TSTP Solution File: SWV724-1 by E-SAT---3.1.00
View Problem
- Process Solution
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
% File : E-SAT---3.1.00
% Problem : SWV724-1 : TPTP v8.2.0. Released v4.1.0.
% Transfm : none
% Format : tptp:raw
% Command : run_E %s %d THM
% Computer : n022.cluster.edu
% Model : x86_64 x86_64
% CPU : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 2.10GHz
% Memory : 8042.1875MB
% OS : Linux 3.10.0-693.el7.x86_64
% CPULimit : 300s
% WCLimit : 300s
% DateTime : Tue May 21 05:42:09 EDT 2024
% Result : Unsatisfiable 0.16s 0.48s
% Output : CNFRefutation 0.16s
% Verified :
% SZS Type : Refutation
% Derivation depth : 8
% Number of leaves : 9
% Syntax : Number of clauses : 34 ( 9 unt; 2 nHn; 26 RR)
% Number of literals : 63 ( 0 equ; 32 neg)
% Maximal clause size : 3 ( 1 avg)
% Maximal term depth : 4 ( 2 avg)
% Number of predicates : 2 ( 1 usr; 1 prp; 0-1 aty)
% Number of functors : 16 ( 16 usr; 10 con; 0-3 aty)
% Number of variables : 46 ( 11 sgn)
% Comments :
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
cnf(cls_conjecture_1,negated_conjecture,
( ~ hBOOL(c_in(v_A,c_Event_Obad,tc_Message_Oagent))
| ~ hBOOL(c_in(hAPP(c_Message_Omsg_OKey,hAPP(c_Public_OshrK,v_A)),c_Message_Oanalz(c_Event_Oknows(c_Message_Oagent_OSpy,v_evs)),tc_Message_Omsg)) ),
file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',cls_conjecture_1) ).
cnf(cls_analz_OInj_0,axiom,
( hBOOL(c_in(X1,c_Message_Oanalz(X2),tc_Message_Omsg))
| ~ hBOOL(c_in(X1,X2,tc_Message_Omsg)) ),
file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',cls_analz_OInj_0) ).
cnf(cls_Spy__spies__bad__shrK_0,axiom,
( hBOOL(c_in(hAPP(c_Message_Omsg_OKey,hAPP(c_Public_OshrK,X1)),c_Event_Oknows(c_Message_Oagent_OSpy,X2),tc_Message_Omsg))
| ~ hBOOL(c_in(X1,c_Event_Obad,tc_Message_Oagent)) ),
file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',cls_Spy__spies__bad__shrK_0) ).
cnf(cls_mem__def_0,axiom,
( hBOOL(hAPP(X1,X2))
| ~ hBOOL(c_in(X2,X1,X3)) ),
file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',cls_mem__def_0) ).
cnf(cls_conjecture_2,negated_conjecture,
( hBOOL(c_in(hAPP(c_Message_Omsg_OKey,hAPP(c_Public_OshrK,v_A)),c_Message_Oanalz(c_Event_Oknows(c_Message_Oagent_OSpy,v_evs)),tc_Message_Omsg))
| hBOOL(c_in(v_A,c_Event_Obad,tc_Message_Oagent)) ),
file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',cls_conjecture_2) ).
cnf(cls_Spy__see__shrK_0,axiom,
( hBOOL(c_in(X1,c_Event_Obad,tc_Message_Oagent))
| ~ hBOOL(c_in(hAPP(c_Message_Omsg_OKey,hAPP(c_Public_OshrK,X1)),c_Message_Oparts(c_Event_Oknows(c_Message_Oagent_OSpy,X2)),tc_Message_Omsg))
| ~ hBOOL(c_in(X2,c_NS__Shared__Mirabelle_Ons__shared,tc_List_Olist(tc_Event_Oevent))) ),
file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',cls_Spy__see__shrK_0) ).
cnf(cls_not__parts__not__analz_0,axiom,
( hBOOL(c_in(X1,c_Message_Oparts(X2),tc_Message_Omsg))
| ~ hBOOL(c_in(X1,c_Message_Oanalz(X2),tc_Message_Omsg)) ),
file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',cls_not__parts__not__analz_0) ).
cnf(cls_mem__def_1,axiom,
( hBOOL(c_in(X1,X2,X3))
| ~ hBOOL(hAPP(X2,X1)) ),
file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',cls_mem__def_1) ).
