TSTP Solution File: SWV885-1 by iProver---3.8
View Problem
- Process Solution
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
% File : iProver---3.8
% Problem : SWV885-1 : TPTP v8.1.2. Released v4.1.0.
% Transfm : none
% Format : tptp:raw
% Command : run_iprover %s %d THM
% Computer : n008.cluster.edu
% Model : x86_64 x86_64
% CPU : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 2.10GHz
% Memory : 8042.1875MB
% OS : Linux 3.10.0-693.el7.x86_64
% CPULimit : 300s
% WCLimit : 300s
% DateTime : Thu Aug 31 22:42:59 EDT 2023
% Result : Unsatisfiable 12.54s 2.83s
% Output : CNFRefutation 12.54s
% Verified :
% SZS Type : Refutation
% Derivation depth : 5
% Number of leaves : 10
% Syntax : Number of clauses : 17 ( 12 unt; 1 nHn; 15 RR)
% Number of literals : 24 ( 10 equ; 9 neg)
% Maximal clause size : 3 ( 1 avg)
% Maximal term depth : 5 ( 2 avg)
% Number of predicates : 5 ( 3 usr; 1 prp; 0-3 aty)
% Number of functors : 16 ( 16 usr; 9 con; 0-4 aty)
% Number of variables : 12 ( 1 sgn)
% Comments :
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
cnf(c_1050,plain,
c_HOL_Ominus__class_Ominus(c_Suc(X0),c_Suc(X1),tc_nat) = c_HOL_Ominus__class_Ominus(X0,X1,tc_nat),
file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',cls_diff__Suc__Suc_0) ).
cnf(c_1057,plain,
( ~ c_lessequals(X0,X1,tc_nat)
| c_Suc(c_HOL_Ominus__class_Ominus(X1,X0,tc_nat)) = c_HOL_Ominus__class_Ominus(c_Suc(X1),X0,tc_nat) ),
file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',cls_Suc__diff__le_0) ).
cnf(c_1062,plain,
( ~ c_lessequals(X0,c_Set_Oimage(X1,X2,X3,X4),tc_fun(X4,tc_bool))
| ~ c_Finite__Set_Ofinite(X2,X3)
| c_Finite__Set_Ofinite(X0,X4) ),
file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',cls_finite__surj_0) ).
cnf(c_1070,plain,
( ~ c_Finite__Set_Ofinite(X0,X1)
| c_Finite__Set_Ocard(c_Set_Oinsert(X2,X0,X1),X1) = c_Suc(c_Finite__Set_Ocard(X0,X1))
| c_in(X2,X0,X1) ),
file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',cls_card__insert__if_1) ).
cnf(c_1104,negated_conjecture,
c_Finite__Set_Ofinite(v_U,tc_Com_Opname),
file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',cls_conjecture_0) ).
cnf(c_1105,negated_conjecture,
c_lessequals(v_G,c_Set_Oimage(v_mgt__call,v_U,tc_Com_Opname,t_a),tc_fun(t_a,tc_bool)),
file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',cls_conjecture_1) ).
cnf(c_1106,negated_conjecture,
c_lessequals(c_Suc(v_na),c_Finite__Set_Ocard(c_Set_Oimage(v_mgt__call,v_U,tc_Com_Opname,t_a),t_a),tc_nat),
file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',cls_conjecture_2) ).
cnf(c_1107,negated_conjecture,
c_HOL_Ominus__class_Ominus(c_Finite__Set_Ocard(c_Set_Oimage(v_mgt__call,v_U,tc_Com_Opname,t_a),t_a),c_Suc(v_na),tc_nat) = c_Finite__Set_Ocard(v_G,t_a),
file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',cls_conjecture_3) ).
cnf(c_1109,negated_conjecture,
~ c_in(hAPP(v_mgt__call,v_pn),v_G,t_a),
file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',cls_conjecture_5) ).
cnf(c_1110,negated_conjecture,
c_HOL_Ominus__class_Ominus(c_Finite__Set_Ocard(c_Set_Oimage(v_mgt__call,v_U,tc_Com_Opname,t_a),t_a),v_na,tc_nat) != c_Finite__Set_Ocard(c_Set_Oinsert(hAPP(v_mgt__call,v_pn),v_G,t_a),t_a),
file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',cls_conjecture_6) ).
cnf(c_24781,plain,
c_Suc(c_HOL_Ominus__class_Ominus(c_Finite__Set_Ocard(c_Set_Oimage(v_mgt__call,v_U,tc_Com_Opname,t_a),t_a),c_Suc(v_na),tc_nat)) = c_HOL_Ominus__class_Ominus(c_Suc(c_Finite__Set_Ocard(c_Set_Oimage(v_mgt__call,v_U,tc_Com_Opname,t_a),t_a)),c_Suc(v_na),tc_nat),
inference(superposition,[status(thm)],[c_1106,c_1057]) ).
cnf(c_24879,plain,
( ~ c_Finite__Set_Ofinite(v_U,tc_Com_Opname)
| c_Finite__Set_Ofinite(v_G,t_a) ),
inference(superposition,[status(thm)],[c_1105,c_1062]) ).
cnf(c_25167,plain,
( ~ c_Finite__Set_Ofinite(v_G,t_a)
| c_Finite__Set_Ocard(c_Set_Oinsert(hAPP(v_mgt__call,v_pn),v_G,t_a),t_a) = c_Suc(c_Finite__Set_Ocard(v_G,t_a)) ),
inference(superposition,[status(thm)],[c_1070,c_1109]) ).
