TSTP Solution File: SWV839-1 by E---3.1

View Problem - Process Solution

%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
% File     : E---3.1
% Problem  : SWV839-1 : TPTP v8.1.2. Released v4.1.0.
% Transfm  : none
% Format   : tptp:raw
% Command  : run_E %s %d THM

% Computer : n027.cluster.edu
% Model    : x86_64 x86_64
% CPU      : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 2.10GHz
% Memory   : 8042.1875MB
% OS       : Linux 3.10.0-693.el7.x86_64
% CPULimit : 2400s
% WCLimit  : 300s
% DateTime : Tue Oct 10 19:55:28 EDT 2023

% Result   : Unsatisfiable 0.20s 0.53s
% Output   : CNFRefutation 0.20s
% Verified : 
% SZS Type : Refutation
%            Derivation depth      :    2
%            Number of leaves      :    2
% Syntax   : Number of clauses     :    5 (   5 unt;   0 nHn;   3 RR)
%            Number of literals    :    5 (   0 equ;   2 neg)
%            Maximal clause size   :    1 (   1 avg)
%            Maximal term depth    :    5 (   2 avg)
%            Number of predicates  :    2 (   1 usr;   1 prp; 0-3 aty)
%            Number of functors    :   10 (  10 usr;   5 con; 0-4 aty)
%            Number of variables   :    6 (   2 sgn)

% Comments : 
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
cnf(cls_conjecture_1,negated_conjecture,
    ~ c_Hoare__Mirabelle_Ohoare__derivs(v_Ga,c_Set_Oinsert(c_Hoare__Mirabelle_Otriple_Otriple(v_P,c_Com_Ocom_OSKIP,v_P,t_a),c_Orderings_Obot__class_Obot(tc_fun(tc_Hoare__Mirabelle_Otriple(t_a),tc_bool)),tc_Hoare__Mirabelle_Otriple(t_a)),t_a),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox/tmp/tmp.6GE3dnRZln/E---3.1_11211.p',cls_conjecture_1) ).

cnf(cls_hoare__derivs_OSkip_0,axiom,
    c_Hoare__Mirabelle_Ohoare__derivs(X1,c_Set_Oinsert(c_Hoare__Mirabelle_Otriple_Otriple(X2,c_Com_Ocom_OSKIP,X2,X3),c_Orderings_Obot__class_Obot(tc_fun(tc_Hoare__Mirabelle_Otriple(X3),tc_bool)),tc_Hoare__Mirabelle_Otriple(X3)),X3),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox/tmp/tmp.6GE3dnRZln/E---3.1_11211.p',cls_hoare__derivs_OSkip_0) ).

cnf(c_0_2,negated_conjecture,
    ~ c_Hoare__Mirabelle_Ohoare__derivs(v_Ga,c_Set_Oinsert(c_Hoare__Mirabelle_Otriple_Otriple(v_P,c_Com_Ocom_OSKIP,v_P,t_a),c_Orderings_Obot__class_Obot(tc_fun(tc_Hoare__Mirabelle_Otriple(t_a),tc_bool)),tc_Hoare__Mirabelle_Otriple(t_a)),t_a),
    cls_conjecture_1 ).

cnf(c_0_3,axiom,
    c_Hoare__Mirabelle_Ohoare__derivs(X1,c_Set_Oinsert(c_Hoare__Mirabelle_Otriple_Otriple(X2,c_Com_Ocom_OSKIP,X2,X3),c_Orderings_Obot__class_Obot(tc_fun(tc_Hoare__Mirabelle_Otriple(X3),tc_bool)),tc_Hoare__Mirabelle_Otriple(X3)),X3),
    cls_hoare__derivs_OSkip_0 ).

cnf(c_0_4,negated_conjecture,
    $false,
    inference(cn,[status(thm)],[inference(rw,[status(thm)],[c_0_2,c_0_3])]),
    [proof] ).

