TSTP Solution File: SWV834-1 by E-SAT---3.1
View Problem
- Process Solution
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
% File : E-SAT---3.1
% Problem : SWV834-1 : TPTP v8.1.2. Released v4.1.0.
% Transfm : none
% Format : tptp:raw
% Command : run_E %s %d THM
% Computer : n001.cluster.edu
% Model : x86_64 x86_64
% CPU : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 2.10GHz
% Memory : 8042.1875MB
% OS : Linux 3.10.0-693.el7.x86_64
% CPULimit : 2400s
% WCLimit : 300s
% DateTime : Tue Oct 10 20:07:57 EDT 2023
% Result : Unsatisfiable 731.64s 94.29s
% Output : CNFRefutation 731.64s
% Verified :
% SZS Type : Refutation
% Derivation depth : 5
% Number of leaves : 6
% Syntax : Number of clauses : 17 ( 15 unt; 2 nHn; 7 RR)
% Number of literals : 19 ( 8 equ; 6 neg)
% Maximal clause size : 2 ( 1 avg)
% Maximal term depth : 12 ( 2 avg)
% Number of predicates : 4 ( 2 usr; 1 prp; 0-3 aty)
% Number of functors : 23 ( 23 usr; 10 con; 0-4 aty)
% Number of variables : 29 ( 14 sgn)
% Comments :
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
cnf(cls_empty__def_0,axiom,
c_Orderings_Obot__class_Obot(tc_fun(X1,tc_bool)) = c_Collect(c_COMBK(c_False,tc_bool,X1),X1),
file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/tmp/tmp.ghYwmWNuoP/E---3.1_18356.p',cls_empty__def_0) ).
cnf(cls_Collect__def_0,axiom,
c_Collect(X1,X2) = X1,
file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/tmp/tmp.ghYwmWNuoP/E---3.1_18356.p',cls_Collect__def_0) ).
cnf(cls_COMBK__def_0,axiom,
hAPP(c_COMBK(X1,X2,X3),X4) = X1,
file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/tmp/tmp.ghYwmWNuoP/E---3.1_18356.p',cls_COMBK__def_0) ).
cnf(cls_conjecture_0,negated_conjecture,
~ c_Hoare__Mirabelle_Ohoare__derivs(v_G,hAPP(hAPP(c_Set_Oinsert(tc_Hoare__Mirabelle_Otriple(t_a)),c_Hoare__Mirabelle_Otriple_Otriple(c_COMBK(c_COMBK(c_False,tc_bool,tc_Com_Ostate),tc_fun(tc_Com_Ostate,tc_bool),t_a),v_c,hAPP(c_COMBC(hAPP(hAPP(c_COMBB(tc_fun(tc_Com_Ostate,tc_fun(tc_bool,tc_bool)),tc_fun(tc_fun(tc_Com_Ostate,tc_bool),tc_fun(tc_Com_Ostate,tc_bool)),t_a),c_COMBS(tc_Com_Ostate,tc_bool,tc_bool)),hAPP(hAPP(c_COMBB(tc_fun(tc_Com_Ostate,tc_bool),tc_fun(tc_Com_Ostate,tc_fun(tc_bool,tc_bool)),t_a),hAPP(c_COMBB(tc_bool,tc_fun(tc_bool,tc_bool),tc_Com_Ostate),c_and)),v_P)),t_a,tc_fun(tc_Com_Ostate,tc_bool),tc_fun(tc_Com_Ostate,tc_bool)),hAPP(hAPP(c_COMBB(tc_bool,tc_bool,tc_Com_Ostate),c_Not),v_b)),t_a)),c_Orderings_Obot__class_Obot(tc_fun(tc_Hoare__Mirabelle_Otriple(t_a),tc_bool))),t_a),
file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/tmp/tmp.ghYwmWNuoP/E---3.1_18356.p',cls_conjecture_0) ).
cnf(cls_bot1E_0,axiom,
~ hBOOL(hAPP(c_Orderings_Obot__class_Obot(tc_fun(X1,tc_bool)),X2)),
file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/tmp/tmp.ghYwmWNuoP/E---3.1_18356.p',cls_bot1E_0) ).
