TSTP Solution File: SWV687-1 by E-SAT---3.1
View Problem
- Process Solution
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
% File : E-SAT---3.1
% Problem : SWV687-1 : TPTP v8.1.2. Released v4.1.0.
% Transfm : none
% Format : tptp:raw
% Command : run_E %s %d THM
% Computer : n019.cluster.edu
% Model : x86_64 x86_64
% CPU : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 2.10GHz
% Memory : 8042.1875MB
% OS : Linux 3.10.0-693.el7.x86_64
% CPULimit : 2400s
% WCLimit : 300s
% DateTime : Tue Oct 10 20:07:39 EDT 2023
% Result : Unsatisfiable 1190.05s 150.32s
% Output : CNFRefutation 1190.05s
% Verified :
% SZS Type : Refutation
% Derivation depth : 5
% Number of leaves : 5
% Syntax : Number of clauses : 15 ( 13 unt; 0 nHn; 7 RR)
% Number of literals : 17 ( 12 equ; 6 neg)
% Maximal clause size : 2 ( 1 avg)
% Maximal term depth : 5 ( 2 avg)
% Number of predicates : 3 ( 1 usr; 1 prp; 0-2 aty)
% Number of functors : 7 ( 7 usr; 2 con; 0-5 aty)
% Number of variables : 55 ( 30 sgn)
% Comments :
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
cnf(cls_COMBB__def_0,axiom,
hAPP(hAPP(c_COMBB(X1,X2,X3,X4),X5),X6) = hAPP(X1,hAPP(X5,X6)),
file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/tmp/tmp.AHtgvFibNR/E---3.1_23411.p',cls_COMBB__def_0) ).
cnf(cls_COMBS__def_0,axiom,
hAPP(c_COMBS(X1,X2,X3,X4,X5),X6) = hAPP(hAPP(X1,X6),hAPP(X2,X6)),
file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/tmp/tmp.AHtgvFibNR/E---3.1_23411.p',cls_COMBS__def_0) ).
cnf(cls_n__not__Suc__n_0,axiom,
X1 != hAPP(c_Suc,X1),
file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/tmp/tmp.AHtgvFibNR/E---3.1_23411.p',cls_n__not__Suc__n_0) ).
cnf(cls_class__semiring_Omul__1_0,axiom,
( hAPP(hAPP(c_HOL_Otimes__class_Otimes(X1),c_HOL_Oone__class_Oone(X1)),X2) = X2
| ~ class_Ring__and__Field_Ocomm__semiring__1(X1) ),
file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/tmp/tmp.AHtgvFibNR/E---3.1_23411.p',cls_class__semiring_Omul__1_0) ).
cnf(clsarity_Int__Oint__Ring__and__Field_Ocomm__semiring__1,axiom,
class_Ring__and__Field_Ocomm__semiring__1(tc_Int_Oint),
file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/tmp/tmp.AHtgvFibNR/E---3.1_23411.p',clsarity_Int__Oint__Ring__and__Field_Ocomm__semiring__1) ).
cnf(c_0_5,axiom,
hAPP(hAPP(c_COMBB(X1,X2,X3,X4),X5),X6) = hAPP(X1,hAPP(X5,X6)),
cls_COMBB__def_0 ).
cnf(c_0_6,axiom,
hAPP(c_COMBS(X1,X2,X3,X4,X5),X6) = hAPP(hAPP(X1,X6),hAPP(X2,X6)),
cls_COMBS__def_0 ).
cnf(c_0_7,axiom,
X1 != hAPP(c_Suc,X1),
cls_n__not__Suc__n_0 ).
cnf(c_0_8,plain,
hAPP(c_COMBS(c_COMBB(X1,X2,X3,X4),X5,X6,X7,X8),X9) = hAPP(X1,hAPP(X9,hAPP(X5,X9))),
inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_5,c_0_6]) ).
cnf(c_0_9,axiom,
( hAPP(hAPP(c_HOL_Otimes__class_Otimes(X1),c_HOL_Oone__class_Oone(X1)),X2) = X2
| ~ class_Ring__and__Field_Ocomm__semiring__1(X1) ),
cls_class__semiring_Omul__1_0 ).
cnf(c_0_10,axiom,
class_Ring__and__Field_Ocomm__semiring__1(tc_Int_Oint),
clsarity_Int__Oint__Ring__and__Field_Ocomm__semiring__1 ).
