TSTP Solution File: SWV679-1 by iProver---3.8
View Problem
- Process Solution
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
% File : iProver---3.8
% Problem : SWV679-1 : TPTP v8.1.2. Released v4.1.0.
% Transfm : none
% Format : tptp:raw
% Command : run_iprover %s %d THM
% Computer : n004.cluster.edu
% Model : x86_64 x86_64
% CPU : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 2.10GHz
% Memory : 8042.1875MB
% OS : Linux 3.10.0-693.el7.x86_64
% CPULimit : 300s
% WCLimit : 300s
% DateTime : Thu Aug 31 22:42:16 EDT 2023
% Result : Unsatisfiable 8.09s 1.66s
% Output : CNFRefutation 8.09s
% Verified :
% SZS Type : Refutation
% Derivation depth : 5
% Number of leaves : 8
% Syntax : Number of clauses : 18 ( 7 unt; 5 nHn; 10 RR)
% Number of literals : 35 ( 20 equ; 17 neg)
% Maximal clause size : 4 ( 1 avg)
% Maximal term depth : 4 ( 1 avg)
% Number of predicates : 4 ( 2 usr; 1 prp; 0-3 aty)
% Number of functors : 11 ( 11 usr; 5 con; 0-3 aty)
% Number of variables : 20 ( 0 sgn)
% Comments :
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
cnf(c_604,plain,
( ~ class_Ring__and__Field_Ofield(X0)
| c_HOL_Oinverse__class_Odivide(c_HOL_Oone__class_Oone(X0),X1,X0) = c_HOL_Oinverse__class_Oinverse(X1,X0) ),
file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',cls_inverse__eq__divide_0) ).
cnf(c_616,plain,
( ~ c_lessequals(X0,X1,tc_nat)
| ~ class_Ring__and__Field_Ofield(X2)
| c_HOL_Oinverse__class_Odivide(c_Power_Opower__class_Opower(X3,X0,X2),c_Power_Opower__class_Opower(X3,X1,X2),X2) = c_Power_Opower__class_Opower(c_HOL_Oinverse__class_Oinverse(X3,X2),c_HOL_Ominus__class_Ominus(X1,X0,tc_nat),X2)
| c_HOL_Ozero__class_Ozero(X2) = X3 ),
file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',cls_power__diff__inverse_0) ).
cnf(c_652,plain,
( c_lessequals(X0,X1,tc_nat)
| c_lessequals(X1,X0,tc_nat) ),
file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',cls_nat__le__linear_0) ).
cnf(c_687,plain,
~ c_lessequals(v_n,v_m,tc_nat),
file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',cls_CHAINED_0) ).
cnf(c_688,plain,
( c_HOL_Ozero__class_Ozero(t_a) != v_a
| ~ class_Ring__and__Field_Ofield(t_a) ),
file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',cls_CHAINED_0_01) ).
cnf(c_689,negated_conjecture,
class_Ring__and__Field_Ofield(t_a),
file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',tfree_tcs) ).
cnf(c_690,negated_conjecture,
( c_Power_Opower__class_Opower(c_HOL_Oinverse__class_Odivide(c_HOL_Oone__class_Oone(t_a),v_a,t_a),c_HOL_Ominus__class_Ominus(v_n,v_m,tc_nat),t_a) != c_HOL_Oinverse__class_Odivide(c_Power_Opower__class_Opower(v_a,v_m,t_a),c_Power_Opower__class_Opower(v_a,v_n,t_a),t_a)
| c_lessequals(v_n,v_m,tc_nat) ),
file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',cls_conjecture_0) ).
cnf(c_692,negated_conjecture,
( c_Power_Opower__class_Opower(c_HOL_Oinverse__class_Odivide(c_HOL_Oone__class_Oone(t_a),v_a,t_a),c_HOL_Ominus__class_Ominus(v_n,v_m,tc_nat),t_a) != c_HOL_Oinverse__class_Odivide(c_Power_Opower__class_Opower(v_a,v_m,t_a),c_Power_Opower__class_Opower(v_a,v_n,t_a),t_a)
| c_HOL_Oinverse__class_Odivide(c_Power_Opower__class_Opower(v_a,v_m,t_a),c_Power_Opower__class_Opower(v_a,v_n,t_a),t_a) != c_Power_Opower__class_Opower(v_a,c_HOL_Ominus__class_Ominus(v_m,v_n,tc_nat),t_a) ),
file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',cls_conjecture_2) ).
