TSTP Solution File: SWV817-1 by Otter---3.3

View Problem - Process Solution

%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
% File     : Otter---3.3
% Problem  : SWV817-1 : TPTP v8.1.0. Released v4.1.0.
% Transfm  : none
% Format   : tptp:raw
% Command  : otter-tptp-script %s

% Computer : n011.cluster.edu
% Model    : x86_64 x86_64
% CPU      : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 2.10GHz
% Memory   : 8042.1875MB
% OS       : Linux 3.10.0-693.el7.x86_64
% CPULimit : 300s
% WCLimit  : 300s
% DateTime : Wed Jul 27 13:21:37 EDT 2022

% Result   : Unsatisfiable 1.93s 2.10s
% Output   : Refutation 1.93s
% Verified : 
% SZS Type : Refutation
%            Derivation depth      :    2
%            Number of leaves      :    3
% Syntax   : Number of clauses     :    6 (   4 unt;   0 nHn;   4 RR)
%            Number of literals    :    8 (   4 equ;   4 neg)
%            Maximal clause size   :    2 (   1 avg)
%            Maximal term depth    :    1 (   1 avg)
%            Number of predicates  :    3 (   1 usr;   2 prp; 0-2 aty)
%            Number of functors    :    3 (   3 usr;   3 con; 0-0 aty)
%            Number of variables   :    2 (   2 sgn)

% Comments : 
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
cnf(3,axiom,
    ( v_sko__Hoare__Mirabelle__Xstate__not__singleton__def__1 != v_sko__Hoare__Mirabelle__Xstate__not__singleton__def__2
    | ~ c_Hoare__Mirabelle_Ostate__not__singleton ),
    file('SWV817-1.p',unknown),
    [] ).

cnf(4,plain,
    ( v_sko__Hoare__Mirabelle__Xstate__not__singleton__def__2 != v_sko__Hoare__Mirabelle__Xstate__not__singleton__def__1
    | ~ c_Hoare__Mirabelle_Ostate__not__singleton ),
    inference(flip,[status(thm),theory(equality)],[inference(copy,[status(thm)],[3])]),
    [iquote('copy,3,flip.1')] ).

cnf(9,axiom,
    c_Hoare__Mirabelle_Ostate__not__singleton,
    file('SWV817-1.p',unknown),
    [] ).

cnf(10,axiom,
    A = v_x,
    file('SWV817-1.p',unknown),
    [] ).

cnf(11,plain,
    v_x = A,
    inference(flip,[status(thm),theory(equality)],[inference(copy,[status(thm)],[10])]),
    [iquote('copy,10,flip.1')] ).

cnf(12,plain,
    $false,
    inference(unit_del,[status(thm)],[inference(para_from,[status(thm),theory(equality)],[10,4]),11,9]),
    [iquote('para_from,10.1.1,4.1.1,unit_del,11,9')] ).

