TSTP Solution File: SWV864-1 by E---3.1
View Problem
- Process Solution
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
% File : E---3.1
% Problem : SWV864-1 : TPTP v8.1.2. Released v4.1.0.
% Transfm : none
% Format : tptp:raw
% Command : run_E %s %d THM
% Computer : n008.cluster.edu
% Model : x86_64 x86_64
% CPU : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 2.10GHz
% Memory : 8042.1875MB
% OS : Linux 3.10.0-693.el7.x86_64
% CPULimit : 2400s
% WCLimit : 300s
% DateTime : Tue Oct 10 19:55:31 EDT 2023
% Result : Unsatisfiable 0.16s 0.45s
% Output : CNFRefutation 0.16s
% Verified :
% SZS Type : Refutation
% Derivation depth : 6
% Number of leaves : 5
% Syntax : Number of clauses : 15 ( 6 unt; 5 nHn; 9 RR)
% Number of literals : 28 ( 18 equ; 11 neg)
% Maximal clause size : 3 ( 1 avg)
% Maximal term depth : 2 ( 1 avg)
% Number of predicates : 3 ( 1 usr; 1 prp; 0-3 aty)
% Number of functors : 6 ( 6 usr; 4 con; 0-2 aty)
% Number of variables : 22 ( 5 sgn)
% Comments :
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
cnf(cls_com__det_0,axiom,
( X1 = X2
| ~ c_Natural_Oevalc(X3,X4,X1)
| ~ c_Natural_Oevalc(X3,X4,X2) ),
file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/tmp/tmp.pexvljmBGA/E---3.1_5291.p',cls_com__det_0) ).
cnf(cls_conjecture_2,negated_conjecture,
( X1 = v_xa
| c_Natural_Oevalc(v_c,v_x,v_xb(X1)) ),
file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/tmp/tmp.pexvljmBGA/E---3.1_5291.p',cls_conjecture_2) ).
cnf(cls_conjecture_3,negated_conjecture,
( X1 = v_xa
| X1 != v_xb(X1) ),
file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/tmp/tmp.pexvljmBGA/E---3.1_5291.p',cls_conjecture_3) ).
cnf(cls_conjecture_1,negated_conjecture,
~ c_Natural_Oevalc(v_c,v_x,v_xa),
file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/tmp/tmp.pexvljmBGA/E---3.1_5291.p',cls_conjecture_1) ).
cnf(cls_com_Osimps_I12_J_0,axiom,
c_Com_Ocom_OSKIP != c_Com_Ocom_OSemi(X1,X2),
file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/tmp/tmp.pexvljmBGA/E---3.1_5291.p',cls_com_Osimps_I12_J_0) ).
cnf(c_0_5,axiom,
( X1 = X2
| ~ c_Natural_Oevalc(X3,X4,X1)
| ~ c_Natural_Oevalc(X3,X4,X2) ),
cls_com__det_0 ).
cnf(c_0_6,negated_conjecture,
( X1 = v_xa
| c_Natural_Oevalc(v_c,v_x,v_xb(X1)) ),
cls_conjecture_2 ).
cnf(c_0_7,negated_conjecture,
( X1 = v_xb(X2)
| X2 = v_xa
| ~ c_Natural_Oevalc(v_c,v_x,X1) ),
inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_5,c_0_6]) ).
cnf(c_0_8,negated_conjecture,
( X1 = v_xa
| X1 != v_xb(X1) ),
cls_conjecture_3 ).
cnf(c_0_9,negated_conjecture,
( v_xb(X1) = v_xb(X2)
| X1 = v_xa
| X2 = v_xa ),
inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_7,c_0_6]) ).
cnf(c_0_10,negated_conjecture,
( v_xb(X1) = v_xa
| X1 = v_xa ),
inference(er,[status(thm)],[inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_8,c_0_9])]) ).
cnf(c_0_11,negated_conjecture,
~ c_Natural_Oevalc(v_c,v_x,v_xa),
cls_conjecture_1 ).
cnf(c_0_12,axiom,
c_Com_Ocom_OSKIP != c_Com_Ocom_OSemi(X1,X2),
cls_com_Osimps_I12_J_0 ).
cnf(c_0_13,negated_conjecture,
X1 = v_xa,
inference(sr,[status(thm)],[inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_6,c_0_10]),c_0_11]) ).
cnf(c_0_14,plain,
$false,
inference(cn,[status(thm)],[inference(rw,[status(thm)],[inference(rw,[status(thm)],[c_0_12,c_0_13]),c_0_13])]),
[proof] ).
