TSTP Solution File: SWV873-1 by E---3.1
View Problem
- Process Solution
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
% File : E---3.1
% Problem : SWV873-1 : TPTP v8.1.2. Released v4.1.0.
% Transfm : none
% Format : tptp:raw
% Command : run_E %s %d THM
% Computer : n026.cluster.edu
% Model : x86_64 x86_64
% CPU : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 2.10GHz
% Memory : 8042.1875MB
% OS : Linux 3.10.0-693.el7.x86_64
% CPULimit : 2400s
% WCLimit : 300s
% DateTime : Tue Oct 10 19:55:32 EDT 2023
% Result : Unsatisfiable 0.75s 0.71s
% Output : CNFRefutation 0.75s
% Verified :
% SZS Type : Refutation
% Derivation depth : 2
% Number of leaves : 2
% Syntax : Number of clauses : 5 ( 5 unt; 0 nHn; 3 RR)
% Number of literals : 5 ( 0 equ; 2 neg)
% Maximal clause size : 1 ( 1 avg)
% Maximal term depth : 4 ( 2 avg)
% Number of predicates : 2 ( 1 usr; 1 prp; 0-1 aty)
% Number of functors : 4 ( 4 usr; 2 con; 0-2 aty)
% Number of variables : 2 ( 0 sgn)
% Comments :
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
cnf(cls_conjecture_0,negated_conjecture,
~ hBOOL(hAPP(hAPP(c_Natural_Oevalc(c_Com_Ocom_OSKIP),v_x),v_x)),
file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/tmp/tmp.i7ZVrkqGuu/E---3.1_32675.p',cls_conjecture_0) ).
cnf(cls_evalc_OSkip_0,axiom,
hBOOL(hAPP(hAPP(c_Natural_Oevalc(c_Com_Ocom_OSKIP),X1),X1)),
file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/tmp/tmp.i7ZVrkqGuu/E---3.1_32675.p',cls_evalc_OSkip_0) ).
cnf(c_0_2,negated_conjecture,
~ hBOOL(hAPP(hAPP(c_Natural_Oevalc(c_Com_Ocom_OSKIP),v_x),v_x)),
cls_conjecture_0 ).
cnf(c_0_3,axiom,
hBOOL(hAPP(hAPP(c_Natural_Oevalc(c_Com_Ocom_OSKIP),X1),X1)),
cls_evalc_OSkip_0 ).
cnf(c_0_4,negated_conjecture,
$false,
inference(cn,[status(thm)],[inference(rw,[status(thm)],[c_0_2,c_0_3])]),
[proof] ).
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
%----ORIGINAL SYSTEM OUTPUT
% 0.08/0.21 % Problem : SWV873-1 : TPTP v8.1.2. Released v4.1.0.
% 0.08/0.22 % Command : run_E %s %d THM
% 0.21/0.42 % Computer : n026.cluster.edu
% 0.21/0.42 % Model : x86_64 x86_64
% 0.21/0.42 % CPU : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 @ 2.10GHz
% 0.21/0.42 % Memory : 8042.1875MB
% 0.21/0.42 % OS : Linux 3.10.0-693.el7.x86_64
% 0.21/0.42 % CPULimit : 2400
% 0.21/0.42 % WCLimit : 300
% 0.21/0.42 % DateTime : Tue Oct 3 03:31:14 EDT 2023
% 0.21/0.42 % CPUTime :
% 0.46/0.63 Running first-order theorem proving
% 0.46/0.63 Running: /export/starexec/sandbox2/solver/bin/eprover --delete-bad-limit=2000000000 --definitional-cnf=24 -s --print-statistics -R --print-version --proof-object --auto-schedule=8 --cpu-limit=300 /export/starexec/sandbox2/tmp/tmp.i7ZVrkqGuu/E---3.1_32675.p
% 0.75/0.71 # Version: 3.1pre001
% 0.75/0.71 # Preprocessing class: FMLMSMSMSSSNFFN.
% 0.75/0.71 # Scheduled 4 strats onto 8 cores with 300 seconds (2400 total)
% 0.75/0.71 # Starting G-E--_208_C18_F1_SE_CS_SOS_SP_PS_S5PRR_RG_S04AN with 1500s (5) cores
% 0.75/0.71 # Starting new_bool_3 with 300s (1) cores
% 0.75/0.71 # Starting new_bool_1 with 300s (1) cores
% 0.75/0.71 # Starting sh5l with 300s (1) cores
% 0.75/0.71 # new_bool_1 with pid 32755 completed with status 0
% 0.75/0.71 # Result found by new_bool_1
% 0.75/0.71 # Preprocessing class: FMLMSMSMSSSNFFN.
% 0.75/0.71 # Scheduled 4 strats onto 8 cores with 300 seconds (2400 total)
% 0.75/0.71 # Starting G-E--_208_C18_F1_SE_CS_SOS_SP_PS_S5PRR_RG_S04AN with 1500s (5) cores
% 0.75/0.71 # Starting new_bool_3 with 300s (1) cores
% 0.75/0.71 # Starting new_bool_1 with 300s (1) cores
% 0.75/0.71 # SinE strategy is GSinE(CountFormulas,hypos,1.5,,3,20000,1.0)
% 0.75/0.71 # Search class: FGHSM-FSLM32-DFFFFFNN
% 0.75/0.71 # Scheduled 13 strats onto 1 cores with 300 seconds (300 total)
% 0.75/0.71 # Starting G-E--_301_C18_F1_URBAN_S5PRR_S0Y with 23s (1) cores
% 0.75/0.71 # G-E--_301_C18_F1_URBAN_S5PRR_S0Y with pid 32757 completed with status 0
% 0.75/0.71 # Result found by G-E--_301_C18_F1_URBAN_S5PRR_S0Y
% 0.75/0.71 # Preprocessing class: FMLMSMSMSSSNFFN.
