /export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p
% 0.13/0.37 # Begin clausification derivation
% 0.13/0.37
% 0.13/0.37 # End clausification derivation
% 0.13/0.37 # Begin listing active clauses obtained from FOF to CNF conversion
% 0.13/0.37 cnf(i_0_109, negated_conjecture, (c_Natural_Oevalc(c_Option_Othe(c_Com_Obody(v_pn),tc_Com_Ocom),v_x,v_xa))).
% 0.13/0.37 cnf(i_0_62, plain, (c_Com_OWT(c_Com_Ocom_OSKIP))).
% 0.13/0.37 cnf(i_0_96, plain, (c_Natural_Oevalc(c_Com_Ocom_OSKIP,X1,X1))).
% 0.13/0.37 cnf(i_0_90, plain, (c_Option_Othe(c_Option_Ooption_OSome(X1,X2),X2)=X1)).
% 0.13/0.37 cnf(i_0_79, plain, (c_Natural_Oevaln(c_Com_Ocom_OSKIP,X1,X2,X1))).
% 0.13/0.37 cnf(i_0_105, plain, (c_Com_Ocom_OBODY(X1)!=c_Com_Ocom_OSKIP)).
% 0.13/0.37 cnf(i_0_110, negated_conjecture, (~c_Natural_Oevalc(c_Com_Ocom_OBODY(v_pn),v_x,v_xa))).
% 0.13/0.37 cnf(i_0_87, plain, (c_Suc(X1)!=X1)).
% 0.13/0.37 cnf(i_0_89, plain, (c_Com_Ocom_OSemi(X1,X2)!=c_Com_Ocom_OSKIP)).
% 0.13/0.37 cnf(i_0_64, plain, (c_Option_Ooption_ONone(X1)!=c_Option_Ooption_OSome(X2,X1))).
% 0.13/0.37 cnf(i_0_100, plain, (c_Com_Ocom_OBODY(X1)!=c_Com_Ocom_OSemi(X2,X3))).
% 0.13/0.37 cnf(i_0_104, plain, (X1=X2|c_Com_Ocom_OBODY(X1)!=c_Com_Ocom_OBODY(X2))).
% 0.13/0.37 cnf(i_0_73, plain, (X1=X2|c_Suc(X1)!=c_Suc(X2))).
% 0.13/0.37 cnf(i_0_91, plain, (c_Com_Obody(X1)=c_Option_Ooption_ONone(tc_Com_Ocom)|c_Com_OWT(c_Com_Ocom_OBODY(X1)))).
% 0.13/0.37 cnf(i_0_80, plain, (c_Com_OWT(X1)|~c_Com_OWT(c_Com_Ocom_OSemi(X2,X1)))).
% 0.13/0.37 cnf(i_0_81, plain, (c_Com_OWT(X1)|~c_Com_OWT(c_Com_Ocom_OSemi(X1,X2)))).
% 0.13/0.37 cnf(i_0_85, plain, (c_Com_OWT(X1)|c_Com_Obody(X2)!=c_Option_Ooption_OSome(X1,tc_Com_Ocom)|~c_Com_OWT__bodies)).
% 0.13/0.37 cnf(i_0_106, plain, (X1=X2|~c_Natural_Oevalc(c_Com_Ocom_OSKIP,X2,X1))).
% 0.13/0.37 cnf(i_0_99, plain, (c_Option_Ooption_OSome(c_Com_Osko__Com__XWTs__elim__cases__7__1(X1),tc_Com_Ocom)=c_Com_Obody(X1)|~c_Com_OWT(c_Com_Ocom_OBODY(X1)))).
% 0.13/0.37 cnf(i_0_93, plain, (c_Natural_Oevalc(c_Com_Ocom_OBODY(X1),X2,X3)|~c_Natural_Oevalc(c_Option_Othe(c_Com_Obody(X1),tc_Com_Ocom),X2,X3))).
% 0.13/0.37 cnf(i_0_84, plain, (c_Com_OWT(c_Com_Ocom_OSemi(X1,X2))|~c_Com_OWT(X2)|~c_Com_OWT(X1))).
% 0.13/0.37 cnf(i_0_57, plain, (X1=X2|~c_Natural_Oevaln(c_Com_Ocom_OSKIP,X2,X3,X1))).
% 0.13/0.37 cnf(i_0_68, plain, (X1=X2|c_Com_Ocom_OSemi(X3,X1)!=c_Com_Ocom_OSemi(X4,X2))).
% 0.13/0.37 cnf(i_0_72, plain, (X1=X2|c_Option_Ooption_OSome(X1,X3)!=c_Option_Ooption_OSome(X2,X3))).
% 0.13/0.37 cnf(i_0_69, plain, (X1=X2|c_Com_Ocom_OSemi(X1,X3)!=c_Com_Ocom_OSemi(X2,X4))).
% 0.13/0.37 cnf(i_0_58, plain, (c_Option_Ooption_OSome(c_ATP__Linkup_Osko__Option__Xoption__Xnchotomy__1__1(X1,X2),X2)=X1|X1=c_Option_Ooption_ONone(X2))).
% 0.13/0.37 cnf(i_0_94, plain, (c_Natural_Oevalc(c_Option_Othe(c_Com_Obody(X1),tc_Com_Ocom),X2,X3)|~c_Natural_Oevalc(c_Com_Ocom_OBODY(X1),X2,X3))).
% 0.13/0.37 cnf(i_0_107, plain, (c_Natural_Oevalc(X1,X2,X3)|~c_Natural_Oevaln(X1,X2,X4,X3))).
% 0.13/0.37 cnf(i_0_95, plain, (X1=X2|~c_Natural_Oevalc(X3,X4,X2)|~c_Natural_Oevalc(X3,X4,X1))).
