TSTP Solution File: SWV854-1 by E---3.1.00
View Problem
- Process Solution
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
% File : E---3.1.00
% Problem : SWV854-1 : TPTP v8.2.0. Released v4.1.0.
% Transfm : none
% Format : tptp:raw
% Command : run_E %s %d THM
% Computer : n028.cluster.edu
% Model : x86_64 x86_64
% CPU : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 2.10GHz
% Memory : 8042.1875MB
% OS : Linux 3.10.0-693.el7.x86_64
% CPULimit : 300s
% WCLimit : 300s
% DateTime : Tue May 21 05:32:18 EDT 2024
% Result : Unsatisfiable 0.76s 0.58s
% Output : CNFRefutation 0.76s
% Verified :
% SZS Type : Refutation
% Derivation depth : 4
% Number of leaves : 4
% Syntax : Number of clauses : 13 ( 7 unt; 0 nHn; 13 RR)
% Number of literals : 19 ( 0 equ; 9 neg)
% Maximal clause size : 2 ( 1 avg)
% Maximal term depth : 4 ( 1 avg)
% Number of predicates : 3 ( 2 usr; 1 prp; 0-3 aty)
% Number of functors : 15 ( 15 usr; 9 con; 0-4 aty)
% Number of variables : 18 ( 0 sgn)
% Comments :
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
cnf(cls_conjecture_4,negated_conjecture,
( c_Hoare__Mirabelle_Otriple__valid(v_na,c_Hoare__Mirabelle_Otriple_Otriple(hAPP(v_P,X1),c_Option_Othe(c_Com_Obody(X1),tc_Com_Ocom),hAPP(v_Q,X1),t_a),t_a)
| ~ hBOOL(c_in(X1,v_Procs,tc_Com_Opname)) ),
file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',cls_conjecture_4) ).
cnf(cls_Body__triple__valid__Suc_0,axiom,
( c_Hoare__Mirabelle_Otriple__valid(hAPP(c_Suc,X1),c_Hoare__Mirabelle_Otriple_Otriple(X2,c_Com_Ocom_OBODY(X3),X4,X5),X5)
| ~ c_Hoare__Mirabelle_Otriple__valid(X1,c_Hoare__Mirabelle_Otriple_Otriple(X2,c_Option_Othe(c_Com_Obody(X3),tc_Com_Ocom),X4,X5),X5) ),
file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',cls_Body__triple__valid__Suc_0) ).
cnf(cls_conjecture_0,negated_conjecture,
hBOOL(c_in(v_x,v_Procs,tc_Com_Opname)),
file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',cls_conjecture_0) ).
cnf(cls_conjecture_1,negated_conjecture,
~ c_Hoare__Mirabelle_Otriple__valid(hAPP(c_Suc,v_na),c_Hoare__Mirabelle_Otriple_Otriple(hAPP(v_P,v_x),c_Com_Ocom_OBODY(v_x),hAPP(v_Q,v_x),t_a),t_a),
file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',cls_conjecture_1) ).
cnf(c_0_4,negated_conjecture,
( c_Hoare__Mirabelle_Otriple__valid(v_na,c_Hoare__Mirabelle_Otriple_Otriple(hAPP(v_P,X1),c_Option_Othe(c_Com_Obody(X1),tc_Com_Ocom),hAPP(v_Q,X1),t_a),t_a)
| ~ hBOOL(c_in(X1,v_Procs,tc_Com_Opname)) ),
inference(fof_simplification,[status(thm)],[cls_conjecture_4]) ).
cnf(c_0_5,plain,
( c_Hoare__Mirabelle_Otriple__valid(hAPP(c_Suc,X1),c_Hoare__Mirabelle_Otriple_Otriple(X2,c_Com_Ocom_OBODY(X3),X4,X5),X5)
| ~ c_Hoare__Mirabelle_Otriple__valid(X1,c_Hoare__Mirabelle_Otriple_Otriple(X2,c_Option_Othe(c_Com_Obody(X3),tc_Com_Ocom),X4,X5),X5) ),
inference(fof_simplification,[status(thm)],[cls_Body__triple__valid__Suc_0]) ).
