TSTP Solution File: SWV888-1 by E-SAT---3.1

View Problem - Process Solution

%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
% File     : E-SAT---3.1
% Problem  : SWV888-1 : TPTP v8.1.2. Released v4.1.0.
% Transfm  : none
% Format   : tptp:raw
% Command  : run_E %s %d THM

% Computer : n024.cluster.edu
% Model    : x86_64 x86_64
% CPU      : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 2.10GHz
% Memory   : 8042.1875MB
% OS       : Linux 3.10.0-693.el7.x86_64
% CPULimit : 2400s
% WCLimit  : 300s
% DateTime : Tue Oct 10 20:08:04 EDT 2023

% Result   : Unsatisfiable 0.20s 0.50s
% Output   : CNFRefutation 0.20s
% Verified : 
% SZS Type : Refutation
%            Derivation depth      :    2
%            Number of leaves      :    3
% Syntax   : Number of clauses     :    7 (   5 unt;   0 nHn;   7 RR)
%            Number of literals    :    9 (   0 equ;   4 neg)
%            Maximal clause size   :    2 (   1 avg)
%            Maximal term depth    :    3 (   1 avg)
%            Number of predicates  :    2 (   1 usr;   1 prp; 0-3 aty)
%            Number of functors    :    7 (   7 usr;   4 con; 0-2 aty)
%            Number of variables   :    6 (   0 sgn)

% Comments : 
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
cnf(cls_evalc_OBody_0,axiom,
    ( c_Natural_Oevalc(c_Com_Ocom_OBODY(X1),X2,X3)
    | ~ c_Natural_Oevalc(c_Option_Othe(c_Com_Obody(X1),tc_Com_Ocom),X2,X3) ),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/tmp/tmp.qwGaZGVW9q/E---3.1_757.p',cls_evalc_OBody_0) ).

cnf(cls_conjecture_0,negated_conjecture,
    c_Natural_Oevalc(c_Option_Othe(c_Com_Obody(v_pn),tc_Com_Ocom),v_x,v_xa),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/tmp/tmp.qwGaZGVW9q/E---3.1_757.p',cls_conjecture_0) ).

cnf(cls_conjecture_1,negated_conjecture,
    ~ c_Natural_Oevalc(c_Com_Ocom_OBODY(v_pn),v_x,v_xa),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/tmp/tmp.qwGaZGVW9q/E---3.1_757.p',cls_conjecture_1) ).

cnf(c_0_3,axiom,
    ( c_Natural_Oevalc(c_Com_Ocom_OBODY(X1),X2,X3)
    | ~ c_Natural_Oevalc(c_Option_Othe(c_Com_Obody(X1),tc_Com_Ocom),X2,X3) ),
    cls_evalc_OBody_0 ).

cnf(c_0_4,negated_conjecture,
    c_Natural_Oevalc(c_Option_Othe(c_Com_Obody(v_pn),tc_Com_Ocom),v_x,v_xa),
    cls_conjecture_0 ).

cnf(c_0_5,negated_conjecture,
    ~ c_Natural_Oevalc(c_Com_Ocom_OBODY(v_pn),v_x,v_xa),
    cls_conjecture_1 ).

cnf(c_0_6,negated_conjecture,
    $false,
    inference(sr,[status(thm)],[inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_3,c_0_4]),c_0_5]),
    [proof] ).

