TSTP Solution File: SWV682-1 by E-SAT---3.1
View Problem
- Process Solution
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
% File : E-SAT---3.1
% Problem : SWV682-1 : TPTP v8.1.2. Released v4.1.0.
% Transfm : none
% Format : tptp:raw
% Command : run_E %s %d THM
% Computer : n014.cluster.edu
% Model : x86_64 x86_64
% CPU : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 2.10GHz
% Memory : 8042.1875MB
% OS : Linux 3.10.0-693.el7.x86_64
% CPULimit : 2400s
% WCLimit : 300s
% DateTime : Tue Oct 10 20:07:38 EDT 2023
% Result : Unsatisfiable 559.18s 71.23s
% Output : CNFRefutation 559.18s
% Verified :
% SZS Type : Refutation
% Derivation depth : 5
% Number of leaves : 4
% Syntax : Number of clauses : 12 ( 12 unt; 0 nHn; 5 RR)
% Number of literals : 12 ( 11 equ; 4 neg)
% Maximal clause size : 1 ( 1 avg)
% Maximal term depth : 7 ( 2 avg)
% Number of predicates : 2 ( 0 usr; 1 prp; 0-2 aty)
% Number of functors : 5 ( 5 usr; 1 con; 0-4 aty)
% Number of variables : 66 ( 39 sgn)
% Comments :
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
cnf(cls_COMBC__def_0,axiom,
hAPP(hAPP(c_COMBC(X1,X2,X3,X4),X5),X6) = hAPP(hAPP(X1,X6),X5),
file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/tmp/tmp.RzjB9gcxuc/E---3.1_8837.p',cls_COMBC__def_0) ).
cnf(cls_COMBB__def_0,axiom,
hAPP(hAPP(hAPP(c_COMBB(X1,X2,X3),X4),X5),X6) = hAPP(X4,hAPP(X5,X6)),
file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/tmp/tmp.RzjB9gcxuc/E---3.1_8837.p',cls_COMBB__def_0) ).
cnf(cls_n__not__Suc__n_0,axiom,
X1 != hAPP(c_Suc,X1),
file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/tmp/tmp.RzjB9gcxuc/E---3.1_8837.p',cls_n__not__Suc__n_0) ).
cnf(cls_COMBS__def_0,axiom,
hAPP(hAPP(hAPP(c_COMBS(X1,X2,X3),X4),X5),X6) = hAPP(hAPP(X4,X6),hAPP(X5,X6)),
file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/tmp/tmp.RzjB9gcxuc/E---3.1_8837.p',cls_COMBS__def_0) ).
cnf(c_0_4,axiom,
hAPP(hAPP(c_COMBC(X1,X2,X3,X4),X5),X6) = hAPP(hAPP(X1,X6),X5),
cls_COMBC__def_0 ).
cnf(c_0_5,axiom,
hAPP(hAPP(hAPP(c_COMBB(X1,X2,X3),X4),X5),X6) = hAPP(X4,hAPP(X5,X6)),
cls_COMBB__def_0 ).
cnf(c_0_6,axiom,
X1 != hAPP(c_Suc,X1),
cls_n__not__Suc__n_0 ).
cnf(c_0_7,plain,
hAPP(hAPP(c_COMBC(hAPP(c_COMBB(X1,X2,X3),X4),X5,X6,X7),X8),X9) = hAPP(X4,hAPP(X9,X8)),
inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_4,c_0_5]) ).
cnf(c_0_8,plain,
hAPP(hAPP(c_COMBC(hAPP(c_COMBB(X1,X2,X3),c_Suc),X4,X5,X6),X7),X8) != hAPP(X8,X7),
inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_6,c_0_7]) ).
cnf(c_0_9,axiom,
hAPP(hAPP(hAPP(c_COMBS(X1,X2,X3),X4),X5),X6) = hAPP(hAPP(X4,X6),hAPP(X5,X6)),
cls_COMBS__def_0 ).
cnf(c_0_10,plain,
hAPP(hAPP(hAPP(c_COMBS(X1,X2,X3),c_COMBC(hAPP(c_COMBB(X4,X5,X6),c_Suc),X7,X8,X9)),X10),X11) != hAPP(hAPP(X10,X11),X11),
inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_8,c_0_9]) ).
cnf(c_0_11,plain,
$false,
inference(er,[status(thm)],[c_0_10]),
[proof] ).
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
%----ORIGINAL SYSTEM OUTPUT
% 0.00/0.11 % Problem : SWV682-1 : TPTP v8.1.2. Released v4.1.0.
