TSTP Solution File: SWV837-1 by E---3.1

View Problem - Process Solution

%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
% File     : E---3.1
% Problem  : SWV837-1 : TPTP v8.1.2. Released v4.1.0.
% Transfm  : none
% Format   : tptp:raw
% Command  : run_E %s %d THM

% Computer : n004.cluster.edu
% Model    : x86_64 x86_64
% CPU      : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 2.10GHz
% Memory   : 8042.1875MB
% OS       : Linux 3.10.0-693.el7.x86_64
% CPULimit : 2400s
% WCLimit  : 300s
% DateTime : Tue Oct 10 19:55:28 EDT 2023

% Result   : Unsatisfiable 0.39s 0.64s
% Output   : CNFRefutation 0.39s
% Verified : 
% SZS Type : Refutation
%            Derivation depth      :    3
%            Number of leaves      :    4
% Syntax   : Number of clauses     :   10 (   7 unt;   0 nHn;  10 RR)
%            Number of literals    :   15 (   0 equ;   7 neg)
%            Maximal clause size   :    3 (   1 avg)
%            Maximal term depth    :    1 (   1 avg)
%            Number of predicates  :    2 (   1 usr;   1 prp; 0-3 aty)
%            Number of functors    :    4 (   4 usr;   4 con; 0-0 aty)
%            Number of variables   :    9 (   0 sgn)

% Comments : 
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
cnf(cls_cut_0,axiom,
    ( c_Hoare__Mirabelle_Ohoare__derivs(X1,X2,X3)
    | ~ c_Hoare__Mirabelle_Ohoare__derivs(X1,X4,X3)
    | ~ c_Hoare__Mirabelle_Ohoare__derivs(X4,X2,X3) ),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/tmp/tmp.qnATZSRCgd/E---3.1_23402.p',cls_cut_0) ).

cnf(cls_conjecture_0,negated_conjecture,
    c_Hoare__Mirabelle_Ohoare__derivs(v_G_Ha,v_tsa,t_a),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/tmp/tmp.qnATZSRCgd/E---3.1_23402.p',cls_conjecture_0) ).

cnf(cls_conjecture_4,negated_conjecture,
    ~ c_Hoare__Mirabelle_Ohoare__derivs(v_Ga,v_tsa,t_a),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/tmp/tmp.qnATZSRCgd/E---3.1_23402.p',cls_conjecture_4) ).

cnf(cls_conjecture_3,negated_conjecture,
    c_Hoare__Mirabelle_Ohoare__derivs(v_Ga,v_G_Ha,t_a),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/tmp/tmp.qnATZSRCgd/E---3.1_23402.p',cls_conjecture_3) ).

cnf(c_0_4,axiom,
    ( c_Hoare__Mirabelle_Ohoare__derivs(X1,X2,X3)
    | ~ c_Hoare__Mirabelle_Ohoare__derivs(X1,X4,X3)
    | ~ c_Hoare__Mirabelle_Ohoare__derivs(X4,X2,X3) ),
    cls_cut_0 ).

cnf(c_0_5,negated_conjecture,
    c_Hoare__Mirabelle_Ohoare__derivs(v_G_Ha,v_tsa,t_a),
    cls_conjecture_0 ).

cnf(c_0_6,negated_conjecture,
    ~ c_Hoare__Mirabelle_Ohoare__derivs(v_Ga,v_tsa,t_a),
    cls_conjecture_4 ).

cnf(c_0_7,negated_conjecture,
    ( c_Hoare__Mirabelle_Ohoare__derivs(X1,v_tsa,t_a)
    | ~ c_Hoare__Mirabelle_Ohoare__derivs(X1,v_G_Ha,t_a) ),
    inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_4,c_0_5]) ).

cnf(c_0_8,negated_conjecture,
    c_Hoare__Mirabelle_Ohoare__derivs(v_Ga,v_G_Ha,t_a),
    cls_conjecture_3 ).

cnf(c_0_9,negated_conjecture,
    $false,
    inference(cn,[status(thm)],[inference(rw,[status(thm)],[inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_6,c_0_7]),c_0_8])]),
    [proof] ).

