TSTP Solution File: SWV861-1 by SNARK---20120808r022
View Problem
- Process Solution
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
% File : SNARK---20120808r022
% Problem : SWV861-1 : TPTP v8.1.0. Released v4.1.0.
% Transfm : none
% Format : tptp:raw
% Command : run-snark %s %d
% Computer : n005.cluster.edu
% Model : x86_64 x86_64
% CPU : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 2.10GHz
% Memory : 8042.1875MB
% OS : Linux 3.10.0-693.el7.x86_64
% CPULimit : 300s
% WCLimit : 600s
% DateTime : Wed Jul 20 21:36:16 EDT 2022
% Result : Unsatisfiable 1.07s 1.29s
% Output : Refutation 1.07s
% Verified :
% SZS Type : Refutation
% Derivation depth : 2
% Number of leaves : 6
% Syntax : Number of clauses : 8 ( 6 unt; 0 nHn; 8 RR)
% Number of literals : 12 ( 0 equ; 5 neg)
% Maximal clause size : 3 ( 1 avg)
% Maximal term depth : 3 ( 1 avg)
% Number of predicates : 3 ( 2 usr; 1 prp; 0-4 aty)
% Number of functors : 11 ( 11 usr; 10 con; 0-2 aty)
% Number of variables : 6 ( 0 sgn)
% Comments :
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
cnf(cls_conjecture_0,negated_conjecture,
hBOOL(hAPP(hAPP(v_P,v_Z),v_s)),
file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',cls_conjecture_0) ).
cnf(cls_conjecture_1,negated_conjecture,
c_Natural_Oevaln(v_c,v_s,v_n,v_s1),
file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',cls_conjecture_1) ).
cnf(cls_conjecture_2,negated_conjecture,
c_Natural_Oevaln(v_d,v_s1,v_n,v_s_H),
file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',cls_conjecture_2) ).
cnf(cls_conjecture_3,negated_conjecture,
~ hBOOL(hAPP(hAPP(v_R,v_Z),v_s_H)),
file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',cls_conjecture_3) ).
cnf(cls_conjecture_5,negated_conjecture,
( hBOOL(hAPP(hAPP(v_Q,X),Y))
| ~ c_Natural_Oevaln(v_c,Z,v_n,Y)
| ~ hBOOL(hAPP(hAPP(v_P,X),Z)) ),
file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',cls_conjecture_5) ).
cnf(cls_conjecture_6,negated_conjecture,
( hBOOL(hAPP(hAPP(v_R,X),Y))
| ~ c_Natural_Oevaln(v_d,Z,v_n,Y)
| ~ hBOOL(hAPP(hAPP(v_Q,X),Z)) ),
file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',cls_conjecture_6) ).
cnf(2397,plain,
hBOOL(hAPP(hAPP(v_Q,v_Z),v_s1)),
inference('HYPERRESOLVE',[status(thm)],[cls_conjecture_5,cls_conjecture_1,cls_conjecture_0]) ).
cnf(2403,plain,
$false,
inference('REWRITE',[status(thm)],[inference('UR-RESOLVE',[status(thm)],[cls_conjecture_6,cls_conjecture_3,cls_conjecture_2]),2397]) ).
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
%----ORIGINAL SYSTEM OUTPUT
% 0.00/0.13 % Problem : SWV861-1 : TPTP v8.1.0. Released v4.1.0.
% 0.13/0.14 % Command : run-snark %s %d
% 0.13/0.35 % Computer : n005.cluster.edu
% 0.13/0.35 % Model : x86_64 x86_64
% 0.13/0.35 % CPU : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 @ 2.10GHz
% 0.13/0.35 % Memory : 8042.1875MB
% 0.13/0.35 % OS : Linux 3.10.0-693.el7.x86_64
% 0.13/0.35 % CPULimit : 300
% 0.13/0.35 % WCLimit : 600
% 0.13/0.35 % DateTime : Tue Jun 14 18:26:39 EDT 2022
% 0.13/0.35 % CPUTime :
% 0.20/0.47 /export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p
% 0.20/0.48 *
% 0.20/0.48 *
% 0.20/0.48 #<PACKAGE "SNARK-USER">
% 0.20/0.48 *
% 0.20/0.48 SNARK-TPTP-OPTIONS
% 0.20/0.48 *
% 0.20/0.49 ((AGENDA-LENGTH-LIMIT NIL) (AGENDA-LENGTH-BEFORE-SIMPLIFICATION-LIMIT NIL)
% 0.20/0.49 (USE-HYPERRESOLUTION T) (USE-UR-RESOLUTION T) (USE-PARAMODULATION T)
% 0.20/0.49 (USE-FACTORING :POS)
% 0.20/0.49 (USE-LITERAL-ORDERING-WITH-HYPERRESOLUTION 'LITERAL-ORDERING-P)
% 0.20/0.49 (USE-LITERAL-ORDERING-WITH-PARAMODULATION 'LITERAL-ORDERING-P)
% 0.20/0.49 (ORDERING-FUNCTIONS>CONSTANTS T) (ASSERT-CONTEXT :CURRENT)
% 0.20/0.49 (RUN-TIME-LIMIT 300) (LISTEN-FOR-COMMANDS NIL)
% 0.20/0.49 (USE-CLOSURE-WHEN-SATISFIABLE T) (PRINT-ROWS-WHEN-GIVEN NIL)
% 0.20/0.49 (PRINT-ROWS-WHEN-DERIVED NIL) (PRINT-UNORIENTABLE-ROWS NIL)
% 0.20/0.49 (PRINT-ROW-WFFS-PRETTILY NIL) (PRINT-FINAL-ROWS :TPTP)
% 0.20/0.49 (PRINT-OPTIONS-WHEN-STARTING NIL) (USE-VARIABLE-NAME-SORTS NIL)
% 0.20/0.49 (USE-PURITY-TEST T) (USE-RELEVANCE-TEST T) (DECLARE-TPTP-SYMBOLS1)
% 0.20/0.49 (DECLARE-TPTP-SYMBOLS2))
% 0.20/0.49 *
% 0.20/0.49 "."