% 0.11/0.12 % Command : run_E %s %d THM
% 0.12/0.32 % Computer : n014.cluster.edu
% 0.12/0.32 % Model : x86_64 x86_64
% 0.12/0.32 % CPU : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 @ 2.10GHz
% 0.12/0.32 % Memory : 8042.1875MB
% 0.12/0.32 % OS : Linux 3.10.0-693.el7.x86_64
% 0.12/0.32 % CPULimit : 2400
% 0.12/0.32 % WCLimit : 300
% 0.12/0.32 % DateTime : Tue Oct 3 04:15:04 EDT 2023
% 0.12/0.32 % CPUTime :
% 0.16/0.54 Running first-order model finding
% 0.16/0.54 Running: /export/starexec/sandbox2/solver/bin/eprover --delete-bad-limit=2000000000 --definitional-cnf=24 -s --print-statistics -R --print-version --proof-object --satauto-schedule=8 --cpu-limit=300 /export/starexec/sandbox2/tmp/tmp.RzjB9gcxuc/E---3.1_8837.p
% 559.18/71.23 # Version: 3.1pre001
% 559.18/71.23 # Preprocessing class: FSLMSMSSSSSNFFN.
% 559.18/71.23 # Scheduled 4 strats onto 8 cores with 300 seconds (2400 total)
% 559.18/71.23 # Starting G-E--_208_B07_F1_S5PRR_SE_CS_SP_PS_S0Y with 900s (3) cores
% 559.18/71.23 # Starting new_bool_3 with 600s (2) cores
% 559.18/71.23 # Starting new_bool_1 with 600s (2) cores
% 559.18/71.23 # Starting sh5l with 300s (1) cores
% 559.18/71.23 # G-E--_208_B07_F1_S5PRR_SE_CS_SP_PS_S0Y with pid 8914 completed with status 0
% 559.18/71.23 # Result found by G-E--_208_B07_F1_S5PRR_SE_CS_SP_PS_S0Y
% 559.18/71.23 # Preprocessing class: FSLMSMSSSSSNFFN.
% 559.18/71.23 # Scheduled 4 strats onto 8 cores with 300 seconds (2400 total)
% 559.18/71.23 # Starting G-E--_208_B07_F1_S5PRR_SE_CS_SP_PS_S0Y with 900s (3) cores
% 559.18/71.23 # No SInE strategy applied
% 559.18/71.23 # Search class: FGHSM-FSLM32-DFFFFFNN
% 559.18/71.23 # Scheduled 13 strats onto 3 cores with 900 seconds (900 total)
% 559.18/71.23 # Starting G-E--_301_C18_F1_URBAN_S5PRR_S0Y with 68s (1) cores
% 559.18/71.23 # Starting G-E--_208_B07_F1_S5PRR_SE_CS_SP_PS_S0Y with 91s (1) cores
% 559.18/71.23 # Starting G-E--_300_C18_F1_SE_CS_SP_PS_S0Y with 68s (1) cores
% 559.18/71.23 # G-E--_301_C18_F1_URBAN_S5PRR_S0Y with pid 8923 completed with status 7
% 559.18/71.23 # Starting U----_206c_05_B11_00_F1_SE_PI_CS_SP_PS_S5PRR_RG_S04AN with 68s (1) cores
% 559.18/71.23 # U----_206c_05_B11_00_F1_SE_PI_CS_SP_PS_S5PRR_RG_S04AN with pid 8940 completed with status 0
% 559.18/71.23 # Result found by U----_206c_05_B11_00_F1_SE_PI_CS_SP_PS_S5PRR_RG_S04AN
% 559.18/71.23 # Preprocessing class: FSLMSMSSSSSNFFN.
% 559.18/71.23 # Scheduled 4 strats onto 8 cores with 300 seconds (2400 total)
% 559.18/71.23 # Starting G-E--_208_B07_F1_S5PRR_SE_CS_SP_PS_S0Y with 900s (3) cores
% 559.18/71.23 # No SInE strategy applied
% 559.18/71.23 # Search class: FGHSM-FSLM32-DFFFFFNN
% 559.18/71.23 # Scheduled 13 strats onto 3 cores with 900 seconds (900 total)
% 559.18/71.23 # Starting G-E--_301_C18_F1_URBAN_S5PRR_S0Y with 68s (1) cores
% 559.18/71.23 # Starting G-E--_208_B07_F1_S5PRR_SE_CS_SP_PS_S0Y with 91s (1) cores
% 559.18/71.23 # Starting G-E--_300_C18_F1_SE_CS_SP_PS_S0Y with 68s (1) cores
% 559.18/71.23 # G-E--_301_C18_F1_URBAN_S5PRR_S0Y with pid 8923 completed with status 7
% 559.18/71.23 # Starting U----_206c_05_B11_00_F1_SE_PI_CS_SP_PS_S5PRR_RG_S04AN with 68s (1) cores
% 559.18/71.23 # Preprocessing time : 0.012 s
% 559.18/71.23 # Presaturation interreduction done
% 559.18/71.23
% 559.18/71.23 # Proof found!