%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
%----ORIGINAL SYSTEM OUTPUT
% 0.07/0.17  % Problem    : SWV837-1 : TPTP v8.1.2. Released v4.1.0.
% 0.07/0.18  % Command    : run_E %s %d THM
% 0.18/0.40  % Computer : n004.cluster.edu
% 0.18/0.40  % Model    : x86_64 x86_64
% 0.18/0.40  % CPU      : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 @ 2.10GHz
% 0.18/0.40  % Memory   : 8042.1875MB
% 0.18/0.40  % OS       : Linux 3.10.0-693.el7.x86_64
% 0.18/0.40  % CPULimit   : 2400
% 0.18/0.40  % WCLimit    : 300
% 0.18/0.40  % DateTime   : Tue Oct  3 04:35:45 EDT 2023
% 0.18/0.40  % CPUTime    : 
% 0.24/0.59  Running first-order theorem proving
% 0.24/0.59  Running: /export/starexec/sandbox2/solver/bin/eprover --delete-bad-limit=2000000000 --definitional-cnf=24 -s --print-statistics -R --print-version --proof-object --auto-schedule=8 --cpu-limit=300 /export/starexec/sandbox2/tmp/tmp.qnATZSRCgd/E---3.1_23402.p
% 0.39/0.64  # Version: 3.1pre001
% 0.39/0.64  # Preprocessing class: FSLSSMSSSSSNFFN.
% 0.39/0.64  # Scheduled 4 strats onto 8 cores with 300 seconds (2400 total)
% 0.39/0.64  # Starting G-E--_207_C18_F1_SE_CS_SP_PI_PS_S5PRR_S2S with 1500s (5) cores
% 0.39/0.64  # Starting new_bool_3 with 300s (1) cores
% 0.39/0.64  # Starting new_bool_1 with 300s (1) cores
% 0.39/0.64  # Starting sh5l with 300s (1) cores
% 0.39/0.64  # new_bool_3 with pid 23481 completed with status 0
% 0.39/0.64  # Result found by new_bool_3
% 0.39/0.64  # Preprocessing class: FSLSSMSSSSSNFFN.
% 0.39/0.64  # Scheduled 4 strats onto 8 cores with 300 seconds (2400 total)
% 0.39/0.64  # Starting G-E--_207_C18_F1_SE_CS_SP_PI_PS_S5PRR_S2S with 1500s (5) cores
% 0.39/0.64  # Starting new_bool_3 with 300s (1) cores
% 0.39/0.64  # SinE strategy is GSinE(CountFormulas,hypos,1.5,,3,20000,1.0)
% 0.39/0.64  # Search class: FGHSM-FFLS32-MFFFFFNN
% 0.39/0.64  # Scheduled 5 strats onto 1 cores with 300 seconds (300 total)
% 0.39/0.64  # Starting SAT001_MinMin_p005000_rr_RG with 181s (1) cores
% 0.39/0.64  # SAT001_MinMin_p005000_rr_RG with pid 23484 completed with status 0
% 0.39/0.64  # Result found by SAT001_MinMin_p005000_rr_RG
% 0.39/0.64  # Preprocessing class: FSLSSMSSSSSNFFN.
% 0.39/0.64  # Scheduled 4 strats onto 8 cores with 300 seconds (2400 total)
% 0.39/0.64  # Starting G-E--_207_C18_F1_SE_CS_SP_PI_PS_S5PRR_S2S with 1500s (5) cores
% 0.39/0.64  # Starting new_bool_3 with 300s (1) cores
% 0.39/0.64  # SinE strategy is GSinE(CountFormulas,hypos,1.5,,3,20000,1.0)
% 0.39/0.64  # Search class: FGHSM-FFLS32-MFFFFFNN
% 0.39/0.64  # Scheduled 5 strats onto 1 cores with 300 seconds (300 total)
% 0.39/0.64  # Starting SAT001_MinMin_p005000_rr_RG with 181s (1) cores
% 0.39/0.64  # Preprocessing time       : 0.003 s
% 0.39/0.64  # Presaturation interreduction done
% 0.39/0.64  
% 0.39/0.64  # Proof found!
% 0.39/0.64  # SZS status Unsatisfiable
% 0.39/0.64  # SZS output start CNFRefutation
% See solution above
% 0.39/0.64  # Parsed axioms                        : 574
% 0.39/0.64  # Removed by relevancy pruning/SinE    : 422
% 0.39/0.64  # Initial clauses                      : 152
% 0.39/0.64  # Removed in clause preprocessing      : 0
% 0.39/0.64  # Initial clauses in saturation        : 152
% 0.39/0.64  # Processed clauses                    : 205
% 0.39/0.64  # ...of these trivial                  : 6
