TSTP Solution File: SWV772-1 by E---3.1.00
View Problem
- Process Solution
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
% File : E---3.1.00
% Problem : SWV772-1 : TPTP v8.2.0. Released v4.1.0.
% Transfm : none
% Format : tptp:raw
% Command : run_E %s %d THM
% Computer : n025.cluster.edu
% Model : x86_64 x86_64
% CPU : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 2.10GHz
% Memory : 8042.1875MB
% OS : Linux 3.10.0-693.el7.x86_64
% CPULimit : 300s
% WCLimit : 300s
% DateTime : Tue May 21 05:31:57 EDT 2024
% Result : Unsatisfiable 0.20s 0.50s
% Output : CNFRefutation 0.20s
% Verified :
% SZS Type : Refutation
% Derivation depth : 4
% Number of leaves : 3
% Syntax : Number of clauses : 9 ( 9 unt; 0 nHn; 5 RR)
% Number of literals : 9 ( 8 equ; 4 neg)
% Maximal clause size : 1 ( 1 avg)
% Maximal term depth : 5 ( 2 avg)
% Number of predicates : 2 ( 0 usr; 1 prp; 0-2 aty)
% Number of functors : 12 ( 12 usr; 6 con; 0-3 aty)
% Number of variables : 12 ( 4 sgn)
% Comments :
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
cnf(cls_conjecture_0,negated_conjecture,
c_Event_Oknows(c_Message_Oagent_OSpy,c_List_Oappend(c_List_Olist_ONil(tc_Event_Oevent),c_List_Olist_OCons(c_Event_Oevent_OSays(v_A,v_B,v_X),c_List_Olist_ONil(tc_Event_Oevent),tc_Event_Oevent),tc_Event_Oevent)) != c_Set_Oinsert(v_X,c_Event_Oknows(c_Message_Oagent_OSpy,c_List_Olist_ONil(tc_Event_Oevent)),tc_Message_Omsg),
file('/export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',cls_conjecture_0) ).
cnf(cls_self__append__conv2_1,axiom,
X1 = c_List_Oappend(c_List_Olist_ONil(X2),X1,X2),
file('/export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',cls_self__append__conv2_1) ).
cnf(cls_knows__Spy__Says_0,axiom,
c_Event_Oknows(c_Message_Oagent_OSpy,c_List_Olist_OCons(c_Event_Oevent_OSays(X1,X2,X3),X4,tc_Event_Oevent)) = c_Set_Oinsert(X3,c_Event_Oknows(c_Message_Oagent_OSpy,X4),tc_Message_Omsg),
file('/export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',cls_knows__Spy__Says_0) ).
cnf(c_0_3,negated_conjecture,
c_Event_Oknows(c_Message_Oagent_OSpy,c_List_Oappend(c_List_Olist_ONil(tc_Event_Oevent),c_List_Olist_OCons(c_Event_Oevent_OSays(v_A,v_B,v_X),c_List_Olist_ONil(tc_Event_Oevent),tc_Event_Oevent),tc_Event_Oevent)) != c_Set_Oinsert(v_X,c_Event_Oknows(c_Message_Oagent_OSpy,c_List_Olist_ONil(tc_Event_Oevent)),tc_Message_Omsg),
inference(fof_simplification,[status(thm)],[cls_conjecture_0]) ).
cnf(c_0_4,negated_conjecture,
c_Event_Oknows(c_Message_Oagent_OSpy,c_List_Oappend(c_List_Olist_ONil(tc_Event_Oevent),c_List_Olist_OCons(c_Event_Oevent_OSays(v_A,v_B,v_X),c_List_Olist_ONil(tc_Event_Oevent),tc_Event_Oevent),tc_Event_Oevent)) != c_Set_Oinsert(v_X,c_Event_Oknows(c_Message_Oagent_OSpy,c_List_Olist_ONil(tc_Event_Oevent)),tc_Message_Omsg),
c_0_3 ).
cnf(c_0_5,axiom,
X1 = c_List_Oappend(c_List_Olist_ONil(X2),X1,X2),
cls_self__append__conv2_1 ).
cnf(c_0_6,negated_conjecture,
c_Event_Oknows(c_Message_Oagent_OSpy,c_List_Olist_OCons(c_Event_Oevent_OSays(v_A,v_B,v_X),c_List_Olist_ONil(tc_Event_Oevent),tc_Event_Oevent)) != c_Set_Oinsert(v_X,c_Event_Oknows(c_Message_Oagent_OSpy,c_List_Olist_ONil(tc_Event_Oevent)),tc_Message_Omsg),
inference(rw,[status(thm)],[c_0_4,c_0_5]) ).
cnf(c_0_7,axiom,
c_Event_Oknows(c_Message_Oagent_OSpy,c_List_Olist_OCons(c_Event_Oevent_OSays(X1,X2,X3),X4,tc_Event_Oevent)) = c_Set_Oinsert(X3,c_Event_Oknows(c_Message_Oagent_OSpy,X4),tc_Message_Omsg),
cls_knows__Spy__Says_0 ).
cnf(c_0_8,negated_conjecture,
$false,
inference(cn,[status(thm)],[inference(rw,[status(thm)],[c_0_6,c_0_7])]),
[proof] ).
