TSTP Solution File: SWV757-1 by E-SAT---3.1
View Problem
- Process Solution
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
% File : E-SAT---3.1
% Problem : SWV757-1 : TPTP v8.1.2. Released v4.1.0.
% Transfm : none
% Format : tptp:raw
% Command : run_E %s %d THM
% Computer : n020.cluster.edu
% Model : x86_64 x86_64
% CPU : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 2.10GHz
% Memory : 8042.1875MB
% OS : Linux 3.10.0-693.el7.x86_64
% CPULimit : 2400s
% WCLimit : 300s
% DateTime : Tue Oct 10 20:07:47 EDT 2023
% Result : Unsatisfiable 17.48s 2.71s
% Output : CNFRefutation 17.48s
% Verified :
% SZS Type : Refutation
% Derivation depth : 8
% Number of leaves : 10
% Syntax : Number of clauses : 31 ( 14 unt; 0 nHn; 16 RR)
% Number of literals : 52 ( 2 equ; 28 neg)
% Maximal clause size : 3 ( 1 avg)
% Maximal term depth : 6 ( 2 avg)
% Number of predicates : 4 ( 2 usr; 1 prp; 0-3 aty)
% Number of functors : 18 ( 18 usr; 6 con; 0-3 aty)
% Number of variables : 70 ( 21 sgn)
% Comments :
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
cnf(cls_usedI_0,axiom,
( hBOOL(c_in(X1,c_Event_Oused(X2),tc_Message_Omsg))
| ~ hBOOL(c_in(X1,c_Message_Oparts(c_Event_Oknows(c_Message_Oagent_OSpy,X2)),tc_Message_Omsg)) ),
file('/export/starexec/sandbox/tmp/tmp.yNQnlnSZDr/E---3.1_30051.p',cls_usedI_0) ).
cnf(cls_not__parts__not__analz_0,axiom,
( hBOOL(c_in(X1,c_Message_Oparts(X2),tc_Message_Omsg))
| ~ hBOOL(c_in(X1,c_Message_Oanalz(X2),tc_Message_Omsg)) ),
file('/export/starexec/sandbox/tmp/tmp.yNQnlnSZDr/E---3.1_30051.p',cls_not__parts__not__analz_0) ).
cnf(cls_predicate1D_0,axiom,
( hBOOL(hAPP(X1,X2))
| ~ hBOOL(hAPP(X3,X2))
| ~ c_lessequals(X3,X1,tc_fun(X4,tc_bool)) ),
file('/export/starexec/sandbox/tmp/tmp.yNQnlnSZDr/E---3.1_30051.p',cls_predicate1D_0) ).
cnf(cls_analz__increasing_0,axiom,
c_lessequals(X1,c_Message_Oanalz(X1),tc_fun(tc_Message_Omsg,tc_bool)),
file('/export/starexec/sandbox/tmp/tmp.yNQnlnSZDr/E---3.1_30051.p',cls_analz__increasing_0) ).
cnf(cls_Nonce__supply1_0,axiom,
~ hBOOL(c_in(c_Message_Omsg_ONonce(c_Public_Osko__Public__XNonce__supply1__1__1(X1)),c_Event_Oused(X1),tc_Message_Omsg)),
file('/export/starexec/sandbox/tmp/tmp.yNQnlnSZDr/E---3.1_30051.p',cls_Nonce__supply1_0) ).
cnf(cls_mem__def_1,axiom,
( hBOOL(c_in(X1,X2,X3))
| ~ hBOOL(hAPP(X2,X1)) ),
file('/export/starexec/sandbox/tmp/tmp.yNQnlnSZDr/E---3.1_30051.p',cls_mem__def_1) ).
cnf(cls_keymode_Oinduct_0,axiom,
( hBOOL(hAPP(X1,X2))
| ~ hBOOL(hAPP(X1,c_Public_Okeymode_OEncryption))
| ~ hBOOL(hAPP(X1,c_Public_Okeymode_OSignature)) ),
file('/export/starexec/sandbox/tmp/tmp.yNQnlnSZDr/E---3.1_30051.p',cls_keymode_Oinduct_0) ).