% 0.13/0.37 cnf(i_0_67, plain, (c_Option_Ooption_OSome(c_ATP__Linkup_Osko__Option__Xnot__None__eq__1__1(X1,X2),X2)=X1|X1=c_Option_Ooption_ONone(X2))).
% 0.13/0.37 cnf(i_0_78, plain, (c_Option_Ooption_OSome(c_ATP__Linkup_Osko__Option__Xnot__Some__eq__1__1(X1,X2),X2)=X1|X1=c_Option_Ooption_ONone(X2))).
% 0.13/0.37 cnf(i_0_77, plain, (c_Natural_Oevaln(X1,X2,c_Suc(X3),X4)|~c_Natural_Oevaln(X1,X2,X3,X4))).
% 0.13/0.37 cnf(i_0_59, plain, (c_Suc(c_Natural_Osko__Natural__Xevaln__elim__cases__6__1(X1,X2,X3,X4))=X2|~c_Natural_Oevaln(c_Com_Ocom_OBODY(X1),X3,X2,X4))).
% 0.13/0.37 cnf(i_0_88, plain, (c_Option_Ooption_OSome(c_ATP__Linkup_Osko__Option__Xoption__Xexhaust__1__1(X1,X2),X2)=X1|X1=c_Option_Ooption_ONone(X2))).
% 0.13/0.37 cnf(i_0_103, plain, (c_Natural_Oevaln(c_Com_Ocom_OBODY(X1),X2,c_Suc(X3),X4)|~c_Natural_Oevaln(c_Option_Othe(c_Com_Obody(X1),tc_Com_Ocom),X2,X3,X4))).
% 0.13/0.37 cnf(i_0_66, plain, (c_Natural_Oevaln(X1,X2,c_Natural_Osko__Natural__Xeval__eq__1__1(X1,X2,X3),X3)|~c_Natural_Oevalc(X1,X2,X3))).
% 0.13/0.37 cnf(i_0_102, plain, (c_Natural_Oevalc(c_Com_Ocom_OSemi(X1,X2),X3,X4)|~c_Natural_Oevalc(X2,X5,X4)|~c_Natural_Oevalc(X1,X3,X5))).
% 0.13/0.37 cnf(i_0_61, plain, (c_Natural_Oevalc(X1,X2,c_Natural_Osko__Natural__Xevalc__elim__cases__4__1(X1,X3,X2,X4))|~c_Natural_Oevalc(c_Com_Ocom_OSemi(X1,X3),X2,X4))).
% 0.13/0.37 cnf(i_0_60, plain, (c_Natural_Oevalc(X1,c_Natural_Osko__Natural__Xevalc__elim__cases__4__1(X2,X1,X3,X4),X4)|~c_Natural_Oevalc(c_Com_Ocom_OSemi(X2,X1),X3,X4))).
% 0.13/0.37 cnf(i_0_83, plain, (c_Natural_Oevaln(X1,X2,c_Natural_Osko__Natural__Xevalc__evaln__1__1(X1,X2,X3),X3)|~c_Natural_Oevalc(X1,X2,X3))).
% 0.13/0.37 cnf(i_0_63, plain, (c_Natural_Oevaln(c_Com_Ocom_OSemi(X1,X2),X3,X4,X5)|~c_Natural_Oevaln(X2,X6,X4,X5)|~c_Natural_Oevaln(X1,X3,X4,X6))).
% 0.13/0.37 cnf(i_0_98, plain, (c_Natural_Oevaln(c_Option_Othe(c_Com_Obody(X1),tc_Com_Ocom),X2,c_Natural_Osko__Natural__Xevaln__elim__cases__6__1(X1,X3,X2,X4),X4)|~c_Natural_Oevaln(c_Com_Ocom_OBODY(X1),X2,X3,X4))).
% 0.13/0.37 cnf(i_0_76, plain, (c_Natural_Oevaln(X1,X2,X3,c_Natural_Osko__Natural__Xevaln__elim__cases__4__1(X1,X4,X3,X2,X5))|~c_Natural_Oevaln(c_Com_Ocom_OSemi(X1,X4),X2,X3,X5))).
% 0.13/0.37 cnf(i_0_75, plain, (c_Natural_Oevaln(X1,c_Natural_Osko__Natural__Xevaln__elim__cases__4__1(X2,X1,X3,X4,X5),X3,X5)|~c_Natural_Oevaln(c_Com_Ocom_OSemi(X2,X1),X4,X3,X5))).
% 0.13/0.37 # End listing active clauses. There is an equivalent clause to each of these in the clausification!
% 0.13/0.37 # Begin printing tableau
% 0.13/0.37 # Found 3 steps
% 0.13/0.37 cnf(i_0_110, negated_conjecture, (~c_Natural_Oevalc(c_Com_Ocom_OBODY(v_pn),v_x,v_xa)), inference(start_rule)).
% 0.13/0.37 cnf(i_0_111, plain, (~c_Natural_Oevalc(c_Com_Ocom_OBODY(v_pn),v_x,v_xa)), inference(extension_rule, [i_0_93])).
% 0.13/0.37 cnf(i_0_131, plain, (~c_Natural_Oevalc(c_Option_Othe(c_Com_Obody(v_pn),tc_Com_Ocom),v_x,v_xa)), inference(closure_rule, [i_0_109])).
% 0.13/0.37 # End printing tableau
% 0.13/0.37 # SZS output end
% 0.13/0.37 # Branches closed with saturation will be marked with an "s"
% 0.13/0.37 # Returning from population with 2 new_tableaux and 0 remaining starting tableaux.
% 0.13/0.37 # We now have 2 tableaux to operate on
% 0.13/0.37 # Found closed tableau during pool population.
% 0.13/0.37 # Proof search is over...
% 0.13/0.37 # Freeing feature tree
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------