TSTP Solution File: SWV885-1 by SNARK---20120808r022

View Problem - Process Solution

%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
% File     : SNARK---20120808r022
% Problem  : SWV885-1 : TPTP v8.1.0. Released v4.1.0.
% Transfm  : none
% Format   : tptp:raw
% Command  : run-snark %s %d

% Computer : n018.cluster.edu
% Model    : x86_64 x86_64
% CPU      : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 2.10GHz
% Memory   : 8042.1875MB
% OS       : Linux 3.10.0-693.el7.x86_64
% CPULimit : 300s
% WCLimit  : 600s
% DateTime : Wed Jul 20 21:36:20 EDT 2022

% Result   : Unsatisfiable 3.23s 3.40s
% Output   : Refutation 3.23s
% Verified : 
% SZS Type : Refutation
%            Derivation depth      :    3
%            Number of leaves      :   15
% Syntax   : Number of clauses     :   21 (  15 unt;   4 nHn;  14 RR)
%            Number of literals    :   30 (  13 equ;  10 neg)
%            Maximal clause size   :    3 (   1 avg)
%            Maximal term depth    :    4 (   1 avg)
%            Number of predicates  :    7 (   5 usr;   1 prp; 0-3 aty)
%            Number of functors    :   18 (  18 usr;   9 con; 0-4 aty)
%            Number of variables   :   22 (   1 sgn)

% Comments : 
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
cnf(cls_linorder__not__less_1,axiom,
    ( ~ class_Orderings_Olinorder(X)
    | ~ c_HOL_Oord__class_Oless(Y,Z,X)
    | ~ c_lessequals(Z,Y,X) ),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',cls_linorder__not__less_1) ).

cnf(cls_Suc__neq__Zero_0,axiom,
    c_Suc(X) != c_HOL_Ozero__class_Ozero(tc_nat),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',cls_Suc__neq__Zero_0) ).

cnf(cls_add__Suc_0,axiom,
    c_HOL_Oplus__class_Oplus(c_Suc(X),Y,tc_nat) = c_Suc(c_HOL_Oplus__class_Oplus(X,Y,tc_nat)),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',cls_add__Suc_0) ).

cnf(cls_add__Suc__right_0,axiom,
    c_HOL_Oplus__class_Oplus(X,c_Suc(Y),tc_nat) = c_Suc(c_HOL_Oplus__class_Oplus(X,Y,tc_nat)),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',cls_add__Suc__right_0) ).

cnf(cls_add__diff__inverse_0,axiom,
    ( c_HOL_Oplus__class_Oplus(X,c_HOL_Ominus__class_Ominus(Y,X,tc_nat),tc_nat) = Y
    | c_HOL_Oord__class_Oless(Y,X,tc_nat) ),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',cls_add__diff__inverse_0) ).

cnf(cls_diff__add__inverse_0,axiom,
    c_HOL_Ominus__class_Ominus(c_HOL_Oplus__class_Oplus(X,Y,tc_nat),X,tc_nat) = Y,
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',cls_diff__add__inverse_0) ).

cnf(cls_card__eq__0__iff_2,axiom,
    ( c_Finite__Set_Ocard(X,Y) = c_HOL_Ozero__class_Ozero(tc_nat)
    | c_Finite__Set_Ofinite(X,Y) ),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',cls_card__eq__0__iff_2) ).

cnf(cls_rev__finite__subset_0,axiom,
    ( c_Finite__Set_Ofinite(X,Y)
    | ~ c_lessequals(X,Z,tc_fun(Y,tc_bool))
    | ~ c_Finite__Set_Ofinite(Z,Y) ),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',cls_rev__finite__subset_0) ).

cnf(cls_card__insert__if_1,axiom,
    ( c_Finite__Set_Ocard(c_Set_Oinsert(X,Y,Z),Z) = c_Suc(c_Finite__Set_Ocard(Y,Z))
    | c_in(X,Y,Z)
    | ~ c_Finite__Set_Ofinite(Y,Z) ),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',cls_card__insert__if_1) ).

cnf(cls_conjecture_1,negated_conjecture,
    c_lessequals(v_G,c_Set_Oimage(v_mgt__call,v_U,tc_Com_Opname,t_a),tc_fun(t_a,tc_bool)),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',cls_conjecture_1) ).

cnf(cls_conjecture_2,negated_conjecture,
    c_lessequals(c_Suc(v_na),c_Finite__Set_Ocard(c_Set_Oimage(v_mgt__call,v_U,tc_Com_Opname,t_a),t_a),tc_nat),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',cls_conjecture_2) ).