%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
%----ORIGINAL SYSTEM OUTPUT
% 0.11/0.12  % Problem  : SWV817-1 : TPTP v8.1.0. Released v4.1.0.
% 0.11/0.12  % Command  : otter-tptp-script %s
% 0.12/0.33  % Computer : n011.cluster.edu
% 0.12/0.33  % Model    : x86_64 x86_64
% 0.12/0.33  % CPU      : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 @ 2.10GHz
% 0.12/0.33  % Memory   : 8042.1875MB
% 0.12/0.33  % OS       : Linux 3.10.0-693.el7.x86_64
% 0.12/0.33  % CPULimit : 300
% 0.12/0.33  % WCLimit  : 300
% 0.12/0.33  % DateTime : Wed Jul 27 06:01:55 EDT 2022
% 0.12/0.33  % CPUTime  : 
% 1.93/2.10  ----- Otter 3.3f, August 2004 -----
% 1.93/2.10  The process was started by sandbox2 on n011.cluster.edu,
% 1.93/2.10  Wed Jul 27 06:01:55 2022
% 1.93/2.10  The command was "./otter".  The process ID is 28825.
% 1.93/2.10  
% 1.93/2.10  set(prolog_style_variables).
% 1.93/2.10  set(auto).
% 1.93/2.10     dependent: set(auto1).
% 1.93/2.10     dependent: set(process_input).
% 1.93/2.10     dependent: clear(print_kept).
% 1.93/2.10     dependent: clear(print_new_demod).
% 1.93/2.10     dependent: clear(print_back_demod).
% 1.93/2.10     dependent: clear(print_back_sub).
% 1.93/2.10     dependent: set(control_memory).
% 1.93/2.10     dependent: assign(max_mem, 12000).
% 1.93/2.10     dependent: assign(pick_given_ratio, 4).
% 1.93/2.10     dependent: assign(stats_level, 1).
% 1.93/2.10     dependent: assign(max_seconds, 10800).
% 1.93/2.10  clear(print_given).
% 1.93/2.10  
% 1.93/2.10  list(usable).
% 1.93/2.10  0 [] A=A.
% 1.93/2.10  0 [] c_Fun_Oid(V_x,T_a)=V_x.
% 1.93/2.10  0 [] c_Fun_Oid(v_x,t_a)=v_x.
% 1.93/2.10  0 [] v_sko__Hoare__Mirabelle__Xstate__not__singleton__def__raw__1!=v_sko__Hoare__Mirabelle__Xstate__not__singleton__def__raw__2| -c_Hoare__Mirabelle_Ostate__not__singleton.
% 1.93/2.10  0 [] c_Hoare__Mirabelle_Ostate__not__singleton|V_x=V_xa.
% 1.93/2.10  0 [] v_sko__Hoare__Mirabelle__Xstate__not__singleton__def__1!=v_sko__Hoare__Mirabelle__Xstate__not__singleton__def__2| -c_Hoare__Mirabelle_Ostate__not__singleton.
% 1.93/2.10  0 [] c_Hoare__Mirabelle_Ostate__not__singleton.
% 1.93/2.10  0 [] V_s=v_x.
% 1.93/2.10  end_of_list.
% 1.93/2.10  
% 1.93/2.10  SCAN INPUT: prop=0, horn=0, equality=1, symmetry=0, max_lits=2.
% 1.93/2.10  
% 1.93/2.10  This ia a non-Horn set with equality.  The strategy will be
% 1.93/2.10  Knuth-Bendix, ordered hyper_res, factoring, and unit
% 1.93/2.10  deletion, with positive clauses in sos and nonpositive
% 1.93/2.10  clauses in usable.
% 1.93/2.10  
% 1.93/2.10     dependent: set(knuth_bendix).
% 1.93/2.10     dependent: set(anl_eq).
% 1.93/2.10     dependent: set(para_from).
% 1.93/2.10     dependent: set(para_into).
% 1.93/2.10     dependent: clear(para_from_right).
% 1.93/2.10     dependent: clear(para_into_right).
% 1.93/2.10     dependent: set(para_from_vars).
% 1.93/2.10     dependent: set(eq_units_both_ways).
% 1.93/2.10     dependent: set(dynamic_demod_all).
% 1.93/2.10     dependent: set(dynamic_demod).
% 1.93/2.10     dependent: set(order_eq).
% 1.93/2.10     dependent: set(back_demod).
% 1.93/2.10     dependent: set(lrpo).
% 1.93/2.10     dependent: set(hyper_res).
