TSTP Solution File: SWV812-1 by E---3.1.00

View Problem - Process Solution

%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
% File     : E---3.1.00
% Problem  : SWV812-1 : TPTP v8.1.2. Released v4.1.0.
% Transfm  : none
% Format   : tptp:raw
% Command  : run_E %s %d THM

% Computer : n018.cluster.edu
% Model    : x86_64 x86_64
% CPU      : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 2.10GHz
% Memory   : 8042.1875MB
% OS       : Linux 3.10.0-693.el7.x86_64
% CPULimit : 300s
% WCLimit  : 300s
% DateTime : Sat May  4 09:51:09 EDT 2024

% Result   : Unsatisfiable 0.39s 0.65s
% Output   : CNFRefutation 0.39s
% Verified : 
% SZS Type : Refutation
%            Derivation depth      :    4
%            Number of leaves      :    3
% Syntax   : Number of clauses     :    9 (   9 unt;   0 nHn;   9 RR)
%            Number of literals    :    9 (   2 equ;   4 neg)
%            Maximal clause size   :    1 (   1 avg)
%            Maximal term depth    :    1 (   1 avg)
%            Number of predicates  :    3 (   1 usr;   1 prp; 0-3 aty)
%            Number of functors    :    4 (   4 usr;   4 con; 0-0 aty)
%            Number of variables   :    0 (   0 sgn)

% Comments : 
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
cnf(cls_conjecture_0,negated_conjecture,
    ~ c_in(v_A,c_Event_Obad,tc_Message_Oagent),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox/tmp/tmp.jW6FD0UH7Z/E---3.1_12997.p',cls_conjecture_0) ).

cnf(cls_conjecture_5,negated_conjecture,
    v_A = c_Message_Oagent_OSpy,
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox/tmp/tmp.jW6FD0UH7Z/E---3.1_12997.p',cls_conjecture_5) ).

cnf(cls_Spy__in__bad_0,axiom,
    c_in(c_Message_Oagent_OSpy,c_Event_Obad,tc_Message_Oagent),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox/tmp/tmp.jW6FD0UH7Z/E---3.1_12997.p',cls_Spy__in__bad_0) ).

cnf(c_0_3,negated_conjecture,
    ~ c_in(v_A,c_Event_Obad,tc_Message_Oagent),
    inference(fof_simplification,[status(thm)],[cls_conjecture_0]) ).

cnf(c_0_4,negated_conjecture,
    ~ c_in(v_A,c_Event_Obad,tc_Message_Oagent),
    c_0_3 ).

cnf(c_0_5,negated_conjecture,
    v_A = c_Message_Oagent_OSpy,
    cls_conjecture_5 ).

cnf(c_0_6,axiom,
    c_in(c_Message_Oagent_OSpy,c_Event_Obad,tc_Message_Oagent),
    cls_Spy__in__bad_0 ).

cnf(c_0_7,negated_conjecture,
    ~ c_in(c_Message_Oagent_OSpy,c_Event_Obad,tc_Message_Oagent),
    inference(rw,[status(thm)],[c_0_4,c_0_5]) ).

cnf(c_0_8,plain,
    $false,
    inference(sr,[status(thm)],[c_0_6,c_0_7]),
    [proof] ).

