TSTP Solution File: SWV856-1 by E-SAT---3.1
View Problem
- Process Solution
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
% File : E-SAT---3.1
% Problem : SWV856-1 : TPTP v8.1.2. Released v4.1.0.
% Transfm : none
% Format : tptp:raw
% Command : run_E %s %d THM
% Computer : n006.cluster.edu
% Model : x86_64 x86_64
% CPU : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 2.10GHz
% Memory : 8042.1875MB
% OS : Linux 3.10.0-693.el7.x86_64
% CPULimit : 2400s
% WCLimit : 300s
% DateTime : Tue Oct 10 20:08:00 EDT 2023
% Result : Unsatisfiable 0.15s 0.49s
% Output : CNFRefutation 0.15s
% Verified :
% SZS Type : Refutation
% Derivation depth : 2
% Number of leaves : 2
% Syntax : Number of clauses : 5 ( 5 unt; 0 nHn; 5 RR)
% Number of literals : 5 ( 0 equ; 2 neg)
% Maximal clause size : 1 ( 1 avg)
% Maximal term depth : 5 ( 2 avg)
% Number of predicates : 2 ( 1 usr; 1 prp; 0-1 aty)
% Number of functors : 8 ( 8 usr; 3 con; 0-2 aty)
% Number of variables : 4 ( 2 sgn)
% Comments :
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
cnf(cls_conjecture_0,negated_conjecture,
hBOOL(hAPP(hAPP(c_in(tc_Hoare__Mirabelle_Otriple(t_a)),v_xa),c_Orderings_Obot__class_Obot(tc_fun(tc_Hoare__Mirabelle_Otriple(t_a),tc_bool)))),
file('/export/starexec/sandbox/tmp/tmp.XYWCz4FqTF/E---3.1_21952.p',cls_conjecture_0) ).
cnf(cls_ex__in__conv_0,axiom,
~ hBOOL(hAPP(hAPP(c_in(X1),X2),c_Orderings_Obot__class_Obot(tc_fun(X1,tc_bool)))),
file('/export/starexec/sandbox/tmp/tmp.XYWCz4FqTF/E---3.1_21952.p',cls_ex__in__conv_0) ).
cnf(c_0_2,negated_conjecture,
hBOOL(hAPP(hAPP(c_in(tc_Hoare__Mirabelle_Otriple(t_a)),v_xa),c_Orderings_Obot__class_Obot(tc_fun(tc_Hoare__Mirabelle_Otriple(t_a),tc_bool)))),
cls_conjecture_0 ).
cnf(c_0_3,axiom,
~ hBOOL(hAPP(hAPP(c_in(X1),X2),c_Orderings_Obot__class_Obot(tc_fun(X1,tc_bool)))),
cls_ex__in__conv_0 ).
cnf(c_0_4,negated_conjecture,
$false,
inference(sr,[status(thm)],[c_0_2,c_0_3]),
[proof] ).
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
%----ORIGINAL SYSTEM OUTPUT
% 0.04/0.09 % Problem : SWV856-1 : TPTP v8.1.2. Released v4.1.0.
% 0.04/0.10 % Command : run_E %s %d THM
% 0.09/0.30 % Computer : n006.cluster.edu
% 0.09/0.30 % Model : x86_64 x86_64
% 0.09/0.30 % CPU : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 @ 2.10GHz
% 0.09/0.30 % Memory : 8042.1875MB
% 0.09/0.30 % OS : Linux 3.10.0-693.el7.x86_64
% 0.09/0.30 % CPULimit : 2400
% 0.09/0.30 % WCLimit : 300
% 0.09/0.30 % DateTime : Tue Oct 3 04:14:25 EDT 2023
% 0.09/0.30 % CPUTime :
% 0.15/0.45 Running first-order model finding
% 0.15/0.45 Running: /export/starexec/sandbox/solver/bin/eprover --delete-bad-limit=2000000000 --definitional-cnf=24 -s --print-statistics -R --print-version --proof-object --satauto-schedule=8 --cpu-limit=300 /export/starexec/sandbox/tmp/tmp.XYWCz4FqTF/E---3.1_21952.p
% 0.15/0.49 # Version: 3.1pre001
% 0.15/0.49 # Preprocessing class: FSLSSMSSSSSNFFN.
% 0.15/0.49 # Scheduled 4 strats onto 8 cores with 300 seconds (2400 total)
% 0.15/0.49 # Starting G-E--_207_C18_F1_SE_CS_SP_PI_PS_S5PRR_S2S with 1500s (5) cores
% 0.15/0.49 # Starting new_bool_3 with 300s (1) cores
% 0.15/0.49 # Starting new_bool_1 with 300s (1) cores
% 0.15/0.49 # Starting sh5l with 300s (1) cores
% 0.15/0.49 # new_bool_3 with pid 22030 completed with status 0
% 0.15/0.49 # Result found by new_bool_3
% 0.15/0.49 # Preprocessing class: FSLSSMSSSSSNFFN.
% 0.15/0.49 # Scheduled 4 strats onto 8 cores with 300 seconds (2400 total)
% 0.15/0.49 # Starting G-E--_207_C18_F1_SE_CS_SP_PI_PS_S5PRR_S2S with 1500s (5) cores
% 0.15/0.49 # Starting new_bool_3 with 300s (1) cores
% 0.15/0.49 # SinE strategy is GSinE(CountFormulas,hypos,1.5,,3,20000,1.0)
% 0.15/0.49 # Search class: FGHSM-FSLM32-DFFFFFNN
% 0.15/0.49 # Scheduled 13 strats onto 1 cores with 300 seconds (300 total)
% 0.15/0.49 # Starting G-E--_301_C18_F1_URBAN_S5PRR_S0Y with 23s (1) cores
% 0.15/0.49 # G-E--_301_C18_F1_URBAN_S5PRR_S0Y with pid 22034 completed with status 0
% 0.15/0.49 # Result found by G-E--_301_C18_F1_URBAN_S5PRR_S0Y
% 0.15/0.49 # Preprocessing class: FSLSSMSSSSSNFFN.
