TSTP Solution File: SWV844-1 by E---3.1
View Problem
- Process Solution
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
% File : E---3.1
% Problem : SWV844-1 : TPTP v8.1.2. Released v4.1.0.
% Transfm : none
% Format : tptp:raw
% Command : run_E %s %d THM
% Computer : n001.cluster.edu
% Model : x86_64 x86_64
% CPU : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 2.10GHz
% Memory : 8042.1875MB
% OS : Linux 3.10.0-693.el7.x86_64
% CPULimit : 2400s
% WCLimit : 300s
% DateTime : Tue Oct 10 19:55:29 EDT 2023
% Result : Unsatisfiable 0.45s 0.83s
% Output : CNFRefutation 0.45s
% Verified :
% SZS Type : Refutation
% Derivation depth : 2
% Number of leaves : 3
% Syntax : Number of clauses : 7 ( 5 unt; 0 nHn; 7 RR)
% Number of literals : 9 ( 0 equ; 4 neg)
% Maximal clause size : 2 ( 1 avg)
% Maximal term depth : 6 ( 2 avg)
% Number of predicates : 2 ( 1 usr; 1 prp; 0-3 aty)
% Number of functors : 15 ( 15 usr; 9 con; 0-3 aty)
% Number of variables : 2 ( 0 sgn)
% Comments :
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
cnf(cls_conjecture_5,negated_conjecture,
( c_Hoare__Mirabelle_Ohoare__derivs(v_G,c_Set_Oinsert(hAPP(hAPP(hAPP(c_Hoare__Mirabelle_Otriple_Otriple(t_b),hAPP(v_P,X1)),hAPP(v_c0,X1)),hAPP(v_Q,X1)),c_Orderings_Obot__class_Obot(tc_fun(tc_Hoare__Mirabelle_Otriple(t_b),tc_bool)),tc_Hoare__Mirabelle_Otriple(t_b)),t_b)
| ~ c_Hoare__Mirabelle_Ohoare__derivs(v_G,c_Set_Oinsert(hAPP(hAPP(hAPP(c_Hoare__Mirabelle_Otriple_Otriple(t_b),hAPP(v_P_H,X1)),hAPP(v_c0,X1)),hAPP(v_Q_H,X1)),c_Orderings_Obot__class_Obot(tc_fun(tc_Hoare__Mirabelle_Otriple(t_b),tc_bool)),tc_Hoare__Mirabelle_Otriple(t_b)),t_b) ),
file('/export/starexec/sandbox/tmp/tmp.tcyOCvbw2L/E---3.1_25288.p',cls_conjecture_5) ).
cnf(cls_conjecture_2,negated_conjecture,
c_Hoare__Mirabelle_Ohoare__derivs(v_G,c_Set_Oinsert(hAPP(hAPP(hAPP(c_Hoare__Mirabelle_Otriple_Otriple(t_b),hAPP(v_P_H,v_x)),hAPP(v_c0,v_x)),hAPP(v_Q_H,v_x)),c_Orderings_Obot__class_Obot(tc_fun(tc_Hoare__Mirabelle_Otriple(t_b),tc_bool)),tc_Hoare__Mirabelle_Otriple(t_b)),t_b),
file('/export/starexec/sandbox/tmp/tmp.tcyOCvbw2L/E---3.1_25288.p',cls_conjecture_2) ).
cnf(cls_conjecture_4,negated_conjecture,
~ c_Hoare__Mirabelle_Ohoare__derivs(v_G,c_Set_Oinsert(hAPP(hAPP(hAPP(c_Hoare__Mirabelle_Otriple_Otriple(t_b),hAPP(v_P,v_x)),hAPP(v_c0,v_x)),hAPP(v_Q,v_x)),c_Orderings_Obot__class_Obot(tc_fun(tc_Hoare__Mirabelle_Otriple(t_b),tc_bool)),tc_Hoare__Mirabelle_Otriple(t_b)),t_b),
file('/export/starexec/sandbox/tmp/tmp.tcyOCvbw2L/E---3.1_25288.p',cls_conjecture_4) ).
