TSTP Solution File: SWV684-1 by E---3.1
View Problem
- Process Solution
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
% File : E---3.1
% Problem : SWV684-1 : TPTP v8.1.2. Released v4.1.0.
% Transfm : none
% Format : tptp:raw
% Command : run_E %s %d THM
% Computer : n005.cluster.edu
% Model : x86_64 x86_64
% CPU : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 2.10GHz
% Memory : 8042.1875MB
% OS : Linux 3.10.0-693.el7.x86_64
% CPULimit : 2400s
% WCLimit : 300s
% DateTime : Tue Oct 10 19:55:07 EDT 2023
% Result : Unsatisfiable 1012.66s 131.63s
% Output : CNFRefutation 1012.66s
% Verified :
% SZS Type : Refutation
% Derivation depth : 5
% Number of leaves : 4
% Syntax : Number of clauses : 12 ( 12 unt; 0 nHn; 5 RR)
% Number of literals : 12 ( 11 equ; 4 neg)
% Maximal clause size : 1 ( 1 avg)
% Maximal term depth : 6 ( 2 avg)
% Number of predicates : 2 ( 0 usr; 1 prp; 0-2 aty)
% Number of functors : 5 ( 5 usr; 1 con; 0-3 aty)
% Number of variables : 67 ( 39 sgn)
% Comments :
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
cnf(cls_COMBB__def_0,axiom,
hAPP(hAPP(hAPP(c_COMBB(X1,X2,X3),X4),X5),X6) = hAPP(X4,hAPP(X5,X6)),
file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/tmp/tmp.FEpitKSJp5/E---3.1_16111.p',cls_COMBB__def_0) ).
cnf(cls_COMBC__def_0,axiom,
hAPP(hAPP(hAPP(c_COMBC(X1,X2,X3),X4),X5),X6) = hAPP(hAPP(X4,X6),X5),
file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/tmp/tmp.FEpitKSJp5/E---3.1_16111.p',cls_COMBC__def_0) ).
cnf(cls_n__not__Suc__n_0,axiom,
X1 != hAPP(c_Suc,X1),
file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/tmp/tmp.FEpitKSJp5/E---3.1_16111.p',cls_n__not__Suc__n_0) ).
cnf(cls_COMBS__def_0,axiom,
hAPP(hAPP(hAPP(c_COMBS(X1,X2,X3),X4),X5),X6) = hAPP(hAPP(X4,X6),hAPP(X5,X6)),
file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/tmp/tmp.FEpitKSJp5/E---3.1_16111.p',cls_COMBS__def_0) ).
cnf(c_0_4,axiom,
hAPP(hAPP(hAPP(c_COMBB(X1,X2,X3),X4),X5),X6) = hAPP(X4,hAPP(X5,X6)),
cls_COMBB__def_0 ).
cnf(c_0_5,axiom,
hAPP(hAPP(hAPP(c_COMBC(X1,X2,X3),X4),X5),X6) = hAPP(hAPP(X4,X6),X5),
cls_COMBC__def_0 ).
cnf(c_0_6,axiom,
X1 != hAPP(c_Suc,X1),
cls_n__not__Suc__n_0 ).
cnf(c_0_7,plain,
hAPP(hAPP(hAPP(c_COMBC(X1,X2,X3),hAPP(c_COMBB(X4,X5,X6),X7)),X8),X9) = hAPP(X7,hAPP(X9,X8)),
inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_4,c_0_5]) ).
cnf(c_0_8,plain,
hAPP(hAPP(hAPP(c_COMBC(X1,X2,X3),hAPP(c_COMBB(X4,X5,X6),c_Suc)),X7),X8) != hAPP(X8,X7),
inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_6,c_0_7]) ).
cnf(c_0_9,axiom,
hAPP(hAPP(hAPP(c_COMBS(X1,X2,X3),X4),X5),X6) = hAPP(hAPP(X4,X6),hAPP(X5,X6)),
cls_COMBS__def_0 ).
cnf(c_0_10,plain,
hAPP(hAPP(hAPP(c_COMBC(X1,X2,X3),hAPP(c_COMBB(X4,X5,X6),c_Suc)),X7),hAPP(hAPP(c_COMBS(X8,X9,X10),X11),X12)) != hAPP(hAPP(X11,X7),hAPP(X12,X7)),
inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_8,c_0_9]) ).
cnf(c_0_11,plain,
$false,
inference(er,[status(thm)],[c_0_10]),
[proof] ).
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
%----ORIGINAL SYSTEM OUTPUT
% 0.17/0.18 % Problem : SWV684-1 : TPTP v8.1.2. Released v4.1.0.
