TSTP Solution File: SWV684-1 by E-SAT---3.1
View Problem
- Process Solution
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
% File : E-SAT---3.1
% Problem : SWV684-1 : TPTP v8.1.2. Released v4.1.0.
% Transfm : none
% Format : tptp:raw
% Command : run_E %s %d THM
% Computer : n024.cluster.edu
% Model : x86_64 x86_64
% CPU : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 2.10GHz
% Memory : 8042.1875MB
% OS : Linux 3.10.0-693.el7.x86_64
% CPULimit : 2400s
% WCLimit : 300s
% DateTime : Tue Oct 10 20:07:38 EDT 2023
% Result : Unsatisfiable 1001.38s 128.46s
% Output : CNFRefutation 1001.38s
% Verified :
% SZS Type : Refutation
% Derivation depth : 5
% Number of leaves : 4
% Syntax : Number of clauses : 12 ( 12 unt; 0 nHn; 5 RR)
% Number of literals : 12 ( 11 equ; 4 neg)
% Maximal clause size : 1 ( 1 avg)
% Maximal term depth : 6 ( 2 avg)
% Number of predicates : 2 ( 0 usr; 1 prp; 0-2 aty)
% Number of functors : 5 ( 5 usr; 1 con; 0-3 aty)
% Number of variables : 67 ( 39 sgn)
% Comments :
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
cnf(cls_COMBB__def_0,axiom,
hAPP(hAPP(hAPP(c_COMBB(X1,X2,X3),X4),X5),X6) = hAPP(X4,hAPP(X5,X6)),
file('/export/starexec/sandbox/tmp/tmp.wICRvWrgvo/E---3.1_586.p',cls_COMBB__def_0) ).
cnf(cls_COMBC__def_0,axiom,
hAPP(hAPP(hAPP(c_COMBC(X1,X2,X3),X4),X5),X6) = hAPP(hAPP(X4,X6),X5),
file('/export/starexec/sandbox/tmp/tmp.wICRvWrgvo/E---3.1_586.p',cls_COMBC__def_0) ).
cnf(cls_n__not__Suc__n_0,axiom,
X1 != hAPP(c_Suc,X1),
file('/export/starexec/sandbox/tmp/tmp.wICRvWrgvo/E---3.1_586.p',cls_n__not__Suc__n_0) ).
cnf(cls_COMBS__def_0,axiom,
hAPP(hAPP(hAPP(c_COMBS(X1,X2,X3),X4),X5),X6) = hAPP(hAPP(X4,X6),hAPP(X5,X6)),
file('/export/starexec/sandbox/tmp/tmp.wICRvWrgvo/E---3.1_586.p',cls_COMBS__def_0) ).
cnf(c_0_4,axiom,
hAPP(hAPP(hAPP(c_COMBB(X1,X2,X3),X4),X5),X6) = hAPP(X4,hAPP(X5,X6)),
cls_COMBB__def_0 ).
cnf(c_0_5,axiom,
hAPP(hAPP(hAPP(c_COMBC(X1,X2,X3),X4),X5),X6) = hAPP(hAPP(X4,X6),X5),
cls_COMBC__def_0 ).
cnf(c_0_6,axiom,
X1 != hAPP(c_Suc,X1),
cls_n__not__Suc__n_0 ).
cnf(c_0_7,plain,
hAPP(hAPP(hAPP(c_COMBC(X1,X2,X3),hAPP(c_COMBB(X4,X5,X6),X7)),X8),X9) = hAPP(X7,hAPP(X9,X8)),
inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_4,c_0_5]) ).
cnf(c_0_8,plain,
hAPP(hAPP(hAPP(c_COMBC(X1,X2,X3),hAPP(c_COMBB(X4,X5,X6),c_Suc)),X7),X8) != hAPP(X8,X7),
inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_6,c_0_7]) ).
cnf(c_0_9,axiom,
hAPP(hAPP(hAPP(c_COMBS(X1,X2,X3),X4),X5),X6) = hAPP(hAPP(X4,X6),hAPP(X5,X6)),
cls_COMBS__def_0 ).
cnf(c_0_10,plain,
hAPP(hAPP(hAPP(c_COMBC(X1,X2,X3),hAPP(c_COMBB(X4,X5,X6),c_Suc)),X7),hAPP(hAPP(c_COMBS(X8,X9,X10),X11),X12)) != hAPP(hAPP(X11,X7),hAPP(X12,X7)),
inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_8,c_0_9]) ).
cnf(c_0_11,plain,
$false,
inference(er,[status(thm)],[c_0_10]),
[proof] ).
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
%----ORIGINAL SYSTEM OUTPUT
% 0.09/0.09 % Problem : SWV684-1 : TPTP v8.1.2. Released v4.1.0.