cnf(c_0_6,negated_conjecture,
( c_Hoare__Mirabelle_Otriple__valid(v_na,c_Hoare__Mirabelle_Otriple_Otriple(hAPP(v_P,X1),c_Option_Othe(c_Com_Obody(X1),tc_Com_Ocom),hAPP(v_Q,X1),t_a),t_a)
| ~ hBOOL(c_in(X1,v_Procs,tc_Com_Opname)) ),
c_0_4 ).
cnf(c_0_7,negated_conjecture,
hBOOL(c_in(v_x,v_Procs,tc_Com_Opname)),
cls_conjecture_0 ).
cnf(c_0_8,negated_conjecture,
~ c_Hoare__Mirabelle_Otriple__valid(hAPP(c_Suc,v_na),c_Hoare__Mirabelle_Otriple_Otriple(hAPP(v_P,v_x),c_Com_Ocom_OBODY(v_x),hAPP(v_Q,v_x),t_a),t_a),
inference(fof_simplification,[status(thm)],[cls_conjecture_1]) ).
cnf(c_0_9,plain,
( c_Hoare__Mirabelle_Otriple__valid(hAPP(c_Suc,X1),c_Hoare__Mirabelle_Otriple_Otriple(X2,c_Com_Ocom_OBODY(X3),X4,X5),X5)
| ~ c_Hoare__Mirabelle_Otriple__valid(X1,c_Hoare__Mirabelle_Otriple_Otriple(X2,c_Option_Othe(c_Com_Obody(X3),tc_Com_Ocom),X4,X5),X5) ),
c_0_5 ).
cnf(c_0_10,negated_conjecture,
c_Hoare__Mirabelle_Otriple__valid(v_na,c_Hoare__Mirabelle_Otriple_Otriple(hAPP(v_P,v_x),c_Option_Othe(c_Com_Obody(v_x),tc_Com_Ocom),hAPP(v_Q,v_x),t_a),t_a),
inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_6,c_0_7]) ).
cnf(c_0_11,negated_conjecture,
~ c_Hoare__Mirabelle_Otriple__valid(hAPP(c_Suc,v_na),c_Hoare__Mirabelle_Otriple_Otriple(hAPP(v_P,v_x),c_Com_Ocom_OBODY(v_x),hAPP(v_Q,v_x),t_a),t_a),
c_0_8 ).
cnf(c_0_12,negated_conjecture,
$false,
inference(sr,[status(thm)],[inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_9,c_0_10]),c_0_11]),
[proof] ).
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
%----ORIGINAL SYSTEM OUTPUT
% 0.04/0.12 % Problem : SWV854-1 : TPTP v8.2.0. Released v4.1.0.
% 0.04/0.13 % Command : run_E %s %d THM
% 0.13/0.34 % Computer : n028.cluster.edu
% 0.13/0.34 % Model : x86_64 x86_64
% 0.13/0.34 % CPU : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 @ 2.10GHz
% 0.13/0.34 % Memory : 8042.1875MB
% 0.13/0.34 % OS : Linux 3.10.0-693.el7.x86_64
% 0.13/0.34 % CPULimit : 300
% 0.13/0.34 % WCLimit : 300
% 0.13/0.34 % DateTime : Sun May 19 09:24:53 EDT 2024
% 0.13/0.34 % CPUTime :
% 0.19/0.47 Running first-order theorem proving
% 0.19/0.47 Running: /export/starexec/sandbox2/solver/bin/eprover --delete-bad-limit=2000000000 --definitional-cnf=24 -s --print-statistics -R --print-version --proof-object --auto-schedule=8 --cpu-limit=300 /export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p
% 0.76/0.58 # Version: 3.1.0
% 0.76/0.58 # Preprocessing class: FSLMSMSMSSSNFFN.