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
%----ORIGINAL SYSTEM OUTPUT
% 0.00/0.11 % Problem : SWV864-1 : TPTP v8.1.2. Released v4.1.0.
% 0.11/0.12 % Command : run_E %s %d THM
% 0.11/0.32 % Computer : n008.cluster.edu
% 0.11/0.32 % Model : x86_64 x86_64
% 0.11/0.32 % CPU : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 @ 2.10GHz
% 0.11/0.32 % Memory : 8042.1875MB
% 0.11/0.32 % OS : Linux 3.10.0-693.el7.x86_64
% 0.11/0.33 % CPULimit : 2400
% 0.11/0.33 % WCLimit : 300
% 0.11/0.33 % DateTime : Tue Oct 3 03:54:28 EDT 2023
% 0.11/0.33 % CPUTime :
% 0.16/0.44 Running first-order theorem proving
% 0.16/0.44 Running: /export/starexec/sandbox2/solver/bin/eprover --delete-bad-limit=2000000000 --definitional-cnf=24 -s --print-statistics -R --print-version --proof-object --auto-schedule=8 --cpu-limit=300 /export/starexec/sandbox2/tmp/tmp.pexvljmBGA/E---3.1_5291.p
% 0.16/0.45 # Version: 3.1pre001
% 0.16/0.45 # Preprocessing class: FSMSSMSMSSSNFFN.
% 0.16/0.45 # Scheduled 4 strats onto 8 cores with 300 seconds (2400 total)
% 0.16/0.45 # Starting G-E--_207_C18_F1_SE_CS_SP_PI_PS_S2SI with 1500s (5) cores
% 0.16/0.45 # Starting new_bool_3 with 300s (1) cores
% 0.16/0.45 # Starting new_bool_1 with 300s (1) cores
% 0.16/0.45 # Starting sh5l with 300s (1) cores
% 0.16/0.45 # new_bool_3 with pid 5370 completed with status 0
% 0.16/0.45 # Result found by new_bool_3
% 0.16/0.45 # Preprocessing class: FSMSSMSMSSSNFFN.
% 0.16/0.45 # Scheduled 4 strats onto 8 cores with 300 seconds (2400 total)
% 0.16/0.45 # Starting G-E--_207_C18_F1_SE_CS_SP_PI_PS_S2SI with 1500s (5) cores
% 0.16/0.45 # Starting new_bool_3 with 300s (1) cores
% 0.16/0.45 # SinE strategy is GSinE(CountFormulas,hypos,1.5,,3,20000,1.0)
% 0.16/0.45 # Search class: FGUSS-FFSF21-SFFFFFNN
% 0.16/0.45 # Scheduled 5 strats onto 1 cores with 300 seconds (300 total)
% 0.16/0.45 # Starting SAT001_MinMin_p005000_rr_RG with 181s (1) cores
% 0.16/0.45 # SAT001_MinMin_p005000_rr_RG with pid 5373 completed with status 0
% 0.16/0.45 # Result found by SAT001_MinMin_p005000_rr_RG
% 0.16/0.45 # Preprocessing class: FSMSSMSMSSSNFFN.
% 0.16/0.45 # Scheduled 4 strats onto 8 cores with 300 seconds (2400 total)
% 0.16/0.45 # Starting G-E--_207_C18_F1_SE_CS_SP_PI_PS_S2SI with 1500s (5) cores
% 0.16/0.45 # Starting new_bool_3 with 300s (1) cores
% 0.16/0.45 # SinE strategy is GSinE(CountFormulas,hypos,1.5,,3,20000,1.0)
% 0.16/0.45 # Search class: FGUSS-FFSF21-SFFFFFNN
% 0.16/0.45 # Scheduled 5 strats onto 1 cores with 300 seconds (300 total)
% 0.16/0.45 # Starting SAT001_MinMin_p005000_rr_RG with 181s (1) cores
% 0.16/0.45 # Preprocessing time : 0.001 s
% 0.16/0.45 # Presaturation interreduction done
% 0.16/0.45
% 0.16/0.45 # Proof found!