% 0.20/0.49 *
% 0.20/0.49 ; Begin refute-file /export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p 2022-06-14T18:26:39
% 0.20/0.49 ; Running SNARK from /davis/home/graph/tptp/Systems/SNARK---20120808r022/Source/snark-system.lisp in SBCL 1.0.12 on n005.cluster.edu at 2022-06-14T18:26:39
% 0.42/0.62
% 0.42/0.62 ; Recognized possible left identity assertion (|c_Natural_Oevalc| |c_Com_Ocom_OSKIP| ?X ?X).
% 0.42/0.63 WARNING:
% 0.42/0.63 |class_OrderedGroup_Opordered__ab__group__add| is a 1-ary relation that occurs only negatively; disabling rows that contain it.
% 0.42/0.63 WARNING:
% 0.42/0.63 |class_Ring__and__Field_Oordered__idom| is a 1-ary relation that occurs only negatively; disabling rows that contain it.
% 0.42/0.63 WARNING:
% 0.42/0.63 |class_OrderedGroup_Oab__group__add| is a 1-ary relation that occurs only negatively; disabling rows that contain it.
% 1.07/1.29 ; Recognized relation functionality assertion (OR (= ?X ?Y) (NOT (|c_Natural_Oevalc| ?Z ?U ?X)) (NOT (|c_Natural_Oevalc| ?Z ?U ?Y))).
% 1.07/1.29
% 1.07/1.29 #||
% 1.07/1.29 % SZS status Unsatisfiable for /export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p
% 1.07/1.29 % SZS output start Refutation
% See solution above
% 1.07/1.29 ||#
% 1.07/1.29
% 1.07/1.29 ; Summary of computation:
% 1.07/1.29 ; 4074 formulas have been input or derived (from 329 formulas).
% 1.07/1.29 ; 2403 (59%) were retained. Of these,
% 1.07/1.29 ; 317 (13%) were simplified or subsumed later,
% 1.07/1.29 ; 2086 (87%) are still being kept.
% 1.07/1.29 ;
% 1.07/1.29 ; Run time in seconds excluding printing time:
% 1.07/1.29 ; 0.121 15% Read assertion file (1 call)
% 1.07/1.29 ; 0.011 1% Assert (606 calls)
% 1.07/1.29 ; 0.215 27% Process new row (3,733 calls)
% 1.07/1.29 ; 0.080 10% Resolution (656 calls)
% 1.07/1.29 ; 0.028 3% Paramodulation (328 calls)
% 1.07/1.29 ; 0.000 0% Factoring (7 calls)
% 1.07/1.29 ; 0.028 3% Condensing (1,815 calls)
% 1.07/1.29 ; 0.084 10% Forward subsumption (1,815 calls)
% 1.07/1.29 ; 0.038 5% Backward subsumption (1,576 calls)
% 1.07/1.29 ; 0.012 1% Clause clause subsumption (2,939 calls)
% 1.07/1.29 ; 0.088 11% Forward simplification (3,703 calls)
% 1.07/1.29 ; 0.026 3% Backward simplification (2,360 calls)
% 1.07/1.29 ; 0.025 3% Ordering (4,451 calls)
% 1.07/1.29 ; 0.001 0% Sortal reasoning (32 calls)
% 1.07/1.29 ; 0.002 0% Purity testing (1 call)
% 1.07/1.29 ; 0.043 5% Other
% 1.07/1.29 ; 0.802 Total
% 1.07/1.29 ; 0.803 Real time
% 1.07/1.29 ;
% 1.07/1.29 ; Term-hash-array has 6,221 terms in all.
