TSTP Solution File: SWV854-1 by E---3.1.00

View Problem - Process Solution

%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
% File     : E---3.1.00
% Problem  : SWV854-1 : TPTP v8.2.0. Released v4.1.0.
% Transfm  : none
% Format   : tptp:raw
% Command  : run_E %s %d THM

% Computer : n028.cluster.edu
% Model    : x86_64 x86_64
% CPU      : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 2.10GHz
% Memory   : 8042.1875MB
% OS       : Linux 3.10.0-693.el7.x86_64
% CPULimit : 300s
% WCLimit  : 300s
% DateTime : Tue May 21 05:32:18 EDT 2024

% Result   : Unsatisfiable 0.76s 0.58s
% Output   : CNFRefutation 0.76s
% Verified : 
% SZS Type : Refutation
%            Derivation depth      :    4
%            Number of leaves      :    4
% Syntax   : Number of clauses     :   13 (   7 unt;   0 nHn;  13 RR)
%            Number of literals    :   19 (   0 equ;   9 neg)
%            Maximal clause size   :    2 (   1 avg)
%            Maximal term depth    :    4 (   1 avg)
%            Number of predicates  :    3 (   2 usr;   1 prp; 0-3 aty)
%            Number of functors    :   15 (  15 usr;   9 con; 0-4 aty)
%            Number of variables   :   18 (   0 sgn)

% Comments : 
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
cnf(cls_conjecture_4,negated_conjecture,
    ( c_Hoare__Mirabelle_Otriple__valid(v_na,c_Hoare__Mirabelle_Otriple_Otriple(hAPP(v_P,X1),c_Option_Othe(c_Com_Obody(X1),tc_Com_Ocom),hAPP(v_Q,X1),t_a),t_a)
    | ~ hBOOL(c_in(X1,v_Procs,tc_Com_Opname)) ),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',cls_conjecture_4) ).

cnf(cls_Body__triple__valid__Suc_0,axiom,
    ( c_Hoare__Mirabelle_Otriple__valid(hAPP(c_Suc,X1),c_Hoare__Mirabelle_Otriple_Otriple(X2,c_Com_Ocom_OBODY(X3),X4,X5),X5)
    | ~ c_Hoare__Mirabelle_Otriple__valid(X1,c_Hoare__Mirabelle_Otriple_Otriple(X2,c_Option_Othe(c_Com_Obody(X3),tc_Com_Ocom),X4,X5),X5) ),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',cls_Body__triple__valid__Suc_0) ).

cnf(cls_conjecture_0,negated_conjecture,
    hBOOL(c_in(v_x,v_Procs,tc_Com_Opname)),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',cls_conjecture_0) ).

cnf(cls_conjecture_1,negated_conjecture,
    ~ c_Hoare__Mirabelle_Otriple__valid(hAPP(c_Suc,v_na),c_Hoare__Mirabelle_Otriple_Otriple(hAPP(v_P,v_x),c_Com_Ocom_OBODY(v_x),hAPP(v_Q,v_x),t_a),t_a),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',cls_conjecture_1) ).

cnf(c_0_4,negated_conjecture,
    ( c_Hoare__Mirabelle_Otriple__valid(v_na,c_Hoare__Mirabelle_Otriple_Otriple(hAPP(v_P,X1),c_Option_Othe(c_Com_Obody(X1),tc_Com_Ocom),hAPP(v_Q,X1),t_a),t_a)
    | ~ hBOOL(c_in(X1,v_Procs,tc_Com_Opname)) ),
    inference(fof_simplification,[status(thm)],[cls_conjecture_4]) ).

cnf(c_0_5,plain,
    ( c_Hoare__Mirabelle_Otriple__valid(hAPP(c_Suc,X1),c_Hoare__Mirabelle_Otriple_Otriple(X2,c_Com_Ocom_OBODY(X3),X4,X5),X5)
    | ~ c_Hoare__Mirabelle_Otriple__valid(X1,c_Hoare__Mirabelle_Otriple_Otriple(X2,c_Option_Othe(c_Com_Obody(X3),tc_Com_Ocom),X4,X5),X5) ),
    inference(fof_simplification,[status(thm)],[cls_Body__triple__valid__Suc_0]) ).