cnf(cls_conjecture_3,negated_conjecture,
    c_Finite__Set_Ocard(v_G,t_a) = c_HOL_Ominus__class_Ominus(c_Finite__Set_Ocard(c_Set_Oimage(v_mgt__call,v_U,tc_Com_Opname,t_a),t_a),c_Suc(v_na),tc_nat),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',cls_conjecture_3) ).

cnf(cls_conjecture_5,negated_conjecture,
    ~ c_in(hAPP(v_mgt__call,v_pn),v_G,t_a),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',cls_conjecture_5) ).

cnf(cls_conjecture_6,negated_conjecture,
    c_Finite__Set_Ocard(c_Set_Oinsert(hAPP(v_mgt__call,v_pn),v_G,t_a),t_a) != c_HOL_Ominus__class_Ominus(c_Finite__Set_Ocard(c_Set_Oimage(v_mgt__call,v_U,tc_Com_Opname,t_a),t_a),v_na,tc_nat),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',cls_conjecture_6) ).

cnf(clsarity_nat__Orderings_Olinorder,axiom,
    class_Orderings_Olinorder(tc_nat),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',clsarity_nat__Orderings_Olinorder) ).

cnf(1068,plain,
    c_HOL_Ominus__class_Ominus(c_Suc(c_HOL_Oplus__class_Oplus(X,Y,tc_nat)),X,tc_nat) = c_Suc(Y),
    inference('PARAMODULATE',[status(thm)],[cls_diff__add__inverse_0,cls_add__Suc__right_0,theory(equality)]) ).

cnf(1260,plain,
    ( c_Finite__Set_Ocard(c_Set_Oimage(v_mgt__call,v_U,tc_Com_Opname,t_a),t_a) = c_HOL_Ozero__class_Ozero(tc_nat)
    | c_Finite__Set_Ofinite(v_G,t_a) ),
    inference('HYPERRESOLVE',[status(thm)],[cls_rev__finite__subset_0,cls_conjecture_1,cls_card__eq__0__iff_2]) ).

cnf(1427,plain,
    c_Suc(c_HOL_Oplus__class_Oplus(v_na,c_Finite__Set_Ocard(v_G,t_a),tc_nat)) = c_Finite__Set_Ocard(c_Set_Oimage(v_mgt__call,v_U,tc_Com_Opname,t_a),t_a),
    inference('REWRITE',[status(thm)],[inference('HYPERRESOLVE',[status(thm)],[cls_linorder__not__less_1,cls_add__diff__inverse_0,clsarity_nat__Orderings_Olinorder,cls_conjecture_2]),cls_add__Suc_0,cls_conjecture_3,theory(equality)]) ).

cnf(1428,plain,
    c_Finite__Set_Ocard(c_Set_Oinsert(hAPP(v_mgt__call,v_pn),v_G,t_a),t_a) != c_Suc(c_Finite__Set_Ocard(v_G,t_a)),
    inference('REWRITE',[status(thm)],[cls_conjecture_6,1068,1427,theory(equality)]) ).

cnf(1444,plain,
    c_Finite__Set_Ofinite(v_G,t_a),
    inference('REWRITE',[status(thm)],[1260,cls_Suc__neq__Zero_0,1427,theory(equality)]) ).

cnf(3459,plain,
    $false,
    inference('REWRITE',[status(thm)],[inference('UR-RESOLVE',[status(thm)],[cls_card__insert__if_1,1428,cls_conjecture_5]),1444]) ).