cnf(cls_conjecture_0,negated_conjecture,
hBOOL(c_in(v_evs,c_NS__Shared__Mirabelle_Ons__shared,tc_List_Olist(tc_Event_Oevent))),
file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',cls_conjecture_0) ).
cnf(c_0_9,negated_conjecture,
( ~ hBOOL(c_in(v_A,c_Event_Obad,tc_Message_Oagent))
| ~ hBOOL(c_in(hAPP(c_Message_Omsg_OKey,hAPP(c_Public_OshrK,v_A)),c_Message_Oanalz(c_Event_Oknows(c_Message_Oagent_OSpy,v_evs)),tc_Message_Omsg)) ),
inference(fof_simplification,[status(thm)],[cls_conjecture_1]) ).
cnf(c_0_10,plain,
( hBOOL(c_in(X1,c_Message_Oanalz(X2),tc_Message_Omsg))
| ~ hBOOL(c_in(X1,X2,tc_Message_Omsg)) ),
inference(fof_simplification,[status(thm)],[cls_analz_OInj_0]) ).
cnf(c_0_11,negated_conjecture,
( ~ hBOOL(c_in(v_A,c_Event_Obad,tc_Message_Oagent))
| ~ hBOOL(c_in(hAPP(c_Message_Omsg_OKey,hAPP(c_Public_OshrK,v_A)),c_Message_Oanalz(c_Event_Oknows(c_Message_Oagent_OSpy,v_evs)),tc_Message_Omsg)) ),
c_0_9 ).
cnf(c_0_12,plain,
( hBOOL(c_in(X1,c_Message_Oanalz(X2),tc_Message_Omsg))
| ~ hBOOL(c_in(X1,X2,tc_Message_Omsg)) ),
c_0_10 ).
cnf(c_0_13,plain,
( hBOOL(c_in(hAPP(c_Message_Omsg_OKey,hAPP(c_Public_OshrK,X1)),c_Event_Oknows(c_Message_Oagent_OSpy,X2),tc_Message_Omsg))
| ~ hBOOL(c_in(X1,c_Event_Obad,tc_Message_Oagent)) ),
inference(fof_simplification,[status(thm)],[cls_Spy__spies__bad__shrK_0]) ).
cnf(c_0_14,negated_conjecture,
( ~ hBOOL(c_in(hAPP(c_Message_Omsg_OKey,hAPP(c_Public_OshrK,v_A)),c_Event_Oknows(c_Message_Oagent_OSpy,v_evs),tc_Message_Omsg))
| ~ hBOOL(c_in(v_A,c_Event_Obad,tc_Message_Oagent)) ),
inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_11,c_0_12]) ).
cnf(c_0_15,plain,
( hBOOL(c_in(hAPP(c_Message_Omsg_OKey,hAPP(c_Public_OshrK,X1)),c_Event_Oknows(c_Message_Oagent_OSpy,X2),tc_Message_Omsg))
| ~ hBOOL(c_in(X1,c_Event_Obad,tc_Message_Oagent)) ),
c_0_13 ).
cnf(c_0_16,plain,
( hBOOL(hAPP(X1,X2))
| ~ hBOOL(c_in(X2,X1,X3)) ),
inference(fof_simplification,[status(thm)],[cls_mem__def_0]) ).
cnf(c_0_17,negated_conjecture,
( hBOOL(c_in(hAPP(c_Message_Omsg_OKey,hAPP(c_Public_OshrK,v_A)),c_Message_Oanalz(c_Event_Oknows(c_Message_Oagent_OSpy,v_evs)),tc_Message_Omsg))
| hBOOL(c_in(v_A,c_Event_Obad,tc_Message_Oagent)) ),
cls_conjecture_2 ).
cnf(c_0_18,negated_conjecture,
~ hBOOL(c_in(v_A,c_Event_Obad,tc_Message_Oagent)),
inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_14,c_0_15]) ).
cnf(c_0_19,plain,
( hBOOL(c_in(X1,c_Event_Obad,tc_Message_Oagent))
| ~ hBOOL(c_in(hAPP(c_Message_Omsg_OKey,hAPP(c_Public_OshrK,X1)),c_Message_Oparts(c_Event_Oknows(c_Message_Oagent_OSpy,X2)),tc_Message_Omsg))
| ~ hBOOL(c_in(X2,c_NS__Shared__Mirabelle_Ons__shared,tc_List_Olist(tc_Event_Oevent))) ),
inference(fof_simplification,[status(thm)],[cls_Spy__see__shrK_0]) ).