cnf(c_0_6,negated_conjecture,
    ( c_Hoare__Mirabelle_Otriple__valid(v_na,c_Hoare__Mirabelle_Otriple_Otriple(hAPP(v_P,X1),c_Option_Othe(c_Com_Obody(X1),tc_Com_Ocom),hAPP(v_Q,X1),t_a),t_a)
    | ~ hBOOL(c_in(X1,v_Procs,tc_Com_Opname)) ),
    c_0_4 ).

cnf(c_0_7,negated_conjecture,
    hBOOL(c_in(v_x,v_Procs,tc_Com_Opname)),
    cls_conjecture_0 ).

cnf(c_0_8,negated_conjecture,
    ~ c_Hoare__Mirabelle_Otriple__valid(hAPP(c_Suc,v_na),c_Hoare__Mirabelle_Otriple_Otriple(hAPP(v_P,v_x),c_Com_Ocom_OBODY(v_x),hAPP(v_Q,v_x),t_a),t_a),
    inference(fof_simplification,[status(thm)],[cls_conjecture_1]) ).

cnf(c_0_9,plain,
    ( c_Hoare__Mirabelle_Otriple__valid(hAPP(c_Suc,X1),c_Hoare__Mirabelle_Otriple_Otriple(X2,c_Com_Ocom_OBODY(X3),X4,X5),X5)
    | ~ c_Hoare__Mirabelle_Otriple__valid(X1,c_Hoare__Mirabelle_Otriple_Otriple(X2,c_Option_Othe(c_Com_Obody(X3),tc_Com_Ocom),X4,X5),X5) ),
    c_0_5 ).

cnf(c_0_10,negated_conjecture,
    c_Hoare__Mirabelle_Otriple__valid(v_na,c_Hoare__Mirabelle_Otriple_Otriple(hAPP(v_P,v_x),c_Option_Othe(c_Com_Obody(v_x),tc_Com_Ocom),hAPP(v_Q,v_x),t_a),t_a),
    inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_6,c_0_7]) ).

cnf(c_0_11,negated_conjecture,
    ~ c_Hoare__Mirabelle_Otriple__valid(hAPP(c_Suc,v_na),c_Hoare__Mirabelle_Otriple_Otriple(hAPP(v_P,v_x),c_Com_Ocom_OBODY(v_x),hAPP(v_Q,v_x),t_a),t_a),
    c_0_8 ).

cnf(c_0_12,negated_conjecture,
    $false,
    inference(sr,[status(thm)],[inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_9,c_0_10]),c_0_11]),
    [proof] ).

