TSTP Solution File: SWV879-1 by Vampire---4.8

View Problem - Process Solution

%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
% File     : Vampire---4.8
% Problem  : SWV879-1 : TPTP v8.2.0. Released v4.1.0.
% Transfm  : none
% Format   : tptp:raw
% Command  : vampire --input_syntax tptp --proof tptp --output_axiom_names on --mode portfolio --schedule file --schedule_file /export/starexec/sandbox/solver/bin/quickGreedyProduceRating_steal_pow3.txt --cores 8 -m 12000 -t %d %s

% Computer : n008.cluster.edu
% Model    : x86_64 x86_64
% CPU      : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 2.10GHz
% Memory   : 8042.1875MB
% OS       : Linux 3.10.0-693.el7.x86_64
% CPULimit : 300s
% WCLimit  : 300s
% DateTime : Tue May 21 06:06:39 EDT 2024

% Result   : Unsatisfiable 0.67s 0.87s
% Output   : Refutation 0.67s
% Verified : 
% SZS Type : Refutation
%            Derivation depth      :    5
%            Number of leaves      :    6
% Syntax   : Number of formulae    :   11 (   7 unt;   0 def)
%            Number of atoms       :   16 (   0 equ)
%            Maximal formula atoms :    3 (   1 avg)
%            Number of connectives :   15 (  10   ~;   5   |;   0   &)
%                                         (   0 <=>;   0  =>;   0  <=;   0 <~>)
%            Maximal formula depth :    8 (   3 avg)
%            Maximal term depth    :    5 (   1 avg)
%            Number of predicates  :    3 (   2 usr;   1 prp; 0-3 aty)
%            Number of functors    :   13 (  13 usr;   7 con; 0-4 aty)
%            Number of variables   :   13 (  13   !;   0   ?)

% Comments : 
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
fof(f958,plain,
    $false,
    inference(subsumption_resolution,[],[f953,f863]) ).

fof(f863,axiom,
    hBOOL(c_in(v_x,v_U,tc_Com_Opname)),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',cls_conjecture_2) ).

fof(f953,plain,
    ~ hBOOL(c_in(v_x,v_U,tc_Com_Opname)),
    inference(resolution,[],[f935,f857]) ).

fof(f857,axiom,
    ! [X0,X1,X6,X53,X25] :
      ( hBOOL(c_in(hAPP(X25,X1),c_Set_Oimage(X25,X6,X53,X0),X0))
      | ~ hBOOL(c_in(X1,X6,X53)) ),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',cls_rev__image__eqI_0) ).

fof(f935,plain,
    ~ hBOOL(c_in(hAPP(v_mgt__call,v_x),c_Set_Oimage(v_mgt__call,v_U,tc_Com_Opname,t_a),t_a)),
    inference(subsumption_resolution,[],[f925,f616]) ).

fof(f616,axiom,
    ! [X0,X6] : c_lessequals(c_Orderings_Obot__class_Obot(tc_fun(X0,tc_bool)),X6,tc_fun(X0,tc_bool)),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',cls_empty__subsetI_0) ).

fof(f925,plain,
    ( ~ c_lessequals(c_Orderings_Obot__class_Obot(tc_fun(t_a,tc_bool)),c_Set_Oimage(v_mgt__call,v_U,tc_Com_Opname,t_a),tc_fun(t_a,tc_bool))
    | ~ hBOOL(c_in(hAPP(v_mgt__call,v_x),c_Set_Oimage(v_mgt__call,v_U,tc_Com_Opname,t_a),t_a)) ),
    inference(resolution,[],[f915,f647]) ).

fof(f647,axiom,
    ! [X0,X1,X8,X6] :
      ( c_lessequals(c_Set_Oinsert(X1,X6,X0),X8,tc_fun(X0,tc_bool))
      | ~ c_lessequals(X6,X8,tc_fun(X0,tc_bool))
      | ~ hBOOL(c_in(X1,X8,X0)) ),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',cls_insert__subset_2) ).

fof(f915,plain,
    ~ c_lessequals(c_Set_Oinsert(hAPP(v_mgt__call,v_x),c_Orderings_Obot__class_Obot(tc_fun(t_a,tc_bool)),t_a),c_Set_Oimage(v_mgt__call,v_U,tc_Com_Opname,t_a),tc_fun(t_a,tc_bool)),
    inference(resolution,[],[f864,f640]) ).

fof(f640,axiom,
    ! [X44,X52] :
      ( hBOOL(hAPP(hAPP(v_P,X44),X52))
      | ~ c_lessequals(X52,X44,tc_fun(t_a,tc_bool)) ),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',cls_assms_I1_J_0) ).

fof(f864,axiom,
    ~ hBOOL(hAPP(hAPP(v_P,c_Set_Oimage(v_mgt__call,v_U,tc_Com_Opname,t_a)),c_Set_Oinsert(hAPP(v_mgt__call,v_x),c_Orderings_Obot__class_Obot(tc_fun(t_a,tc_bool)),t_a))),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',cls_conjecture_3) ).