cnf(c_0_11,plain,
hAPP(c_COMBS(c_COMBB(c_Suc,X1,X2,X3),X4,X5,X6,X7),X8) != hAPP(X8,hAPP(X4,X8)),
inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_7,c_0_8]) ).
cnf(c_0_12,plain,
hAPP(hAPP(c_HOL_Otimes__class_Otimes(tc_Int_Oint),c_HOL_Oone__class_Oone(tc_Int_Oint)),X1) = X1,
inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_9,c_0_10]) ).
cnf(c_0_13,plain,
hAPP(c_COMBS(c_COMBB(c_Suc,X1,X2,X3),hAPP(c_HOL_Otimes__class_Otimes(tc_Int_Oint),c_HOL_Oone__class_Oone(tc_Int_Oint)),X4,X5,X6),X7) != hAPP(X7,X7),
inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_11,c_0_12]) ).
cnf(c_0_14,plain,
$false,
inference(er,[status(thm)],[c_0_13]),
[proof] ).
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
%----ORIGINAL SYSTEM OUTPUT
% 0.09/0.10 % Problem : SWV687-1 : TPTP v8.1.2. Released v4.1.0.
% 0.09/0.11 % Command : run_E %s %d THM
% 0.10/0.31 % Computer : n019.cluster.edu
% 0.10/0.31 % Model : x86_64 x86_64
% 0.10/0.31 % CPU : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 @ 2.10GHz
% 0.10/0.31 % Memory : 8042.1875MB
% 0.10/0.31 % OS : Linux 3.10.0-693.el7.x86_64
% 0.10/0.31 % CPULimit : 2400
% 0.10/0.31 % WCLimit : 300
% 0.10/0.31 % DateTime : Tue Oct 3 04:18:21 EDT 2023
% 0.10/0.31 % CPUTime :
% 0.36/0.58 Running first-order model finding
% 0.36/0.58 Running: /export/starexec/sandbox2/solver/bin/eprover --delete-bad-limit=2000000000 --definitional-cnf=24 -s --print-statistics -R --print-version --proof-object --satauto-schedule=8 --cpu-limit=300 /export/starexec/sandbox2/tmp/tmp.AHtgvFibNR/E---3.1_23411.p
% 1190.05/150.31 # Version: 3.1pre001
% 1190.05/150.31 # Preprocessing class: FMLMSMSMSSSNFFN.
% 1190.05/150.31 # Scheduled 4 strats onto 8 cores with 300 seconds (2400 total)
% 1190.05/150.31 # Starting G-E--_208_C18_F1_SE_CS_SOS_SP_PS_S5PRR_RG_S04AN with 1500s (5) cores
% 1190.05/150.31 # Starting new_bool_3 with 300s (1) cores
% 1190.05/150.31 # Starting new_bool_1 with 300s (1) cores
% 1190.05/150.31 # Starting sh5l with 300s (1) cores
% 1190.05/150.31 # G-E--_208_C18_F1_SE_CS_SOS_SP_PS_S5PRR_RG_S04AN with pid 23488 completed with status 0
% 1190.05/150.31 # Result found by G-E--_208_C18_F1_SE_CS_SOS_SP_PS_S5PRR_RG_S04AN
% 1190.05/150.31 # Preprocessing class: FMLMSMSMSSSNFFN.