cnf(cls_escape_0,axiom,
( c_Hoare__Mirabelle_Ohoare__derivs(X1,hAPP(hAPP(c_Set_Oinsert(tc_Hoare__Mirabelle_Otriple(t_a)),c_Hoare__Mirabelle_Otriple_Otriple(X2,X3,X4,t_a)),c_Orderings_Obot__class_Obot(tc_fun(tc_Hoare__Mirabelle_Otriple(t_a),tc_bool))),t_a)
| hBOOL(hAPP(hAPP(X2,v_sko__Hoare__Mirabelle__Xescape__1(X1,X2,X4,X3)),v_sko__Hoare__Mirabelle__Xescape__2(X1,X2,X4,X3))) ),
file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/tmp/tmp.ghYwmWNuoP/E---3.1_18356.p',cls_escape_0) ).
cnf(c_0_6,axiom,
c_Orderings_Obot__class_Obot(tc_fun(X1,tc_bool)) = c_Collect(c_COMBK(c_False,tc_bool,X1),X1),
cls_empty__def_0 ).
cnf(c_0_7,axiom,
c_Collect(X1,X2) = X1,
cls_Collect__def_0 ).
cnf(c_0_8,axiom,
hAPP(c_COMBK(X1,X2,X3),X4) = X1,
cls_COMBK__def_0 ).
cnf(c_0_9,plain,
c_Orderings_Obot__class_Obot(tc_fun(X1,tc_bool)) = c_COMBK(c_False,tc_bool,X1),
inference(rw,[status(thm)],[c_0_6,c_0_7]) ).
cnf(c_0_10,negated_conjecture,
~ c_Hoare__Mirabelle_Ohoare__derivs(v_G,hAPP(hAPP(c_Set_Oinsert(tc_Hoare__Mirabelle_Otriple(t_a)),c_Hoare__Mirabelle_Otriple_Otriple(c_COMBK(c_COMBK(c_False,tc_bool,tc_Com_Ostate),tc_fun(tc_Com_Ostate,tc_bool),t_a),v_c,hAPP(c_COMBC(hAPP(hAPP(c_COMBB(tc_fun(tc_Com_Ostate,tc_fun(tc_bool,tc_bool)),tc_fun(tc_fun(tc_Com_Ostate,tc_bool),tc_fun(tc_Com_Ostate,tc_bool)),t_a),c_COMBS(tc_Com_Ostate,tc_bool,tc_bool)),hAPP(hAPP(c_COMBB(tc_fun(tc_Com_Ostate,tc_bool),tc_fun(tc_Com_Ostate,tc_fun(tc_bool,tc_bool)),t_a),hAPP(c_COMBB(tc_bool,tc_fun(tc_bool,tc_bool),tc_Com_Ostate),c_and)),v_P)),t_a,tc_fun(tc_Com_Ostate,tc_bool),tc_fun(tc_Com_Ostate,tc_bool)),hAPP(hAPP(c_COMBB(tc_bool,tc_bool,tc_Com_Ostate),c_Not),v_b)),t_a)),c_Orderings_Obot__class_Obot(tc_fun(tc_Hoare__Mirabelle_Otriple(t_a),tc_bool))),t_a),
cls_conjecture_0 ).
cnf(c_0_11,axiom,
~ hBOOL(hAPP(c_Orderings_Obot__class_Obot(tc_fun(X1,tc_bool)),X2)),
cls_bot1E_0 ).
cnf(c_0_12,plain,
hAPP(c_Orderings_Obot__class_Obot(tc_fun(X1,tc_bool)),X2) = c_False,
inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_8,c_0_9]) ).