%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
%----ORIGINAL SYSTEM OUTPUT
% 0.09/0.10  % Problem    : SWV879-1 : TPTP v8.2.0. Released v4.1.0.
% 0.09/0.11  % Command    : vampire --input_syntax tptp --proof tptp --output_axiom_names on --mode portfolio --schedule file --schedule_file /export/starexec/sandbox/solver/bin/quickGreedyProduceRating_steal_pow3.txt --cores 8 -m 12000 -t %d %s
% 0.10/0.31  % Computer : n008.cluster.edu
% 0.10/0.31  % Model    : x86_64 x86_64
% 0.10/0.31  % CPU      : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 @ 2.10GHz
% 0.10/0.31  % Memory   : 8042.1875MB
% 0.10/0.31  % OS       : Linux 3.10.0-693.el7.x86_64
% 0.10/0.31  % CPULimit   : 300
% 0.10/0.31  % WCLimit    : 300
% 0.10/0.31  % DateTime   : Sun May 19 07:09:07 EDT 2024
% 0.15/0.31  % CPUTime    : 
% 0.15/0.31  This is a CNF_UNS_RFO_SEQ_NHN problem
% 0.15/0.31  Running vampire --input_syntax tptp --proof tptp --output_axiom_names on --mode portfolio --schedule file --schedule_file /export/starexec/sandbox/solver/bin/quickGreedyProduceRating_steal_pow3.txt --cores 8 -m 12000 -t 300 /export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p
% 0.67/0.85  % (32084)dis-1011_2:1_sil=2000:lsd=20:nwc=5.0:flr=on:mep=off:st=3.0:i=34:sd=1:ep=RS:ss=axioms_0 on theBenchmark for (2994ds/34Mi)
% 0.67/0.85  % (32087)ott+1011_1:1_sil=2000:urr=on:i=33:sd=1:kws=inv_frequency:ss=axioms:sup=off_0 on theBenchmark for (2994ds/33Mi)
% 0.67/0.85  % (32086)lrs+1011_1:1_sil=8000:sp=occurrence:nwc=10.0:i=78:ss=axioms:sgt=8_0 on theBenchmark for (2994ds/78Mi)
% 0.67/0.85  % (32085)lrs+1011_461:32768_sil=16000:irw=on:sp=frequency:lsd=20:fd=preordered:nwc=10.0:s2agt=32:alpa=false:cond=fast:s2a=on:i=51:s2at=3.0:awrs=decay:awrsf=691:bd=off:nm=20:fsr=off:amm=sco:uhcvi=on:rawr=on_0 on theBenchmark for (2994ds/51Mi)
% 0.67/0.85  % (32088)lrs+2_1:1_sil=16000:fde=none:sos=all:nwc=5.0:i=34:ep=RS:s2pl=on:lma=on:afp=100000_0 on theBenchmark for (2994ds/34Mi)
% 0.67/0.85  % (32089)lrs+1002_1:16_to=lpo:sil=32000:sp=unary_frequency:sos=on:i=45:bd=off:ss=axioms_0 on theBenchmark for (2994ds/45Mi)
% 0.67/0.85  % (32090)lrs+21_1:5_sil=2000:sos=on:urr=on:newcnf=on:slsq=on:i=83:slsql=off:bd=off:nm=2:ss=axioms:st=1.5:sp=const_min:gsp=on:rawr=on_0 on theBenchmark for (2994ds/83Mi)
% 0.67/0.85  % (32091)lrs-21_1:1_to=lpo:sil=2000:sp=frequency:sos=on:lma=on:i=56:sd=2:ss=axioms:ep=R_0 on theBenchmark for (2994ds/56Mi)
% 0.67/0.86  % (32091)Refutation not found, incomplete strategy% (32091)------------------------------
% 0.67/0.86  % (32091)Version: Vampire 4.8 (commit 3a798227e on 2024-05-03 07:42:47 +0200)
% 0.67/0.86  % (32091)Termination reason: Refutation not found, incomplete strategy
% 0.67/0.86  
% 0.67/0.86  % (32091)Memory used [KB]: 1753
% 0.67/0.86  % (32091)Time elapsed: 0.010 s
% 0.67/0.86  % (32091)Instructions burned: 18 (million)
% 0.67/0.86  % (32091)------------------------------
% 0.67/0.86  % (32091)------------------------------
% 0.67/0.87  % (32092)lrs+21_1:16_sil=2000:sp=occurrence:urr=on:flr=on:i=55:sd=1:nm=0:ins=3:ss=included:rawr=on:br=off_0 on theBenchmark for (2994ds/55Mi)
% 0.67/0.87  % (32089)First to succeed.
% 0.67/0.87  % (32088)Instruction limit reached!
% 0.67/0.87  % (32088)------------------------------
% 0.67/0.87  % (32088)Version: Vampire 4.8 (commit 3a798227e on 2024-05-03 07:42:47 +0200)
% 0.67/0.87  % (32089)Solution written to "/export/starexec/sandbox/tmp/vampire-proof-32078"
% 0.67/0.87  % (32088)Termination reason: Unknown
% 0.67/0.87  % (32088)Termination phase: Saturation
% 0.67/0.87  
% 0.67/0.87  % (32088)Memory used [KB]: 1915
% 0.67/0.87  % (32088)Time elapsed: 0.016 s
% 0.67/0.87  % (32088)Instructions burned: 34 (million)
% 0.67/0.87  % (32088)------------------------------
% 0.67/0.87  % (32088)------------------------------
% 0.67/0.87  % (32089)Refutation found. Thanks to Tanya!
% 0.67/0.87  % SZS status Unsatisfiable for theBenchmark
% 0.67/0.87  % SZS output start Proof for theBenchmark
% See solution above
% 0.67/0.87  % (32089)------------------------------
% 0.67/0.87  % (32089)Version: Vampire 4.8 (commit 3a798227e on 2024-05-03 07:42:47 +0200)
% 0.67/0.87  % (32089)Termination reason: Refutation
% 0.67/0.87  
% 0.67/0.87  % (32089)Memory used [KB]: 1851
% 0.67/0.87  % (32089)Time elapsed: 0.015 s
% 0.67/0.87  % (32089)Instructions burned: 28 (million)
% 0.67/0.87  % (32078)Success in time 0.539 s
% 0.67/0.87  % Vampire---4.8 exiting
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------