% 0.09/0.10 % Command : run_E %s %d THM
% 0.10/0.30 % Computer : n024.cluster.edu
% 0.10/0.30 % Model : x86_64 x86_64
% 0.10/0.30 % CPU : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 @ 2.10GHz
% 0.10/0.30 % Memory : 8042.1875MB
% 0.10/0.30 % OS : Linux 3.10.0-693.el7.x86_64
% 0.10/0.30 % CPULimit : 2400
% 0.10/0.30 % WCLimit : 300
% 0.10/0.30 % DateTime : Tue Oct 3 04:35:41 EDT 2023
% 0.10/0.31 % CPUTime :
% 0.15/0.46 Running first-order model finding
% 0.15/0.46 Running: /export/starexec/sandbox/solver/bin/eprover --delete-bad-limit=2000000000 --definitional-cnf=24 -s --print-statistics -R --print-version --proof-object --satauto-schedule=8 --cpu-limit=300 /export/starexec/sandbox/tmp/tmp.wICRvWrgvo/E---3.1_586.p
% 1001.38/128.46 # Version: 3.1pre001
% 1001.38/128.46 # Preprocessing class: FSLSSMSSSSSNFFN.
% 1001.38/128.46 # Scheduled 4 strats onto 8 cores with 300 seconds (2400 total)
% 1001.38/128.46 # Starting G-E--_207_C18_F1_SE_CS_SP_PI_PS_S5PRR_S2S with 1500s (5) cores
% 1001.38/128.46 # Starting new_bool_3 with 300s (1) cores
% 1001.38/128.46 # Starting new_bool_1 with 300s (1) cores
% 1001.38/128.46 # Starting sh5l with 300s (1) cores
% 1001.38/128.46 # G-E--_207_C18_F1_SE_CS_SP_PI_PS_S5PRR_S2S with pid 707 completed with status 0
% 1001.38/128.46 # Result found by G-E--_207_C18_F1_SE_CS_SP_PI_PS_S5PRR_S2S
% 1001.38/128.46 # Preprocessing class: FSLSSMSSSSSNFFN.
% 1001.38/128.46 # Scheduled 4 strats onto 8 cores with 300 seconds (2400 total)
% 1001.38/128.46 # Starting G-E--_207_C18_F1_SE_CS_SP_PI_PS_S5PRR_S2S with 1500s (5) cores
% 1001.38/128.46 # No SInE strategy applied
% 1001.38/128.46 # Search class: FGHSM-FSLM31-DFFFFFNN
% 1001.38/128.46 # Scheduled 6 strats onto 5 cores with 1500 seconds (1500 total)
% 1001.38/128.46 # Starting G-E--_208_C18C--_F1_SE_CS_SP_PS_S5PRR_RG_S04AN with 680s (1) cores
% 1001.38/128.46 # Starting G-E--_207_C18_F1_SE_CS_SP_PI_PS_S5PRR_S2S with 151s (1) cores
% 1001.38/128.46 # Starting U----_206c_10_B11_00_F1_SE_PI_CS_SP_PS_S5PRR_RG_S04AN with 136s (1) cores
% 1001.38/128.46 # Starting G-E--_302_C18_F1_URBAN_S5PRR_RG_S0Y with 136s (1) cores
% 1001.38/128.46 # Starting G-E--_208_B07_F1_SE_CS_SP_PS_S4d with 136s (1) cores
% 1001.38/128.46 # U----_206c_10_B11_00_F1_SE_PI_CS_SP_PS_S5PRR_RG_S04AN with pid 718 completed with status 0
% 1001.38/128.46 # Result found by U----_206c_10_B11_00_F1_SE_PI_CS_SP_PS_S5PRR_RG_S04AN
% 1001.38/128.46 # Preprocessing class: FSLSSMSSSSSNFFN.
% 1001.38/128.46 # Scheduled 4 strats onto 8 cores with 300 seconds (2400 total)
% 1001.38/128.46 # Starting G-E--_207_C18_F1_SE_CS_SP_PI_PS_S5PRR_S2S with 1500s (5) cores
% 1001.38/128.46 # No SInE strategy applied
% 1001.38/128.46 # Search class: FGHSM-FSLM31-DFFFFFNN
% 1001.38/128.46 # Scheduled 6 strats onto 5 cores with 1500 seconds (1500 total)
% 1001.38/128.46 # Starting G-E--_208_C18C--_F1_SE_CS_SP_PS_S5PRR_RG_S04AN with 680s (1) cores
% 1001.38/128.46 # Starting G-E--_207_C18_F1_SE_CS_SP_PI_PS_S5PRR_S2S with 151s (1) cores
% 1001.38/128.46 # Starting U----_206c_10_B11_00_F1_SE_PI_CS_SP_PS_S5PRR_RG_S04AN with 136s (1) cores
% 1001.38/128.46 # Preprocessing time : 0.007 s
% 1001.38/128.46 # Presaturation interreduction done
% 1001.38/128.46
% 1001.38/128.46 # Proof found!