%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
%----ORIGINAL SYSTEM OUTPUT
% 0.10/0.14  % Problem    : SWV839-1 : TPTP v8.1.2. Released v4.1.0.
% 0.10/0.15  % Command    : run_E %s %d THM
% 0.14/0.35  % Computer : n027.cluster.edu
% 0.14/0.35  % Model    : x86_64 x86_64
% 0.14/0.35  % CPU      : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 @ 2.10GHz
% 0.14/0.35  % Memory   : 8042.1875MB
% 0.14/0.35  % OS       : Linux 3.10.0-693.el7.x86_64
% 0.14/0.35  % CPULimit   : 2400
% 0.14/0.35  % WCLimit    : 300
% 0.14/0.35  % DateTime   : Tue Oct  3 03:45:46 EDT 2023
% 0.14/0.35  % CPUTime    : 
% 0.20/0.50  Running first-order theorem proving
% 0.20/0.50  Running: /export/starexec/sandbox/solver/bin/eprover --delete-bad-limit=2000000000 --definitional-cnf=24 -s --print-statistics -R --print-version --proof-object --auto-schedule=8 --cpu-limit=300 /export/starexec/sandbox/tmp/tmp.6GE3dnRZln/E---3.1_11211.p
% 0.20/0.53  # Version: 3.1pre001
% 0.20/0.53  # Preprocessing class: FSLSSMSMSSSNFFN.
% 0.20/0.53  # Scheduled 4 strats onto 8 cores with 300 seconds (2400 total)
% 0.20/0.53  # Starting C07_19_nc_SOS_SAT001_MinMin_p005000_rr with 1500s (5) cores
% 0.20/0.53  # Starting new_bool_3 with 300s (1) cores
% 0.20/0.53  # Starting new_bool_1 with 300s (1) cores
% 0.20/0.53  # Starting sh5l with 300s (1) cores
% 0.20/0.53  # new_bool_3 with pid 11290 completed with status 0
% 0.20/0.53  # Result found by new_bool_3
% 0.20/0.53  # Preprocessing class: FSLSSMSMSSSNFFN.
% 0.20/0.53  # Scheduled 4 strats onto 8 cores with 300 seconds (2400 total)
% 0.20/0.53  # Starting C07_19_nc_SOS_SAT001_MinMin_p005000_rr with 1500s (5) cores
% 0.20/0.53  # Starting new_bool_3 with 300s (1) cores
% 0.20/0.53  # SinE strategy is GSinE(CountFormulas,hypos,1.5,,3,20000,1.0)
% 0.20/0.53  # Search class: FGHSM-FFLF32-DFFFFFNN
% 0.20/0.53  # partial match(1): FGHSM-FFLM32-DFFFFFNN
% 0.20/0.53  # Scheduled 5 strats onto 1 cores with 300 seconds (300 total)
% 0.20/0.53  # Starting G-E--_208_C18_F1_SE_CS_SP_PS_S5PRR_S0Y with 62s (1) cores
% 0.20/0.53  # G-E--_208_C18_F1_SE_CS_SP_PS_S5PRR_S0Y with pid 11294 completed with status 0
% 0.20/0.53  # Result found by G-E--_208_C18_F1_SE_CS_SP_PS_S5PRR_S0Y
% 0.20/0.53  # Preprocessing class: FSLSSMSMSSSNFFN.
% 0.20/0.53  # Scheduled 4 strats onto 8 cores with 300 seconds (2400 total)
% 0.20/0.53  # Starting C07_19_nc_SOS_SAT001_MinMin_p005000_rr with 1500s (5) cores
% 0.20/0.53  # Starting new_bool_3 with 300s (1) cores
% 0.20/0.53  # SinE strategy is GSinE(CountFormulas,hypos,1.5,,3,20000,1.0)
% 0.20/0.53  # Search class: FGHSM-FFLF32-DFFFFFNN
% 0.20/0.53  # partial match(1): FGHSM-FFLM32-DFFFFFNN
% 0.20/0.53  # Scheduled 5 strats onto 1 cores with 300 seconds (300 total)
% 0.20/0.53  # Starting G-E--_208_C18_F1_SE_CS_SP_PS_S5PRR_S0Y with 62s (1) cores
% 0.20/0.53  # Preprocessing time       : 0.002 s
% 0.20/0.53  # Presaturation interreduction done
% 0.20/0.53  
% 0.20/0.53  # Proof found!
% 0.20/0.53  # SZS status Unsatisfiable
% 0.20/0.53  # SZS output start CNFRefutation
% See solution above
% 0.20/0.53  # Parsed axioms                        : 454
% 0.20/0.53  # Removed by relevancy pruning/SinE    : 305
% 0.20/0.53  # Initial clauses                      : 149
% 0.20/0.53  # Removed in clause preprocessing      : 0
% 0.20/0.53  # Initial clauses in saturation        : 149