cnf(c_0_13,negated_conjecture,
~ c_Hoare__Mirabelle_Ohoare__derivs(v_G,hAPP(hAPP(c_Set_Oinsert(tc_Hoare__Mirabelle_Otriple(t_a)),c_Hoare__Mirabelle_Otriple_Otriple(c_COMBK(c_Orderings_Obot__class_Obot(tc_fun(tc_Com_Ostate,tc_bool)),tc_fun(tc_Com_Ostate,tc_bool),t_a),v_c,hAPP(c_COMBC(hAPP(hAPP(c_COMBB(tc_fun(tc_Com_Ostate,tc_fun(tc_bool,tc_bool)),tc_fun(tc_fun(tc_Com_Ostate,tc_bool),tc_fun(tc_Com_Ostate,tc_bool)),t_a),c_COMBS(tc_Com_Ostate,tc_bool,tc_bool)),hAPP(hAPP(c_COMBB(tc_fun(tc_Com_Ostate,tc_bool),tc_fun(tc_Com_Ostate,tc_fun(tc_bool,tc_bool)),t_a),hAPP(c_COMBB(tc_bool,tc_fun(tc_bool,tc_bool),tc_Com_Ostate),c_and)),v_P)),t_a,tc_fun(tc_Com_Ostate,tc_bool),tc_fun(tc_Com_Ostate,tc_bool)),hAPP(hAPP(c_COMBB(tc_bool,tc_bool,tc_Com_Ostate),c_Not),v_b)),t_a)),c_Orderings_Obot__class_Obot(tc_fun(tc_Hoare__Mirabelle_Otriple(t_a),tc_bool))),t_a),
inference(rw,[status(thm)],[c_0_10,c_0_9]) ).
cnf(c_0_14,axiom,
( c_Hoare__Mirabelle_Ohoare__derivs(X1,hAPP(hAPP(c_Set_Oinsert(tc_Hoare__Mirabelle_Otriple(t_a)),c_Hoare__Mirabelle_Otriple_Otriple(X2,X3,X4,t_a)),c_Orderings_Obot__class_Obot(tc_fun(tc_Hoare__Mirabelle_Otriple(t_a),tc_bool))),t_a)
| hBOOL(hAPP(hAPP(X2,v_sko__Hoare__Mirabelle__Xescape__1(X1,X2,X4,X3)),v_sko__Hoare__Mirabelle__Xescape__2(X1,X2,X4,X3))) ),
cls_escape_0 ).
cnf(c_0_15,plain,
~ hBOOL(c_False),
inference(rw,[status(thm)],[c_0_11,c_0_12]) ).
cnf(c_0_16,negated_conjecture,
$false,
inference(sr,[status(thm)],[inference(rw,[status(thm)],[inference(rw,[status(thm)],[inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_13,c_0_14]),c_0_8]),c_0_12]),c_0_15]),
[proof] ).
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
%----ORIGINAL SYSTEM OUTPUT
% 0.00/0.09 % Problem : SWV834-1 : TPTP v8.1.2. Released v4.1.0.
% 0.08/0.09 % Command : run_E %s %d THM
% 0.08/0.29 % Computer : n001.cluster.edu
% 0.08/0.29 % Model : x86_64 x86_64
% 0.08/0.29 % CPU : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 @ 2.10GHz
% 0.08/0.29 % Memory : 8042.1875MB
% 0.08/0.29 % OS : Linux 3.10.0-693.el7.x86_64
% 0.08/0.29 % CPULimit : 2400
% 0.08/0.29 % WCLimit : 300
% 0.08/0.29 % DateTime : Tue Oct 3 04:16:37 EDT 2023
% 0.08/0.29 % CPUTime :
% 0.13/0.44 Running first-order model finding
% 0.13/0.44 Running: /export/starexec/sandbox2/solver/bin/eprover --delete-bad-limit=2000000000 --definitional-cnf=24 -s --print-statistics -R --print-version --proof-object --satauto-schedule=8 --cpu-limit=300 /export/starexec/sandbox2/tmp/tmp.ghYwmWNuoP/E---3.1_18356.p
% 731.64/94.29 # Version: 3.1pre001
% 731.64/94.29 # Preprocessing class: FSLMSMSMSSSNFFN.
% 731.64/94.29 # Scheduled 4 strats onto 8 cores with 300 seconds (2400 total)
% 731.64/94.29 # Starting G-E--_207_C18_F1_AE_CS_SP_PI_PS_S2S with 1200s (4) cores
% 731.64/94.29 # Starting new_bool_3 with 600s (2) cores
% 731.64/94.29 # Starting new_bool_1 with 300s (1) cores
% 731.64/94.29 # Starting sh5l with 300s (1) cores
% 731.64/94.29 # G-E--_207_C18_F1_AE_CS_SP_PI_PS_S2S with pid 18433 completed with status 0
% 731.64/94.29 # Result found by G-E--_207_C18_F1_AE_CS_SP_PI_PS_S2S
% 731.64/94.29 # Preprocessing class: FSLMSMSMSSSNFFN.