cnf(c_0_20,plain,
( hBOOL(c_in(X1,c_Message_Oparts(X2),tc_Message_Omsg))
| ~ hBOOL(c_in(X1,c_Message_Oanalz(X2),tc_Message_Omsg)) ),
inference(fof_simplification,[status(thm)],[cls_not__parts__not__analz_0]) ).
cnf(c_0_21,plain,
( hBOOL(c_in(X1,X2,X3))
| ~ hBOOL(hAPP(X2,X1)) ),
inference(fof_simplification,[status(thm)],[cls_mem__def_1]) ).
cnf(c_0_22,plain,
( hBOOL(hAPP(X1,X2))
| ~ hBOOL(c_in(X2,X1,X3)) ),
c_0_16 ).
cnf(c_0_23,negated_conjecture,
hBOOL(c_in(hAPP(c_Message_Omsg_OKey,hAPP(c_Public_OshrK,v_A)),c_Message_Oanalz(c_Event_Oknows(c_Message_Oagent_OSpy,v_evs)),tc_Message_Omsg)),
inference(sr,[status(thm)],[c_0_17,c_0_18]) ).
cnf(c_0_24,negated_conjecture,
hBOOL(c_in(v_evs,c_NS__Shared__Mirabelle_Ons__shared,tc_List_Olist(tc_Event_Oevent))),
cls_conjecture_0 ).
cnf(c_0_25,plain,
( hBOOL(c_in(X1,c_Event_Obad,tc_Message_Oagent))
| ~ hBOOL(c_in(hAPP(c_Message_Omsg_OKey,hAPP(c_Public_OshrK,X1)),c_Message_Oparts(c_Event_Oknows(c_Message_Oagent_OSpy,X2)),tc_Message_Omsg))
| ~ hBOOL(c_in(X2,c_NS__Shared__Mirabelle_Ons__shared,tc_List_Olist(tc_Event_Oevent))) ),
c_0_19 ).
cnf(c_0_26,plain,
( hBOOL(c_in(X1,c_Message_Oparts(X2),tc_Message_Omsg))
| ~ hBOOL(c_in(X1,c_Message_Oanalz(X2),tc_Message_Omsg)) ),
c_0_20 ).
cnf(c_0_27,plain,
( hBOOL(c_in(X1,X2,X3))
| ~ hBOOL(hAPP(X2,X1)) ),
c_0_21 ).
cnf(c_0_28,negated_conjecture,
hBOOL(hAPP(c_Message_Oanalz(c_Event_Oknows(c_Message_Oagent_OSpy,v_evs)),hAPP(c_Message_Omsg_OKey,hAPP(c_Public_OshrK,v_A)))),
inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_22,c_0_23]) ).
cnf(c_0_29,negated_conjecture,
hBOOL(hAPP(c_NS__Shared__Mirabelle_Ons__shared,v_evs)),
inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_22,c_0_24]) ).
cnf(c_0_30,plain,
( hBOOL(c_in(X1,c_Event_Obad,tc_Message_Oagent))
| ~ hBOOL(c_in(hAPP(c_Message_Omsg_OKey,hAPP(c_Public_OshrK,X1)),c_Message_Oanalz(c_Event_Oknows(c_Message_Oagent_OSpy,X2)),tc_Message_Omsg))
| ~ hBOOL(c_in(X2,c_NS__Shared__Mirabelle_Ons__shared,tc_List_Olist(tc_Event_Oevent))) ),
inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_25,c_0_26]) ).
cnf(c_0_31,negated_conjecture,
hBOOL(c_in(hAPP(c_Message_Omsg_OKey,hAPP(c_Public_OshrK,v_A)),c_Message_Oanalz(c_Event_Oknows(c_Message_Oagent_OSpy,v_evs)),X1)),
inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_27,c_0_28]) ).
cnf(c_0_32,negated_conjecture,
hBOOL(c_in(v_evs,c_NS__Shared__Mirabelle_Ons__shared,X1)),
inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_27,c_0_29]) ).
cnf(c_0_33,negated_conjecture,
$false,
inference(sr,[status(thm)],[inference(cn,[status(thm)],[inference(rw,[status(thm)],[inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_30,c_0_31]),c_0_32])]),c_0_18]),
[proof] ).
