TSTP Solution File: SWV799-1 by E---3.1
View Problem
- Process Solution
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
% File : E---3.1
% Problem : SWV799-1 : TPTP v8.1.2. Released v4.1.0.
% Transfm : none
% Format : tptp:raw
% Command : run_E %s %d THM
% Computer : n009.cluster.edu
% Model : x86_64 x86_64
% CPU : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 2.10GHz
% Memory : 8042.1875MB
% OS : Linux 3.10.0-693.el7.x86_64
% CPULimit : 2400s
% WCLimit : 300s
% DateTime : Tue Oct 10 19:55:22 EDT 2023
% Result : Unsatisfiable 0.47s 0.53s
% Output : CNFRefutation 0.47s
% Verified :
% SZS Type : Refutation
% Derivation depth : 3
% Number of leaves : 3
% Syntax : Number of clauses : 8 ( 8 unt; 0 nHn; 6 RR)
% Number of literals : 8 ( 2 equ; 2 neg)
% Maximal clause size : 1 ( 1 avg)
% Maximal term depth : 6 ( 2 avg)
% Number of predicates : 3 ( 1 usr; 1 prp; 0-3 aty)
% Number of functors : 19 ( 19 usr; 10 con; 0-2 aty)
% Number of variables : 8 ( 6 sgn)
% Comments :
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
cnf(cls_conjecture_3,negated_conjecture,
c_in(c_Message_Omsg_OCrypt(hAPP(c_Public_OshrK,v_A),c_Message_Omsg_OMPair(c_Message_Omsg_ONonce(v_NA),c_Message_Omsg_OMPair(c_Message_Omsg_OAgent(v_B),c_Message_Omsg_OMPair(hAPP(c_Message_Omsg_OKey,v_K),v_X)))),c_Message_Oparts(c_Event_Oknows(c_Message_Oagent_OSpy,c_List_Olist_ONil(tc_Event_Oevent))),tc_Message_Omsg),
file('/export/starexec/sandbox/tmp/tmp.2LO9kqfqNM/E---3.1_31538.p',cls_conjecture_3) ).
cnf(cls_knows__Nil_0,axiom,
c_Event_Oknows(X1,c_List_Olist_ONil(tc_Event_Oevent)) = c_Event_OinitState(X1),
file('/export/starexec/sandbox/tmp/tmp.2LO9kqfqNM/E---3.1_31538.p',cls_knows__Nil_0) ).
cnf(cls_Crypt__notin__initState_0,axiom,
~ c_in(c_Message_Omsg_OCrypt(X1,X2),c_Message_Oparts(c_Event_OinitState(X3)),tc_Message_Omsg),
file('/export/starexec/sandbox/tmp/tmp.2LO9kqfqNM/E---3.1_31538.p',cls_Crypt__notin__initState_0) ).
cnf(c_0_3,negated_conjecture,
c_in(c_Message_Omsg_OCrypt(hAPP(c_Public_OshrK,v_A),c_Message_Omsg_OMPair(c_Message_Omsg_ONonce(v_NA),c_Message_Omsg_OMPair(c_Message_Omsg_OAgent(v_B),c_Message_Omsg_OMPair(hAPP(c_Message_Omsg_OKey,v_K),v_X)))),c_Message_Oparts(c_Event_Oknows(c_Message_Oagent_OSpy,c_List_Olist_ONil(tc_Event_Oevent))),tc_Message_Omsg),
cls_conjecture_3 ).
cnf(c_0_4,axiom,
c_Event_Oknows(X1,c_List_Olist_ONil(tc_Event_Oevent)) = c_Event_OinitState(X1),
cls_knows__Nil_0 ).
cnf(c_0_5,negated_conjecture,
c_in(c_Message_Omsg_OCrypt(hAPP(c_Public_OshrK,v_A),c_Message_Omsg_OMPair(c_Message_Omsg_ONonce(v_NA),c_Message_Omsg_OMPair(c_Message_Omsg_OAgent(v_B),c_Message_Omsg_OMPair(hAPP(c_Message_Omsg_OKey,v_K),v_X)))),c_Message_Oparts(c_Event_OinitState(c_Message_Oagent_OSpy)),tc_Message_Omsg),
inference(rw,[status(thm)],[c_0_3,c_0_4]) ).
cnf(c_0_6,axiom,
~ c_in(c_Message_Omsg_OCrypt(X1,X2),c_Message_Oparts(c_Event_OinitState(X3)),tc_Message_Omsg),
cls_Crypt__notin__initState_0 ).
cnf(c_0_7,negated_conjecture,
$false,
inference(sr,[status(thm)],[c_0_5,c_0_6]),
[proof] ).