% 1001.38/128.46 # SZS status Unsatisfiable
% 1001.38/128.46 # SZS output start CNFRefutation
% See solution above
% 1001.38/128.46 # Parsed axioms : 590
% 1001.38/128.46 # Removed by relevancy pruning/SinE : 0
% 1001.38/128.46 # Initial clauses : 590
% 1001.38/128.46 # Removed in clause preprocessing : 0
% 1001.38/128.46 # Initial clauses in saturation : 590
% 1001.38/128.46 # Processed clauses : 69058
% 1001.38/128.46 # ...of these trivial : 427
% 1001.38/128.46 # ...subsumed : 61372
% 1001.38/128.46 # ...remaining for further processing : 7259
% 1001.38/128.46 # Other redundant clauses eliminated : 16562
% 1001.38/128.46 # Clauses deleted for lack of memory : 299091
% 1001.38/128.46 # Backward-subsumed : 402
% 1001.38/128.46 # Backward-rewritten : 498
% 1001.38/128.46 # Generated clauses : 3445612
% 1001.38/128.46 # ...of the previous two non-redundant : 3361721
% 1001.38/128.46 # ...aggressively subsumed : 0
% 1001.38/128.46 # Contextual simplify-reflections : 38
% 1001.38/128.46 # Paramodulations : 3428816
% 1001.38/128.46 # Factorizations : 31
% 1001.38/128.46 # NegExts : 0
% 1001.38/128.46 # Equation resolutions : 16765
% 1001.38/128.46 # Total rewrite steps : 830097
% 1001.38/128.46 # Propositional unsat checks : 0
% 1001.38/128.46 # Propositional check models : 0
% 1001.38/128.46 # Propositional check unsatisfiable : 0
% 1001.38/128.46 # Propositional clauses : 0
% 1001.38/128.46 # Propositional clauses after purity: 0
% 1001.38/128.46 # Propositional unsat core size : 0
% 1001.38/128.46 # Propositional preprocessing time : 0.000
% 1001.38/128.46 # Propositional encoding time : 0.000
% 1001.38/128.46 # Propositional solver time : 0.000
% 1001.38/128.46 # Success case prop preproc time : 0.000
% 1001.38/128.46 # Success case prop encoding time : 0.000
% 1001.38/128.46 # Success case prop solver time : 0.000
% 1001.38/128.46 # Current number of processed clauses : 5875
% 1001.38/128.46 # Positive orientable unit clauses : 344
% 1001.38/128.46 # Positive unorientable unit clauses: 327
% 1001.38/128.46 # Negative unit clauses : 645
% 1001.38/128.46 # Non-unit-clauses : 4559
% 1001.38/128.46 # Current number of unprocessed clauses: 1173666
% 1001.38/128.46 # ...number of literals in the above : 2584842
% 1001.38/128.46 # Current number of archived formulas : 0
% 1001.38/128.46 # Current number of archived clauses : 1384
% 1001.38/128.46 # Clause-clause subsumption calls (NU) : 2275926
% 1001.38/128.46 # Rec. Clause-clause subsumption calls : 1324594
% 1001.38/128.46 # Non-unit clause-clause subsumptions : 25833
% 1001.38/128.46 # Unit Clause-clause subsumption calls : 156229
% 1001.38/128.46 # Rewrite failures with RHS unbound : 0
% 1001.38/128.46 # BW rewrite match attempts : 376257
% 1001.38/128.46 # BW rewrite match successes : 80429
% 1001.38/128.46 # Condensation attempts : 0
% 1001.38/128.46 # Condensation successes : 0
% 1001.38/128.46 # Termbank termtop insertions : 108555319
% 1001.38/128.46
% 1001.38/128.46 # -------------------------------------------------
% 1001.38/128.46 # User time : 121.850 s
% 1001.38/128.46 # System time : 1.781 s
% 1001.38/128.46 # Total time : 123.631 s
% 1001.38/128.46 # Maximum resident set size: 2876 pages
% 1001.38/128.46
% 1001.38/128.46 # -------------------------------------------------
% 1001.38/128.46 # User time : 615.205 s
% 1001.38/128.46 # System time : 9.453 s
% 1001.38/128.46 # Total time : 624.659 s
% 1001.38/128.46 # Maximum resident set size: 2172 pages
% 1001.38/128.46 % E---3.1 exiting
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------