% 0.20/0.53  # Processed clauses                    : 89
% 0.20/0.53  # ...of these trivial                  : 6
% 0.20/0.53  # ...subsumed                          : 11
% 0.20/0.53  # ...remaining for further processing  : 72
% 0.20/0.53  # Other redundant clauses eliminated   : 0
% 0.20/0.53  # Clauses deleted for lack of memory   : 0
% 0.20/0.53  # Backward-subsumed                    : 0
% 0.20/0.53  # Backward-rewritten                   : 1
% 0.20/0.53  # Generated clauses                    : 0
% 0.20/0.53  # ...of the previous two non-redundant : 0
% 0.20/0.53  # ...aggressively subsumed             : 0
% 0.20/0.53  # Contextual simplify-reflections      : 0
% 0.20/0.53  # Paramodulations                      : 0
% 0.20/0.53  # Factorizations                       : 0
% 0.20/0.53  # NegExts                              : 0
% 0.20/0.53  # Equation resolutions                 : 0
% 0.20/0.53  # Total rewrite steps                  : 7
% 0.20/0.53  # Propositional unsat checks           : 0
% 0.20/0.53  #    Propositional check models        : 0
% 0.20/0.53  #    Propositional check unsatisfiable : 0
% 0.20/0.53  #    Propositional clauses             : 0
% 0.20/0.53  #    Propositional clauses after purity: 0
% 0.20/0.53  #    Propositional unsat core size     : 0
% 0.20/0.53  #    Propositional preprocessing time  : 0.000
% 0.20/0.53  #    Propositional encoding time       : 0.000
% 0.20/0.53  #    Propositional solver time         : 0.000
% 0.20/0.53  #    Success case prop preproc time    : 0.000
% 0.20/0.53  #    Success case prop encoding time   : 0.000
% 0.20/0.53  #    Success case prop solver time     : 0.000
% 0.20/0.53  # Current number of processed clauses  : 71
% 0.20/0.53  #    Positive orientable unit clauses  : 22
% 0.20/0.53  #    Positive unorientable unit clauses: 1
% 0.20/0.53  #    Negative unit clauses             : 6
% 0.20/0.53  #    Non-unit-clauses                  : 42
% 0.20/0.53  # Current number of unprocessed clauses: 60
% 0.20/0.53  # ...number of literals in the above   : 158
% 0.20/0.53  # Current number of archived formulas  : 0
% 0.20/0.53  # Current number of archived clauses   : 1
% 0.20/0.53  # Clause-clause subsumption calls (NU) : 422
% 0.20/0.53  # Rec. Clause-clause subsumption calls : 415
% 0.20/0.53  # Non-unit clause-clause subsumptions  : 4
% 0.20/0.53  # Unit Clause-clause subsumption calls : 3
% 0.20/0.53  # Rewrite failures with RHS unbound    : 0
% 0.20/0.53  # BW rewrite match attempts            : 31
% 0.20/0.53  # BW rewrite match successes           : 11
% 0.20/0.53  # Condensation attempts                : 0
% 0.20/0.53  # Condensation successes               : 0
% 0.20/0.53  # Termbank termtop insertions          : 8597
% 0.20/0.53  
% 0.20/0.53  # -------------------------------------------------
% 0.20/0.53  # User time                : 0.007 s
% 0.20/0.53  # System time              : 0.005 s
% 0.20/0.53  # Total time               : 0.012 s
% 0.20/0.53  # Maximum resident set size: 2316 pages
% 0.20/0.53  
% 0.20/0.53  # -------------------------------------------------
% 0.20/0.53  # User time                : 0.018 s
% 0.20/0.53  # System time              : 0.008 s
% 0.20/0.53  # Total time               : 0.026 s
% 0.20/0.53  # Maximum resident set size: 2056 pages
% 0.20/0.53  % E---3.1 exiting
% 0.20/0.53  % E---3.1 exiting
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------