TSTP Solution File: SWV861-1 by E---3.1
View Problem
- Process Solution
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
% File : E---3.1
% Problem : SWV861-1 : TPTP v8.1.2. Released v4.1.0.
% Transfm : none
% Format : tptp:raw
% Command : run_E %s %d THM
% Computer : n007.cluster.edu
% Model : x86_64 x86_64
% CPU : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 2.10GHz
% Memory : 8042.1875MB
% OS : Linux 3.10.0-693.el7.x86_64
% CPULimit : 2400s
% WCLimit : 300s
% DateTime : Tue Oct 10 19:55:31 EDT 2023
% Result : Unsatisfiable 0.20s 0.58s
% Output : CNFRefutation 0.20s
% Verified :
% SZS Type : Refutation
% Derivation depth : 5
% Number of leaves : 6
% Syntax : Number of clauses : 16 ( 10 unt; 0 nHn; 16 RR)
% Number of literals : 26 ( 0 equ; 12 neg)
% Maximal clause size : 3 ( 1 avg)
% Maximal term depth : 3 ( 1 avg)
% Number of predicates : 3 ( 2 usr; 1 prp; 0-4 aty)
% Number of functors : 11 ( 11 usr; 10 con; 0-2 aty)
% Number of variables : 14 ( 0 sgn)
% Comments :
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
cnf(cls_conjecture_5,negated_conjecture,
( hBOOL(hAPP(hAPP(v_Q,X1),X2))
| ~ c_Natural_Oevaln(v_c,X3,v_n,X2)
| ~ hBOOL(hAPP(hAPP(v_P,X1),X3)) ),
file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/tmp/tmp.9uWTXRVvrs/E---3.1_28888.p',cls_conjecture_5) ).
cnf(cls_conjecture_0,negated_conjecture,
hBOOL(hAPP(hAPP(v_P,v_Z),v_s)),
file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/tmp/tmp.9uWTXRVvrs/E---3.1_28888.p',cls_conjecture_0) ).
cnf(cls_conjecture_1,negated_conjecture,
c_Natural_Oevaln(v_c,v_s,v_n,v_s1),
file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/tmp/tmp.9uWTXRVvrs/E---3.1_28888.p',cls_conjecture_1) ).
cnf(cls_conjecture_6,negated_conjecture,
( hBOOL(hAPP(hAPP(v_R,X1),X2))
| ~ c_Natural_Oevaln(v_d,X3,v_n,X2)
| ~ hBOOL(hAPP(hAPP(v_Q,X1),X3)) ),
file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/tmp/tmp.9uWTXRVvrs/E---3.1_28888.p',cls_conjecture_6) ).
cnf(cls_conjecture_2,negated_conjecture,
c_Natural_Oevaln(v_d,v_s1,v_n,v_s_H),
file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/tmp/tmp.9uWTXRVvrs/E---3.1_28888.p',cls_conjecture_2) ).
cnf(cls_conjecture_3,negated_conjecture,
~ hBOOL(hAPP(hAPP(v_R,v_Z),v_s_H)),
file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/tmp/tmp.9uWTXRVvrs/E---3.1_28888.p',cls_conjecture_3) ).
cnf(c_0_6,negated_conjecture,
( hBOOL(hAPP(hAPP(v_Q,X1),X2))
| ~ c_Natural_Oevaln(v_c,X3,v_n,X2)
| ~ hBOOL(hAPP(hAPP(v_P,X1),X3)) ),
cls_conjecture_5 ).
cnf(c_0_7,negated_conjecture,
hBOOL(hAPP(hAPP(v_P,v_Z),v_s)),
cls_conjecture_0 ).
cnf(c_0_8,negated_conjecture,
( hBOOL(hAPP(hAPP(v_Q,v_Z),X1))
| ~ c_Natural_Oevaln(v_c,v_s,v_n,X1) ),
inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_6,c_0_7]) ).
cnf(c_0_9,negated_conjecture,
c_Natural_Oevaln(v_c,v_s,v_n,v_s1),
cls_conjecture_1 ).
cnf(c_0_10,negated_conjecture,
( hBOOL(hAPP(hAPP(v_R,X1),X2))
| ~ c_Natural_Oevaln(v_d,X3,v_n,X2)
| ~ hBOOL(hAPP(hAPP(v_Q,X1),X3)) ),
cls_conjecture_6 ).
cnf(c_0_11,negated_conjecture,
hBOOL(hAPP(hAPP(v_Q,v_Z),v_s1)),
inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_8,c_0_9]) ).