cnf(c_33422,plain,
c_Suc(c_HOL_Ominus__class_Ominus(c_Finite__Set_Ocard(c_Set_Oimage(v_mgt__call,v_U,tc_Com_Opname,t_a),t_a),c_Suc(v_na),tc_nat)) = c_HOL_Ominus__class_Ominus(c_Finite__Set_Ocard(c_Set_Oimage(v_mgt__call,v_U,tc_Com_Opname,t_a),t_a),v_na,tc_nat),
inference(demodulation,[status(thm)],[c_24781,c_1050]) ).
cnf(c_33423,plain,
c_HOL_Ominus__class_Ominus(c_Finite__Set_Ocard(c_Set_Oimage(v_mgt__call,v_U,tc_Com_Opname,t_a),t_a),v_na,tc_nat) = c_Suc(c_Finite__Set_Ocard(v_G,t_a)),
inference(light_normalisation,[status(thm)],[c_33422,c_1107]) ).
cnf(c_33460,plain,
c_Finite__Set_Ocard(c_Set_Oinsert(hAPP(v_mgt__call,v_pn),v_G,t_a),t_a) != c_Suc(c_Finite__Set_Ocard(v_G,t_a)),
inference(superposition,[status(thm)],[c_33423,c_1110]) ).
cnf(c_33463,plain,
$false,
inference(prop_impl_just,[status(thm)],[c_33460,c_25167,c_24879,c_1104]) ).
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
%----ORIGINAL SYSTEM OUTPUT
% 0.08/0.19 % Problem : SWV885-1 : TPTP v8.1.2. Released v4.1.0.
% 0.08/0.21 % Command : run_iprover %s %d THM
% 0.18/0.44 % Computer : n008.cluster.edu
% 0.18/0.44 % Model : x86_64 x86_64
% 0.18/0.44 % CPU : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 @ 2.10GHz
% 0.18/0.44 % Memory : 8042.1875MB
% 0.18/0.44 % OS : Linux 3.10.0-693.el7.x86_64
% 0.18/0.44 % CPULimit : 300
% 0.18/0.44 % WCLimit : 300
% 0.18/0.44 % DateTime : Tue Aug 29 03:44:33 EDT 2023
% 0.18/0.45 % CPUTime :
% 0.27/0.58 Running first-order theorem proving
% 0.27/0.58 Running: /export/starexec/sandbox2/solver/bin/run_problem --schedule fof_schedule --no_cores 8 /export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p 300
% 12.54/2.83 % SZS status Started for theBenchmark.p
% 12.54/2.83 % SZS status Unsatisfiable for theBenchmark.p
% 12.54/2.83
% 12.54/2.83 %---------------- iProver v3.8 (pre SMT-COMP 2023/CASC 2023) ----------------%
% 12.54/2.83
% 12.54/2.83 ------ iProver source info
% 12.54/2.83
% 12.54/2.83 git: date: 2023-05-31 18:12:56 +0000
% 12.54/2.83 git: sha1: 8abddc1f627fd3ce0bcb8b4cbf113b3cc443d7b6
% 12.54/2.83 git: non_committed_changes: false
% 12.54/2.83 git: last_make_outside_of_git: false
% 12.54/2.83
% 12.54/2.83 ------ Parsing...successful
% 12.54/2.83
% 12.54/2.83
% 12.54/2.83
% 12.54/2.83 ------ Preprocessing... sup_sim: 44 sf_s rm: 125 0s sf_e pe_s pe:1:0s pe:2:0s pe:4:0s pe:8:0s pe:16:0s pe:32:0s pe_e
% 12.54/2.83
% 12.54/2.83 ------ Preprocessing... gs_s sp: 0 0s gs_e snvd_s sp: 0 0s snvd_e
% 12.54/2.83
% 12.54/2.83 ------ Preprocessing... sf_s rm: 1 0s sf_e sf_s rm: 0 0s sf_e
% 12.54/2.83 ------ Proving...
% 12.54/2.83 ------ Problem Properties
% 12.54/2.83
% 12.54/2.83
% 12.54/2.83 clauses 642
% 12.54/2.83 conjectures 7
% 12.54/2.83 EPR 52
% 12.54/2.83 Horn 556
% 12.54/2.83 unary 185
% 12.54/2.83 binary 245
% 12.54/2.83 lits 1356
% 12.54/2.83 lits eq 362
% 12.54/2.83 fd_pure 0
% 12.54/2.83 fd_pseudo 0
% 12.54/2.83 fd_cond 26
% 12.54/2.83 fd_pseudo_cond 51
% 12.54/2.83 AC symbols 0
% 12.54/2.83
% 12.54/2.83 ------ Input Options Time Limit: Unbounded
% 12.54/2.83
% 12.54/2.83
% 12.54/2.83 ------
% 12.54/2.83 Current options:
% 12.54/2.83 ------
% 12.54/2.83
% 12.54/2.83
% 12.54/2.83
% 12.54/2.83
% 12.54/2.83 ------ Proving...
% 12.54/2.83
% 12.54/2.83
% 12.54/2.83 % SZS status Unsatisfiable for theBenchmark.p
% 12.54/2.83
% 12.54/2.83 % SZS output start CNFRefutation for theBenchmark.p
% See solution above
% 12.54/2.83
% 12.54/2.83
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------