% 0.17/0.19 % Command : run_E %s %d THM
% 0.18/0.39 % Computer : n005.cluster.edu
% 0.18/0.39 % Model : x86_64 x86_64
% 0.18/0.39 % CPU : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 @ 2.10GHz
% 0.18/0.39 % Memory : 8042.1875MB
% 0.18/0.39 % OS : Linux 3.10.0-693.el7.x86_64
% 0.18/0.39 % CPULimit : 2400
% 0.18/0.39 % WCLimit : 300
% 0.18/0.39 % DateTime : Tue Oct 3 04:33:31 EDT 2023
% 0.18/0.39 % CPUTime :
% 0.24/0.56 Running first-order theorem proving
% 0.24/0.56 Running: /export/starexec/sandbox2/solver/bin/eprover --delete-bad-limit=2000000000 --definitional-cnf=24 -s --print-statistics -R --print-version --proof-object --auto-schedule=8 --cpu-limit=300 /export/starexec/sandbox2/tmp/tmp.FEpitKSJp5/E---3.1_16111.p
% 1012.66/131.63 # Version: 3.1pre001
% 1012.66/131.63 # Preprocessing class: FSLSSMSSSSSNFFN.
% 1012.66/131.63 # Scheduled 4 strats onto 8 cores with 300 seconds (2400 total)
% 1012.66/131.63 # Starting G-E--_207_C18_F1_SE_CS_SP_PI_PS_S5PRR_S2S with 1500s (5) cores
% 1012.66/131.63 # Starting new_bool_3 with 300s (1) cores
% 1012.66/131.63 # Starting new_bool_1 with 300s (1) cores
% 1012.66/131.63 # Starting sh5l with 300s (1) cores
% 1012.66/131.63 # G-E--_207_C18_F1_SE_CS_SP_PI_PS_S5PRR_S2S with pid 16190 completed with status 0
% 1012.66/131.63 # Result found by G-E--_207_C18_F1_SE_CS_SP_PI_PS_S5PRR_S2S
% 1012.66/131.63 # Preprocessing class: FSLSSMSSSSSNFFN.
% 1012.66/131.63 # Scheduled 4 strats onto 8 cores with 300 seconds (2400 total)
% 1012.66/131.63 # Starting G-E--_207_C18_F1_SE_CS_SP_PI_PS_S5PRR_S2S with 1500s (5) cores
% 1012.66/131.63 # No SInE strategy applied
% 1012.66/131.63 # Search class: FGHSM-FSLM31-DFFFFFNN
% 1012.66/131.63 # Scheduled 6 strats onto 5 cores with 1500 seconds (1500 total)
% 1012.66/131.63 # Starting G-E--_208_C18C--_F1_SE_CS_SP_PS_S5PRR_RG_S04AN with 680s (1) cores
% 1012.66/131.63 # Starting G-E--_207_C18_F1_SE_CS_SP_PI_PS_S5PRR_S2S with 151s (1) cores
% 1012.66/131.63 # Starting U----_206c_10_B11_00_F1_SE_PI_CS_SP_PS_S5PRR_RG_S04AN with 136s (1) cores
% 1012.66/131.63 # Starting G-E--_302_C18_F1_URBAN_S5PRR_RG_S0Y with 136s (1) cores
% 1012.66/131.63 # Starting G-E--_208_B07_F1_SE_CS_SP_PS_S4d with 136s (1) cores
% 1012.66/131.63 # U----_206c_10_B11_00_F1_SE_PI_CS_SP_PS_S5PRR_RG_S04AN with pid 16198 completed with status 0
% 1012.66/131.63 # Result found by U----_206c_10_B11_00_F1_SE_PI_CS_SP_PS_S5PRR_RG_S04AN
% 1012.66/131.63 # Preprocessing class: FSLSSMSSSSSNFFN.
% 1012.66/131.63 # Scheduled 4 strats onto 8 cores with 300 seconds (2400 total)
% 1012.66/131.63 # Starting G-E--_207_C18_F1_SE_CS_SP_PI_PS_S5PRR_S2S with 1500s (5) cores
% 1012.66/131.63 # No SInE strategy applied
% 1012.66/131.63 # Search class: FGHSM-FSLM31-DFFFFFNN
% 1012.66/131.63 # Scheduled 6 strats onto 5 cores with 1500 seconds (1500 total)
% 1012.66/131.63 # Starting G-E--_208_C18C--_F1_SE_CS_SP_PS_S5PRR_RG_S04AN with 680s (1) cores
% 1012.66/131.63 # Starting G-E--_207_C18_F1_SE_CS_SP_PI_PS_S5PRR_S2S with 151s (1) cores
% 1012.66/131.63 # Starting U----_206c_10_B11_00_F1_SE_PI_CS_SP_PS_S5PRR_RG_S04AN with 136s (1) cores
% 1012.66/131.63 # Preprocessing time : 0.006 s
% 1012.66/131.63 # Presaturation interreduction done
% 1012.66/131.63
% 1012.66/131.63 # Proof found!