% 731.64/94.29 # Scheduled 4 strats onto 8 cores with 300 seconds (2400 total)
% 731.64/94.29 # Starting G-E--_207_C18_F1_AE_CS_SP_PI_PS_S2S with 1200s (4) cores
% 731.64/94.29 # No SInE strategy applied
% 731.64/94.29 # Search class: FGHSM-FSLM32-DFFFFFNN
% 731.64/94.29 # Scheduled 13 strats onto 4 cores with 1200 seconds (1200 total)
% 731.64/94.29 # Starting G-E--_301_C18_F1_URBAN_S5PRR_S0Y with 90s (1) cores
% 731.64/94.29 # Starting G-E--_207_C18_F1_AE_CS_SP_PI_PS_S2S with 121s (1) cores
% 731.64/94.29 # Starting G-E--_300_C18_F1_SE_CS_SP_PS_S0Y with 90s (1) cores
% 731.64/94.29 # Starting U----_206c_05_B11_00_F1_SE_PI_CS_SP_PS_S5PRR_RG_S04AN with 90s (1) cores
% 731.64/94.29 # G-E--_300_C18_F1_SE_CS_SP_PS_S0Y with pid 18443 completed with status 7
% 731.64/94.29 # Starting G-E--_208_B07_F1_AE_CS_SP_PS_S5PRR_S0Y with 90s (1) cores
% 731.64/94.29 # G-E--_301_C18_F1_URBAN_S5PRR_S0Y with pid 18441 completed with status 7
% 731.64/94.29 # Starting G-E--_208_C18_F1_SE_CS_SP_PS_S5PRR_S059I with 90s (1) cores
% 731.64/94.29 # U----_206c_05_B11_00_F1_SE_PI_CS_SP_PS_S5PRR_RG_S04AN with pid 18444 completed with status 7
% 731.64/94.29 # Starting U----_206d_02_B11_00_F1_SE_PI_CS_SP_PS_S5PRR_RG_S04AN with 90s (1) cores
% 731.64/94.29 # G-E--_208_C18_F1_SE_CS_SP_PS_S5PRR_S059I with pid 18486 completed with status 0
% 731.64/94.29 # Result found by G-E--_208_C18_F1_SE_CS_SP_PS_S5PRR_S059I
% 731.64/94.29 # Preprocessing class: FSLMSMSMSSSNFFN.
% 731.64/94.29 # Scheduled 4 strats onto 8 cores with 300 seconds (2400 total)
% 731.64/94.29 # Starting G-E--_207_C18_F1_AE_CS_SP_PI_PS_S2S with 1200s (4) cores
% 731.64/94.29 # No SInE strategy applied
% 731.64/94.29 # Search class: FGHSM-FSLM32-DFFFFFNN
% 731.64/94.29 # Scheduled 13 strats onto 4 cores with 1200 seconds (1200 total)
% 731.64/94.29 # Starting G-E--_301_C18_F1_URBAN_S5PRR_S0Y with 90s (1) cores
% 731.64/94.29 # Starting G-E--_207_C18_F1_AE_CS_SP_PI_PS_S2S with 121s (1) cores
% 731.64/94.29 # Starting G-E--_300_C18_F1_SE_CS_SP_PS_S0Y with 90s (1) cores
% 731.64/94.29 # Starting U----_206c_05_B11_00_F1_SE_PI_CS_SP_PS_S5PRR_RG_S04AN with 90s (1) cores
% 731.64/94.29 # G-E--_300_C18_F1_SE_CS_SP_PS_S0Y with pid 18443 completed with status 7
% 731.64/94.29 # Starting G-E--_208_B07_F1_AE_CS_SP_PS_S5PRR_S0Y with 90s (1) cores
% 731.64/94.29 # G-E--_301_C18_F1_URBAN_S5PRR_S0Y with pid 18441 completed with status 7
% 731.64/94.29 # Starting G-E--_208_C18_F1_SE_CS_SP_PS_S5PRR_S059I with 90s (1) cores
% 731.64/94.29 # Preprocessing time : 0.008 s
% 731.64/94.29 # Presaturation interreduction done
% 731.64/94.29
% 731.64/94.29 # Proof found!