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
%----ORIGINAL SYSTEM OUTPUT
% 0.03/0.12 % Problem : SWV772-1 : TPTP v8.2.0. Released v4.1.0.
% 0.03/0.13 % Command : run_E %s %d THM
% 0.13/0.34 % Computer : n025.cluster.edu
% 0.13/0.34 % Model : x86_64 x86_64
% 0.13/0.34 % CPU : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 @ 2.10GHz
% 0.13/0.34 % Memory : 8042.1875MB
% 0.13/0.34 % OS : Linux 3.10.0-693.el7.x86_64
% 0.13/0.34 % CPULimit : 300
% 0.13/0.34 % WCLimit : 300
% 0.13/0.34 % DateTime : Sun May 19 08:12:52 EDT 2024
% 0.13/0.34 % CPUTime :
% 0.20/0.47 Running first-order theorem proving
% 0.20/0.47 Running: /export/starexec/sandbox/solver/bin/eprover --delete-bad-limit=2000000000 --definitional-cnf=24 -s --print-statistics -R --print-version --proof-object --auto-schedule=8 --cpu-limit=300 /export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p
% 0.20/0.50 # Version: 3.1.0
% 0.20/0.50 # Preprocessing class: FSLSSMSMSSSNFFN.
% 0.20/0.50 # Scheduled 4 strats onto 8 cores with 300 seconds (2400 total)
% 0.20/0.50 # Starting C07_19_nc_SOS_SAT001_MinMin_p005000_rr with 1500s (5) cores
% 0.20/0.50 # Starting new_bool_3 with 300s (1) cores
% 0.20/0.50 # Starting new_bool_1 with 300s (1) cores
% 0.20/0.50 # Starting sh5l with 300s (1) cores
% 0.20/0.50 # new_bool_3 with pid 20777 completed with status 0
% 0.20/0.50 # Result found by new_bool_3
% 0.20/0.50 # Preprocessing class: FSLSSMSMSSSNFFN.
% 0.20/0.50 # Scheduled 4 strats onto 8 cores with 300 seconds (2400 total)
% 0.20/0.50 # Starting C07_19_nc_SOS_SAT001_MinMin_p005000_rr with 1500s (5) cores
% 0.20/0.50 # Starting new_bool_3 with 300s (1) cores
% 0.20/0.50 # SinE strategy is GSinE(CountFormulas,hypos,1.5,,3,20000,1.0)
% 0.20/0.50 # Search class: FGHSM-FFLF32-MFFFFFNN
% 0.20/0.50 # partial match(1): FGHSM-FFMF32-MFFFFFNN
% 0.20/0.50 # Scheduled 5 strats onto 1 cores with 300 seconds (300 total)
% 0.20/0.50 # Starting G-E--_208_C18_F1_SE_CS_SP_PS_S038I with 181s (1) cores
% 0.20/0.50 # G-E--_208_C18_F1_SE_CS_SP_PS_S038I with pid 20780 completed with status 0
% 0.20/0.50 # Result found by G-E--_208_C18_F1_SE_CS_SP_PS_S038I
% 0.20/0.50 # Preprocessing class: FSLSSMSMSSSNFFN.
% 0.20/0.50 # Scheduled 4 strats onto 8 cores with 300 seconds (2400 total)
% 0.20/0.50 # Starting C07_19_nc_SOS_SAT001_MinMin_p005000_rr with 1500s (5) cores
% 0.20/0.50 # Starting new_bool_3 with 300s (1) cores
% 0.20/0.50 # SinE strategy is GSinE(CountFormulas,hypos,1.5,,3,20000,1.0)
% 0.20/0.50 # Search class: FGHSM-FFLF32-MFFFFFNN
% 0.20/0.50 # partial match(1): FGHSM-FFMF32-MFFFFFNN
% 0.20/0.50 # Scheduled 5 strats onto 1 cores with 300 seconds (300 total)
% 0.20/0.50 # Starting G-E--_208_C18_F1_SE_CS_SP_PS_S038I with 181s (1) cores
% 0.20/0.50 # Preprocessing time : 0.003 s
% 0.20/0.50 # Presaturation interreduction done
% 0.20/0.50
% 0.20/0.50 # Proof found!