%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
%----ORIGINAL SYSTEM OUTPUT
% 0.17/0.18  % Problem    : SWV812-1 : TPTP v8.1.2. Released v4.1.0.
% 0.17/0.19  % Command    : run_E %s %d THM
% 0.19/0.40  % Computer : n018.cluster.edu
% 0.19/0.40  % Model    : x86_64 x86_64
% 0.19/0.40  % CPU      : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 @ 2.10GHz
% 0.19/0.40  % Memory   : 8042.1875MB
% 0.19/0.40  % OS       : Linux 3.10.0-693.el7.x86_64
% 0.19/0.40  % CPULimit   : 300
% 0.19/0.40  % WCLimit    : 300
% 0.19/0.40  % DateTime   : Fri May  3 16:49:53 EDT 2024
% 0.19/0.40  % CPUTime    : 
% 0.39/0.60  Running first-order theorem proving
% 0.39/0.60  Running: /export/starexec/sandbox/solver/bin/eprover --delete-bad-limit=2000000000 --definitional-cnf=24 -s --print-statistics -R --print-version --proof-object --auto-schedule=8 --cpu-limit=300 /export/starexec/sandbox/tmp/tmp.jW6FD0UH7Z/E---3.1_12997.p
% 0.39/0.65  # Version: 3.1.0
% 0.39/0.65  # Preprocessing class: FSLSSMSMSSSNFFN.
% 0.39/0.65  # Scheduled 4 strats onto 8 cores with 300 seconds (2400 total)
% 0.39/0.65  # Starting C07_19_nc_SOS_SAT001_MinMin_p005000_rr with 1500s (5) cores
% 0.39/0.65  # Starting new_bool_3 with 300s (1) cores
% 0.39/0.65  # Starting new_bool_1 with 300s (1) cores
% 0.39/0.65  # Starting sh5l with 300s (1) cores
% 0.39/0.65  # C07_19_nc_SOS_SAT001_MinMin_p005000_rr with pid 13084 completed with status 0
% 0.39/0.65  # Result found by C07_19_nc_SOS_SAT001_MinMin_p005000_rr
% 0.39/0.65  # Preprocessing class: FSLSSMSMSSSNFFN.
% 0.39/0.65  # Scheduled 4 strats onto 8 cores with 300 seconds (2400 total)
% 0.39/0.65  # Starting C07_19_nc_SOS_SAT001_MinMin_p005000_rr with 1500s (5) cores
% 0.39/0.65  # No SInE strategy applied
% 0.39/0.65  # Search class: FGHSM-FSLM32-DFFFFFNN
% 0.39/0.65  # Scheduled 13 strats onto 5 cores with 1500 seconds (1500 total)
% 0.39/0.65  # Starting G-E--_301_C18_F1_URBAN_S5PRR_S0Y with 113s (1) cores
% 0.39/0.65  # Starting C07_19_nc_SOS_SAT001_MinMin_p005000_rr with 151s (1) cores
% 0.39/0.65  # Starting G-E--_300_C18_F1_SE_CS_SP_PS_S0Y with 113s (1) cores
% 0.39/0.65  # Starting U----_206c_05_B11_00_F1_SE_PI_CS_SP_PS_S5PRR_RG_S04AN with 113s (1) cores
% 0.39/0.65  # Starting G-E--_208_B07_F1_AE_CS_SP_PS_S5PRR_S0Y with 113s (1) cores
% 0.39/0.65  # G-E--_208_B07_F1_AE_CS_SP_PS_S5PRR_S0Y with pid 13095 completed with status 0
% 0.39/0.65  # Result found by G-E--_208_B07_F1_AE_CS_SP_PS_S5PRR_S0Y
% 0.39/0.65  # Preprocessing class: FSLSSMSMSSSNFFN.
% 0.39/0.65  # Scheduled 4 strats onto 8 cores with 300 seconds (2400 total)
% 0.39/0.65  # Starting C07_19_nc_SOS_SAT001_MinMin_p005000_rr with 1500s (5) cores
% 0.39/0.65  # No SInE strategy applied
% 0.39/0.65  # Search class: FGHSM-FSLM32-DFFFFFNN
% 0.39/0.65  # Scheduled 13 strats onto 5 cores with 1500 seconds (1500 total)
% 0.39/0.65  # Starting G-E--_301_C18_F1_URBAN_S5PRR_S0Y with 113s (1) cores
% 0.39/0.65  # Starting C07_19_nc_SOS_SAT001_MinMin_p005000_rr with 151s (1) cores
% 0.39/0.65  # Starting G-E--_300_C18_F1_SE_CS_SP_PS_S0Y with 113s (1) cores
% 0.39/0.65  # Starting U----_206c_05_B11_00_F1_SE_PI_CS_SP_PS_S5PRR_RG_S04AN with 113s (1) cores
% 0.39/0.65  # Starting G-E--_208_B07_F1_AE_CS_SP_PS_S5PRR_S0Y with 113s (1) cores
% 0.39/0.65  # Preprocessing time       : 0.008 s
% 0.39/0.65  # Presaturation interreduction done
% 0.39/0.65  
% 0.39/0.65  # Proof found!
% 0.39/0.65  # SZS status Unsatisfiable
% 0.39/0.65  # SZS output start CNFRefutation
% See solution above
% 0.39/0.65  # Parsed axioms                        : 581
% 0.39/0.65  # Removed by relevancy pruning/SinE    : 0
% 0.39/0.65  # Initial clauses                      : 581