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
%----ORIGINAL SYSTEM OUTPUT
% 0.08/0.13 % Problem : SWV799-1 : TPTP v8.1.2. Released v4.1.0.
% 0.08/0.14 % Command : run_E %s %d THM
% 0.14/0.34 % Computer : n009.cluster.edu
% 0.14/0.34 % Model : x86_64 x86_64
% 0.14/0.34 % CPU : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 @ 2.10GHz
% 0.14/0.34 % Memory : 8042.1875MB
% 0.14/0.34 % OS : Linux 3.10.0-693.el7.x86_64
% 0.14/0.34 % CPULimit : 2400
% 0.14/0.34 % WCLimit : 300
% 0.14/0.34 % DateTime : Tue Oct 3 03:29:59 EDT 2023
% 0.14/0.34 % CPUTime :
% 0.19/0.49 Running first-order theorem proving
% 0.19/0.49 Running: /export/starexec/sandbox/solver/bin/eprover --delete-bad-limit=2000000000 --definitional-cnf=24 -s --print-statistics -R --print-version --proof-object --auto-schedule=8 --cpu-limit=300 /export/starexec/sandbox/tmp/tmp.2LO9kqfqNM/E---3.1_31538.p
% 0.47/0.53 # Version: 3.1pre001
% 0.47/0.53 # Preprocessing class: FSLSSMSMSSSNFFN.
% 0.47/0.53 # Scheduled 4 strats onto 8 cores with 300 seconds (2400 total)
% 0.47/0.53 # Starting C07_19_nc_SOS_SAT001_MinMin_p005000_rr with 1500s (5) cores
% 0.47/0.53 # Starting new_bool_3 with 300s (1) cores
% 0.47/0.53 # Starting new_bool_1 with 300s (1) cores
% 0.47/0.53 # Starting sh5l with 300s (1) cores
% 0.47/0.53 # sh5l with pid 31619 completed with status 0
% 0.47/0.53 # Result found by sh5l
% 0.47/0.53 # Preprocessing class: FSLSSMSMSSSNFFN.
% 0.47/0.53 # Scheduled 4 strats onto 8 cores with 300 seconds (2400 total)
% 0.47/0.53 # Starting C07_19_nc_SOS_SAT001_MinMin_p005000_rr with 1500s (5) cores
% 0.47/0.53 # Starting new_bool_3 with 300s (1) cores
% 0.47/0.53 # Starting new_bool_1 with 300s (1) cores
% 0.47/0.53 # Starting sh5l with 300s (1) cores
% 0.47/0.53 # SinE strategy is gf500_gu_R04_F100_L20000
% 0.47/0.53 # Search class: FGHSM-FSLM31-DFFFFFNN
% 0.47/0.53 # Scheduled 6 strats onto 1 cores with 300 seconds (300 total)
% 0.47/0.53 # Starting G-E--_208_C18C--_F1_SE_CS_SP_PS_S5PRR_RG_S04AN with 136s (1) cores
% 0.47/0.53 # G-E--_208_C18C--_F1_SE_CS_SP_PS_S5PRR_RG_S04AN with pid 31622 completed with status 0
% 0.47/0.53 # Result found by G-E--_208_C18C--_F1_SE_CS_SP_PS_S5PRR_RG_S04AN
% 0.47/0.53 # Preprocessing class: FSLSSMSMSSSNFFN.
% 0.47/0.53 # Scheduled 4 strats onto 8 cores with 300 seconds (2400 total)
% 0.47/0.53 # Starting C07_19_nc_SOS_SAT001_MinMin_p005000_rr with 1500s (5) cores
% 0.47/0.53 # Starting new_bool_3 with 300s (1) cores
% 0.47/0.53 # Starting new_bool_1 with 300s (1) cores
% 0.47/0.53 # Starting sh5l with 300s (1) cores
% 0.47/0.53 # SinE strategy is gf500_gu_R04_F100_L20000
% 0.47/0.53 # Search class: FGHSM-FSLM31-DFFFFFNN
% 0.47/0.53 # Scheduled 6 strats onto 1 cores with 300 seconds (300 total)
% 0.47/0.53 # Starting G-E--_208_C18C--_F1_SE_CS_SP_PS_S5PRR_RG_S04AN with 136s (1) cores
% 0.47/0.53 # Preprocessing time : 0.007 s
% 0.47/0.53 # Presaturation interreduction done
% 0.47/0.53
% 0.47/0.53 # Proof found!