% 0.39/0.64  # ...subsumed                          : 28
% 0.39/0.64  # ...remaining for further processing  : 171
% 0.39/0.64  # Other redundant clauses eliminated   : 1
% 0.39/0.64  # Clauses deleted for lack of memory   : 0
% 0.39/0.64  # Backward-subsumed                    : 0
% 0.39/0.64  # Backward-rewritten                   : 1
% 0.39/0.64  # Generated clauses                    : 59
% 0.39/0.64  # ...of the previous two non-redundant : 30
% 0.39/0.64  # ...aggressively subsumed             : 0
% 0.39/0.64  # Contextual simplify-reflections      : 3
% 0.39/0.64  # Paramodulations                      : 58
% 0.39/0.64  # Factorizations                       : 0
% 0.39/0.64  # NegExts                              : 0
% 0.39/0.64  # Equation resolutions                 : 1
% 0.39/0.64  # Total rewrite steps                  : 31
% 0.39/0.64  # Propositional unsat checks           : 0
% 0.39/0.64  #    Propositional check models        : 0
% 0.39/0.64  #    Propositional check unsatisfiable : 0
% 0.39/0.64  #    Propositional clauses             : 0
% 0.39/0.64  #    Propositional clauses after purity: 0
% 0.39/0.64  #    Propositional unsat core size     : 0
% 0.39/0.64  #    Propositional preprocessing time  : 0.000
% 0.39/0.64  #    Propositional encoding time       : 0.000
% 0.39/0.64  #    Propositional solver time         : 0.000
% 0.39/0.64  #    Success case prop preproc time    : 0.000
% 0.39/0.64  #    Success case prop encoding time   : 0.000
% 0.39/0.64  #    Success case prop solver time     : 0.000
% 0.39/0.64  # Current number of processed clauses  : 50
% 0.39/0.64  #    Positive orientable unit clauses  : 19
% 0.39/0.64  #    Positive unorientable unit clauses: 0
% 0.39/0.64  #    Negative unit clauses             : 5
% 0.39/0.64  #    Non-unit-clauses                  : 26
% 0.39/0.64  # Current number of unprocessed clauses: 97
% 0.39/0.64  # ...number of literals in the above   : 198
% 0.39/0.64  # Current number of archived formulas  : 0
% 0.39/0.64  # Current number of archived clauses   : 121
% 0.39/0.64  # Clause-clause subsumption calls (NU) : 729
% 0.39/0.64  # Rec. Clause-clause subsumption calls : 646
% 0.39/0.64  # Non-unit clause-clause subsumptions  : 25
% 0.39/0.64  # Unit Clause-clause subsumption calls : 6
% 0.39/0.64  # Rewrite failures with RHS unbound    : 0
% 0.39/0.64  # BW rewrite match attempts            : 46
% 0.39/0.64  # BW rewrite match successes           : 31
% 0.39/0.64  # Condensation attempts                : 0
% 0.39/0.64  # Condensation successes               : 0
% 0.39/0.64  # Termbank termtop insertions          : 10212
% 0.39/0.64  
% 0.39/0.64  # -------------------------------------------------
% 0.39/0.64  # User time                : 0.017 s
% 0.39/0.64  # System time              : 0.006 s
% 0.39/0.64  # Total time               : 0.023 s
% 0.39/0.64  # Maximum resident set size: 2264 pages
% 0.39/0.64  
% 0.39/0.64  # -------------------------------------------------
% 0.39/0.64  # User time                : 0.030 s
% 0.39/0.64  # System time              : 0.010 s
% 0.39/0.64  # Total time               : 0.041 s
% 0.39/0.64  # Maximum resident set size: 2072 pages
% 0.39/0.64  % E---3.1 exiting
% 0.39/0.64  % E---3.1 exiting
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------