cnf(c_0_3,negated_conjecture,
( c_Hoare__Mirabelle_Ohoare__derivs(v_G,c_Set_Oinsert(hAPP(hAPP(hAPP(c_Hoare__Mirabelle_Otriple_Otriple(t_b),hAPP(v_P,X1)),hAPP(v_c0,X1)),hAPP(v_Q,X1)),c_Orderings_Obot__class_Obot(tc_fun(tc_Hoare__Mirabelle_Otriple(t_b),tc_bool)),tc_Hoare__Mirabelle_Otriple(t_b)),t_b)
| ~ c_Hoare__Mirabelle_Ohoare__derivs(v_G,c_Set_Oinsert(hAPP(hAPP(hAPP(c_Hoare__Mirabelle_Otriple_Otriple(t_b),hAPP(v_P_H,X1)),hAPP(v_c0,X1)),hAPP(v_Q_H,X1)),c_Orderings_Obot__class_Obot(tc_fun(tc_Hoare__Mirabelle_Otriple(t_b),tc_bool)),tc_Hoare__Mirabelle_Otriple(t_b)),t_b) ),
cls_conjecture_5 ).
cnf(c_0_4,negated_conjecture,
c_Hoare__Mirabelle_Ohoare__derivs(v_G,c_Set_Oinsert(hAPP(hAPP(hAPP(c_Hoare__Mirabelle_Otriple_Otriple(t_b),hAPP(v_P_H,v_x)),hAPP(v_c0,v_x)),hAPP(v_Q_H,v_x)),c_Orderings_Obot__class_Obot(tc_fun(tc_Hoare__Mirabelle_Otriple(t_b),tc_bool)),tc_Hoare__Mirabelle_Otriple(t_b)),t_b),
cls_conjecture_2 ).
cnf(c_0_5,negated_conjecture,
~ c_Hoare__Mirabelle_Ohoare__derivs(v_G,c_Set_Oinsert(hAPP(hAPP(hAPP(c_Hoare__Mirabelle_Otriple_Otriple(t_b),hAPP(v_P,v_x)),hAPP(v_c0,v_x)),hAPP(v_Q,v_x)),c_Orderings_Obot__class_Obot(tc_fun(tc_Hoare__Mirabelle_Otriple(t_b),tc_bool)),tc_Hoare__Mirabelle_Otriple(t_b)),t_b),
cls_conjecture_4 ).
cnf(c_0_6,negated_conjecture,
$false,
inference(sr,[status(thm)],[inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_3,c_0_4]),c_0_5]),
[proof] ).
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
%----ORIGINAL SYSTEM OUTPUT
% 0.08/0.20 % Problem : SWV844-1 : TPTP v8.1.2. Released v4.1.0.
% 0.20/0.21 % Command : run_E %s %d THM
% 0.20/0.41 % Computer : n001.cluster.edu
% 0.20/0.41 % Model : x86_64 x86_64
% 0.20/0.41 % CPU : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 @ 2.10GHz
% 0.20/0.41 % Memory : 8042.1875MB
% 0.20/0.41 % OS : Linux 3.10.0-693.el7.x86_64
% 0.20/0.41 % CPULimit : 2400
% 0.20/0.41 % WCLimit : 300
% 0.20/0.41 % DateTime : Tue Oct 3 04:26:22 EDT 2023
% 0.20/0.41 % CPUTime :
% 0.37/0.61 Running first-order theorem proving
% 0.37/0.61 Running: /export/starexec/sandbox/solver/bin/eprover --delete-bad-limit=2000000000 --definitional-cnf=24 -s --print-statistics -R --print-version --proof-object --auto-schedule=8 --cpu-limit=300 /export/starexec/sandbox/tmp/tmp.tcyOCvbw2L/E---3.1_25288.p
% 0.45/0.83 # Version: 3.1pre001
% 0.45/0.83 # Preprocessing class: FMLMSMSMSSSNFFN.