%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
%----ORIGINAL SYSTEM OUTPUT
% 0.08/0.14  % Problem  : SWV885-1 : TPTP v8.1.0. Released v4.1.0.
% 0.08/0.15  % Command  : run-snark %s %d
% 0.15/0.37  % Computer : n018.cluster.edu
% 0.15/0.37  % Model    : x86_64 x86_64
% 0.15/0.37  % CPU      : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 @ 2.10GHz
% 0.15/0.37  % Memory   : 8042.1875MB
% 0.15/0.37  % OS       : Linux 3.10.0-693.el7.x86_64
% 0.15/0.37  % CPULimit : 300
% 0.15/0.37  % WCLimit  : 600
% 0.15/0.37  % DateTime : Tue Jun 14 19:00:59 EDT 2022
% 0.15/0.37  % CPUTime  : 
% 0.22/0.50  /export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p
% 0.22/0.51  * 
% 0.22/0.51  * 
% 0.35/0.52  #<PACKAGE "SNARK-USER">
% 0.35/0.52  * 
% 0.35/0.52  SNARK-TPTP-OPTIONS
% 0.35/0.52  * 
% 0.35/0.52  ((AGENDA-LENGTH-LIMIT NIL) (AGENDA-LENGTH-BEFORE-SIMPLIFICATION-LIMIT NIL)
% 0.35/0.52   (USE-HYPERRESOLUTION T) (USE-UR-RESOLUTION T) (USE-PARAMODULATION T)
% 0.35/0.52   (USE-FACTORING :POS)
% 0.35/0.52   (USE-LITERAL-ORDERING-WITH-HYPERRESOLUTION 'LITERAL-ORDERING-P)
% 0.35/0.52   (USE-LITERAL-ORDERING-WITH-PARAMODULATION 'LITERAL-ORDERING-P)
% 0.35/0.52   (ORDERING-FUNCTIONS>CONSTANTS T) (ASSERT-CONTEXT :CURRENT)
% 0.35/0.52   (RUN-TIME-LIMIT 300) (LISTEN-FOR-COMMANDS NIL)
% 0.35/0.52   (USE-CLOSURE-WHEN-SATISFIABLE T) (PRINT-ROWS-WHEN-GIVEN NIL)
% 0.35/0.52   (PRINT-ROWS-WHEN-DERIVED NIL) (PRINT-UNORIENTABLE-ROWS NIL)
% 0.35/0.52   (PRINT-ROW-WFFS-PRETTILY NIL) (PRINT-FINAL-ROWS :TPTP)
% 0.35/0.52   (PRINT-OPTIONS-WHEN-STARTING NIL) (USE-VARIABLE-NAME-SORTS NIL)
% 0.35/0.52   (USE-PURITY-TEST T) (USE-RELEVANCE-TEST T) (DECLARE-TPTP-SYMBOLS1)
% 0.35/0.52   (DECLARE-TPTP-SYMBOLS2))
% 0.35/0.52  * 
% 0.35/0.52  "."
% 0.35/0.52  * 
% 0.35/0.52  ; Begin refute-file /export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p 2022-06-14T19:00:59
% 0.35/0.52  ; Running SNARK from /davis/home/graph/tptp/Systems/SNARK---20120808r022/Source/snark-system.lisp in SBCL 1.0.12 on n018.cluster.edu at 2022-06-14T19:00:59
% 0.35/0.75  
% 0.35/0.75  ; Recognized possible right inverse assertion (|c_HOL_Oord__class_Oless| ?X (|c_Suc| ?X) |tc_nat|).
% 0.35/0.77  WARNING:
% 0.35/0.77     |class_Ring__and__Field_Oring__1| is a 1-ary relation that occurs only negatively; disabling rows that contain it.
% 0.35/0.77  WARNING:
% 0.35/0.77     |class_Ring__and__Field_Ocomm__ring| is a 1-ary relation that occurs only negatively; disabling rows that contain it.
% 0.35/0.77  WARNING:
% 0.35/0.77     |class_OrderedGroup_Ogroup__add| is a 1-ary relation that occurs only negatively; disabling rows that contain it.
% 0.35/0.77  WARNING:
% 0.35/0.77     |class_Ring__and__Field_Ocomm__ring__1| is a 1-ary relation that occurs only negatively; disabling rows that contain it.
% 0.35/0.77  WARNING:
% 0.35/0.77     |class_Divides_Oring__div| is a 1-ary relation that occurs only negatively; disabling rows that contain it.
% 0.35/0.77  WARNING:
% 0.35/0.77     |class_OrderedGroup_Oab__semigroup__idem__mult| is a 1-ary relation that occurs only negatively; disabling rows that contain it.
% 0.35/0.77  WARNING:
% 0.35/0.77     |class_OrderedGroup_Opordered__ab__group__add| is a 1-ary relation that occurs only negatively; disabling rows that contain it.
% 0.35/0.77  WARNING:
% 0.35/0.77     |class_Ring__and__Field_Oring__no__zero__divisors| is a 1-ary relation that occurs only negatively; disabling rows that contain it.
% 0.35/0.77  WARNING:
% 0.35/0.77     |class_Ring__and__Field_Oordered__idom| is a 1-ary relation that occurs only negatively; disabling rows that contain it.
% 0.35/0.77  WARNING:
% 0.35/0.77     |class_Ring__and__Field_Opordered__ring| is a 1-ary relation that occurs only negatively; disabling rows that contain it.
% 0.35/0.77  WARNING:
% 0.35/0.77     |class_Ring__and__Field_Oordered__ring__strict| is a 1-ary relation that occurs only negatively; disabling rows that contain it.
% 0.35/0.77  WARNING:
% 0.35/0.77     |class_Ring__and__Field_Oring| is a 1-ary relation that occurs only negatively; disabling rows that contain it.
% 0.35/0.77  WARNING:
% 0.35/0.77     |class_Int_Onumber__ring| is a 1-ary relation that occurs only negatively; disabling rows that contain it.
% 0.35/0.77  WARNING:
% 0.35/0.77     |class_Ring__and__Field_Oidom| is a 1-ary relation that occurs only negatively; disabling rows that contain it.
% 0.35/0.77  WARNING:
% 0.35/0.77     |class_OrderedGroup_Olordered__ab__group__add__meet| is a 1-ary relation that occurs only negatively; disabling rows that contain it.
% 0.35/0.77  WARNING:
% 0.35/0.77     |class_OrderedGroup_Oab__group__add| is a 1-ary relation that occurs only negatively; disabling rows that contain it.
% 0.35/0.77  WARNING:
% 0.35/0.77     |class_OrderedGroup_Olordered__ab__group__add| is a 1-ary relation that occurs only negatively; disabling rows that contain it.
% 3.23/3.40  ; Recognized possible right inverse assertion (|c_HOL_Oord__class_Oless| ?X (|c_Suc| ?X) |tc_nat|).
% 3.23/3.40  
% 3.23/3.40  #||
% 3.23/3.40  % SZS status Unsatisfiable for /export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p
% 3.23/3.40  % SZS output start Refutation
% See solution above
% 3.23/3.40  ||#
% 3.23/3.40  
% 3.23/3.40  ; Summary of computation:
% 3.23/3.40  ;     11463 formulas have been input or derived (from 552 formulas).
% 3.23/3.40  ;      3459 (30%) were retained.  Of these,
% 3.23/3.40  ;          164 ( 5%) were simplified or subsumed later,
% 3.23/3.40  ;         3295 (95%) are still being kept.
% 3.23/3.40  ; 
% 3.23/3.40  ; Run time in seconds excluding printing time:
% 3.23/3.40  ;     0.204   7%   Read assertion file          (1 call)
% 3.23/3.40  ;     0.021   1%   Assert                       (1,121 calls)
% 3.23/3.40  ;     0.269   9%   Process new row              (10,159 calls)
% 3.23/3.40  ;     0.232   8%   Resolution                   (1,102 calls)
% 3.23/3.40  ;     0.053   2%   Paramodulation               (551 calls)
% 3.23/3.40  ;     0.000   0%   Factoring                    (13 calls)
% 3.23/3.40  ;     0.063   2%   Condensing                   (4,251 calls)
% 3.23/3.40  ;     0.178   6%   Forward subsumption          (4,251 calls)
% 3.23/3.40  ;     0.101   4%   Backward subsumption         (2,237 calls)
% 3.23/3.40  ;     0.056   2%   Clause clause subsumption    (18,481 calls)
% 3.23/3.40  ;     0.359  12%   Forward simplification       (10,025 calls)
% 3.23/3.40  ;     0.041   1%   Backward simplification      (3,430 calls)
% 3.23/3.40  ;     1.213  42%   Ordering                     (31,329 calls)
% 3.23/3.40  ;     0.000   0%   Sortal reasoning             (32 calls)
% 3.23/3.40  ;     0.012   0%   Purity testing               (1 call)
% 3.23/3.40  ;     0.076   3%   Other
% 3.23/3.40  ;     2.878        Total
% 3.23/3.40  ;     2.881        Real time
% 3.23/3.40  ; 
% 3.23/3.40  ; Term-hash-array has 5,968 terms in all.
% 3.23/3.40  ; Feature-vector-row-index has 2,181 entries (2,181 at peak, 2,237 added, 56 deleted).
% 3.23/3.40  ; Feature-vector-row-index has 8,425 nodes (8,425 at peak, 8,854 added, 429 deleted).
% 3.23/3.40  ;  Retrieved 28,486 possibly forward subsuming rows in 4,251 calls.
% 3.23/3.40  ;  Retrieved 2,672 possibly backward subsumed rows in 2,237 calls.
% 3.23/3.40  ; Path-index has 5,743 entries (5,743 at peak, 6,069 added, 326 deleted).
% 3.23/3.40  ; Path-index has 23,114 nodes (23,114 at peak, 25,092 added, 1,978 deleted).
% 3.23/3.40  ; Trie-index has 5,743 entries (5,743 at peak, 6,069 added, 326 deleted).
% 3.23/3.40  ; Trie-index has 27,305 nodes (27,305 at peak, 32,068 added, 4,763 deleted).