% 1012.66/131.63 # SZS status Unsatisfiable
% 1012.66/131.63 # SZS output start CNFRefutation
% See solution above
% 1012.66/131.63 # Parsed axioms : 590
% 1012.66/131.63 # Removed by relevancy pruning/SinE : 0
% 1012.66/131.63 # Initial clauses : 590
% 1012.66/131.63 # Removed in clause preprocessing : 0
% 1012.66/131.63 # Initial clauses in saturation : 590
% 1012.66/131.63 # Processed clauses : 69058
% 1012.66/131.63 # ...of these trivial : 427
% 1012.66/131.63 # ...subsumed : 61373
% 1012.66/131.63 # ...remaining for further processing : 7258
% 1012.66/131.63 # Other redundant clauses eliminated : 16562
% 1012.66/131.63 # Clauses deleted for lack of memory : 298074
% 1012.66/131.63 # Backward-subsumed : 401
% 1012.66/131.63 # Backward-rewritten : 498
% 1012.66/131.63 # Generated clauses : 3444584
% 1012.66/131.63 # ...of the previous two non-redundant : 3360700
% 1012.66/131.63 # ...aggressively subsumed : 0
% 1012.66/131.63 # Contextual simplify-reflections : 38
% 1012.66/131.63 # Paramodulations : 3427788
% 1012.66/131.63 # Factorizations : 31
% 1012.66/131.63 # NegExts : 0
% 1012.66/131.63 # Equation resolutions : 16765
% 1012.66/131.63 # Total rewrite steps : 830047
% 1012.66/131.63 # Propositional unsat checks : 0
% 1012.66/131.63 # Propositional check models : 0
% 1012.66/131.63 # Propositional check unsatisfiable : 0
% 1012.66/131.63 # Propositional clauses : 0
% 1012.66/131.63 # Propositional clauses after purity: 0
% 1012.66/131.63 # Propositional unsat core size : 0
% 1012.66/131.63 # Propositional preprocessing time : 0.000
% 1012.66/131.63 # Propositional encoding time : 0.000
% 1012.66/131.63 # Propositional solver time : 0.000
% 1012.66/131.63 # Success case prop preproc time : 0.000
% 1012.66/131.63 # Success case prop encoding time : 0.000
% 1012.66/131.63 # Success case prop solver time : 0.000
% 1012.66/131.63 # Current number of processed clauses : 5875
% 1012.66/131.63 # Positive orientable unit clauses : 344
% 1012.66/131.63 # Positive unorientable unit clauses: 327
% 1012.66/131.63 # Negative unit clauses : 645
% 1012.66/131.63 # Non-unit-clauses : 4559
% 1012.66/131.63 # Current number of unprocessed clauses: 1173152
% 1012.66/131.63 # ...number of literals in the above : 2583716
% 1012.66/131.63 # Current number of archived formulas : 0
% 1012.66/131.63 # Current number of archived clauses : 1383
% 1012.66/131.63 # Clause-clause subsumption calls (NU) : 2276931
% 1012.66/131.63 # Rec. Clause-clause subsumption calls : 1325442
% 1012.66/131.63 # Non-unit clause-clause subsumptions : 25840
% 1012.66/131.63 # Unit Clause-clause subsumption calls : 156229
% 1012.66/131.63 # Rewrite failures with RHS unbound : 0
% 1012.66/131.63 # BW rewrite match attempts : 376249
% 1012.66/131.63 # BW rewrite match successes : 80420
% 1012.66/131.63 # Condensation attempts : 0
% 1012.66/131.63 # Condensation successes : 0
% 1012.66/131.63 # Termbank termtop insertions : 108531402
% 1012.66/131.63
% 1012.66/131.63 # -------------------------------------------------
% 1012.66/131.63 # User time : 125.004 s
% 1012.66/131.63 # System time : 1.739 s
% 1012.66/131.63 # Total time : 126.744 s
% 1012.66/131.63 # Maximum resident set size: 2880 pages
% 1012.66/131.63
% 1012.66/131.63 # -------------------------------------------------
% 1012.66/131.63 # User time : 620.793 s
% 1012.66/131.63 # System time : 9.237 s
% 1012.66/131.63 # Total time : 630.030 s
% 1012.66/131.63 # Maximum resident set size: 2176 pages
% 1012.66/131.63 % E---3.1 exiting
% 1012.66/131.63 % E---3.1 exiting
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------