% 1190.05/150.31 # Scheduled 4 strats onto 8 cores with 300 seconds (2400 total)
% 1190.05/150.31 # Starting G-E--_208_C18_F1_SE_CS_SOS_SP_PS_S5PRR_RG_S04AN with 1500s (5) cores
% 1190.05/150.31 # No SInE strategy applied
% 1190.05/150.31 # Search class: FGHSM-SMLM32-DFFFFFNN
% 1190.05/150.31 # Scheduled 13 strats onto 5 cores with 1500 seconds (1500 total)
% 1190.05/150.31 # Starting G-E--_207_C18_F1_SE_CS_SP_PI_PS_S5PRR_RG_S0Y with 113s (1) cores
% 1190.05/150.31 # Starting G-E--_208_C18_F1_SE_CS_SOS_SP_PS_S5PRR_RG_S04AN with 151s (1) cores
% 1190.05/150.31 # Starting G-E--_207_C01_F1_SE_CS_SP_PI_S5PRR_S0Y with 113s (1) cores
% 1190.05/150.31 # Starting G-E--_208_B07CMA_F1_SE_CS_SP_PS_S5PRR_RG_S04AN with 113s (1) cores
% 1190.05/150.31 # Starting G-E--_208_B00_00_F1_SE_CS_SP_PS_S5PRR_S00EN with 113s (1) cores
% 1190.05/150.31 # G-E--_207_C01_F1_SE_CS_SP_PI_S5PRR_S0Y with pid 23496 completed with status 7
% 1190.05/150.31 # Starting G-E--_301_C18_F1_URBAN_S5PRR_RG_S070I with 113s (1) cores
% 1190.05/150.31 # G-E--_208_B00_00_F1_SE_CS_SP_PS_S5PRR_S00EN with pid 23498 completed with status 7
% 1190.05/150.31 # Starting G-E--_200_B02_F1_SE_CS_SP_PI_S2k with 113s (1) cores
% 1190.05/150.31 # G-E--_208_B07CMA_F1_SE_CS_SP_PS_S5PRR_RG_S04AN with pid 23497 completed with status 7
% 1190.05/150.31 # Starting U----_206c_02_C11_23_F1_SE_PI_CS_SP_PS_S5PRR_RG_S04AN with 113s (1) cores
% 1190.05/150.31 # G-E--_207_C18_F1_SE_CS_SP_PI_PS_S5PRR_RG_S0Y with pid 23494 completed with status 7
% 1190.05/150.31 # Starting G-E--_301_C18_F1_URBAN_S5PRR_RG_S04AN with 113s (1) cores
% 1190.05/150.31 # U----_206c_02_C11_23_F1_SE_PI_CS_SP_PS_S5PRR_RG_S04AN with pid 23566 completed with status 0
% 1190.05/150.31 # Result found by U----_206c_02_C11_23_F1_SE_PI_CS_SP_PS_S5PRR_RG_S04AN
% 1190.05/150.31 # Preprocessing class: FMLMSMSMSSSNFFN.
% 1190.05/150.31 # Scheduled 4 strats onto 8 cores with 300 seconds (2400 total)
% 1190.05/150.31 # Starting G-E--_208_C18_F1_SE_CS_SOS_SP_PS_S5PRR_RG_S04AN with 1500s (5) cores
% 1190.05/150.31 # No SInE strategy applied
% 1190.05/150.31 # Search class: FGHSM-SMLM32-DFFFFFNN
% 1190.05/150.31 # Scheduled 13 strats onto 5 cores with 1500 seconds (1500 total)
% 1190.05/150.31 # Starting G-E--_207_C18_F1_SE_CS_SP_PI_PS_S5PRR_RG_S0Y with 113s (1) cores
% 1190.05/150.31 # Starting G-E--_208_C18_F1_SE_CS_SOS_SP_PS_S5PRR_RG_S04AN with 151s (1) cores
% 1190.05/150.31 # Starting G-E--_207_C01_F1_SE_CS_SP_PI_S5PRR_S0Y with 113s (1) cores
% 1190.05/150.31 # Starting G-E--_208_B07CMA_F1_SE_CS_SP_PS_S5PRR_RG_S04AN with 113s (1) cores
% 1190.05/150.31 # Starting G-E--_208_B00_00_F1_SE_CS_SP_PS_S5PRR_S00EN with 113s (1) cores
% 1190.05/150.31 # G-E--_207_C01_F1_SE_CS_SP_PI_S5PRR_S0Y with pid 23496 completed with status 7
% 1190.05/150.31 # Starting G-E--_301_C18_F1_URBAN_S5PRR_RG_S070I with 113s (1) cores
% 1190.05/150.31 # G-E--_208_B00_00_F1_SE_CS_SP_PS_S5PRR_S00EN with pid 23498 completed with status 7
% 1190.05/150.31 # Starting G-E--_200_B02_F1_SE_CS_SP_PI_S2k with 113s (1) cores
% 1190.05/150.31 # G-E--_208_B07CMA_F1_SE_CS_SP_PS_S5PRR_RG_S04AN with pid 23497 completed with status 7
% 1190.05/150.31 # Starting U----_206c_02_C11_23_F1_SE_PI_CS_SP_PS_S5PRR_RG_S04AN with 113s (1) cores
% 1190.05/150.32 # Preprocessing time : 0.019 s
% 1190.05/150.32 # Presaturation interreduction done
% 1190.05/150.32
% 1190.05/150.32 # Proof found!