% 0.16/0.45 # SZS status Unsatisfiable
% 0.16/0.45 # SZS output start CNFRefutation
% See solution above
% 0.16/0.45 # Parsed axioms : 29
% 0.16/0.45 # Removed by relevancy pruning/SinE : 11
% 0.16/0.45 # Initial clauses : 18
% 0.16/0.45 # Removed in clause preprocessing : 0
% 0.16/0.45 # Initial clauses in saturation : 18
% 0.16/0.45 # Processed clauses : 38
% 0.16/0.45 # ...of these trivial : 1
% 0.16/0.45 # ...subsumed : 3
% 0.16/0.45 # ...remaining for further processing : 34
% 0.16/0.45 # Other redundant clauses eliminated : 2
% 0.16/0.45 # Clauses deleted for lack of memory : 0
% 0.16/0.45 # Backward-subsumed : 0
% 0.16/0.45 # Backward-rewritten : 11
% 0.16/0.45 # Generated clauses : 25
% 0.16/0.45 # ...of the previous two non-redundant : 20
% 0.16/0.45 # ...aggressively subsumed : 0
% 0.16/0.45 # Contextual simplify-reflections : 0
% 0.16/0.45 # Paramodulations : 21
% 0.16/0.45 # Factorizations : 0
% 0.16/0.45 # NegExts : 0
% 0.16/0.45 # Equation resolutions : 4
% 0.16/0.45 # Total rewrite steps : 12
% 0.16/0.45 # Propositional unsat checks : 0
% 0.16/0.45 # Propositional check models : 0
% 0.16/0.45 # Propositional check unsatisfiable : 0
% 0.16/0.45 # Propositional clauses : 0
% 0.16/0.45 # Propositional clauses after purity: 0
% 0.16/0.45 # Propositional unsat core size : 0
% 0.16/0.45 # Propositional preprocessing time : 0.000
% 0.16/0.45 # Propositional encoding time : 0.000
% 0.16/0.45 # Propositional solver time : 0.000
% 0.16/0.45 # Success case prop preproc time : 0.000
% 0.16/0.45 # Success case prop encoding time : 0.000
% 0.16/0.45 # Success case prop solver time : 0.000
% 0.16/0.45 # Current number of processed clauses : 8
% 0.16/0.45 # Positive orientable unit clauses : 3
% 0.16/0.45 # Positive unorientable unit clauses: 1
% 0.16/0.45 # Negative unit clauses : 0
% 0.16/0.45 # Non-unit-clauses : 4
% 0.16/0.45 # Current number of unprocessed clauses: 12
% 0.16/0.45 # ...number of literals in the above : 37
% 0.16/0.45 # Current number of archived formulas : 0
% 0.16/0.45 # Current number of archived clauses : 26
% 0.16/0.45 # Clause-clause subsumption calls (NU) : 16
% 0.16/0.45 # Rec. Clause-clause subsumption calls : 14
% 0.16/0.45 # Non-unit clause-clause subsumptions : 2
% 0.16/0.45 # Unit Clause-clause subsumption calls : 5
% 0.16/0.45 # Rewrite failures with RHS unbound : 0
% 0.16/0.45 # BW rewrite match attempts : 33
% 0.16/0.45 # BW rewrite match successes : 12
% 0.16/0.45 # Condensation attempts : 0
% 0.16/0.45 # Condensation successes : 0
% 0.16/0.45 # Termbank termtop insertions : 507
% 0.16/0.45
% 0.16/0.45 # -------------------------------------------------
% 0.16/0.45 # User time : 0.001 s
% 0.16/0.45 # System time : 0.003 s
% 0.16/0.45 # Total time : 0.004 s
% 0.16/0.45 # Maximum resident set size: 1632 pages
% 0.16/0.45
% 0.16/0.45 # -------------------------------------------------
% 0.16/0.45 # User time : 0.002 s
% 0.16/0.45 # System time : 0.004 s
% 0.16/0.45 # Total time : 0.006 s
% 0.16/0.45 # Maximum resident set size: 1696 pages
% 0.16/0.45 % E---3.1 exiting
% 0.16/0.45 % E---3.1 exiting
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------