% 731.64/94.29 # SZS status Unsatisfiable
% 731.64/94.29 # SZS output start CNFRefutation
% See solution above
% 731.64/94.29 # Parsed axioms : 644
% 731.64/94.29 # Removed by relevancy pruning/SinE : 0
% 731.64/94.29 # Initial clauses : 644
% 731.64/94.29 # Removed in clause preprocessing : 3
% 731.64/94.29 # Initial clauses in saturation : 641
% 731.64/94.29 # Processed clauses : 3141
% 731.64/94.29 # ...of these trivial : 55
% 731.64/94.29 # ...subsumed : 1500
% 731.64/94.29 # ...remaining for further processing : 1586
% 731.64/94.29 # Other redundant clauses eliminated : 691
% 731.64/94.29 # Clauses deleted for lack of memory : 0
% 731.64/94.29 # Backward-subsumed : 53
% 731.64/94.29 # Backward-rewritten : 38
% 731.64/94.29 # Generated clauses : 22146
% 731.64/94.29 # ...of the previous two non-redundant : 19452
% 731.64/94.29 # ...aggressively subsumed : 0
% 731.64/94.29 # Contextual simplify-reflections : 0
% 731.64/94.29 # Paramodulations : 21435
% 731.64/94.29 # Factorizations : 3
% 731.64/94.29 # NegExts : 0
% 731.64/94.29 # Equation resolutions : 708
% 731.64/94.29 # Total rewrite steps : 5534
% 731.64/94.29 # Propositional unsat checks : 0
% 731.64/94.29 # Propositional check models : 0
% 731.64/94.29 # Propositional check unsatisfiable : 0
% 731.64/94.29 # Propositional clauses : 0
% 731.64/94.29 # Propositional clauses after purity: 0
% 731.64/94.29 # Propositional unsat core size : 0
% 731.64/94.29 # Propositional preprocessing time : 0.000
% 731.64/94.29 # Propositional encoding time : 0.000
% 731.64/94.29 # Propositional solver time : 0.000
% 731.64/94.29 # Success case prop preproc time : 0.000
% 731.64/94.29 # Success case prop encoding time : 0.000
% 731.64/94.29 # Success case prop solver time : 0.000
% 731.64/94.29 # Current number of processed clauses : 983
% 731.64/94.29 # Positive orientable unit clauses : 201
% 731.64/94.29 # Positive unorientable unit clauses: 18
% 731.64/94.29 # Negative unit clauses : 123
% 731.64/94.29 # Non-unit-clauses : 641
% 731.64/94.29 # Current number of unprocessed clauses: 16795
% 731.64/94.29 # ...number of literals in the above : 43117
% 731.64/94.29 # Current number of archived formulas : 0
% 731.64/94.29 # Current number of archived clauses : 604
% 731.64/94.29 # Clause-clause subsumption calls (NU) : 90882
% 731.64/94.29 # Rec. Clause-clause subsumption calls : 56345
% 731.64/94.29 # Non-unit clause-clause subsumptions : 555
% 731.64/94.29 # Unit Clause-clause subsumption calls : 7011
% 731.64/94.29 # Rewrite failures with RHS unbound : 472
% 731.64/94.29 # BW rewrite match attempts : 2568
% 731.64/94.29 # BW rewrite match successes : 246
% 731.64/94.29 # Condensation attempts : 0
% 731.64/94.29 # Condensation successes : 0
% 731.64/94.29 # Termbank termtop insertions : 452286
% 731.64/94.29
% 731.64/94.29 # -------------------------------------------------
% 731.64/94.29 # User time : 266.099 s
% 731.64/94.29 # System time : 4.723 s
% 731.64/94.29 # Total time : 270.822 s
% 731.64/94.29 # Maximum resident set size: 3064 pages
% 731.64/94.29
% 731.64/94.29 # -------------------------------------------------
% 731.64/94.29 # User time : 357.828 s
% 731.64/94.29 # System time : 6.283 s
% 731.64/94.29 # Total time : 364.111 s
% 731.64/94.29 # Maximum resident set size: 2260 pages
% 731.64/94.29 % E---3.1 exiting
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------