% 559.18/71.23 # SZS status Unsatisfiable
% 559.18/71.23 # SZS output start CNFRefutation
% See solution above
% 559.18/71.23 # Parsed axioms : 964
% 559.18/71.23 # Removed by relevancy pruning/SinE : 0
% 559.18/71.23 # Initial clauses : 964
% 559.18/71.23 # Removed in clause preprocessing : 0
% 559.18/71.23 # Initial clauses in saturation : 964
% 559.18/71.23 # Processed clauses : 6427
% 559.18/71.23 # ...of these trivial : 142
% 559.18/71.23 # ...subsumed : 3931
% 559.18/71.23 # ...remaining for further processing : 2354
% 559.18/71.23 # Other redundant clauses eliminated : 14
% 559.18/71.23 # Clauses deleted for lack of memory : 0
% 559.18/71.23 # Backward-subsumed : 36
% 559.18/71.23 # Backward-rewritten : 46
% 559.18/71.23 # Generated clauses : 53634
% 559.18/71.23 # ...of the previous two non-redundant : 48768
% 559.18/71.23 # ...aggressively subsumed : 0
% 559.18/71.23 # Contextual simplify-reflections : 0
% 559.18/71.23 # Paramodulations : 53600
% 559.18/71.23 # Factorizations : 6
% 559.18/71.23 # NegExts : 0
% 559.18/71.23 # Equation resolutions : 28
% 559.18/71.23 # Total rewrite steps : 22315
% 559.18/71.23 # Propositional unsat checks : 0
% 559.18/71.23 # Propositional check models : 0
% 559.18/71.23 # Propositional check unsatisfiable : 0
% 559.18/71.23 # Propositional clauses : 0
% 559.18/71.23 # Propositional clauses after purity: 0
% 559.18/71.23 # Propositional unsat core size : 0
% 559.18/71.23 # Propositional preprocessing time : 0.000
% 559.18/71.23 # Propositional encoding time : 0.000
% 559.18/71.23 # Propositional solver time : 0.000
% 559.18/71.23 # Success case prop preproc time : 0.000
% 559.18/71.23 # Success case prop encoding time : 0.000
% 559.18/71.23 # Success case prop solver time : 0.000
% 559.18/71.23 # Current number of processed clauses : 1468
% 559.18/71.23 # Positive orientable unit clauses : 197
% 559.18/71.23 # Positive unorientable unit clauses: 27
% 559.18/71.23 # Negative unit clauses : 291
% 559.18/71.23 # Non-unit-clauses : 953
% 559.18/71.23 # Current number of unprocessed clauses: 44022
% 559.18/71.23 # ...number of literals in the above : 106591
% 559.18/71.23 # Current number of archived formulas : 0
% 559.18/71.23 # Current number of archived clauses : 886
% 559.18/71.23 # Clause-clause subsumption calls (NU) : 150934
% 559.18/71.23 # Rec. Clause-clause subsumption calls : 74568
% 559.18/71.23 # Non-unit clause-clause subsumptions : 1642
% 559.18/71.23 # Unit Clause-clause subsumption calls : 11054
% 559.18/71.23 # Rewrite failures with RHS unbound : 0
% 559.18/71.23 # BW rewrite match attempts : 7460
% 559.18/71.23 # BW rewrite match successes : 1774
% 559.18/71.23 # Condensation attempts : 0
% 559.18/71.23 # Condensation successes : 0
% 559.18/71.23 # Termbank termtop insertions : 1399920
% 559.18/71.23
% 559.18/71.23 # -------------------------------------------------
% 559.18/71.23 # User time : 67.967 s
% 559.18/71.23 # System time : 1.723 s
% 559.18/71.23 # Total time : 69.690 s
% 559.18/71.23 # Maximum resident set size: 3680 pages
% 559.18/71.23
% 559.18/71.23 # -------------------------------------------------
% 559.18/71.23 # User time : 202.410 s
% 559.18/71.23 # System time : 4.909 s
% 559.18/71.23 # Total time : 207.319 s
% 559.18/71.23 # Maximum resident set size: 2504 pages
% 559.18/71.23 % E---3.1 exiting
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------