% 1.07/1.29 ; Feature-vector-row-index has 1,384 entries (1,384 at peak, 1,576 added, 192 deleted).
% 1.07/1.29 ; Feature-vector-row-index has 6,663 nodes (6,663 at peak, 8,804 added, 2,141 deleted).
% 1.07/1.29 ; Retrieved 3,737 possibly forward subsuming rows in 1,815 calls.
% 1.07/1.29 ; Retrieved 1,081 possibly backward subsumed rows in 1,576 calls.
% 1.07/1.29 ; Path-index has 5,547 entries (5,547 at peak, 6,515 added, 968 deleted).
% 1.07/1.29 ; Path-index has 19,925 nodes (19,925 at peak, 21,442 added, 1,517 deleted).
% 1.07/1.29 ; Trie-index has 5,547 entries (5,547 at peak, 6,515 added, 968 deleted).
% 1.07/1.29 ; Trie-index has 25,816 nodes (25,816 at peak, 30,685 added, 4,869 deleted).
% 1.07/1.29 ; Retrieved 5,700 generalization terms in 14,963 calls.
% 1.07/1.29 ; Retrieved 1,566 instance terms in 881 calls.
% 1.07/1.29 ; Retrieved 115,661 unifiable terms in 3,077 calls.
% 1.07/1.29 ;
% 1.07/1.29 ; The agenda of rows to process has 5 entries:
% 1.07/1.29 ; 1 with value 28 1 with value 31 2 with value 34
% 1.07/1.29 ; 1 with value 30
% 1.07/1.29 ; The agenda of input rows to give has 126 entries:
% 1.07/1.29 ; 2 with value 24 4 with value 34 1 with value 45
% 1.07/1.29 ; 10 with value 25 6 with value 35 1 with value 47
% 1.07/1.29 ; 4 with value 26 2 with value 36 3 with value 48
% 1.07/1.29 ; 8 with value 27 6 with value 37 1 with value 50
% 1.07/1.29 ; 1 with value 28 7 with value 38 3 with value 51
% 1.07/1.29 ; 12 with value 29 2 with value 39 3 with value 53
% 1.07/1.29 ; 9 with value 30 6 with value 40 1 with value 55
% 1.07/1.29 ; 6 with value 31 2 with value 41 1 with value 57
% 1.07/1.29 ; 13 with value 32 4 with value 42 1 with value 65
% 1.07/1.29 ; 5 with value 33 1 with value 44 1 with value 99
% 1.07/1.29 ; The agenda of rows to give has 1640 entries:
% 1.07/1.29 ; 5 with value (4 6) 52 with value (4 21) 39 with value (4 35)
% 1.07/1.29 ; 18 with value (4 7) 74 with value (4 22) 42 with value (4 36)
% 1.07/1.29 ; 7 with value (4 8) 39 with value (4 23) 35 with value (4 37)
% 1.07/1.29 ; 13 with value (4 9) 44 with value (4 24) 56 with value (4 38)
% 1.07/1.29 ; 22 with value (4 10) 35 with value (4 25) 26 with value (4 39)
% 1.07/1.29 ; 19 with value (4 11) 63 with value (4 26) 14 with value (4 40)
% 1.07/1.29 ; 30 with value (4 12) 46 with value (4 27) 6 with value (4 41)
% 1.07/1.29 ; 30 with value (4 13) 45 with value (4 28) 2 with value (4 42)
% 1.07/1.29 ; 26 with value (4 14) 73 with value (4 29) 11 with value (4 43)
% 1.07/1.29 ; 38 with value (4 15) 86 with value (4 30) 3 with value (4 44)
% 1.07/1.29 ; 54 with value (4 16) 67 with value (4 31) 1 with value (4 45)
% 1.07/1.29 ; 36 with value (4 17) 111 with value (4 32) 1 with value (4 46)
% 1.07/1.29 ; 56 with value (4 18) 91 with value (4 33) 13 with value (4 48)
% 1.07/1.29 ; 59 with value (4 19) 82 with value (4 34) 6 with value (4 49)
% 1.07/1.29 ; 64 with value (4 20)
% 1.07/1.29 Evaluation took:
% 1.07/1.29 0.804 seconds of real time
% 1.07/1.29 0.745423 seconds of user run time
% 1.07/1.29 0.059121 seconds of system run time
% 1.07/1.29 [Run times include 0.058 seconds GC run time.]
% 1.07/1.29 0 calls to %EVAL
% 1.07/1.29 0 page faults and
% 1.07/1.29 62,643,096 bytes consed.
% 1.07/1.29 :PROOF-FOUND
% 1.07/1.29 ; End refute-file /export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p 2022-06-14T18:26:40
% 1.07/1.29 :PROOF-FOUND
% 1.07/1.29 *
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------