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
%----ORIGINAL SYSTEM OUTPUT
% 0.09/0.09 % Problem : SWV724-1 : TPTP v8.2.0. Released v4.1.0.
% 0.09/0.10 % Command : run_E %s %d THM
% 0.09/0.31 % Computer : n022.cluster.edu
% 0.09/0.31 % Model : x86_64 x86_64
% 0.09/0.31 % CPU : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 @ 2.10GHz
% 0.09/0.31 % Memory : 8042.1875MB
% 0.09/0.31 % OS : Linux 3.10.0-693.el7.x86_64
% 0.09/0.31 % CPULimit : 300
% 0.09/0.31 % WCLimit : 300
% 0.09/0.31 % DateTime : Sun May 19 07:13:22 EDT 2024
% 0.09/0.31 % CPUTime :
% 0.16/0.41 Running first-order model finding
% 0.16/0.41 Running: /export/starexec/sandbox2/solver/bin/eprover --delete-bad-limit=2000000000 --definitional-cnf=24 -s --print-statistics -R --print-version --proof-object --satauto-schedule=8 --cpu-limit=300 /export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p
% 0.16/0.48 # Version: 3.1.0
% 0.16/0.48 # Preprocessing class: FSLSSMSMSSSNFFN.
% 0.16/0.48 # Scheduled 4 strats onto 8 cores with 300 seconds (2400 total)
% 0.16/0.48 # Starting C07_19_nc_SOS_SAT001_MinMin_p005000_rr with 1500s (5) cores
% 0.16/0.48 # Starting new_bool_3 with 300s (1) cores
% 0.16/0.48 # Starting new_bool_1 with 300s (1) cores
% 0.16/0.48 # Starting sh5l with 300s (1) cores
% 0.16/0.48 # new_bool_3 with pid 19435 completed with status 0
% 0.16/0.48 # Result found by new_bool_3
% 0.16/0.48 # Preprocessing class: FSLSSMSMSSSNFFN.
% 0.16/0.48 # Scheduled 4 strats onto 8 cores with 300 seconds (2400 total)
% 0.16/0.48 # Starting C07_19_nc_SOS_SAT001_MinMin_p005000_rr with 1500s (5) cores
% 0.16/0.48 # Starting new_bool_3 with 300s (1) cores
% 0.16/0.48 # SinE strategy is GSinE(CountFormulas,hypos,1.5,,3,20000,1.0)
% 0.16/0.48 # Search class: FGHSM-FSLM31-DFFFFFNN
% 0.16/0.48 # Scheduled 6 strats onto 1 cores with 300 seconds (300 total)
% 0.16/0.48 # Starting G-E--_208_C18C--_F1_SE_CS_SP_PS_S5PRR_RG_S04AN with 136s (1) cores
% 0.16/0.48 # G-E--_208_C18C--_F1_SE_CS_SP_PS_S5PRR_RG_S04AN with pid 19439 completed with status 0
% 0.16/0.48 # Result found by G-E--_208_C18C--_F1_SE_CS_SP_PS_S5PRR_RG_S04AN
% 0.16/0.48 # Preprocessing class: FSLSSMSMSSSNFFN.
% 0.16/0.48 # Scheduled 4 strats onto 8 cores with 300 seconds (2400 total)
% 0.16/0.48 # Starting C07_19_nc_SOS_SAT001_MinMin_p005000_rr with 1500s (5) cores
% 0.16/0.48 # Starting new_bool_3 with 300s (1) cores
% 0.16/0.48 # SinE strategy is GSinE(CountFormulas,hypos,1.5,,3,20000,1.0)
% 0.16/0.48 # Search class: FGHSM-FSLM31-DFFFFFNN
% 0.16/0.48 # Scheduled 6 strats onto 1 cores with 300 seconds (300 total)
% 0.16/0.48 # Starting G-E--_208_C18C--_F1_SE_CS_SP_PS_S5PRR_RG_S04AN with 136s (1) cores
% 0.16/0.48 # Preprocessing time : 0.005 s
% 0.16/0.48 # Presaturation interreduction done
% 0.16/0.48
% 0.16/0.48 # Proof found!