% 0.76/0.58 # Scheduled 4 strats onto 8 cores with 300 seconds (2400 total)
% 0.76/0.58 # Starting G-E--_207_C18_F1_AE_CS_SP_PI_PS_S2S with 1200s (4) cores
% 0.76/0.58 # Starting new_bool_3 with 600s (2) cores
% 0.76/0.58 # Starting new_bool_1 with 300s (1) cores
% 0.76/0.58 # Starting sh5l with 300s (1) cores
% 0.76/0.58 # G-E--_207_C18_F1_AE_CS_SP_PI_PS_S2S with pid 21587 completed with status 0
% 0.76/0.58 # Result found by G-E--_207_C18_F1_AE_CS_SP_PI_PS_S2S
% 0.76/0.58 # Preprocessing class: FSLMSMSMSSSNFFN.
% 0.76/0.58 # Scheduled 4 strats onto 8 cores with 300 seconds (2400 total)
% 0.76/0.58 # Starting G-E--_207_C18_F1_AE_CS_SP_PI_PS_S2S with 1200s (4) cores
% 0.76/0.58 # No SInE strategy applied
% 0.76/0.58 # Search class: FGHSM-FSLM33-MFFFFFNN
% 0.76/0.58 # Scheduled 6 strats onto 4 cores with 1200 seconds (1200 total)
% 0.76/0.58 # Starting G-E--_208_C18_F1_SE_CS_SP_PS_S5PRR_S2mI with 324s (1) cores
% 0.76/0.58 # Starting G-E--_207_C18_F1_AE_CS_SP_PI_PS_S2S with 121s (1) cores
% 0.76/0.58 # Starting G-E--_303_C18_F1_URBAN_S0Y with 264s (1) cores
% 0.76/0.58 # Starting Y1006__C12_02_nc_F1_AE_CS_SP_S2S with 109s (1) cores
% 0.76/0.58 # Y1006__C12_02_nc_F1_AE_CS_SP_S2S with pid 21598 completed with status 0
% 0.76/0.58 # Result found by Y1006__C12_02_nc_F1_AE_CS_SP_S2S
% 0.76/0.58 # Preprocessing class: FSLMSMSMSSSNFFN.
% 0.76/0.58 # Scheduled 4 strats onto 8 cores with 300 seconds (2400 total)
% 0.76/0.58 # Starting G-E--_207_C18_F1_AE_CS_SP_PI_PS_S2S with 1200s (4) cores
% 0.76/0.58 # No SInE strategy applied
% 0.76/0.58 # Search class: FGHSM-FSLM33-MFFFFFNN
% 0.76/0.58 # Scheduled 6 strats onto 4 cores with 1200 seconds (1200 total)
% 0.76/0.58 # Starting G-E--_208_C18_F1_SE_CS_SP_PS_S5PRR_S2mI with 324s (1) cores
% 0.76/0.58 # Starting G-E--_207_C18_F1_AE_CS_SP_PI_PS_S2S with 121s (1) cores
% 0.76/0.58 # Starting G-E--_303_C18_F1_URBAN_S0Y with 264s (1) cores
% 0.76/0.58 # Starting Y1006__C12_02_nc_F1_AE_CS_SP_S2S with 109s (1) cores
% 0.76/0.58 # Preprocessing time : 0.007 s
% 0.76/0.58 # Presaturation interreduction done
% 0.76/0.58
% 0.76/0.58 # Proof found!