%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
%----ORIGINAL SYSTEM OUTPUT
% 0.06/0.13  % Problem    : SWV888-1 : TPTP v8.1.2. Released v4.1.0.
% 0.06/0.14  % Command    : run_E %s %d THM
% 0.14/0.35  % Computer : n024.cluster.edu
% 0.14/0.35  % Model    : x86_64 x86_64
% 0.14/0.35  % CPU      : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 @ 2.10GHz
% 0.14/0.35  % Memory   : 8042.1875MB
% 0.14/0.35  % OS       : Linux 3.10.0-693.el7.x86_64
% 0.14/0.35  % CPULimit   : 2400
% 0.14/0.35  % WCLimit    : 300
% 0.14/0.35  % DateTime   : Tue Oct  3 03:35:57 EDT 2023
% 0.14/0.35  % CPUTime    : 
% 0.20/0.48  Running first-order model finding
% 0.20/0.48  Running: /export/starexec/sandbox2/solver/bin/eprover --delete-bad-limit=2000000000 --definitional-cnf=24 -s --print-statistics -R --print-version --proof-object --satauto-schedule=8 --cpu-limit=300 /export/starexec/sandbox2/tmp/tmp.qwGaZGVW9q/E---3.1_757.p
% 0.20/0.50  # Version: 3.1pre001
% 0.20/0.50  # Preprocessing class: FSMSSMSSSSSNFFN.
% 0.20/0.50  # Scheduled 4 strats onto 8 cores with 300 seconds (2400 total)
% 0.20/0.50  # Starting G-E--_208_C18_F1_SE_CS_SOS_SP_PS_S5PRR_RG_S04AN with 1500s (5) cores
% 0.20/0.50  # Starting new_bool_3 with 300s (1) cores
% 0.20/0.50  # Starting new_bool_1 with 300s (1) cores
% 0.20/0.50  # Starting sh5l with 300s (1) cores
% 0.20/0.50  # sh5l with pid 848 completed with status 0
% 0.20/0.50  # Result found by sh5l
% 0.20/0.50  # Preprocessing class: FSMSSMSSSSSNFFN.
% 0.20/0.50  # Scheduled 4 strats onto 8 cores with 300 seconds (2400 total)
% 0.20/0.50  # Starting G-E--_208_C18_F1_SE_CS_SOS_SP_PS_S5PRR_RG_S04AN with 1500s (5) cores
% 0.20/0.50  # Starting new_bool_3 with 300s (1) cores
% 0.20/0.50  # Starting new_bool_1 with 300s (1) cores
% 0.20/0.50  # Starting sh5l with 300s (1) cores
% 0.20/0.50  # SinE strategy is gf500_gu_R04_F100_L20000
% 0.20/0.50  # Search class: FGUSM-FFMS31-SFFFFFNN
% 0.20/0.50  # partial match(1): FGHSM-FFMS31-SFFFFFNN
% 0.20/0.50  # Scheduled 5 strats onto 1 cores with 300 seconds (300 total)
% 0.20/0.50  # Starting G-E--_302_C18_F1_URBAN_S5PRR_RG_S04BN with 181s (1) cores
% 0.20/0.50  # G-E--_302_C18_F1_URBAN_S5PRR_RG_S04BN with pid 849 completed with status 0
% 0.20/0.50  # Result found by G-E--_302_C18_F1_URBAN_S5PRR_RG_S04BN
% 0.20/0.50  # Preprocessing class: FSMSSMSSSSSNFFN.
% 0.20/0.50  # Scheduled 4 strats onto 8 cores with 300 seconds (2400 total)
% 0.20/0.50  # Starting G-E--_208_C18_F1_SE_CS_SOS_SP_PS_S5PRR_RG_S04AN with 1500s (5) cores
% 0.20/0.50  # Starting new_bool_3 with 300s (1) cores
% 0.20/0.50  # Starting new_bool_1 with 300s (1) cores
% 0.20/0.50  # Starting sh5l with 300s (1) cores
% 0.20/0.50  # SinE strategy is gf500_gu_R04_F100_L20000
% 0.20/0.50  # Search class: FGUSM-FFMS31-SFFFFFNN
% 0.20/0.50  # partial match(1): FGHSM-FFMS31-SFFFFFNN
% 0.20/0.50  # Scheduled 5 strats onto 1 cores with 300 seconds (300 total)
% 0.20/0.50  # Starting G-E--_302_C18_F1_URBAN_S5PRR_RG_S04BN with 181s (1) cores
% 0.20/0.50  # Preprocessing time       : 0.002 s
% 0.20/0.50  
% 0.20/0.50  # Proof found!
% 0.20/0.50  # SZS status Unsatisfiable
% 0.20/0.50  # SZS output start CNFRefutation
% See solution above
% 0.20/0.50  # Parsed axioms                        : 55
% 0.20/0.50  # Removed by relevancy pruning/SinE    : 12
% 0.20/0.50  # Initial clauses                      : 43
% 0.20/0.50  # Removed in clause preprocessing      : 0