cnf(cls_insert__code_1,axiom,
hBOOL(hAPP(c_Set_Oinsert(X1,X2,X3),X1)),
file('/export/starexec/sandbox/tmp/tmp.yNQnlnSZDr/E---3.1_30051.p',cls_insert__code_1) ).
cnf(cls_knows__Notes_0,axiom,
c_Event_Oknows(X1,c_List_Olist_OCons(c_Event_Oevent_ONotes(X1,X2),X3,tc_Event_Oevent)) = c_Set_Oinsert(X2,c_Event_Oknows(X1,X3),tc_Message_Omsg),
file('/export/starexec/sandbox/tmp/tmp.yNQnlnSZDr/E---3.1_30051.p',cls_knows__Notes_0) ).
cnf(cls_insert__code_2,axiom,
( hBOOL(hAPP(c_Set_Oinsert(X1,X2,X3),X4))
| ~ hBOOL(hAPP(X2,X4)) ),
file('/export/starexec/sandbox/tmp/tmp.yNQnlnSZDr/E---3.1_30051.p',cls_insert__code_2) ).
cnf(c_0_10,axiom,
( hBOOL(c_in(X1,c_Event_Oused(X2),tc_Message_Omsg))
| ~ hBOOL(c_in(X1,c_Message_Oparts(c_Event_Oknows(c_Message_Oagent_OSpy,X2)),tc_Message_Omsg)) ),
cls_usedI_0 ).
cnf(c_0_11,axiom,
( hBOOL(c_in(X1,c_Message_Oparts(X2),tc_Message_Omsg))
| ~ hBOOL(c_in(X1,c_Message_Oanalz(X2),tc_Message_Omsg)) ),
cls_not__parts__not__analz_0 ).
cnf(c_0_12,axiom,
( hBOOL(hAPP(X1,X2))
| ~ hBOOL(hAPP(X3,X2))
| ~ c_lessequals(X3,X1,tc_fun(X4,tc_bool)) ),
cls_predicate1D_0 ).
cnf(c_0_13,axiom,
c_lessequals(X1,c_Message_Oanalz(X1),tc_fun(tc_Message_Omsg,tc_bool)),
cls_analz__increasing_0 ).
cnf(c_0_14,axiom,
~ hBOOL(c_in(c_Message_Omsg_ONonce(c_Public_Osko__Public__XNonce__supply1__1__1(X1)),c_Event_Oused(X1),tc_Message_Omsg)),
cls_Nonce__supply1_0 ).
cnf(c_0_15,plain,
( hBOOL(c_in(X1,c_Event_Oused(X2),tc_Message_Omsg))
| ~ hBOOL(c_in(X1,c_Message_Oanalz(c_Event_Oknows(c_Message_Oagent_OSpy,X2)),tc_Message_Omsg)) ),
inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_10,c_0_11]) ).
cnf(c_0_16,axiom,
( hBOOL(c_in(X1,X2,X3))
| ~ hBOOL(hAPP(X2,X1)) ),
cls_mem__def_1 ).
cnf(c_0_17,plain,
( hBOOL(hAPP(c_Message_Oanalz(X1),X2))
| ~ hBOOL(hAPP(X1,X2)) ),
inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_12,c_0_13]) ).
cnf(c_0_18,plain,
~ hBOOL(c_in(c_Message_Omsg_ONonce(c_Public_Osko__Public__XNonce__supply1__1__1(X1)),c_Message_Oanalz(c_Event_Oknows(c_Message_Oagent_OSpy,X1)),tc_Message_Omsg)),
inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_14,c_0_15]) ).
cnf(c_0_19,plain,
( hBOOL(c_in(X1,c_Message_Oanalz(X2),X3))
| ~ hBOOL(hAPP(X2,X1)) ),
inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_16,c_0_17]) ).