% 1190.05/150.32 # SZS status Unsatisfiable
% 1190.05/150.32 # SZS output start CNFRefutation
% See solution above
% 1190.05/150.32 # Parsed axioms : 1402
% 1190.05/150.32 # Removed by relevancy pruning/SinE : 0
% 1190.05/150.32 # Initial clauses : 1402
% 1190.05/150.32 # Removed in clause preprocessing : 0
% 1190.05/150.32 # Initial clauses in saturation : 1402
% 1190.05/150.32 # Processed clauses : 58787
% 1190.05/150.32 # ...of these trivial : 877
% 1190.05/150.32 # ...subsumed : 49905
% 1190.05/150.32 # ...remaining for further processing : 8005
% 1190.05/150.32 # Other redundant clauses eliminated : 9183
% 1190.05/150.32 # Clauses deleted for lack of memory : 0
% 1190.05/150.32 # Backward-subsumed : 479
% 1190.05/150.32 # Backward-rewritten : 51
% 1190.05/150.32 # Generated clauses : 1269223
% 1190.05/150.32 # ...of the previous two non-redundant : 1200875
% 1190.05/150.32 # ...aggressively subsumed : 0
% 1190.05/150.32 # Contextual simplify-reflections : 29
% 1190.05/150.32 # Paramodulations : 1259898
% 1190.05/150.32 # Factorizations : 19
% 1190.05/150.32 # NegExts : 0
% 1190.05/150.32 # Equation resolutions : 9306
% 1190.05/150.32 # Total rewrite steps : 760185
% 1190.05/150.32 # Propositional unsat checks : 0
% 1190.05/150.32 # Propositional check models : 0
% 1190.05/150.32 # Propositional check unsatisfiable : 0
% 1190.05/150.32 # Propositional clauses : 0
% 1190.05/150.32 # Propositional clauses after purity: 0
% 1190.05/150.32 # Propositional unsat core size : 0
% 1190.05/150.32 # Propositional preprocessing time : 0.000
% 1190.05/150.32 # Propositional encoding time : 0.000
% 1190.05/150.32 # Propositional solver time : 0.000
% 1190.05/150.32 # Success case prop preproc time : 0.000
% 1190.05/150.32 # Success case prop encoding time : 0.000
% 1190.05/150.32 # Success case prop solver time : 0.000
% 1190.05/150.32 # Current number of processed clauses : 6389
% 1190.05/150.32 # Positive orientable unit clauses : 624
% 1190.05/150.32 # Positive unorientable unit clauses: 90
% 1190.05/150.32 # Negative unit clauses : 1057
% 1190.05/150.32 # Non-unit-clauses : 4618
% 1190.05/150.32 # Current number of unprocessed clauses: 1143211
% 1190.05/150.32 # ...number of literals in the above : 3175085
% 1190.05/150.32 # Current number of archived formulas : 0
% 1190.05/150.32 # Current number of archived clauses : 1616
% 1190.05/150.32 # Clause-clause subsumption calls (NU) : 1255046
% 1190.05/150.32 # Rec. Clause-clause subsumption calls : 736155
% 1190.05/150.32 # Non-unit clause-clause subsumptions : 14866
% 1190.05/150.32 # Unit Clause-clause subsumption calls : 92858
% 1190.05/150.32 # Rewrite failures with RHS unbound : 0
% 1190.05/150.32 # BW rewrite match attempts : 62968
% 1190.05/150.32 # BW rewrite match successes : 492
% 1190.05/150.32 # Condensation attempts : 0
% 1190.05/150.32 # Condensation successes : 0
% 1190.05/150.32 # Termbank termtop insertions : 41109538
% 1190.05/150.32
% 1190.05/150.32 # -------------------------------------------------
% 1190.05/150.32 # User time : 478.946 s
% 1190.05/150.32 # System time : 8.816 s
% 1190.05/150.32 # Total time : 487.762 s
% 1190.05/150.32 # Maximum resident set size: 4608 pages
% 1190.05/150.32
% 1190.05/150.32 # -------------------------------------------------
% 1190.05/150.32 # User time : 728.702 s
% 1190.05/150.32 # System time : 14.031 s
% 1190.05/150.32 # Total time : 742.733 s
% 1190.05/150.32 # Maximum resident set size: 2868 pages
% 1190.05/150.32 % E---3.1 exiting
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------