TSTP Solution File: SWV724-1 by SATCoP---0.1

View Problem - Process Solution

%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
% File     : SATCoP---0.1
% Problem  : SWV724-1 : TPTP v8.1.0. Released v4.1.0.
% Transfm  : none
% Format   : tptp:raw
% Command  : satcop --statistics %s

% Computer : n011.cluster.edu
% Model    : x86_64 x86_64
% CPU      : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 2.10GHz
% Memory   : 8042.1875MB
% OS       : Linux 3.10.0-693.el7.x86_64
% CPULimit : 300s
% WCLimit  : 600s
% DateTime : Wed Jul 20 21:30:35 EDT 2022

% Result   : Unsatisfiable 0.12s 0.36s
% Output   : Proof 0.12s
% Verified : 
% SZS Type : ERROR: Analysing output (MakeTreeStats fails)

% Comments : 
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
cnf(g0,plain,
    hBOOL(c_in(v_evs,c_NS__Shared__Mirabelle_Ons__shared,tc_List_Olist(tc_Event_Oevent))),
    inference(ground_cnf,[],[file('/export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',cls_conjecture_0)]) ).

cnf(g1,plain,
    ( ~ hBOOL(c_in(hAPP(c_Message_Omsg_OKey,hAPP(c_Public_OshrK,v_A)),c_Message_Oanalz(c_Event_Oknows(c_Message_Oagent_OSpy,v_evs)),tc_Message_Omsg))
    | ~ hBOOL(c_in(v_A,c_Event_Obad,tc_Message_Oagent)) ),
    inference(ground_cnf,[],[file('/export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',cls_conjecture_1)]) ).

cnf(g2,plain,
    ( hBOOL(c_in(hAPP(c_Message_Omsg_OKey,hAPP(c_Public_OshrK,v_A)),c_Message_Oanalz(c_Event_Oknows(c_Message_Oagent_OSpy,v_evs)),tc_Message_Omsg))
    | hBOOL(c_in(v_A,c_Event_Obad,tc_Message_Oagent)) ),
    inference(ground_cnf,[],[file('/export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',cls_conjecture_2)]) ).

cnf(g3,plain,
    ( ~ hBOOL(c_in(v_evs,c_NS__Shared__Mirabelle_Ons__shared,tc_List_Olist(tc_Event_Oevent)))
    | ~ hBOOL(c_in(hAPP(c_Message_Omsg_OKey,hAPP(c_Public_OshrK,v_A)),c_Message_Oparts(c_Event_Oknows(c_Message_Oagent_OSpy,v_evs)),tc_Message_Omsg))
    | hBOOL(c_in(v_A,c_Event_Obad,tc_Message_Oagent)) ),
    inference(ground_cnf,[],[file('/export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',cls_Spy__see__shrK_0)]) ).

cnf(g4,plain,
    ( ~ hBOOL(c_in(hAPP(c_Message_Omsg_OKey,hAPP(c_Public_OshrK,v_A)),c_Event_Oknows(c_Message_Oagent_OSpy,v_evs),tc_Message_Omsg))
    | hBOOL(c_in(hAPP(c_Message_Omsg_OKey,hAPP(c_Public_OshrK,v_A)),c_Message_Oanalz(c_Event_Oknows(c_Message_Oagent_OSpy,v_evs)),tc_Message_Omsg)) ),
    inference(ground_cnf,[],[file('/export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',cls_analz_OInj_0)]) ).

cnf(g5,plain,
    ( ~ hBOOL(c_in(hAPP(c_Message_Omsg_OKey,hAPP(c_Public_OshrK,v_A)),c_Message_Oanalz(c_Event_Oknows(c_Message_Oagent_OSpy,v_evs)),tc_Message_Omsg))
    | hBOOL(c_in(hAPP(c_Message_Omsg_OKey,hAPP(c_Public_OshrK,v_A)),c_Message_Oparts(c_Event_Oknows(c_Message_Oagent_OSpy,v_evs)),tc_Message_Omsg)) ),
    inference(ground_cnf,[],[file('/export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',cls_not__parts__not__analz_0)]) ).

cnf(g6,plain,
    ( ~ hBOOL(c_in(v_A,c_Event_Obad,tc_Message_Oagent))
    | hBOOL(c_in(hAPP(c_Message_Omsg_OKey,hAPP(c_Public_OshrK,v_A)),c_Event_Oknows(c_Message_Oagent_OSpy,v_evs),tc_Message_Omsg)) ),
    inference(ground_cnf,[],[file('/export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',cls_Spy__spies__bad__shrK_0)]) ).

%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
%----ORIGINAL SYSTEM OUTPUT
% 0.11/0.12  % Problem  : SWV724-1 : TPTP v8.1.0. Released v4.1.0.
% 0.11/0.12  % Command  : satcop --statistics %s
% 0.12/0.33  % Computer : n011.cluster.edu
% 0.12/0.33  % Model    : x86_64 x86_64
% 0.12/0.33  % CPU      : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 @ 2.10GHz
% 0.12/0.33  % Memory   : 8042.1875MB
% 0.12/0.33  % OS       : Linux 3.10.0-693.el7.x86_64
% 0.12/0.33  % CPULimit : 300
% 0.12/0.33  % WCLimit  : 600
% 0.12/0.33  % DateTime : Wed Jun 15 02:46:50 EDT 2022
% 0.12/0.33  % CPUTime  : 
% 0.12/0.36  % symbols: 68
% 0.12/0.36  % clauses: 620
% 0.12/0.36  % start clauses: 3
% 0.12/0.36  % iterative deepening steps: 49
% 0.12/0.36  % maximum path limit: 1
% 0.12/0.36  % literal attempts: 8404
% 0.12/0.36  % depth failures: 6318
% 0.12/0.36  % regularity failures: 22
% 0.12/0.36  % tautology failures: 37
% 0.12/0.36  % reductions: 1774
% 0.12/0.36  % extensions: 6529
% 0.12/0.36  % SAT variables: 4655
% 0.12/0.36  % SAT clauses: 4230
% 0.12/0.36  % WalkSAT solutions: 4224
% 0.12/0.36  % CDCL solutions: 0
% 0.12/0.36  % SZS status Unsatisfiable for theBenchmark
% 0.12/0.36  % SZS output start ListOfCNF for theBenchmark
% See solution above
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------