%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
%----ORIGINAL SYSTEM OUTPUT
% 0.04/0.12  % Problem    : SWV854-1 : TPTP v8.2.0. Released v4.1.0.
% 0.04/0.13  % Command    : run_E %s %d THM
% 0.13/0.34  % Computer : n028.cluster.edu
% 0.13/0.34  % Model    : x86_64 x86_64
% 0.13/0.34  % CPU      : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 @ 2.10GHz
% 0.13/0.34  % Memory   : 8042.1875MB
% 0.13/0.34  % OS       : Linux 3.10.0-693.el7.x86_64
% 0.13/0.34  % CPULimit   : 300
% 0.13/0.34  % WCLimit    : 300
% 0.13/0.34  % DateTime   : Sun May 19 09:24:53 EDT 2024
% 0.13/0.34  % CPUTime    : 
% 0.19/0.47  Running first-order theorem proving
% 0.19/0.47  Running: /export/starexec/sandbox2/solver/bin/eprover --delete-bad-limit=2000000000 --definitional-cnf=24 -s --print-statistics -R --print-version --proof-object --auto-schedule=8 --cpu-limit=300 /export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p
% 0.76/0.58  # Version: 3.1.0
% 0.76/0.58  # Preprocessing class: FSLMSMSMSSSNFFN.
% 0.76/0.58  # Scheduled 4 strats onto 8 cores with 300 seconds (2400 total)
% 0.76/0.58  # Starting G-E--_207_C18_F1_AE_CS_SP_PI_PS_S2S with 1200s (4) cores
% 0.76/0.58  # Starting new_bool_3 with 600s (2) cores
% 0.76/0.58  # Starting new_bool_1 with 300s (1) cores
% 0.76/0.58  # Starting sh5l with 300s (1) cores
% 0.76/0.58  # G-E--_207_C18_F1_AE_CS_SP_PI_PS_S2S with pid 21587 completed with status 0
% 0.76/0.58  # Result found by G-E--_207_C18_F1_AE_CS_SP_PI_PS_S2S
% 0.76/0.58  # Preprocessing class: FSLMSMSMSSSNFFN.
% 0.76/0.58  # Scheduled 4 strats onto 8 cores with 300 seconds (2400 total)
% 0.76/0.58  # Starting G-E--_207_C18_F1_AE_CS_SP_PI_PS_S2S with 1200s (4) cores
% 0.76/0.58  # No SInE strategy applied
% 0.76/0.58  # Search class: FGHSM-FSLM33-MFFFFFNN
% 0.76/0.58  # Scheduled 6 strats onto 4 cores with 1200 seconds (1200 total)
% 0.76/0.58  # Starting G-E--_208_C18_F1_SE_CS_SP_PS_S5PRR_S2mI with 324s (1) cores
% 0.76/0.58  # Starting G-E--_207_C18_F1_AE_CS_SP_PI_PS_S2S with 121s (1) cores
% 0.76/0.58  # Starting G-E--_303_C18_F1_URBAN_S0Y with 264s (1) cores
% 0.76/0.58  # Starting Y1006__C12_02_nc_F1_AE_CS_SP_S2S with 109s (1) cores
% 0.76/0.58  # Y1006__C12_02_nc_F1_AE_CS_SP_S2S with pid 21598 completed with status 0
% 0.76/0.58  # Result found by Y1006__C12_02_nc_F1_AE_CS_SP_S2S
% 0.76/0.58  # Preprocessing class: FSLMSMSMSSSNFFN.
% 0.76/0.58  # Scheduled 4 strats onto 8 cores with 300 seconds (2400 total)
% 0.76/0.58  # Starting G-E--_207_C18_F1_AE_CS_SP_PI_PS_S2S with 1200s (4) cores
% 0.76/0.58  # No SInE strategy applied
% 0.76/0.58  # Search class: FGHSM-FSLM33-MFFFFFNN
% 0.76/0.58  # Scheduled 6 strats onto 4 cores with 1200 seconds (1200 total)
% 0.76/0.58  # Starting G-E--_208_C18_F1_SE_CS_SP_PS_S5PRR_S2mI with 324s (1) cores
% 0.76/0.58  # Starting G-E--_207_C18_F1_AE_CS_SP_PI_PS_S2S with 121s (1) cores
% 0.76/0.58  # Starting G-E--_303_C18_F1_URBAN_S0Y with 264s (1) cores
% 0.76/0.58  # Starting Y1006__C12_02_nc_F1_AE_CS_SP_S2S with 109s (1) cores
% 0.76/0.58  # Preprocessing time       : 0.007 s
% 0.76/0.58  # Presaturation interreduction done
% 0.76/0.58  
% 0.76/0.58  # Proof found!
% 0.76/0.58  # SZS status Unsatisfiable
% 0.76/0.58  # SZS output start CNFRefutation
% See solution above
% 0.76/0.58  # Parsed axioms                        : 763
% 0.76/0.58  # Removed by relevancy pruning/SinE    : 0
% 0.76/0.58  # Initial clauses                      : 763
% 0.76/0.58  # Removed in clause preprocessing      : 6
% 0.76/0.58  # Initial clauses in saturation        : 757