cnf(c_0_20,axiom,
( hBOOL(hAPP(X1,X2))
| ~ hBOOL(hAPP(X1,c_Public_Okeymode_OEncryption))
| ~ hBOOL(hAPP(X1,c_Public_Okeymode_OSignature)) ),
cls_keymode_Oinduct_0 ).
cnf(c_0_21,axiom,
hBOOL(hAPP(c_Set_Oinsert(X1,X2,X3),X1)),
cls_insert__code_1 ).
cnf(c_0_22,plain,
~ hBOOL(hAPP(c_Event_Oknows(c_Message_Oagent_OSpy,X1),c_Message_Omsg_ONonce(c_Public_Osko__Public__XNonce__supply1__1__1(X1)))),
inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_18,c_0_19]) ).
cnf(c_0_23,axiom,
c_Event_Oknows(X1,c_List_Olist_OCons(c_Event_Oevent_ONotes(X1,X2),X3,tc_Event_Oevent)) = c_Set_Oinsert(X2,c_Event_Oknows(X1,X3),tc_Message_Omsg),
cls_knows__Notes_0 ).
cnf(c_0_24,plain,
( hBOOL(hAPP(c_Set_Oinsert(c_Public_Okeymode_OSignature,X1,X2),X3))
| ~ hBOOL(hAPP(c_Set_Oinsert(c_Public_Okeymode_OSignature,X1,X2),c_Public_Okeymode_OEncryption)) ),
inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_20,c_0_21]) ).
cnf(c_0_25,axiom,
( hBOOL(hAPP(c_Set_Oinsert(X1,X2,X3),X4))
| ~ hBOOL(hAPP(X2,X4)) ),
cls_insert__code_2 ).
cnf(c_0_26,plain,
~ hBOOL(hAPP(c_Set_Oinsert(X1,c_Event_Oknows(c_Message_Oagent_OSpy,X2),tc_Message_Omsg),c_Message_Omsg_ONonce(c_Public_Osko__Public__XNonce__supply1__1__1(c_List_Olist_OCons(c_Event_Oevent_ONotes(c_Message_Oagent_OSpy,X1),X2,tc_Event_Oevent))))),
inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_22,c_0_23]) ).
cnf(c_0_27,plain,
( hBOOL(hAPP(c_Set_Oinsert(c_Public_Okeymode_OSignature,X1,X2),X3))
| ~ hBOOL(hAPP(X1,c_Public_Okeymode_OEncryption)) ),
inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_24,c_0_25]) ).
cnf(c_0_28,plain,
~ hBOOL(hAPP(c_Event_Oknows(c_Message_Oagent_OSpy,X1),c_Public_Okeymode_OEncryption)),
inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_26,c_0_27]) ).
cnf(c_0_29,plain,
~ hBOOL(hAPP(c_Set_Oinsert(X1,c_Event_Oknows(c_Message_Oagent_OSpy,X2),tc_Message_Omsg),c_Public_Okeymode_OEncryption)),
inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_28,c_0_23]) ).
cnf(c_0_30,plain,
$false,
inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_29,c_0_21]),
[proof] ).
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
%----ORIGINAL SYSTEM OUTPUT
% 0.11/0.12 % Problem : SWV757-1 : TPTP v8.1.2. Released v4.1.0.
% 0.11/0.13 % Command : run_E %s %d THM
% 0.12/0.33 % Computer : n020.cluster.edu
% 0.12/0.33 % Model : x86_64 x86_64
% 0.12/0.33 % CPU : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 @ 2.10GHz
% 0.12/0.33 % Memory : 8042.1875MB
% 0.12/0.33 % OS : Linux 3.10.0-693.el7.x86_64
% 0.12/0.33 % CPULimit : 2400
% 0.12/0.33 % WCLimit : 300
% 0.12/0.33 % DateTime : Tue Oct 3 04:18:16 EDT 2023
% 0.12/0.33 % CPUTime :
% 0.17/0.47 Running first-order model finding
% 0.17/0.47 Running: /export/starexec/sandbox/solver/bin/eprover --delete-bad-limit=2000000000 --definitional-cnf=24 -s --print-statistics -R --print-version --proof-object --satauto-schedule=8 --cpu-limit=300 /export/starexec/sandbox/tmp/tmp.yNQnlnSZDr/E---3.1_30051.p
% 17.48/2.71 # Version: 3.1pre001
% 17.48/2.71 # Preprocessing class: FSLSSMSMSSSNFFN.