% 3.23/3.40  ; Retrieved 50,168 generalization terms in 50,271 calls.
% 3.23/3.40  ; Retrieved 3,668 instance terms in 1,359 calls.
% 3.23/3.40  ; Retrieved 302,822 unifiable terms in 5,683 calls.
% 3.23/3.40  ; 
% 3.23/3.40  ; The agenda of rows to process has 3 entries:
% 3.23/3.40  ;     1 with value 20              1 with value 28               1 with value 33
% 3.23/3.40  ; The agenda of input rows to give has 228 entries:
% 3.23/3.40  ;    47 with value 24             12 with value 32               2 with value 40
% 3.23/3.40  ;    23 with value 25              6 with value 33               3 with value 42
% 3.23/3.40  ;    12 with value 26              6 with value 34               8 with value 43
% 3.23/3.40  ;    46 with value 27              7 with value 35               8 with value 44
% 3.23/3.40  ;    10 with value 28              1 with value 36               2 with value 46
% 3.23/3.40  ;     8 with value 29              3 with value 37               1 with value 49
% 3.23/3.40  ;     6 with value 30              4 with value 38               3 with value 51
% 3.23/3.40  ;     3 with value 31              6 with value 39               1 with value 53
% 3.23/3.40  ; The agenda of rows to give has 2519 entries:
% 3.23/3.40  ;     1 with value (4 4)         102 with value (4 25)           5 with value (4 45)
% 3.23/3.40  ;     2 with value (4 5)         168 with value (4 26)          12 with value (4 46)
% 3.23/3.40  ;     2 with value (4 6)         118 with value (4 27)           4 with value (4 47)
% 3.23/3.40  ;    17 with value (4 7)          72 with value (4 28)           5 with value (4 49)
% 3.23/3.40  ;     9 with value (4 8)          71 with value (4 29)          10 with value (4 50)
% 3.23/3.40  ;    14 with value (4 9)          86 with value (4 30)           1 with value (4 51)
% 3.23/3.40  ;    21 with value (4 10)         63 with value (4 31)           2 with value (4 52)
% 3.23/3.40  ;    28 with value (4 11)         67 with value (4 32)           1 with value (4 55)
% 3.23/3.40  ;    28 with value (4 12)         59 with value (4 33)           2 with value (4 56)
% 3.23/3.40  ;    51 with value (4 13)         72 with value (4 34)           1 with value (4 60)
% 3.23/3.40  ;    62 with value (4 14)         39 with value (4 35)           1 with value (4 63)
% 3.23/3.40  ;    89 with value (4 15)         40 with value (4 36)           4 with value (4 80)
% 3.23/3.40  ;    89 with value (4 16)         45 with value (4 37)           6 with value (4 83)
% 3.23/3.40  ;   129 with value (4 17)         34 with value (4 38)           1 with value (4 84)
% 3.23/3.40  ;   125 with value (4 18)         32 with value (4 39)           4 with value (4 87)
% 3.23/3.40  ;   104 with value (4 19)         25 with value (4 40)           1 with value (4 91)
% 3.23/3.40  ;   124 with value (4 20)         10 with value (4 41)           1 with value (4 163)
% 3.23/3.40  ;    91 with value (4 21)         12 with value (4 42)           2 with value (4 176)
% 3.23/3.40  ;   127 with value (4 22)          8 with value (4 43)           1 with value (4 234)
% 3.23/3.40  ;   106 with value (4 23)          2 with value (4 44)           1 with value (4 353)
% 3.23/3.40  ;   110 with value (4 24)
% 3.23/3.40  Evaluation took:
% 3.23/3.40    2.882 seconds of real time
% 3.23/3.40    2.688661 seconds of user run time
% 3.23/3.40    0.19293 seconds of system run time
% 3.23/3.40    [Run times include 0.225 seconds GC run time.]
% 3.23/3.40    0 calls to %EVAL
% 3.23/3.40    0 page faults and
% 3.23/3.40    191,350,520 bytes consed.
% 3.23/3.40  :PROOF-FOUND
% 3.23/3.40  ; End refute-file /export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p 2022-06-14T19:01:02
% 3.23/3.40  :PROOF-FOUND
% 3.23/3.40  * 
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------