% 0.76/0.58 # SZS status Unsatisfiable
% 0.76/0.58 # SZS output start CNFRefutation
% See solution above
% 0.76/0.58 # Parsed axioms : 763
% 0.76/0.58 # Removed by relevancy pruning/SinE : 0
% 0.76/0.58 # Initial clauses : 763
% 0.76/0.58 # Removed in clause preprocessing : 6
% 0.76/0.58 # Initial clauses in saturation : 757
% 0.76/0.58 # Processed clauses : 833
% 0.76/0.58 # ...of these trivial : 22
% 0.76/0.58 # ...subsumed : 136
% 0.76/0.58 # ...remaining for further processing : 675
% 0.76/0.58 # Other redundant clauses eliminated : 0
% 0.76/0.58 # Clauses deleted for lack of memory : 0
% 0.76/0.58 # Backward-subsumed : 7
% 0.76/0.58 # Backward-rewritten : 15
% 0.76/0.58 # Generated clauses : 66
% 0.76/0.58 # ...of the previous two non-redundant : 70
% 0.76/0.58 # ...aggressively subsumed : 0
% 0.76/0.58 # Contextual simplify-reflections : 1
% 0.76/0.58 # Paramodulations : 66
% 0.76/0.58 # Factorizations : 0
% 0.76/0.58 # NegExts : 0
% 0.76/0.58 # Equation resolutions : 0
% 0.76/0.58 # Disequality decompositions : 0
% 0.76/0.58 # Total rewrite steps : 44
% 0.76/0.58 # ...of those cached : 0
% 0.76/0.58 # Propositional unsat checks : 0
% 0.76/0.58 # Propositional check models : 0
% 0.76/0.58 # Propositional check unsatisfiable : 0
% 0.76/0.58 # Propositional clauses : 0
% 0.76/0.58 # Propositional clauses after purity: 0
% 0.76/0.58 # Propositional unsat core size : 0
% 0.76/0.58 # Propositional preprocessing time : 0.000
% 0.76/0.58 # Propositional encoding time : 0.000
% 0.76/0.58 # Propositional solver time : 0.000
% 0.76/0.58 # Success case prop preproc time : 0.000
% 0.76/0.58 # Success case prop encoding time : 0.000
% 0.76/0.58 # Success case prop solver time : 0.000
% 0.76/0.58 # Current number of processed clauses : 71
% 0.76/0.58 # Positive orientable unit clauses : 46
% 0.76/0.58 # Positive unorientable unit clauses: 0
% 0.76/0.58 # Negative unit clauses : 6
% 0.76/0.58 # Non-unit-clauses : 19
% 0.76/0.58 # Current number of unprocessed clauses: 576
% 0.76/0.58 # ...number of literals in the above : 1247
% 0.76/0.58 # Current number of archived formulas : 0
% 0.76/0.58 # Current number of archived clauses : 607
% 0.76/0.58 # Clause-clause subsumption calls (NU) : 31276
% 0.76/0.58 # Rec. Clause-clause subsumption calls : 25444
% 0.76/0.58 # Non-unit clause-clause subsumptions : 99
% 0.76/0.58 # Unit Clause-clause subsumption calls : 7184
% 0.76/0.58 # Rewrite failures with RHS unbound : 0
% 0.76/0.58 # BW rewrite match attempts : 623
% 0.76/0.58 # BW rewrite match successes : 66
% 0.76/0.58 # Condensation attempts : 0
% 0.76/0.58 # Condensation successes : 0
% 0.76/0.58 # Termbank termtop insertions : 28096
% 0.76/0.58 # Search garbage collected termcells : 1304
% 0.76/0.58
% 0.76/0.58 # -------------------------------------------------
% 0.76/0.58 # User time : 0.075 s
% 0.76/0.58 # System time : 0.005 s
% 0.76/0.58 # Total time : 0.080 s
% 0.76/0.58 # Maximum resident set size: 3160 pages
% 0.76/0.58
% 0.76/0.58 # -------------------------------------------------
% 0.76/0.58 # User time : 0.254 s
% 0.76/0.58 # System time : 0.023 s
% 0.76/0.58 # Total time : 0.277 s
% 0.76/0.58 # Maximum resident set size: 2208 pages
% 0.76/0.58 % E---3.1 exiting
% 0.76/0.58 % E exiting
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------