% 1.93/2.10     dependent: set(unit_deletion).
% 1.93/2.10     dependent: set(factor).
% 1.93/2.10  
% 1.93/2.10  ------------> process usable:
% 1.93/2.10  ** KEPT (pick-wt=4): 2 [copy,1,flip.1] v_sko__Hoare__Mirabelle__Xstate__not__singleton__def__raw__2!=v_sko__Hoare__Mirabelle__Xstate__not__singleton__def__raw__1| -c_Hoare__Mirabelle_Ostate__not__singleton.
% 1.93/2.10  ** KEPT (pick-wt=4): 4 [copy,3,flip.1] v_sko__Hoare__Mirabelle__Xstate__not__singleton__def__2!=v_sko__Hoare__Mirabelle__Xstate__not__singleton__def__1| -c_Hoare__Mirabelle_Ostate__not__singleton.
% 1.93/2.10  
% 1.93/2.10  ------------> process sos:
% 1.93/2.10  ** KEPT (pick-wt=3): 5 [] A=A.
% 1.93/2.10  ** KEPT (pick-wt=5): 6 [] c_Fun_Oid(A,B)=A.
% 1.93/2.10  ---> New Demodulator: 7 [new_demod,6] c_Fun_Oid(A,B)=A.
% 1.93/2.10    Following clause subsumed by 5 during input processing: 0 [demod,7] v_x=v_x.
% 1.93/2.10  ** KEPT (pick-wt=4): 8 [] c_Hoare__Mirabelle_Ostate__not__singleton|A=B.
% 1.93/2.10  ** KEPT (pick-wt=1): 9 [] c_Hoare__Mirabelle_Ostate__not__singleton.
% 1.93/2.10  ** KEPT (pick-wt=3): 10 [] A=v_x.
% 1.93/2.10    Following clause subsumed by 5 during input processing: 0 [copy,5,flip.1] A=A.
% 1.93/2.10  >>>> Starting back demodulation with 7.
% 1.93/2.10  9 back subsumes 8.
% 1.93/2.10  ** KEPT (pick-wt=3): 11 [copy,10,flip.1] v_x=A.
% 1.93/2.10    Following clause subsumed by 10 during input processing: 0 [copy,11,flip.1] A=v_x.
% 1.93/2.10  
% 1.93/2.10  ======= end of input processing =======
% 1.93/2.10  
% 1.93/2.10  =========== start of search ===========
% 1.93/2.10  
% 1.93/2.10  -------- PROOF -------- 
% 1.93/2.10  
% 1.93/2.10  -----> EMPTY CLAUSE at   0.00 sec ----> 12 [para_from,10.1.1,4.1.1,unit_del,11,9] $F.
% 1.93/2.10  
% 1.93/2.10  Length of proof is 2.  Level of proof is 1.
% 1.93/2.10  
% 1.93/2.10  ---------------- PROOF ----------------
% 1.93/2.10  % SZS status Unsatisfiable
% 1.93/2.10  % SZS output start Refutation
% See solution above
% 1.93/2.10  ------------ end of proof -------------
% 1.93/2.10  
% 1.93/2.10  
% 1.93/2.10  Search stopped by max_proofs option.
% 1.93/2.10  
% 1.93/2.10  
% 1.93/2.10  Search stopped by max_proofs option.
% 1.93/2.10  
% 1.93/2.10  ============ end of search ============
% 1.93/2.10  
% 1.93/2.10  -------------- statistics -------------
% 1.93/2.10  clauses given                  3
% 1.93/2.10  clauses generated              1
% 1.93/2.10  clauses kept                   8
% 1.93/2.10  clauses forward subsumed       3
% 1.93/2.10  clauses back subsumed          1
% 1.93/2.10  Kbytes malloced              976
% 1.93/2.10  
% 1.93/2.10  ----------- times (seconds) -----------
% 1.93/2.10  user CPU time          0.00          (0 hr, 0 min, 0 sec)
% 1.93/2.10  system CPU time        0.00          (0 hr, 0 min, 0 sec)
% 1.93/2.10  wall-clock time        2             (0 hr, 0 min, 2 sec)
% 1.93/2.10  
% 1.93/2.10  That finishes the proof of the theorem.
% 1.93/2.10  
% 1.93/2.10  Process 28825 finished Wed Jul 27 06:01:57 2022
% 1.93/2.10  Otter interrupted
% 1.93/2.10  PROOF FOUND
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------