% 0.39/0.65  # Removed in clause preprocessing      : 0
% 0.39/0.65  # Initial clauses in saturation        : 581
% 0.39/0.65  # Processed clauses                    : 5
% 0.39/0.65  # ...of these trivial                  : 0
% 0.39/0.65  # ...subsumed                          : 0
% 0.39/0.65  # ...remaining for further processing  : 4
% 0.39/0.65  # Other redundant clauses eliminated   : 0
% 0.39/0.65  # Clauses deleted for lack of memory   : 0
% 0.39/0.65  # Backward-subsumed                    : 0
% 0.39/0.65  # Backward-rewritten                   : 0
% 0.39/0.65  # Generated clauses                    : 0
% 0.39/0.65  # ...of the previous two non-redundant : 0
% 0.39/0.65  # ...aggressively subsumed             : 0
% 0.39/0.65  # Contextual simplify-reflections      : 0
% 0.39/0.65  # Paramodulations                      : 0
% 0.39/0.65  # Factorizations                       : 0
% 0.39/0.65  # NegExts                              : 0
% 0.39/0.65  # Equation resolutions                 : 0
% 0.39/0.65  # Disequality decompositions           : 0
% 0.39/0.65  # Total rewrite steps                  : 1
% 0.39/0.65  # ...of those cached                   : 0
% 0.39/0.65  # Propositional unsat checks           : 0
% 0.39/0.65  #    Propositional check models        : 0
% 0.39/0.65  #    Propositional check unsatisfiable : 0
% 0.39/0.65  #    Propositional clauses             : 0
% 0.39/0.65  #    Propositional clauses after purity: 0
% 0.39/0.65  #    Propositional unsat core size     : 0
% 0.39/0.65  #    Propositional preprocessing time  : 0.000
% 0.39/0.65  #    Propositional encoding time       : 0.000
% 0.39/0.65  #    Propositional solver time         : 0.000
% 0.39/0.65  #    Success case prop preproc time    : 0.000
% 0.39/0.65  #    Success case prop encoding time   : 0.000
% 0.39/0.65  #    Success case prop solver time     : 0.000
% 0.39/0.65  # Current number of processed clauses  : 4
% 0.39/0.65  #    Positive orientable unit clauses  : 2
% 0.39/0.65  #    Positive unorientable unit clauses: 0
% 0.39/0.65  #    Negative unit clauses             : 2
% 0.39/0.65  #    Non-unit-clauses                  : 0
% 0.39/0.65  # Current number of unprocessed clauses: 576
% 0.39/0.65  # ...number of literals in the above   : 1128
% 0.39/0.65  # Current number of archived formulas  : 0
% 0.39/0.65  # Current number of archived clauses   : 0
% 0.39/0.65  # Clause-clause subsumption calls (NU) : 0
% 0.39/0.65  # Rec. Clause-clause subsumption calls : 0
% 0.39/0.65  # Non-unit clause-clause subsumptions  : 0
% 0.39/0.65  # Unit Clause-clause subsumption calls : 0
% 0.39/0.65  # Rewrite failures with RHS unbound    : 0
% 0.39/0.65  # BW rewrite match attempts            : 0
% 0.39/0.65  # BW rewrite match successes           : 0
% 0.39/0.65  # Condensation attempts                : 0
% 0.39/0.65  # Condensation successes               : 0
% 0.39/0.65  # Termbank termtop insertions          : 15255
% 0.39/0.65  # Search garbage collected termcells   : 1023
% 0.39/0.65  
% 0.39/0.65  # -------------------------------------------------
% 0.39/0.65  # User time                : 0.016 s
% 0.39/0.65  # System time              : 0.006 s
% 0.39/0.65  # Total time               : 0.022 s
% 0.39/0.65  # Maximum resident set size: 2872 pages
% 0.39/0.65  
% 0.39/0.65  # -------------------------------------------------
% 0.39/0.65  # User time                : 0.065 s
% 0.39/0.65  # System time              : 0.017 s
% 0.39/0.65  # Total time               : 0.082 s
% 0.39/0.65  # Maximum resident set size: 2160 pages
% 0.39/0.65  % E---3.1 exiting
% 0.64/0.65  % E exiting
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------