% 0.16/0.48 # SZS status Unsatisfiable
% 0.16/0.48 # SZS output start CNFRefutation
% See solution above
% 0.16/0.48 # Parsed axioms : 567
% 0.16/0.48 # Removed by relevancy pruning/SinE : 154
% 0.16/0.48 # Initial clauses : 413
% 0.16/0.48 # Removed in clause preprocessing : 0
% 0.16/0.48 # Initial clauses in saturation : 413
% 0.16/0.48 # Processed clauses : 586
% 0.16/0.48 # ...of these trivial : 30
% 0.16/0.48 # ...subsumed : 100
% 0.16/0.48 # ...remaining for further processing : 456
% 0.16/0.48 # Other redundant clauses eliminated : 6
% 0.16/0.48 # Clauses deleted for lack of memory : 0
% 0.16/0.48 # Backward-subsumed : 5
% 0.16/0.48 # Backward-rewritten : 7
% 0.16/0.48 # Generated clauses : 210
% 0.16/0.48 # ...of the previous two non-redundant : 111
% 0.16/0.48 # ...aggressively subsumed : 0
% 0.16/0.48 # Contextual simplify-reflections : 0
% 0.16/0.48 # Paramodulations : 182
% 0.16/0.48 # Factorizations : 0
% 0.16/0.48 # NegExts : 0
% 0.16/0.48 # Equation resolutions : 27
% 0.16/0.48 # Disequality decompositions : 0
% 0.16/0.48 # Total rewrite steps : 130
% 0.16/0.48 # ...of those cached : 42
% 0.16/0.48 # Propositional unsat checks : 0
% 0.16/0.48 # Propositional check models : 0
% 0.16/0.48 # Propositional check unsatisfiable : 0
% 0.16/0.48 # Propositional clauses : 0
% 0.16/0.48 # Propositional clauses after purity: 0
% 0.16/0.48 # Propositional unsat core size : 0
% 0.16/0.48 # Propositional preprocessing time : 0.000
% 0.16/0.48 # Propositional encoding time : 0.000
% 0.16/0.48 # Propositional solver time : 0.000
% 0.16/0.48 # Success case prop preproc time : 0.000
% 0.16/0.48 # Success case prop encoding time : 0.000
% 0.16/0.48 # Success case prop solver time : 0.000
% 0.16/0.48 # Current number of processed clauses : 142
% 0.16/0.48 # Positive orientable unit clauses : 48
% 0.16/0.48 # Positive unorientable unit clauses: 0
% 0.16/0.48 # Negative unit clauses : 41
% 0.16/0.48 # Non-unit-clauses : 53
% 0.16/0.48 # Current number of unprocessed clauses: 238
% 0.16/0.48 # ...number of literals in the above : 474
% 0.16/0.48 # Current number of archived formulas : 0
% 0.16/0.48 # Current number of archived clauses : 314
% 0.16/0.48 # Clause-clause subsumption calls (NU) : 12840
% 0.16/0.48 # Rec. Clause-clause subsumption calls : 7635
% 0.16/0.48 # Non-unit clause-clause subsumptions : 49
% 0.16/0.48 # Unit Clause-clause subsumption calls : 665
% 0.16/0.48 # Rewrite failures with RHS unbound : 0
% 0.16/0.48 # BW rewrite match attempts : 55
% 0.16/0.48 # BW rewrite match successes : 30
% 0.16/0.48 # Condensation attempts : 0
% 0.16/0.48 # Condensation successes : 0
% 0.16/0.48 # Termbank termtop insertions : 20718
% 0.16/0.48 # Search garbage collected termcells : 1216
% 0.16/0.48
% 0.16/0.48 # -------------------------------------------------
% 0.16/0.48 # User time : 0.042 s
% 0.16/0.48 # System time : 0.005 s
% 0.16/0.48 # Total time : 0.047 s
% 0.16/0.48 # Maximum resident set size: 2684 pages
% 0.16/0.48
% 0.16/0.48 # -------------------------------------------------
% 0.16/0.48 # User time : 0.056 s
% 0.16/0.48 # System time : 0.007 s
% 0.16/0.48 # Total time : 0.063 s
% 0.16/0.48 # Maximum resident set size: 2124 pages
% 0.16/0.48 % E---3.1 exiting
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------