% 0.45/0.83 # Scheduled 4 strats onto 8 cores with 300 seconds (2400 total)
% 0.45/0.83 # Starting G-E--_208_C18_F1_SE_CS_SOS_SP_PS_S5PRR_RG_S04AN with 1500s (5) cores
% 0.45/0.83 # Starting new_bool_3 with 300s (1) cores
% 0.45/0.83 # Starting new_bool_1 with 300s (1) cores
% 0.45/0.83 # Starting sh5l with 300s (1) cores
% 0.45/0.83 # G-E--_208_C18_F1_SE_CS_SOS_SP_PS_S5PRR_RG_S04AN with pid 25366 completed with status 0
% 0.45/0.83 # Result found by G-E--_208_C18_F1_SE_CS_SOS_SP_PS_S5PRR_RG_S04AN
% 0.45/0.83 # Preprocessing class: FMLMSMSMSSSNFFN.
% 0.45/0.83 # Scheduled 4 strats onto 8 cores with 300 seconds (2400 total)
% 0.45/0.83 # Starting G-E--_208_C18_F1_SE_CS_SOS_SP_PS_S5PRR_RG_S04AN with 1500s (5) cores
% 0.45/0.83 # No SInE strategy applied
% 0.45/0.83 # Search class: FGHSM-SSLM32-DFFFFFNN
% 0.45/0.83 # Scheduled 13 strats onto 5 cores with 1500 seconds (1500 total)
% 0.45/0.83 # Starting G-E--_208_C18_F1_SE_CS_SP_PI_PS_S5PRR_RG_S04AN with 113s (1) cores
% 0.45/0.83 # Starting G-E--_208_C18_F1_SE_CS_SOS_SP_PS_S5PRR_RG_S04AN with 151s (1) cores
% 0.45/0.83 # Starting G-E--_208_B07_F1_SE_CS_SP_PS_S4d with 113s (1) cores
% 0.45/0.83 # Starting G-E--_208_C18_F1_SE_CS_SP_PS_S5PRR_RG_S04AI with 113s (1) cores
% 0.45/0.83 # Starting G-E--_208_B07_F1_S5PRR_SE_CS_SP_PS_S0Y with 113s (1) cores
% 0.45/0.83 # G-E--_208_C18_F1_SE_CS_SP_PI_PS_S5PRR_RG_S04AN with pid 25373 completed with status 0
% 0.45/0.83 # Result found by G-E--_208_C18_F1_SE_CS_SP_PI_PS_S5PRR_RG_S04AN
% 0.45/0.83 # Preprocessing class: FMLMSMSMSSSNFFN.
% 0.45/0.83 # Scheduled 4 strats onto 8 cores with 300 seconds (2400 total)
% 0.45/0.83 # Starting G-E--_208_C18_F1_SE_CS_SOS_SP_PS_S5PRR_RG_S04AN with 1500s (5) cores
% 0.45/0.83 # No SInE strategy applied
% 0.45/0.83 # Search class: FGHSM-SSLM32-DFFFFFNN
% 0.45/0.83 # Scheduled 13 strats onto 5 cores with 1500 seconds (1500 total)
% 0.45/0.83 # Starting G-E--_208_C18_F1_SE_CS_SP_PI_PS_S5PRR_RG_S04AN with 113s (1) cores
% 0.45/0.83 # Preprocessing time : 0.014 s
% 0.45/0.83 # Presaturation interreduction done
% 0.45/0.83
% 0.45/0.83 # Proof found!
