TSTP Solution File: SWV840-1 by SATCoP---0.1

View Problem - Process Solution

%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
% File     : SATCoP---0.1
% Problem  : SWV840-1 : TPTP v8.1.0. Released v4.1.0.
% Transfm  : none
% Format   : tptp:raw
% Command  : satcop --statistics %s

% Computer : n025.cluster.edu
% Model    : x86_64 x86_64
% CPU      : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 2.10GHz
% Memory   : 8042.1875MB
% OS       : Linux 3.10.0-693.el7.x86_64
% CPULimit : 300s
% WCLimit  : 600s
% DateTime : Wed Jul 20 21:30:58 EDT 2022

% Result   : Unsatisfiable 0.10s 0.33s
% Output   : Proof 0.10s
% Verified : 
% SZS Type : ERROR: Analysing output (MakeTreeStats fails)

% Comments : 
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
cnf(g0,plain,
    c_Hoare__Mirabelle_Ohoare__derivs(v_G,c_Set_Oinsert(hAPP(hAPP(hAPP(c_Hoare__Mirabelle_Otriple_Otriple(t_a),v_P),hAPP(c_Option_Othe(tc_Com_Ocom),hAPP(c_Com_Obody,v_pn))),v_Q),c_Orderings_Obot__class_Obot(tc_fun(tc_Hoare__Mirabelle_Otriple(t_a),tc_bool)),tc_Hoare__Mirabelle_Otriple(t_a)),t_a),
    inference(ground_cnf,[],[file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',cls_conjecture_0)]) ).

cnf(g1,plain,
    ~ c_Hoare__Mirabelle_Ohoare__derivs(c_Set_Oinsert(hAPP(hAPP(hAPP(c_Hoare__Mirabelle_Otriple_Otriple(t_a),v_P),hAPP(c_Com_Ocom_OBODY,v_pn)),v_Q),v_G,tc_Hoare__Mirabelle_Otriple(t_a)),c_Set_Oinsert(hAPP(hAPP(hAPP(c_Hoare__Mirabelle_Otriple_Otriple(t_a),v_P),hAPP(c_Option_Othe(tc_Com_Ocom),hAPP(c_Com_Obody,v_pn))),v_Q),c_Orderings_Obot__class_Obot(tc_fun(tc_Hoare__Mirabelle_Otriple(t_a),tc_bool)),tc_Hoare__Mirabelle_Otriple(t_a)),t_a),
    inference(ground_cnf,[],[file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',cls_conjecture_1)]) ).

cnf(g2,plain,
    ( ~ c_lessequals(v_G,c_Set_Oinsert(hAPP(hAPP(hAPP(c_Hoare__Mirabelle_Otriple_Otriple(t_a),v_P),hAPP(c_Com_Ocom_OBODY,v_pn)),v_Q),v_G,tc_Hoare__Mirabelle_Otriple(t_a)),tc_fun(tc_Hoare__Mirabelle_Otriple(t_a),tc_bool))
    | ~ c_Hoare__Mirabelle_Ohoare__derivs(v_G,c_Set_Oinsert(hAPP(hAPP(hAPP(c_Hoare__Mirabelle_Otriple_Otriple(t_a),v_P),hAPP(c_Option_Othe(tc_Com_Ocom),hAPP(c_Com_Obody,v_pn))),v_Q),c_Orderings_Obot__class_Obot(tc_fun(tc_Hoare__Mirabelle_Otriple(t_a),tc_bool)),tc_Hoare__Mirabelle_Otriple(t_a)),t_a)
    | c_Hoare__Mirabelle_Ohoare__derivs(c_Set_Oinsert(hAPP(hAPP(hAPP(c_Hoare__Mirabelle_Otriple_Otriple(t_a),v_P),hAPP(c_Com_Ocom_OBODY,v_pn)),v_Q),v_G,tc_Hoare__Mirabelle_Otriple(t_a)),c_Set_Oinsert(hAPP(hAPP(hAPP(c_Hoare__Mirabelle_Otriple_Otriple(t_a),v_P),hAPP(c_Option_Othe(tc_Com_Ocom),hAPP(c_Com_Obody,v_pn))),v_Q),c_Orderings_Obot__class_Obot(tc_fun(tc_Hoare__Mirabelle_Otriple(t_a),tc_bool)),tc_Hoare__Mirabelle_Otriple(t_a)),t_a) ),
    inference(ground_cnf,[],[file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',cls_thin_0)]) ).

cnf(g3,plain,
    c_lessequals(v_G,c_Set_Oinsert(hAPP(hAPP(hAPP(c_Hoare__Mirabelle_Otriple_Otriple(t_a),v_P),hAPP(c_Com_Ocom_OBODY,v_pn)),v_Q),v_G,tc_Hoare__Mirabelle_Otriple(t_a)),tc_fun(tc_Hoare__Mirabelle_Otriple(t_a),tc_bool)),
    inference(ground_cnf,[],[file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',cls_subset__insertI_0)]) ).

%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
%----ORIGINAL SYSTEM OUTPUT
% 0.03/0.10  % Problem  : SWV840-1 : TPTP v8.1.0. Released v4.1.0.
% 0.03/0.10  % Command  : satcop --statistics %s
% 0.10/0.31  % Computer : n025.cluster.edu
% 0.10/0.31  % Model    : x86_64 x86_64
% 0.10/0.31  % CPU      : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 @ 2.10GHz
% 0.10/0.31  % Memory   : 8042.1875MB
% 0.10/0.31  % OS       : Linux 3.10.0-693.el7.x86_64
% 0.10/0.31  % CPULimit : 300
% 0.10/0.31  % WCLimit  : 600
% 0.10/0.31  % DateTime : Wed Jun 15 04:21:25 EDT 2022
% 0.10/0.31  % CPUTime  : 
% 0.10/0.33  % symbols: 103
% 0.10/0.33  % clauses: 555
% 0.10/0.33  % start clauses: 2
% 0.10/0.33  % iterative deepening steps: 24
% 0.10/0.33  % maximum path limit: 2
% 0.10/0.33  % literal attempts: 1020
% 0.10/0.33  % depth failures: 891
% 0.10/0.33  % regularity failures: 0
% 0.10/0.33  % tautology failures: 26
% 0.10/0.33  % reductions: 54
% 0.10/0.33  % extensions: 960
% 0.10/0.33  % SAT variables: 952
% 0.10/0.33  % SAT clauses: 712
% 0.10/0.33  % WalkSAT solutions: 710
% 0.10/0.33  % CDCL solutions: 0
% 0.10/0.33  % SZS status Unsatisfiable for theBenchmark
% 0.10/0.33  % SZS output start ListOfCNF for theBenchmark
% See solution above
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------