cnf(c_0_12,negated_conjecture,
( hBOOL(hAPP(hAPP(v_R,v_Z),X1))
| ~ c_Natural_Oevaln(v_d,v_s1,v_n,X1) ),
inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_10,c_0_11]) ).
cnf(c_0_13,negated_conjecture,
c_Natural_Oevaln(v_d,v_s1,v_n,v_s_H),
cls_conjecture_2 ).
cnf(c_0_14,negated_conjecture,
~ hBOOL(hAPP(hAPP(v_R,v_Z),v_s_H)),
cls_conjecture_3 ).
cnf(c_0_15,negated_conjecture,
$false,
inference(sr,[status(thm)],[inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_12,c_0_13]),c_0_14]),
[proof] ).
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
%----ORIGINAL SYSTEM OUTPUT
% 0.09/0.14 % Problem : SWV861-1 : TPTP v8.1.2. Released v4.1.0.
% 0.09/0.14 % Command : run_E %s %d THM
% 0.15/0.34 % Computer : n007.cluster.edu
% 0.15/0.34 % Model : x86_64 x86_64
% 0.15/0.34 % CPU : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 @ 2.10GHz
% 0.15/0.34 % Memory : 8042.1875MB
% 0.15/0.34 % OS : Linux 3.10.0-693.el7.x86_64
% 0.15/0.34 % CPULimit : 2400
% 0.15/0.34 % WCLimit : 300
% 0.15/0.34 % DateTime : Tue Oct 3 03:03:40 EDT 2023
% 0.15/0.34 % CPUTime :
% 0.20/0.49 Running first-order theorem proving
% 0.20/0.49 Running: /export/starexec/sandbox2/solver/bin/eprover --delete-bad-limit=2000000000 --definitional-cnf=24 -s --print-statistics -R --print-version --proof-object --auto-schedule=8 --cpu-limit=300 /export/starexec/sandbox2/tmp/tmp.9uWTXRVvrs/E---3.1_28888.p
% 0.20/0.58 # Version: 3.1pre001
% 0.20/0.58 # Preprocessing class: FSLSSMSMSSSNFFN.
% 0.20/0.58 # Scheduled 4 strats onto 8 cores with 300 seconds (2400 total)
% 0.20/0.58 # Starting C07_19_nc_SOS_SAT001_MinMin_p005000_rr with 1500s (5) cores
% 0.20/0.58 # Starting new_bool_3 with 300s (1) cores
% 0.20/0.58 # Starting new_bool_1 with 300s (1) cores
% 0.20/0.58 # Starting sh5l with 300s (1) cores
% 0.20/0.58 # new_bool_3 with pid 28967 completed with status 0
% 0.20/0.58 # Result found by new_bool_3
% 0.20/0.58 # Preprocessing class: FSLSSMSMSSSNFFN.
% 0.20/0.58 # Scheduled 4 strats onto 8 cores with 300 seconds (2400 total)
% 0.20/0.58 # Starting C07_19_nc_SOS_SAT001_MinMin_p005000_rr with 1500s (5) cores
% 0.20/0.58 # Starting new_bool_3 with 300s (1) cores
% 0.20/0.58 # SinE strategy is GSinE(CountFormulas,hypos,1.5,,3,20000,1.0)
% 0.20/0.58 # Search class: FGHSM-FSLM32-DFFFFFNN
% 0.20/0.58 # Scheduled 13 strats onto 1 cores with 300 seconds (300 total)
% 0.20/0.58 # Starting G-E--_301_C18_F1_URBAN_S5PRR_S0Y with 23s (1) cores
% 0.20/0.58 # G-E--_301_C18_F1_URBAN_S5PRR_S0Y with pid 28970 completed with status 0
% 0.20/0.58 # Result found by G-E--_301_C18_F1_URBAN_S5PRR_S0Y
% 0.20/0.58 # Preprocessing class: FSLSSMSMSSSNFFN.
% 0.20/0.58 # Scheduled 4 strats onto 8 cores with 300 seconds (2400 total)
% 0.20/0.58 # Starting C07_19_nc_SOS_SAT001_MinMin_p005000_rr with 1500s (5) cores
% 0.20/0.58 # Starting new_bool_3 with 300s (1) cores
% 0.20/0.58 # SinE strategy is GSinE(CountFormulas,hypos,1.5,,3,20000,1.0)
% 0.20/0.58 # Search class: FGHSM-FSLM32-DFFFFFNN
% 0.20/0.58 # Scheduled 13 strats onto 1 cores with 300 seconds (300 total)
% 0.20/0.58 # Starting G-E--_301_C18_F1_URBAN_S5PRR_S0Y with 23s (1) cores
% 0.20/0.58 # Preprocessing time : 0.007 s
% 0.20/0.58
% 0.20/0.58 # Proof found!