% 0.76/0.58  # Processed clauses                    : 833
% 0.76/0.58  # ...of these trivial                  : 22
% 0.76/0.58  # ...subsumed                          : 136
% 0.76/0.58  # ...remaining for further processing  : 675
% 0.76/0.58  # Other redundant clauses eliminated   : 0
% 0.76/0.58  # Clauses deleted for lack of memory   : 0
% 0.76/0.58  # Backward-subsumed                    : 7
% 0.76/0.58  # Backward-rewritten                   : 15
% 0.76/0.58  # Generated clauses                    : 66
% 0.76/0.58  # ...of the previous two non-redundant : 70
% 0.76/0.58  # ...aggressively subsumed             : 0
% 0.76/0.58  # Contextual simplify-reflections      : 1
% 0.76/0.58  # Paramodulations                      : 66
% 0.76/0.58  # Factorizations                       : 0
% 0.76/0.58  # NegExts                              : 0
% 0.76/0.58  # Equation resolutions                 : 0
% 0.76/0.58  # Disequality decompositions           : 0
% 0.76/0.58  # Total rewrite steps                  : 44
% 0.76/0.58  # ...of those cached                   : 0
% 0.76/0.58  # Propositional unsat checks           : 0
% 0.76/0.58  #    Propositional check models        : 0
% 0.76/0.58  #    Propositional check unsatisfiable : 0
% 0.76/0.58  #    Propositional clauses             : 0
% 0.76/0.58  #    Propositional clauses after purity: 0
% 0.76/0.58  #    Propositional unsat core size     : 0
% 0.76/0.58  #    Propositional preprocessing time  : 0.000
% 0.76/0.58  #    Propositional encoding time       : 0.000
% 0.76/0.58  #    Propositional solver time         : 0.000
% 0.76/0.58  #    Success case prop preproc time    : 0.000
% 0.76/0.58  #    Success case prop encoding time   : 0.000
% 0.76/0.58  #    Success case prop solver time     : 0.000
% 0.76/0.58  # Current number of processed clauses  : 71
% 0.76/0.58  #    Positive orientable unit clauses  : 46
% 0.76/0.58  #    Positive unorientable unit clauses: 0
% 0.76/0.58  #    Negative unit clauses             : 6
% 0.76/0.58  #    Non-unit-clauses                  : 19
% 0.76/0.58  # Current number of unprocessed clauses: 576
% 0.76/0.58  # ...number of literals in the above   : 1247
% 0.76/0.58  # Current number of archived formulas  : 0
% 0.76/0.58  # Current number of archived clauses   : 607
% 0.76/0.58  # Clause-clause subsumption calls (NU) : 31276
% 0.76/0.58  # Rec. Clause-clause subsumption calls : 25444
% 0.76/0.58  # Non-unit clause-clause subsumptions  : 99
% 0.76/0.58  # Unit Clause-clause subsumption calls : 7184
% 0.76/0.58  # Rewrite failures with RHS unbound    : 0
% 0.76/0.58  # BW rewrite match attempts            : 623
% 0.76/0.58  # BW rewrite match successes           : 66
% 0.76/0.58  # Condensation attempts                : 0
% 0.76/0.58  # Condensation successes               : 0
% 0.76/0.58  # Termbank termtop insertions          : 28096
% 0.76/0.58  # Search garbage collected termcells   : 1304
% 0.76/0.58  
% 0.76/0.58  # -------------------------------------------------
% 0.76/0.58  # User time                : 0.075 s
% 0.76/0.58  # System time              : 0.005 s
% 0.76/0.58  # Total time               : 0.080 s
% 0.76/0.58  # Maximum resident set size: 3160 pages
% 0.76/0.58  
% 0.76/0.58  # -------------------------------------------------
% 0.76/0.58  # User time                : 0.254 s
% 0.76/0.58  # System time              : 0.023 s
% 0.76/0.58  # Total time               : 0.277 s
% 0.76/0.58  # Maximum resident set size: 2208 pages
% 0.76/0.58  % E---3.1 exiting
% 0.76/0.58  % E exiting
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------