% 0.20/0.50 # SZS status Unsatisfiable
% 0.20/0.50 # SZS output start CNFRefutation
% See solution above
% 0.20/0.50 # Parsed axioms : 450
% 0.20/0.50 # Removed by relevancy pruning/SinE : 277
% 0.20/0.50 # Initial clauses : 173
% 0.20/0.50 # Removed in clause preprocessing : 0
% 0.20/0.50 # Initial clauses in saturation : 173
% 0.20/0.50 # Processed clauses : 59
% 0.20/0.50 # ...of these trivial : 6
% 0.20/0.50 # ...subsumed : 12
% 0.20/0.50 # ...remaining for further processing : 41
% 0.20/0.50 # Other redundant clauses eliminated : 0
% 0.20/0.50 # Clauses deleted for lack of memory : 0
% 0.20/0.50 # Backward-subsumed : 0
% 0.20/0.50 # Backward-rewritten : 2
% 0.20/0.50 # Generated clauses : 0
% 0.20/0.50 # ...of the previous two non-redundant : 1
% 0.20/0.50 # ...aggressively subsumed : 0
% 0.20/0.50 # Contextual simplify-reflections : 0
% 0.20/0.50 # Paramodulations : 0
% 0.20/0.50 # Factorizations : 0
% 0.20/0.50 # NegExts : 0
% 0.20/0.50 # Equation resolutions : 0
% 0.20/0.50 # Disequality decompositions : 0
% 0.20/0.50 # Total rewrite steps : 8
% 0.20/0.50 # ...of those cached : 1
% 0.20/0.50 # Propositional unsat checks : 0
% 0.20/0.50 # Propositional check models : 0
% 0.20/0.50 # Propositional check unsatisfiable : 0
% 0.20/0.50 # Propositional clauses : 0
% 0.20/0.50 # Propositional clauses after purity: 0
% 0.20/0.50 # Propositional unsat core size : 0
% 0.20/0.50 # Propositional preprocessing time : 0.000
% 0.20/0.50 # Propositional encoding time : 0.000
% 0.20/0.50 # Propositional solver time : 0.000
% 0.20/0.50 # Success case prop preproc time : 0.000
% 0.20/0.50 # Success case prop encoding time : 0.000
% 0.20/0.50 # Success case prop solver time : 0.000
% 0.20/0.50 # Current number of processed clauses : 39
% 0.20/0.50 # Positive orientable unit clauses : 12
% 0.20/0.50 # Positive unorientable unit clauses: 0
% 0.20/0.50 # Negative unit clauses : 6
% 0.20/0.50 # Non-unit-clauses : 21
% 0.20/0.50 # Current number of unprocessed clauses: 115
% 0.20/0.50 # ...number of literals in the above : 254
% 0.20/0.50 # Current number of archived formulas : 0
% 0.20/0.50 # Current number of archived clauses : 2
% 0.20/0.50 # Clause-clause subsumption calls (NU) : 191
% 0.20/0.50 # Rec. Clause-clause subsumption calls : 157
% 0.20/0.50 # Non-unit clause-clause subsumptions : 6
% 0.20/0.50 # Unit Clause-clause subsumption calls : 24
% 0.20/0.50 # Rewrite failures with RHS unbound : 0
% 0.20/0.50 # BW rewrite match attempts : 3
% 0.20/0.50 # BW rewrite match successes : 2
% 0.20/0.50 # Condensation attempts : 0
% 0.20/0.50 # Condensation successes : 0
% 0.20/0.50 # Termbank termtop insertions : 6119
% 0.20/0.50 # Search garbage collected termcells : 1352
% 0.20/0.50
% 0.20/0.50 # -------------------------------------------------
% 0.20/0.50 # User time : 0.009 s
% 0.20/0.50 # System time : 0.003 s
% 0.20/0.50 # Total time : 0.012 s
% 0.20/0.50 # Maximum resident set size: 2300 pages
% 0.20/0.50
% 0.20/0.50 # -------------------------------------------------
% 0.20/0.50 # User time : 0.019 s
% 0.20/0.50 # System time : 0.006 s
% 0.20/0.50 # Total time : 0.024 s
% 0.20/0.50 # Maximum resident set size: 2020 pages
% 0.20/0.50 % E---3.1 exiting
% 0.20/0.50 % E exiting
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------