% 0.20/0.58 # SZS status Unsatisfiable
% 0.20/0.58 # SZS output start CNFRefutation
% See solution above
% 0.20/0.58 # Parsed axioms : 606
% 0.20/0.58 # Removed by relevancy pruning/SinE : 293
% 0.20/0.58 # Initial clauses : 313
% 0.20/0.58 # Removed in clause preprocessing : 0
% 0.20/0.58 # Initial clauses in saturation : 313
% 0.20/0.58 # Processed clauses : 339
% 0.20/0.58 # ...of these trivial : 12
% 0.20/0.58 # ...subsumed : 70
% 0.20/0.58 # ...remaining for further processing : 257
% 0.20/0.58 # Other redundant clauses eliminated : 0
% 0.20/0.58 # Clauses deleted for lack of memory : 0
% 0.20/0.58 # Backward-subsumed : 0
% 0.20/0.58 # Backward-rewritten : 5
% 0.20/0.58 # Generated clauses : 1858
% 0.20/0.58 # ...of the previous two non-redundant : 1609
% 0.20/0.58 # ...aggressively subsumed : 0
% 0.20/0.58 # Contextual simplify-reflections : 1
% 0.20/0.58 # Paramodulations : 1845
% 0.20/0.58 # Factorizations : 2
% 0.20/0.58 # NegExts : 0
% 0.20/0.58 # Equation resolutions : 11
% 0.20/0.58 # Total rewrite steps : 508
% 0.20/0.58 # Propositional unsat checks : 0
% 0.20/0.58 # Propositional check models : 0
% 0.20/0.58 # Propositional check unsatisfiable : 0
% 0.20/0.58 # Propositional clauses : 0
% 0.20/0.58 # Propositional clauses after purity: 0
% 0.20/0.58 # Propositional unsat core size : 0
% 0.20/0.58 # Propositional preprocessing time : 0.000
% 0.20/0.58 # Propositional encoding time : 0.000
% 0.20/0.58 # Propositional solver time : 0.000
% 0.20/0.58 # Success case prop preproc time : 0.000
% 0.20/0.58 # Success case prop encoding time : 0.000
% 0.20/0.58 # Success case prop solver time : 0.000
% 0.20/0.58 # Current number of processed clauses : 252
% 0.20/0.58 # Positive orientable unit clauses : 49
% 0.20/0.58 # Positive unorientable unit clauses: 5
% 0.20/0.58 # Negative unit clauses : 10
% 0.20/0.58 # Non-unit-clauses : 188
% 0.20/0.58 # Current number of unprocessed clauses: 1582
% 0.20/0.58 # ...number of literals in the above : 4043
% 0.20/0.58 # Current number of archived formulas : 0
% 0.20/0.58 # Current number of archived clauses : 5
% 0.20/0.58 # Clause-clause subsumption calls (NU) : 7320
% 0.20/0.58 # Rec. Clause-clause subsumption calls : 6046
% 0.20/0.58 # Non-unit clause-clause subsumptions : 53
% 0.20/0.58 # Unit Clause-clause subsumption calls : 125
% 0.20/0.58 # Rewrite failures with RHS unbound : 5
% 0.20/0.58 # BW rewrite match attempts : 105
% 0.20/0.58 # BW rewrite match successes : 18
% 0.20/0.58 # Condensation attempts : 0
% 0.20/0.58 # Condensation successes : 0
% 0.20/0.58 # Termbank termtop insertions : 41369
% 0.20/0.58
% 0.20/0.58 # -------------------------------------------------
% 0.20/0.58 # User time : 0.051 s
% 0.20/0.58 # System time : 0.009 s
% 0.20/0.58 # Total time : 0.060 s
% 0.20/0.58 # Maximum resident set size: 2604 pages
% 0.20/0.58
% 0.20/0.58 # -------------------------------------------------
% 0.20/0.58 # User time : 0.066 s
% 0.20/0.58 # System time : 0.011 s
% 0.20/0.58 # Total time : 0.077 s
% 0.20/0.58 # Maximum resident set size: 2156 pages
% 0.20/0.58 % E---3.1 exiting
% 0.20/0.58 % E---3.1 exiting
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------