% 0.20/0.50  # Initial clauses in saturation        : 43
% 0.20/0.50  # Processed clauses                    : 33
% 0.20/0.50  # ...of these trivial                  : 0
% 0.20/0.50  # ...subsumed                          : 9
% 0.20/0.50  # ...remaining for further processing  : 24
% 0.20/0.50  # Other redundant clauses eliminated   : 0
% 0.20/0.50  # Clauses deleted for lack of memory   : 0
% 0.20/0.50  # Backward-subsumed                    : 0
% 0.20/0.50  # Backward-rewritten                   : 1
% 0.20/0.50  # Generated clauses                    : 11
% 0.20/0.50  # ...of the previous two non-redundant : 4
% 0.20/0.50  # ...aggressively subsumed             : 0
% 0.20/0.50  # Contextual simplify-reflections      : 0
% 0.20/0.50  # Paramodulations                      : 8
% 0.20/0.50  # Factorizations                       : 0
% 0.20/0.50  # NegExts                              : 0
% 0.20/0.50  # Equation resolutions                 : 3
% 0.20/0.50  # Total rewrite steps                  : 1
% 0.20/0.50  # Propositional unsat checks           : 0
% 0.20/0.50  #    Propositional check models        : 0
% 0.20/0.50  #    Propositional check unsatisfiable : 0
% 0.20/0.50  #    Propositional clauses             : 0
% 0.20/0.50  #    Propositional clauses after purity: 0
% 0.20/0.50  #    Propositional unsat core size     : 0
% 0.20/0.50  #    Propositional preprocessing time  : 0.000
% 0.20/0.50  #    Propositional encoding time       : 0.000
% 0.20/0.50  #    Propositional solver time         : 0.000
% 0.20/0.50  #    Success case prop preproc time    : 0.000
% 0.20/0.50  #    Success case prop encoding time   : 0.000
% 0.20/0.50  #    Success case prop solver time     : 0.000
% 0.20/0.50  # Current number of processed clauses  : 23
% 0.20/0.50  #    Positive orientable unit clauses  : 5
% 0.20/0.50  #    Positive unorientable unit clauses: 0
% 0.20/0.50  #    Negative unit clauses             : 6
% 0.20/0.50  #    Non-unit-clauses                  : 12
% 0.20/0.50  # Current number of unprocessed clauses: 13
% 0.20/0.50  # ...number of literals in the above   : 30
% 0.20/0.50  # Current number of archived formulas  : 0
% 0.20/0.50  # Current number of archived clauses   : 1
% 0.20/0.50  # Clause-clause subsumption calls (NU) : 9
% 0.20/0.50  # Rec. Clause-clause subsumption calls : 8
% 0.20/0.50  # Non-unit clause-clause subsumptions  : 2
% 0.20/0.50  # Unit Clause-clause subsumption calls : 11
% 0.20/0.50  # Rewrite failures with RHS unbound    : 0
% 0.20/0.50  # BW rewrite match attempts            : 1
% 0.20/0.50  # BW rewrite match successes           : 1
% 0.20/0.50  # Condensation attempts                : 0
% 0.20/0.50  # Condensation successes               : 0
% 0.20/0.50  # Termbank termtop insertions          : 683
% 0.20/0.50  
% 0.20/0.50  # -------------------------------------------------
% 0.20/0.50  # User time                : 0.005 s
% 0.20/0.50  # System time              : 0.001 s
% 0.20/0.50  # Total time               : 0.005 s
% 0.20/0.50  # Maximum resident set size: 1816 pages
% 0.20/0.50  
% 0.20/0.50  # -------------------------------------------------
% 0.20/0.50  # User time                : 0.006 s
% 0.20/0.50  # System time              : 0.003 s
% 0.20/0.50  # Total time               : 0.010 s
% 0.20/0.50  # Maximum resident set size: 1716 pages
% 0.20/0.50  % E---3.1 exiting
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------