% 0.45/0.83 # SZS status Unsatisfiable
% 0.45/0.83 # SZS output start CNFRefutation
% See solution above
% 0.45/0.83 # Parsed axioms : 1042
% 0.45/0.83 # Removed by relevancy pruning/SinE : 0
% 0.45/0.83 # Initial clauses : 1042
% 0.45/0.83 # Removed in clause preprocessing : 1
% 0.45/0.83 # Initial clauses in saturation : 1041
% 0.45/0.83 # Processed clauses : 1281
% 0.45/0.83 # ...of these trivial : 23
% 0.45/0.83 # ...subsumed : 144
% 0.45/0.83 # ...remaining for further processing : 1114
% 0.45/0.83 # Other redundant clauses eliminated : 6
% 0.45/0.83 # Clauses deleted for lack of memory : 0
% 0.45/0.83 # Backward-subsumed : 0
% 0.45/0.83 # Backward-rewritten : 10
% 0.45/0.83 # Generated clauses : 294
% 0.45/0.83 # ...of the previous two non-redundant : 161
% 0.45/0.83 # ...aggressively subsumed : 0
% 0.45/0.83 # Contextual simplify-reflections : 5
% 0.45/0.83 # Paramodulations : 283
% 0.45/0.83 # Factorizations : 0
% 0.45/0.83 # NegExts : 0
% 0.45/0.83 # Equation resolutions : 11
% 0.45/0.83 # Total rewrite steps : 139
% 0.45/0.83 # Propositional unsat checks : 0
% 0.45/0.83 # Propositional check models : 0
% 0.45/0.83 # Propositional check unsatisfiable : 0
% 0.45/0.83 # Propositional clauses : 0
% 0.45/0.83 # Propositional clauses after purity: 0
% 0.45/0.83 # Propositional unsat core size : 0
% 0.45/0.83 # Propositional preprocessing time : 0.000
% 0.45/0.83 # Propositional encoding time : 0.000
% 0.45/0.83 # Propositional solver time : 0.000
% 0.45/0.83 # Success case prop preproc time : 0.000
% 0.45/0.83 # Success case prop encoding time : 0.000
% 0.45/0.83 # Success case prop solver time : 0.000
% 0.45/0.83 # Current number of processed clauses : 238
% 0.45/0.83 # Positive orientable unit clauses : 83
% 0.45/0.83 # Positive unorientable unit clauses: 0
% 0.45/0.83 # Negative unit clauses : 12
% 0.45/0.83 # Non-unit-clauses : 143
% 0.45/0.83 # Current number of unprocessed clauses: 787
% 0.45/0.83 # ...number of literals in the above : 1936
% 0.45/0.83 # Current number of archived formulas : 0
% 0.45/0.83 # Current number of archived clauses : 877
% 0.45/0.83 # Clause-clause subsumption calls (NU) : 118206
% 0.45/0.83 # Rec. Clause-clause subsumption calls : 71506
% 0.45/0.83 # Non-unit clause-clause subsumptions : 135
% 0.45/0.83 # Unit Clause-clause subsumption calls : 1782
% 0.45/0.83 # Rewrite failures with RHS unbound : 0
% 0.45/0.83 # BW rewrite match attempts : 847
% 0.45/0.83 # BW rewrite match successes : 79
% 0.45/0.83 # Condensation attempts : 0
% 0.45/0.83 # Condensation successes : 0
% 0.45/0.83 # Termbank termtop insertions : 58821
% 0.45/0.83
% 0.45/0.83 # -------------------------------------------------
% 0.45/0.83 # User time : 0.159 s
% 0.45/0.83 # System time : 0.012 s
% 0.45/0.83 # Total time : 0.171 s
% 0.45/0.83 # Maximum resident set size: 3864 pages
% 0.45/0.83
% 0.45/0.83 # -------------------------------------------------
% 0.45/0.83 # User time : 0.782 s
% 0.45/0.83 # System time : 0.035 s
% 0.45/0.83 # Total time : 0.816 s
% 0.45/0.83 # Maximum resident set size: 2560 pages
% 0.45/0.83 % E---3.1 exiting
% 1.80/0.83 % E---3.1 exiting
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------