cnf(c_1099,negated_conjecture,
c_Power_Opower__class_Opower(c_HOL_Oinverse__class_Odivide(c_HOL_Oone__class_Oone(t_a),v_a,t_a),c_HOL_Ominus__class_Ominus(v_n,v_m,tc_nat),t_a) != c_HOL_Oinverse__class_Odivide(c_Power_Opower__class_Opower(v_a,v_m,t_a),c_Power_Opower__class_Opower(v_a,v_n,t_a),t_a),
inference(global_subsumption_just,[status(thm)],[c_692,c_687,c_690]) ).
cnf(c_1363,plain,
( ~ class_Ring__and__Field_Ofield(X0)
| c_HOL_Oinverse__class_Odivide(c_HOL_Oone__class_Oone(X0),X1,X0) = c_HOL_Oinverse__class_Oinverse(X1,X0) ),
inference(prop_impl_just,[status(thm)],[c_604]) ).
cnf(c_9544,plain,
( X0 != t_a
| c_HOL_Oinverse__class_Odivide(c_HOL_Oone__class_Oone(X0),X1,X0) = c_HOL_Oinverse__class_Oinverse(X1,X0) ),
inference(resolution_lifted,[status(thm)],[c_1363,c_689]) ).
cnf(c_9545,plain,
c_HOL_Oinverse__class_Odivide(c_HOL_Oone__class_Oone(t_a),X0,t_a) = c_HOL_Oinverse__class_Oinverse(X0,t_a),
inference(unflattening,[status(thm)],[c_9544]) ).
cnf(c_9669,plain,
( X0 != t_a
| ~ c_lessequals(X1,X2,tc_nat)
| c_HOL_Oinverse__class_Odivide(c_Power_Opower__class_Opower(X3,X1,X0),c_Power_Opower__class_Opower(X3,X2,X0),X0) = c_Power_Opower__class_Opower(c_HOL_Oinverse__class_Oinverse(X3,X0),c_HOL_Ominus__class_Ominus(X2,X1,tc_nat),X0)
| c_HOL_Ozero__class_Ozero(X0) = X3 ),
inference(resolution_lifted,[status(thm)],[c_689,c_616]) ).
cnf(c_9670,plain,
( ~ c_lessequals(X0,X1,tc_nat)
| c_HOL_Oinverse__class_Odivide(c_Power_Opower__class_Opower(X2,X0,t_a),c_Power_Opower__class_Opower(X2,X1,t_a),t_a) = c_Power_Opower__class_Opower(c_HOL_Oinverse__class_Oinverse(X2,t_a),c_HOL_Ominus__class_Ominus(X1,X0,tc_nat),t_a)
| c_HOL_Ozero__class_Ozero(t_a) = X2 ),
inference(unflattening,[status(thm)],[c_9669]) ).
cnf(c_13323,plain,
c_HOL_Oinverse__class_Odivide(c_Power_Opower__class_Opower(v_a,v_m,t_a),c_Power_Opower__class_Opower(v_a,v_n,t_a),t_a) != c_Power_Opower__class_Opower(c_HOL_Oinverse__class_Oinverse(v_a,t_a),c_HOL_Ominus__class_Ominus(v_n,v_m,tc_nat),t_a),
inference(demodulation,[status(thm)],[c_1099,c_9545]) ).
cnf(c_23604,plain,
c_lessequals(v_m,v_n,tc_nat),
inference(superposition,[status(thm)],[c_652,c_687]) ).
cnf(c_30250,plain,
( ~ c_lessequals(v_m,v_n,tc_nat)
| c_HOL_Oinverse__class_Odivide(c_Power_Opower__class_Opower(v_a,v_m,t_a),c_Power_Opower__class_Opower(v_a,v_n,t_a),t_a) = c_Power_Opower__class_Opower(c_HOL_Oinverse__class_Oinverse(v_a,t_a),c_HOL_Ominus__class_Ominus(v_n,v_m,tc_nat),t_a)
| c_HOL_Ozero__class_Ozero(t_a) = v_a ),
inference(instantiation,[status(thm)],[c_9670]) ).
cnf(c_30251,plain,
$false,
inference(prop_impl_just,[status(thm)],[c_30250,c_23604,c_13323,c_688,c_689]) ).
