TSTP Solution File: SWV839-1 by Twee---2.4.2
View Problem
- Process Solution
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
% File : Twee---2.4.2
% Problem : SWV839-1 : TPTP v8.1.2. Released v4.1.0.
% Transfm : none
% Format : tptp:raw
% Command : parallel-twee %s --tstp --conditional-encoding if --smaller --drop-non-horn --give-up-on-saturation --explain-encoding --formal-proof
% Computer : n006.cluster.edu
% Model : x86_64 x86_64
% CPU : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 2.10GHz
% Memory : 8042.1875MB
% OS : Linux 3.10.0-693.el7.x86_64
% CPULimit : 300s
% WCLimit : 300s
% DateTime : Thu Aug 31 23:06:28 EDT 2023
% Result : Unsatisfiable 11.42s 1.88s
% Output : Proof 11.42s
% Verified :
% SZS Type : -
% Comments :
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
%----WARNING: Could not form TPTP format derivation
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
%----ORIGINAL SYSTEM OUTPUT
% 0.06/0.12 % Problem : SWV839-1 : TPTP v8.1.2. Released v4.1.0.
% 0.06/0.13 % Command : parallel-twee %s --tstp --conditional-encoding if --smaller --drop-non-horn --give-up-on-saturation --explain-encoding --formal-proof
% 0.14/0.34 % Computer : n006.cluster.edu
% 0.14/0.34 % Model : x86_64 x86_64
% 0.14/0.34 % CPU : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 @ 2.10GHz
% 0.14/0.34 % Memory : 8042.1875MB
% 0.14/0.34 % OS : Linux 3.10.0-693.el7.x86_64
% 0.14/0.34 % CPULimit : 300
% 0.14/0.34 % WCLimit : 300
% 0.14/0.34 % DateTime : Tue Aug 29 04:07:51 EDT 2023
% 0.14/0.34 % CPUTime :
% 11.42/1.88 Command-line arguments: --kbo-weight0 --lhs-weight 5 --flip-ordering --normalise-queue-percent 10 --cp-renormalise-threshold 10 --goal-heuristic
% 11.42/1.88
% 11.42/1.88 % SZS status Unsatisfiable
% 11.42/1.88
% 11.42/1.89 % SZS output start Proof
% 11.42/1.89 Take the following subset of the input axioms:
% 11.42/1.89 fof(cls_conjecture_1, negated_conjecture, ~c_Hoare__Mirabelle_Ohoare__derivs(v_Ga, c_Set_Oinsert(c_Hoare__Mirabelle_Otriple_Otriple(v_P, c_Com_Ocom_OSKIP, v_P, t_a), c_Orderings_Obot__class_Obot(tc_fun(tc_Hoare__Mirabelle_Otriple(t_a), tc_bool)), tc_Hoare__Mirabelle_Otriple(t_a)), t_a)).
% 11.42/1.89 fof(cls_hoare__derivs_OSkip_0, axiom, ![T_a, V_P, V_G]: c_Hoare__Mirabelle_Ohoare__derivs(V_G, c_Set_Oinsert(c_Hoare__Mirabelle_Otriple_Otriple(V_P, c_Com_Ocom_OSKIP, V_P, T_a), c_Orderings_Obot__class_Obot(tc_fun(tc_Hoare__Mirabelle_Otriple(T_a), tc_bool)), tc_Hoare__Mirabelle_Otriple(T_a)), T_a)).
% 11.42/1.89
% 11.42/1.89 Now clausify the problem and encode Horn clauses using encoding 3 of
% 11.42/1.89 http://www.cse.chalmers.se/~nicsma/papers/horn.pdf.
% 11.42/1.89 We repeatedly replace C & s=t => u=v by the two clauses:
% 11.42/1.89 fresh(y, y, x1...xn) = u
% 11.42/1.89 C => fresh(s, t, x1...xn) = v
% 11.42/1.89 where fresh is a fresh function symbol and x1..xn are the free
% 11.42/1.89 variables of u and v.
% 11.42/1.89 A predicate p(X) is encoded as p(X)=true (this is sound, because the
% 11.42/1.89 input problem has no model of domain size 1).
% 11.42/1.89
% 11.42/1.89 The encoding turns the above axioms into the following unit equations and goals:
% 11.42/1.89
% 11.42/1.89 Axiom 1 (cls_hoare__derivs_OSkip_0): c_Hoare__Mirabelle_Ohoare__derivs(X, c_Set_Oinsert(c_Hoare__Mirabelle_Otriple_Otriple(Y, c_Com_Ocom_OSKIP, Y, Z), c_Orderings_Obot__class_Obot(tc_fun(tc_Hoare__Mirabelle_Otriple(Z), tc_bool)), tc_Hoare__Mirabelle_Otriple(Z)), Z) = true2.
% 11.42/1.89
% 11.42/1.89 Goal 1 (cls_conjecture_1): c_Hoare__Mirabelle_Ohoare__derivs(v_Ga, c_Set_Oinsert(c_Hoare__Mirabelle_Otriple_Otriple(v_P, c_Com_Ocom_OSKIP, v_P, t_a), c_Orderings_Obot__class_Obot(tc_fun(tc_Hoare__Mirabelle_Otriple(t_a), tc_bool)), tc_Hoare__Mirabelle_Otriple(t_a)), t_a) = true2.
% 11.42/1.89 Proof:
% 11.42/1.89 c_Hoare__Mirabelle_Ohoare__derivs(v_Ga, c_Set_Oinsert(c_Hoare__Mirabelle_Otriple_Otriple(v_P, c_Com_Ocom_OSKIP, v_P, t_a), c_Orderings_Obot__class_Obot(tc_fun(tc_Hoare__Mirabelle_Otriple(t_a), tc_bool)), tc_Hoare__Mirabelle_Otriple(t_a)), t_a)
% 11.42/1.89 = { by axiom 1 (cls_hoare__derivs_OSkip_0) }
% 11.42/1.89 true2
% 11.42/1.89 % SZS output end Proof
% 11.42/1.89
% 11.42/1.89 RESULT: Unsatisfiable (the axioms are contradictory).
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------