% 0.75/0.71 # Scheduled 4 strats onto 8 cores with 300 seconds (2400 total)
% 0.75/0.71 # Starting G-E--_208_C18_F1_SE_CS_SOS_SP_PS_S5PRR_RG_S04AN with 1500s (5) cores
% 0.75/0.71 # Starting new_bool_3 with 300s (1) cores
% 0.75/0.71 # Starting new_bool_1 with 300s (1) cores
% 0.75/0.71 # SinE strategy is GSinE(CountFormulas,hypos,1.5,,3,20000,1.0)
% 0.75/0.71 # Search class: FGHSM-FSLM32-DFFFFFNN
% 0.75/0.71 # Scheduled 13 strats onto 1 cores with 300 seconds (300 total)
% 0.75/0.71 # Starting G-E--_301_C18_F1_URBAN_S5PRR_S0Y with 23s (1) cores
% 0.75/0.71 # Preprocessing time : 0.029 s
% 0.75/0.71
% 0.75/0.71 # Proof found!
% 0.75/0.71 # SZS status Unsatisfiable
% 0.75/0.71 # SZS output start CNFRefutation
% See solution above
% 0.75/0.71 # Parsed axioms : 1108
% 0.75/0.71 # Removed by relevancy pruning/SinE : 558
% 0.75/0.71 # Initial clauses : 550
% 0.75/0.71 # Removed in clause preprocessing : 0
% 0.75/0.71 # Initial clauses in saturation : 550
% 0.75/0.71 # Processed clauses : 33
% 0.75/0.71 # ...of these trivial : 0
% 0.75/0.71 # ...subsumed : 7
% 0.75/0.71 # ...remaining for further processing : 26
% 0.75/0.71 # Other redundant clauses eliminated : 0
% 0.75/0.71 # Clauses deleted for lack of memory : 0
% 0.75/0.71 # Backward-subsumed : 0
% 0.75/0.71 # Backward-rewritten : 1
% 0.75/0.71 # Generated clauses : 4
% 0.75/0.71 # ...of the previous two non-redundant : 3
% 0.75/0.71 # ...aggressively subsumed : 0
% 0.75/0.71 # Contextual simplify-reflections : 0
% 0.75/0.71 # Paramodulations : 3
% 0.75/0.71 # Factorizations : 0
% 0.75/0.71 # NegExts : 0
% 0.75/0.71 # Equation resolutions : 1
% 0.75/0.71 # Total rewrite steps : 2
% 0.75/0.71 # Propositional unsat checks : 0
% 0.75/0.71 # Propositional check models : 0
% 0.75/0.71 # Propositional check unsatisfiable : 0
% 0.75/0.71 # Propositional clauses : 0
% 0.75/0.71 # Propositional clauses after purity: 0
% 0.75/0.71 # Propositional unsat core size : 0
% 0.75/0.71 # Propositional preprocessing time : 0.000
% 0.75/0.71 # Propositional encoding time : 0.000
% 0.75/0.71 # Propositional solver time : 0.000
% 0.75/0.71 # Success case prop preproc time : 0.000
% 0.75/0.71 # Success case prop encoding time : 0.000
% 0.75/0.71 # Success case prop solver time : 0.000
% 0.75/0.71 # Current number of processed clauses : 25
% 0.75/0.71 # Positive orientable unit clauses : 13
% 0.75/0.71 # Positive unorientable unit clauses: 0
% 0.75/0.71 # Negative unit clauses : 6
% 0.75/0.71 # Non-unit-clauses : 6
% 0.75/0.71 # Current number of unprocessed clauses: 520
% 0.75/0.71 # ...number of literals in the above : 1206
% 0.75/0.71 # Current number of archived formulas : 0
% 0.75/0.71 # Current number of archived clauses : 1
% 0.75/0.71 # Clause-clause subsumption calls (NU) : 13
% 0.75/0.71 # Rec. Clause-clause subsumption calls : 13
% 0.75/0.71 # Non-unit clause-clause subsumptions : 0
% 0.75/0.71 # Unit Clause-clause subsumption calls : 11
% 0.75/0.71 # Rewrite failures with RHS unbound : 0
% 0.75/0.71 # BW rewrite match attempts : 2
% 0.75/0.71 # BW rewrite match successes : 1
% 0.75/0.71 # Condensation attempts : 0
% 0.75/0.71 # Condensation successes : 0
% 0.75/0.71 # Termbank termtop insertions : 26115
% 0.75/0.71
% 0.75/0.71 # -------------------------------------------------
% 0.75/0.71 # User time : 0.034 s
% 0.75/0.71 # System time : 0.009 s
% 0.75/0.71 # Total time : 0.042 s
% 0.75/0.71 # Maximum resident set size: 3464 pages
% 0.75/0.71
% 0.75/0.71 # -------------------------------------------------
% 0.75/0.71 # User time : 0.067 s
% 0.75/0.71 # System time : 0.012 s
% 0.75/0.71 # Total time : 0.079 s
% 0.75/0.71 # Maximum resident set size: 2624 pages
% 0.75/0.71 % E---3.1 exiting
% 0.75/0.71 % E---3.1 exiting
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------