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
%----ORIGINAL SYSTEM OUTPUT
% 0.07/0.12 % Problem : SWV679-1 : TPTP v8.1.2. Released v4.1.0.
% 0.07/0.13 % Command : run_iprover %s %d THM
% 0.12/0.34 % Computer : n004.cluster.edu
% 0.12/0.34 % Model : x86_64 x86_64
% 0.12/0.34 % CPU : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 @ 2.10GHz
% 0.12/0.34 % Memory : 8042.1875MB
% 0.12/0.34 % OS : Linux 3.10.0-693.el7.x86_64
% 0.12/0.34 % CPULimit : 300
% 0.12/0.34 % WCLimit : 300
% 0.12/0.34 % DateTime : Tue Aug 29 08:58:22 EDT 2023
% 0.12/0.34 % CPUTime :
% 0.19/0.47 Running first-order theorem proving
% 0.19/0.47 Running: /export/starexec/sandbox2/solver/bin/run_problem --schedule fof_schedule --no_cores 8 /export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p 300
% 8.09/1.66 % SZS status Started for theBenchmark.p
% 8.09/1.66 % SZS status Unsatisfiable for theBenchmark.p
% 8.09/1.66
% 8.09/1.66 %---------------- iProver v3.8 (pre SMT-COMP 2023/CASC 2023) ----------------%
% 8.09/1.66
% 8.09/1.66 ------ iProver source info
% 8.09/1.66
% 8.09/1.66 git: date: 2023-05-31 18:12:56 +0000
% 8.09/1.66 git: sha1: 8abddc1f627fd3ce0bcb8b4cbf113b3cc443d7b6
% 8.09/1.66 git: non_committed_changes: false
% 8.09/1.66 git: last_make_outside_of_git: false
% 8.09/1.66
% 8.09/1.66 ------ Parsing...successful
% 8.09/1.66
% 8.09/1.66
% 8.09/1.66
% 8.09/1.66 ------ Preprocessing... sup_sim: 13 sf_s rm: 137 0s sf_e pe_s pe:1:0s pe:2:0s pe:4:0s pe:8:0s pe:16:0s pe_e sup_sim: 12 sf_s rm: 25 0s sf_e pe_s pe_e sup_sim: 0 sf_s rm: 25 0s sf_e pe_s pe_e sup_sim: 0 sf_s rm: 25 0s sf_e pe_s pe_e
% 8.09/1.66
% 8.09/1.66 ------ Preprocessing... gs_s sp: 0 0s gs_e snvd_s sp: 0 0s snvd_e
% 8.09/1.66
% 8.09/1.66 ------ Preprocessing... sf_s rm: 1 0s sf_e sf_s rm: 0 0s sf_e
% 8.09/1.66 ------ Proving...
% 8.09/1.66 ------ Problem Properties
% 8.09/1.66
% 8.09/1.66
% 8.09/1.66 clauses 292
% 8.09/1.66 conjectures 0
% 8.09/1.66 EPR 16
% 8.09/1.66 Horn 247
% 8.09/1.66 unary 104
% 8.09/1.66 binary 124
% 8.09/1.66 lits 549
% 8.09/1.66 lits eq 196
% 8.09/1.66 fd_pure 0
% 8.09/1.66 fd_pseudo 0
% 8.09/1.66 fd_cond 30
% 8.09/1.66 fd_pseudo_cond 18
% 8.09/1.66 AC symbols 0
% 8.09/1.66
% 8.09/1.66 ------ Schedule dynamic 5 is on
% 8.09/1.66
% 8.09/1.66 ------ no conjectures: strip conj schedule
% 8.09/1.66
% 8.09/1.66 ------ Input Options "--resolution_flag false --inst_lit_sel_side none" stripped conjectures Time Limit: 10.
% 8.09/1.66
% 8.09/1.66
% 8.09/1.66 ------
% 8.09/1.66 Current options:
% 8.09/1.66 ------
% 8.09/1.66
% 8.09/1.66
% 8.09/1.66
% 8.09/1.66
% 8.09/1.66 ------ Proving...
% 8.09/1.66
% 8.09/1.66
% 8.09/1.66 % SZS status Unsatisfiable for theBenchmark.p
% 8.09/1.66
% 8.09/1.66 % SZS output start CNFRefutation for theBenchmark.p
% See solution above
% 8.09/1.66
% 8.09/1.66
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------