% 0.47/0.53 # SZS status Unsatisfiable
% 0.47/0.53 # SZS output start CNFRefutation
% See solution above
% 0.47/0.53 # Parsed axioms : 632
% 0.47/0.53 # Removed by relevancy pruning/SinE : 59
% 0.47/0.53 # Initial clauses : 573
% 0.47/0.53 # Removed in clause preprocessing : 0
% 0.47/0.53 # Initial clauses in saturation : 573
% 0.47/0.53 # Processed clauses : 82
% 0.47/0.53 # ...of these trivial : 0
% 0.47/0.53 # ...subsumed : 23
% 0.47/0.53 # ...remaining for further processing : 59
% 0.47/0.53 # Other redundant clauses eliminated : 0
% 0.47/0.53 # Clauses deleted for lack of memory : 0
% 0.47/0.53 # Backward-subsumed : 0
% 0.47/0.53 # Backward-rewritten : 0
% 0.47/0.53 # Generated clauses : 1
% 0.47/0.53 # ...of the previous two non-redundant : 0
% 0.47/0.53 # ...aggressively subsumed : 0
% 0.47/0.53 # Contextual simplify-reflections : 0
% 0.47/0.53 # Paramodulations : 0
% 0.47/0.53 # Factorizations : 0
% 0.47/0.53 # NegExts : 0
% 0.47/0.53 # Equation resolutions : 0
% 0.47/0.53 # Total rewrite steps : 1
% 0.47/0.53 # Propositional unsat checks : 0
% 0.47/0.53 # Propositional check models : 0
% 0.47/0.53 # Propositional check unsatisfiable : 0
% 0.47/0.53 # Propositional clauses : 0
% 0.47/0.53 # Propositional clauses after purity: 0
% 0.47/0.53 # Propositional unsat core size : 0
% 0.47/0.53 # Propositional preprocessing time : 0.000
% 0.47/0.53 # Propositional encoding time : 0.000
% 0.47/0.53 # Propositional solver time : 0.000
% 0.47/0.53 # Success case prop preproc time : 0.000
% 0.47/0.53 # Success case prop encoding time : 0.000
% 0.47/0.53 # Success case prop solver time : 0.000
% 0.47/0.53 # Current number of processed clauses : 58
% 0.47/0.53 # Positive orientable unit clauses : 19
% 0.47/0.53 # Positive unorientable unit clauses: 0
% 0.47/0.53 # Negative unit clauses : 32
% 0.47/0.53 # Non-unit-clauses : 7
% 0.47/0.53 # Current number of unprocessed clauses: 491
% 0.47/0.53 # ...number of literals in the above : 978
% 0.47/0.53 # Current number of archived formulas : 0
% 0.47/0.53 # Current number of archived clauses : 1
% 0.47/0.53 # Clause-clause subsumption calls (NU) : 8
% 0.47/0.53 # Rec. Clause-clause subsumption calls : 5
% 0.47/0.53 # Non-unit clause-clause subsumptions : 0
% 0.47/0.53 # Unit Clause-clause subsumption calls : 137
% 0.47/0.53 # Rewrite failures with RHS unbound : 0
% 0.47/0.53 # BW rewrite match attempts : 0
% 0.47/0.53 # BW rewrite match successes : 0
% 0.47/0.53 # Condensation attempts : 0
% 0.47/0.53 # Condensation successes : 0
% 0.47/0.53 # Termbank termtop insertions : 14531
% 0.47/0.53
% 0.47/0.53 # -------------------------------------------------
% 0.47/0.53 # User time : 0.013 s
% 0.47/0.53 # System time : 0.005 s
% 0.47/0.53 # Total time : 0.018 s
% 0.47/0.53 # Maximum resident set size: 2936 pages
% 0.47/0.53
% 0.47/0.53 # -------------------------------------------------
% 0.47/0.53 # User time : 0.027 s
% 0.47/0.53 # System time : 0.010 s
% 0.47/0.53 # Total time : 0.036 s
% 0.47/0.53 # Maximum resident set size: 2180 pages
% 0.47/0.53 % E---3.1 exiting
% 0.47/0.53 % E---3.1 exiting
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------