% 17.48/2.71 # Scheduled 4 strats onto 8 cores with 300 seconds (2400 total)
% 17.48/2.71 # Starting C07_19_nc_SOS_SAT001_MinMin_p005000_rr with 1500s (5) cores
% 17.48/2.71 # Starting new_bool_3 with 300s (1) cores
% 17.48/2.71 # Starting new_bool_1 with 300s (1) cores
% 17.48/2.71 # Starting sh5l with 300s (1) cores
% 17.48/2.71 # C07_19_nc_SOS_SAT001_MinMin_p005000_rr with pid 30132 completed with status 0
% 17.48/2.71 # Result found by C07_19_nc_SOS_SAT001_MinMin_p005000_rr
% 17.48/2.71 # Preprocessing class: FSLSSMSMSSSNFFN.
% 17.48/2.71 # Scheduled 4 strats onto 8 cores with 300 seconds (2400 total)
% 17.48/2.71 # Starting C07_19_nc_SOS_SAT001_MinMin_p005000_rr with 1500s (5) cores
% 17.48/2.71 # No SInE strategy applied
% 17.48/2.71 # Search class: FGHSM-FSLM31-DFFFFFNN
% 17.48/2.71 # Scheduled 6 strats onto 5 cores with 1500 seconds (1500 total)
% 17.48/2.71 # Starting G-E--_208_C18C--_F1_SE_CS_SP_PS_S5PRR_RG_S04AN with 680s (1) cores
% 17.48/2.71 # Starting C07_19_nc_SOS_SAT001_MinMin_p005000_rr with 151s (1) cores
% 17.48/2.71 # Starting U----_206c_10_B11_00_F1_SE_PI_CS_SP_PS_S5PRR_RG_S04AN with 136s (1) cores
% 17.48/2.71 # Starting G-E--_302_C18_F1_URBAN_S5PRR_RG_S0Y with 136s (1) cores
% 17.48/2.71 # Starting G-E--_208_B07_F1_SE_CS_SP_PS_S4d with 136s (1) cores
% 17.48/2.71 # G-E--_302_C18_F1_URBAN_S5PRR_RG_S0Y with pid 30142 completed with status 0
% 17.48/2.71 # Result found by G-E--_302_C18_F1_URBAN_S5PRR_RG_S0Y
% 17.48/2.71 # Preprocessing class: FSLSSMSMSSSNFFN.
% 17.48/2.71 # Scheduled 4 strats onto 8 cores with 300 seconds (2400 total)
% 17.48/2.71 # Starting C07_19_nc_SOS_SAT001_MinMin_p005000_rr with 1500s (5) cores
% 17.48/2.71 # No SInE strategy applied
% 17.48/2.71 # Search class: FGHSM-FSLM31-DFFFFFNN
% 17.48/2.71 # Scheduled 6 strats onto 5 cores with 1500 seconds (1500 total)
% 17.48/2.71 # Starting G-E--_208_C18C--_F1_SE_CS_SP_PS_S5PRR_RG_S04AN with 680s (1) cores
% 17.48/2.71 # Starting C07_19_nc_SOS_SAT001_MinMin_p005000_rr with 151s (1) cores
% 17.48/2.71 # Starting U----_206c_10_B11_00_F1_SE_PI_CS_SP_PS_S5PRR_RG_S04AN with 136s (1) cores
% 17.48/2.71 # Starting G-E--_302_C18_F1_URBAN_S5PRR_RG_S0Y with 136s (1) cores
% 17.48/2.71 # Preprocessing time : 0.130 s
% 17.48/2.71
% 17.48/2.71 # Proof found!