% 0.15/0.49 # Scheduled 4 strats onto 8 cores with 300 seconds (2400 total)
% 0.15/0.49 # Starting G-E--_207_C18_F1_SE_CS_SP_PI_PS_S5PRR_S2S with 1500s (5) cores
% 0.15/0.49 # Starting new_bool_3 with 300s (1) cores
% 0.15/0.49 # SinE strategy is GSinE(CountFormulas,hypos,1.5,,3,20000,1.0)
% 0.15/0.49 # Search class: FGHSM-FSLM32-DFFFFFNN
% 0.15/0.49 # Scheduled 13 strats onto 1 cores with 300 seconds (300 total)
% 0.15/0.49 # Starting G-E--_301_C18_F1_URBAN_S5PRR_S0Y with 23s (1) cores
% 0.15/0.49 # Preprocessing time : 0.008 s
% 0.15/0.49
% 0.15/0.49 # Proof found!
% 0.15/0.49 # SZS status Unsatisfiable
% 0.15/0.49 # SZS output start CNFRefutation
% See solution above
% 0.15/0.49 # Parsed axioms : 614
% 0.15/0.49 # Removed by relevancy pruning/SinE : 303
% 0.15/0.49 # Initial clauses : 311
% 0.15/0.49 # Removed in clause preprocessing : 0
% 0.15/0.49 # Initial clauses in saturation : 311
% 0.15/0.49 # Processed clauses : 19
% 0.15/0.49 # ...of these trivial : 0
% 0.15/0.49 # ...subsumed : 3
% 0.15/0.49 # ...remaining for further processing : 16
% 0.15/0.49 # Other redundant clauses eliminated : 0
% 0.15/0.49 # Clauses deleted for lack of memory : 0
% 0.15/0.49 # Backward-subsumed : 0
% 0.15/0.49 # Backward-rewritten : 0
% 0.15/0.49 # Generated clauses : 3
% 0.15/0.49 # ...of the previous two non-redundant : 0
% 0.15/0.49 # ...aggressively subsumed : 0
% 0.15/0.49 # Contextual simplify-reflections : 0
% 0.15/0.49 # Paramodulations : 1
% 0.15/0.49 # Factorizations : 0
% 0.15/0.49 # NegExts : 0
% 0.15/0.49 # Equation resolutions : 1
% 0.15/0.49 # Total rewrite steps : 0
% 0.15/0.49 # Propositional unsat checks : 0
% 0.15/0.49 # Propositional check models : 0
% 0.15/0.49 # Propositional check unsatisfiable : 0
% 0.15/0.49 # Propositional clauses : 0
% 0.15/0.49 # Propositional clauses after purity: 0
% 0.15/0.49 # Propositional unsat core size : 0
% 0.15/0.49 # Propositional preprocessing time : 0.000
% 0.15/0.49 # Propositional encoding time : 0.000
% 0.15/0.49 # Propositional solver time : 0.000
% 0.15/0.49 # Success case prop preproc time : 0.000
% 0.15/0.49 # Success case prop encoding time : 0.000
% 0.15/0.49 # Success case prop solver time : 0.000
% 0.15/0.49 # Current number of processed clauses : 15
% 0.15/0.49 # Positive orientable unit clauses : 6
% 0.15/0.49 # Positive unorientable unit clauses: 0
% 0.15/0.49 # Negative unit clauses : 5
% 0.15/0.49 # Non-unit-clauses : 4
% 0.15/0.49 # Current number of unprocessed clauses: 292
% 0.15/0.49 # ...number of literals in the above : 616
% 0.15/0.49 # Current number of archived formulas : 0
% 0.15/0.49 # Current number of archived clauses : 1
% 0.15/0.49 # Clause-clause subsumption calls (NU) : 5
% 0.15/0.49 # Rec. Clause-clause subsumption calls : 5
% 0.15/0.49 # Non-unit clause-clause subsumptions : 1
% 0.15/0.49 # Unit Clause-clause subsumption calls : 3
% 0.15/0.49 # Rewrite failures with RHS unbound : 0
% 0.15/0.49 # BW rewrite match attempts : 0
% 0.15/0.49 # BW rewrite match successes : 0
% 0.15/0.49 # Condensation attempts : 0
% 0.15/0.49 # Condensation successes : 0
% 0.15/0.49 # Termbank termtop insertions : 11089
% 0.15/0.49
% 0.15/0.49 # -------------------------------------------------
% 0.15/0.49 # User time : 0.010 s
% 0.15/0.49 # System time : 0.007 s
% 0.15/0.49 # Total time : 0.016 s
% 0.15/0.49 # Maximum resident set size: 2596 pages
% 0.15/0.49
% 0.15/0.49 # -------------------------------------------------
% 0.15/0.49 # User time : 0.025 s
% 0.15/0.49 # System time : 0.009 s
% 0.15/0.49 # Total time : 0.034 s
% 0.15/0.49 # Maximum resident set size: 2160 pages
% 0.15/0.49 % E---3.1 exiting
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------