% 17.48/2.71 # SZS status Unsatisfiable
% 17.48/2.71 # SZS output start CNFRefutation
% See solution above
% 17.48/2.71 # Parsed axioms : 588
% 17.48/2.71 # Removed by relevancy pruning/SinE : 0
% 17.48/2.71 # Initial clauses : 588
% 17.48/2.71 # Removed in clause preprocessing : 1
% 17.48/2.71 # Initial clauses in saturation : 587
% 17.48/2.71 # Processed clauses : 7561
% 17.48/2.71 # ...of these trivial : 356
% 17.48/2.71 # ...subsumed : 4146
% 17.48/2.71 # ...remaining for further processing : 3059
% 17.48/2.71 # Other redundant clauses eliminated : 18
% 17.48/2.71 # Clauses deleted for lack of memory : 0
% 17.48/2.71 # Backward-subsumed : 604
% 17.48/2.71 # Backward-rewritten : 309
% 17.48/2.71 # Generated clauses : 78479
% 17.48/2.71 # ...of the previous two non-redundant : 69424
% 17.48/2.71 # ...aggressively subsumed : 0
% 17.48/2.71 # Contextual simplify-reflections : 5
% 17.48/2.71 # Paramodulations : 78411
% 17.48/2.71 # Factorizations : 2
% 17.48/2.71 # NegExts : 0
% 17.48/2.71 # Equation resolutions : 66
% 17.48/2.71 # Total rewrite steps : 47122
% 17.48/2.71 # Propositional unsat checks : 0
% 17.48/2.71 # Propositional check models : 0
% 17.48/2.71 # Propositional check unsatisfiable : 0
% 17.48/2.71 # Propositional clauses : 0
% 17.48/2.71 # Propositional clauses after purity: 0
% 17.48/2.71 # Propositional unsat core size : 0
% 17.48/2.71 # Propositional preprocessing time : 0.000
% 17.48/2.71 # Propositional encoding time : 0.000
% 17.48/2.71 # Propositional solver time : 0.000
% 17.48/2.71 # Success case prop preproc time : 0.000
% 17.48/2.71 # Success case prop encoding time : 0.000
% 17.48/2.71 # Success case prop solver time : 0.000
% 17.48/2.71 # Current number of processed clauses : 2146
% 17.48/2.71 # Positive orientable unit clauses : 702
% 17.48/2.71 # Positive unorientable unit clauses: 8
% 17.48/2.71 # Negative unit clauses : 229
% 17.48/2.71 # Non-unit-clauses : 1207
% 17.48/2.71 # Current number of unprocessed clauses: 58139
% 17.48/2.71 # ...number of literals in the above : 118783
% 17.48/2.71 # Current number of archived formulas : 0
% 17.48/2.71 # Current number of archived clauses : 914
% 17.48/2.71 # Clause-clause subsumption calls (NU) : 364975
% 17.48/2.71 # Rec. Clause-clause subsumption calls : 257836
% 17.48/2.71 # Non-unit clause-clause subsumptions : 1866
% 17.48/2.71 # Unit Clause-clause subsumption calls : 61326
% 17.48/2.71 # Rewrite failures with RHS unbound : 0
% 17.48/2.71 # BW rewrite match attempts : 11237
% 17.48/2.71 # BW rewrite match successes : 341
% 17.48/2.71 # Condensation attempts : 0
% 17.48/2.71 # Condensation successes : 0
% 17.48/2.71 # Termbank termtop insertions : 1631383
% 17.48/2.71
% 17.48/2.71 # -------------------------------------------------
% 17.48/2.71 # User time : 2.043 s
% 17.48/2.71 # System time : 0.102 s
% 17.48/2.71 # Total time : 2.146 s
% 17.48/2.71 # Maximum resident set size: 2892 pages
% 17.48/2.71
% 17.48/2.71 # -------------------------------------------------
% 17.48/2.71 # User time : 10.212 s
% 17.48/2.71 # System time : 0.392 s
% 17.48/2.71 # Total time : 10.603 s
% 17.48/2.71 # Maximum resident set size: 2180 pages
% 17.48/2.71 % E---3.1 exiting
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------